Should Rob Parson be put up for promotion?
Rob Parson should be kept from promotion. Although he has been successful in his areas of specialization, she also has several weaknesses acting against his promotion. He has poor intrapersonal skills, teamwork and collaboration, and he is termed aggressive, some traits that can affect the organization’s performance.
Based on this, what are the critical points that Nasr should make in Parson’s formal performance evaluation?
The first critical point to consider is his leadership and management styles, results and performance, collaboration and teamwork, the potential for leadership roles, adherence to the organization’s values, client relationships and feedback and development areas. Although he has been associated with positive results and performance, leadership and management skills and potential for higher leadership roles, he also has some areas for improvement that hinder him from being promoted to the next level. The first reason against his promotion is his leadership style, which is seen as abrasive or aggressive by other employees and can create conflict and disruption in the organization’s operations. Due to his aggressive nature, he also lacks the necessary skills that can promote collaboration and teamwork. In addition, there are several behaviours and actions that Parson possesses that could raise concern and be inconsistent with the organization’s values. Lastly, there are also areas that Parson needs to improve to qualify for the promotion, including emotional skills, intrapersonal skills and other areas, including his leadership capabilities. Although Parson has several areas that favour his promotion, he needs to adjust and improve the above critical areas that a leader should have for a conducive working environment for the employees.
How should Nasr meet with Parson (e.g., what should he say or do? How should he say or do these things?) to review the performance evaluation and discuss Parson’s future? Could you be sure to explain your answers?
There are several steps that Nasr should take when he meets with Parson to discuss and review his performance evaluation and future. Upon meeting, Nasr should ensure he approaches the conversation with empathy, professionalism, and transparency. Nasr should ensure that the communication is clear and concise and that he sets the appropriate tone. Nasr, therefore, should begin the conversation by adjusting to a constructive and positive tone. He can acknowledge Parson’s positive contribution to the organization and appreciate his strengths. Nasr must also review performance objectively by giving a comprehensive and objective review of Parsons’s performance, referencing some of his achievements and areas for improvement. He should avoid personal biases, show transparency and use factual evidence while focusing on the candidate’s performance to align with the company’s goals and expectations. In addition, Nasr should also discuss Parson’s strengths and areas of improvement, seek Parson’s perspective, and provide constructive feedback. The two individuals should discuss prospects where Nasr will Parson’s possibility of promotion and collaboratively create a development plan that outlines different goals, actions, and timelines for Parsons to improve his weaknesses. Lastly, the meeting should end with a positive and motivating note reiterating the company’s pledge to Parson’s development and achievement and articulating assurance of his potential for future improvement.
Explanation
Nasr is required to communicate effectively, respectfully, and professionally using the right tone since effective communication is an important component in creating good relationship. While in the conversation, he should ensure that he communicates clearly and concisely in a transparent manner and without bias. This would assure Parson that everything is done without bias, and that the communicate results are based on his performance, his relationship with other employees, and how well his daily activity aligns with the organization’s values and culture. The main reason why Nasr should be mindful of Parson’s feelings and reaction while communicating is a way of affirming that there is no bias and everything is for the better for all employees. In addition, the main reason why Nasr should have a positive tone and focus on his prospects and growth is a way of encouraging him. In general, the main aim is to have a transparent and candid conversation that facilitates the candidate’s growth and is consistent with the organization’s values and performance expectations.
References
Harvard Business School. (1998). Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (A) (Case No. 9-498-054). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. https://unstop.com/api/competition/get-attachment/5e1e0bf707cf6_udbhav_case.pdf
write