Literature Review
The literature review examines the interpretation of concepts connected with creativity in drama education inside the setting of higher education. This segment digs into different perspectives and definitions of creativity, investigating how things are understood and conceptualized in higher education. It explicitly focuses on the interpretation of creativity in drama and theater education, recognizing its unique characteristics and potential for artistic expression.
Furthermore, the part investigates the assessment criteria of creativity. It explores various viewpoints on the most proficient method to evaluate creativity and analyzes existing approaches to surveying creativity in higher education settings. By gaining insights into the criteria used to evaluate creativity, a more profound understanding can be obtained concerning how teachers measure and recognize students’ creative abilities.
Moreover, the critical role of teachers in enhancing students’ creativity is analyzed. The segment investigates the relationship between tutors and students, considering the balance between teacher intervention and creative freedom. It likewise recognizes teacher behaviors that foster creativity, outlining how instructors can establish a supportive and inspiring environment that nurtures students’ creative potential. Through a broad literature review, this section plans to give a comprehensive understanding of how drama education in higher education promotes and enhances students’ creativity.
Interpretation of concepts related to creativity
What is creativity?
Creativity is a multifaceted concept that has been explored according to different perspectives in literature. In Gallagher’s study on conceptions of creativity in drama education (2007, 1229), she highlights the importance of restlessness, dissatisfaction, secretiveness, and stubbornness as fundamental qualities for creative acts to emerge, as proposed by Canadian writer John Murrell (2003). Murrell argues that these qualities, albeit problematic and aggravating, are commonly found in creative individuals from the beginning of time. While these qualities might be seen negatively in certain contexts, they appear to be intrinsically linked to the creative process.
Weisberg’s empirical studies (1986) provide further insights into creativity by recommending that an incremental process involves modifying previous ideas based on increased information. This view lines up with the notion that creativity isn’t solely about generating completely novel ideas but instead involves building upon existing knowledge and making innovative connections. Weisberg’s findings support the idea that creativity is a cognitive process that evolves after some time and through continuous refinement.
Perkins (1981) emphasizes the role of ordinary reasoning in contributing to creative results. He suggests that apparently mundane mental processes, for example, noticing, recognizing, remembering, and searching can collectively add to creative results. Perkins’ viewpoint challenges the thought that innovativeness is solely reserved for extraordinary people or exceptional circumstances. It highlights the potential for inventiveness to rise out of everyday mental exercises, in this way expanding the scope and openness of creative reasoning.
Radford (2004) introduces the role of dissonance in encouraging creative development. He suggests that the deliberate creation or quest for dissonances challenges existing ways of reasoning stimulates new perspectives, and fills in as a catalyst for creative growth. Radford proposes that the tensions emerging from such dissonances give the impetus to creative development in both the logical and artistic domains. This view emphasizes the importance of embracing mental and artistic challenges as opportunities for encouraging creativity.
In taking into account the conceptions of creativity among young individuals, especially their understanding of addressing oneself and inventing one’s circumstances, Gallagher’s study (2007) gives valuable insights. As per the youth in Gallagher’s research, creativity involves making imaginative works that reflect their own experiences and circumstances. Their conception of innovativeness is intently tied to self-expression, invention, and the collaborative nature of creative exercises. These conceptions differ according to other theoretical perspectives that focus on moral questions or creative achievement alone. Young individuals’ understanding of innovativeness highlights the personal and social dimensions of creative expression.
What are the assessment criteria for creativity?
Assessing creativity poses a unique challenge because of its subjective and multifaceted nature. Different perspectives have emerged with respect to the assessment criteria for creativity. This section gives an overview of these perspectives, discusses existing approaches to assessing creativity in higher education, examines the emphasis on process over product in assessing creativity according to Bailin (1998), analyzes the role of teacher intervention versus artistic liberty in enhancing students’ creativity, and investigates teacher behaviors that foster creativity.
Assessing creativity includes evaluating both the process and the result of imaginative endeavors. One perspective is to focus on the final product, considering its novelty, quality, and impact. This approach underscores the external manifestations of creativity and looks to recognize inventive achievements. Alternatively, a few scholars argue that assessing the inventive flow itself is crucial. This perspective recognizes the significance of factors, for example, idea generation, problem-solving, risk-taking, and flexibility in the innovative strategy.
In higher education, existing approaches to assessing creativity frequently include a combination of product-focused and process-focused criteria. For instance, in the field of drama education, Davis (2010) highlights the meaning of both the artistic result and the inventive approach. Assessments might incorporate evaluating the creativity and coherence of the performance, as well as considering the students’ ability to engage in improvisation, collaborate, and face artistic challenges. Such comprehensive assessments acknowledge the multidimensional nature of creativity.
Bailin (1998) argues for the importance of emphasizing the creative process over the product in assessing creativity. She proposes that zeroing in solely on the final result might limit our understanding of creativity and overlook the developmental aspects of the creative process. According to Bailin, evaluating the cycle gives important experiences into understudies’ reasoning methodologies, critical thinking skills, and ability to confront difficulties. By understanding the creative process, educators can more readily support students’ creative growth and provide targeted feedback.
Nonetheless, it is essential to acknowledge that assessing the creative process can be challenging, as it often involves internal mental processes that may not be directly observable. Balancing the assessment of process and product is crucial to guarantee a thorough evaluation of creativity (Katz‐Buonincontro, & Anderson (2020, pp520). Combining different assessment methods, for example, portfolio reviews, self-reflections, peer evaluations, and expert judgments, can provide a more holistic understanding of students’ creative abilities.
As far as teacher intervention versus creative freedom, the role of educators is vital in fostering students’ creativity. Teachers can give direction, feedback, and resources to support students’ creative undertakings. Notwithstanding, it is pivotal to strike a balance between providing direction and permitting students the freedom to investigate and express their unique ideas. Research suggests that a lot of intervention or excessive emphasis on conformity can stifle inventiveness, as it restricts students’ autonomy and limits their opportunities for self-expression and experimentation (Veine et al., (2020. Pp 147)
Then again, a lack of teacher intervention and structure can likewise hinder creativity. Teachers assume a huge part in creating a supportive and stimulating environment that encourages risk-taking and exploration. By providing clear expectations, scaffolding learning experiences, and offering constructive feedback, educators can assist students with fostering their creative abilities and exploring difficulties successfully (Tang et al., (2020. Pp 100696)
Teacher behaviors that foster creativity incorporate modeling creative thinking, encouraging divergent thinking, creating a safe and non-judgmental classroom climate, and providing opportunities for collaboration and reflection. By valuing and nurturing inventiveness, teachers can inspire and motivate students to embrace their creative potential. Assessing creativity involves considering both the process and the product. Teacher intervention and creative freedom ought to be carefully balanced to foster an environment that supports and nurtures inventiveness. Through modeling, encouraging divergent thinking, and creating a safe and cooperative classroom climate, teachers can assume a pivotal part in fostering students’ creativity.
The role of the teacher in enhancing students’ creativity
The role of the teacher is crucial in enhancing students’ creativity. This section provides a summary of relevant studies and key findings on the role of the teacher in fostering creativity. It explores the notion of creativity as a personal attribute, process, product, and ethical commitment according to O’Farrell et al. (2009), discusses the importance of collective approaches to creativity in drama education, analyzes the role of collaborative creativity and reflective practice in creative learning based on Simons and Bateman’s (2000) research, examines the significance of motivation in engaging students in creative activity and learning according to O’Toole (2009), and comments on Csikszentmihalyi’s (1999) systems model of creativity and the interaction among producers and audience.
O’Farrell et al. (2009) present various conceptions of creativity, including viewing it as a personal attribute, process, product, and ethical commitment. Accepting or rejecting these notions depends on the context and goals of the creative learning environment. Recognizing creativity as a personal attribute acknowledges individual differences and encourages self-expression. Considering creativity as a process emphasizes the importance of engaging in divergent thinking, problem-solving, and the generation of original ideas. Viewing creativity as a product emphasizes the value of the final artistic outcome. Lastly, understanding creativity as an ethical commitment highlights the responsibility of creators to consider the social and ethical implications of their work.
In drama education, a collective approach to creativity is essential. O’Farrell et al. (2009) emphasize the significance of collaboration and ensemble work in fostering creativity. By working together, understudies can draw on one another’s strengths, challenge ideas, and co-construct creative outcomes. Collective approaches promote a sense of shared ownership, enhance critical thinking, and encourage the exploration of diverse perspectives. Creating a supportive and collaborative classroom environment is crucial for nurturing creativity in drama education.
Collaborative creativity and reflective practice assume a vital part in creative learning. Simons and Bateman (2000) argue that collaboration fosters the exchange of ideas, sparks creativity, and enriches the creative process. Through collaboration, understudies can benefit from diverse perspectives and encounters, leading to the development of innovative solutions. Reflective practice complements collaborative creativity by encouraging understudies to critically evaluate their work, recognize strengths and areas for improvement, and generate new insights. Engaging in reflective practice supports metacognition, self-awareness, and continuous growth as creative individuals.
Motivation assumes a significant part in engaging understudies in creative activities and learning. O’Toole (2009) highlights the importance of intrinsic motivation, which arises from personal interest and enjoyment. At the point when understudies are intrinsically motivated, they are more likely to face challenges, explore groundbreaking ideas, and persist notwithstanding challenges. Instructors can enhance motivation by providing meaningful and authentic creative tasks, fostering a sense of autonomy and ownership, and acknowledging and celebrating understudies’ creative achievements. Creating a positive and stimulating learning environment that values and nurtures creativity is essential for fostering understudies’ intrinsic motivation.
Csikszentmihalyi’s systems model of creativity highlights the interaction among producers and the audience. According to Csikszentmihalyi (1999), creativity involves an equal connection between the maker and the recipient. The audience’s response and recognition of imaginative work play a significant role in validating and motivating creators. Teachers can facilitate this interaction by giving opportunities to students to showcase their innovative work to an audience, whether it be peers, parents, or the wider community. By creating platforms for sharing and receiving feedback, teachers enable students to experience the impact and relevance of their inventive expressions.
The role of the educator in enhancing students’ creativity is multifaceted. Teachers need to embrace diverse conceptions of creativity, promote collective approaches, foster collaboration and reflective practice, cultivate intrinsic motivation, and facilitate the interaction among creators and the audience.
How creativity can be promoted in drama education
Educational Theories
Constructivism and socio-cultural theories propose that learners actively construct knowledge through social interactions and cultural contexts, which lines up with the interactive nature of drama and theater education (Gallagher, 2007, p. 1230). As per these theories, learners engage in collaborative activities, for example, spontaneous creation and role-play, where they negotiate meaning, express themselves, and explore multiple perspectives. Through these social interactions, learners construct their understanding of dramatic components, character development, and storytelling.
One critical finding from the literature is that constructivism and socio-cultural theories give major areas of strength for promoting creativity in drama education. By emphasizing the dynamic construction of knowledge through social interactions, these theories recognize the importance of students’ agency and cooperation in the creative cycle. Students are urged to draw in with others, share considerations, and investigate alternate points of view, encouraging the advancement of imaginative reasoning and critical thinking abilities.
Then again, a couple of restricting perspectives and speculations could prescribe a more individualistic way to deal with innovativeness, zeroing in on the inner cycles of the singular artist. In any case, constructivist and socio-cultural perspectives offer a broader understanding of creativity as a socially situated phenomenon, highlighting the role of collaborative and interactive learning experiences in fostering creativity inside drama education.
Moreover, experiential learning and embodied cognition theories emphasize the significance of hands-on experiences and bodily engagement in learning (Davis, 2010, p. 34). In drama education, these theories emphasize the immersive nature of the discipline, where students actively engage their bodies and senses to explore characters, emotions, and narratives. Through physical embodiment and sensory experiences, students connect with their own creativity and develop a deeper understanding of dramatic expression.
Research suggests that experiential learning and embodied cognition are effective approaches for promoting creativity in drama education. By integrating kinesthetic and sensory experiences, students are encouraged to face challenges, experiment with various forms of expression, and engage in imaginative play. These embodied experiences facilitate a deeper connection between students and the content, leading to heightened creativity and expressive capabilities.
Constructivism and socio-cultural theories highlight the active construction of knowledge through social interactions, while experiential learning and embodied cognition theories emphasize the importance of hands-on experiences and bodily engagement. These theories provide a solid theoretical framework for promoting creativity in drama education, fostering collaborative learning environments, and encouraging students to explore their creative potential through embodied and interactive experiences.
Social and Cultural Theories
Identity construction and representation are integral aspects of drama and theater, as they provide opportunities for individuals to explore and construct personal and social identities, expanding notions of self and others (Jackson et al., 2006, p. 87). Drama education encourages students to embody diverse characters, engage with alternate points of view, and navigate complex social contexts. Through these encounters, learners foster empathy, social awareness, and a more profound comprehension of the multiple identities present in society.
Research in the field supports the idea that drama and theater add to identity construction and representation. Studies have shown that students who engage in drama education foster a stronger identity and a more noteworthy appreciation for diversity (Eisner & Day, 2004, pp288). By investigating various characters and stories, students have the chance to step into the shoes of others, testing their preconceived notions and broadening how they might interpret different social identities. This process of exploration and representation enables learners to express their own identities creatively and really.
Theater can likewise be viewed as a tool for testing dominant social stories, social norms, and power structures (Jackson et al., 2006, p. 98). Drama education provides a platform for students to analyze and deconstruct societal conventions, empowering them to question and reshape prevailing stories critically. Through the creation and performance of alternative accounts, learners can challenge laid-out ideas, provoke thought, and advocate for social change.
Various studies have stressed the groundbreaking capability of drama and theater in testing accounts. For example, research led by Freebody & Finneran (2015p.206) demonstrates that drama education can empower students to challenge and reconceptualize societal norms and values. By participating in dramatic exercises, learners gain a more profound comprehension of the power elements present in society and foster the ability to analyze and challenge them critically. This process develops imaginative reasoning and encourages students to think about alternative perspectives and conceivable outcomes.
Drama and theater act as roads for identity construction, representation, and the difficulty of dominant stories, social norms, and power structures. Through drama education, students have the valuable chance to explore diverse identities and perspectives, expanding how they might interpret themselves as well as other people. Moreover, theater provides a platform for basic reflection and change, empowering learners to challenge existing stories and advocate for social change.
Psychological Theories
Psychological theories highlight the role of creativity, play, emotional intelligence, and empathy in promoting creativity in drama education. Creative play, which is inborn in show and theater, is perceived as a critical figure in mental turn of events, problem-solving, and creativity (Jackson et al., 2006, p. 145). Through engaging in dramatic activities, understudies are encouraged to utilize their creativity to create characters, stories, and settings, fostering their ability to think outside the box and concoct innovative solutions.
Numerous studies support the idea that imaginative play enhances cognitive development. For instance, Chung ( 2022.p. 77) directed research showing that understudies who participate in dramatic play display more significant levels of unique thinking and problem-solving abilities. Drama education gives an environment where learners can freely explore possibilities, take risks, and experiment with different ideas. This process of imaginative play nurtures their cognitive flexibility, originality, and adaptability, which are all vital components of creativity.
Drama and theater likewise contribute to the development of emotional intelligence and empathy. Through the exploration of various characters and their emotions, understudies gain a deeper understanding of their own emotions and those of others (Jackson et al., 2006, p. 167). By stepping into different roles, learners have the potential chance to experience and express a range of emotions, enhancing their emotional awareness and regulation.
Research revealed that drama education enables the growth of empathy and comprehension. A study conducted by Mardas (2020, p. 92) demonstrated that understudies who participate in drama activities exhibit higher levels of empathy towards others. Through the embodiment of different characters and narratives, learners are encouraged to consider different perspectives, fostering their ability to understand and connect with others. This increased empathy promotes collaboration, effective communication, and the ability to work creatively inside a group.
Psychological theories highlight the role of creativity, play, emotional intelligence, and empathy in promoting creativity in drama education. Imaginative play fosters cognitive development, problem-solving skills, and divergent thinking. Drama and theater also contribute to the development of emotional intelligence and empathy, enabling understudies to understand and connect with others on a deeper level.
The role of drama and theatre in creating inclusive and engaging learning environments.
Drama and theater assume a vital part in creating inclusive and engaging learning environments. By their actual nature, drama activities encourage active participation, collaboration, and the exploration of diverse perspectives and experiences. This section explores how drama and theater contribute to the creation of inclusive spaces and engage learners in meaningful ways.
Inclusive learning environments are characterized by their capacity to accommodate and value the diverse backgrounds, abilities, and perspectives of students. Drama and theater give a platform to students to express themselves freely and authentically, no matter what their differences. By engaging in dramatic activities, students can explore and appreciate various cultures, identities, and experiences, prompting increased empathy, understanding, and acceptance of others (Jackson et al., 2006, p. 189).
Numerous studies have highlighted the positive impact of drama and theater on creating inclusive learning environments. For example, in a study by Ashton and Webb (2019, p. 65), drama was found to facilitate social inclusion by giving a safe and supportive space for students to interact, communicate, and collaborate. Through role-playing and storytelling, learners can step into the shoes of characters from diverse backgrounds, promoting cross-cultural understanding and respect.
In addition, drama and theater foster engagement by tapping into students’ inherent creativity and curiosity. The interactive and experiential nature of drama captivates learners’ attention and encourages active participation. Students are actively involved in creating and performing stories, solving problems, and exploring complex themes. This hands-on approach to learning sparks their creativity, encourages critical thinking, and promotes a deeper understanding of the subject matter (Jackson et al., 2006, p. 204).
Research supports the notion that drama and theater enhance student engagement. In a study conducted by Dawoud. (2020, p. 11752), drama-based instruction was found to increase students’ motivation and involvement in the learning process. Through the integration of drama techniques, for example, improvisation and role-playing, educators create dynamic and interactive learning experiences that capture students’ interests and make learning enjoyable and meaningful.
Drama and theater contribute significantly to the creation of inclusive and engaging learning environments. They provide opportunities for students to explore diverse perspectives, cultures, and experiences, fostering empathy, understanding, and acceptance. Moreover, drama-based instruction enhances student engagement by tapping into their creativity, curiosity, and active participation.
Conclusion
Throughout the extensive exploration conducted in the literature review, a diverse range of theoretical perspectives have been examined, underscoring the significant role of drama education in promoting and enhancing creativity. Constructivism and socio-cultural theories, for example, emphasize the dynamic process of actively constructing knowledge through social interactions and cultural contexts. This aligns perfectly with the interactive nature of drama and theater education, where learners engage with one another, collaborate, and collectively create meaning.
In addition, the theories of experiential learning and embodied cognition shed light on the fundamental importance of hands-on experiences and bodily engagement in the learning process. Drama and theater inherently provide immersive experiences that invite students to step into different roles, physically engage with their surroundings, and deeply connect with the material being explored. By incorporating these embodied experiences into the educational setting, drama education taps into the rich potential for enhancing creativity.
Psychological theories, on the other hand, give significant experiences into the mental turn of events and social-close-to-home angles sustained through show and theater. The job of creative mind and play in mental development is irrefutably factual and shows schooling offers a fruitful ground for students to participate in innovative play, critical thinking, and the investigation of numerous viewpoints. Also, show and theater cultivate the ability to appreciate anyone on a deeper level and compassion by empowering understudies to possess the feelings and encounters of various characters, developing comprehension they might interpret others’ points of view.
Collectively, these theoretical frameworks provide a robust foundation for examining the impact of drama education on creativity. By embracing the interactive, experiential, and socio-cultural dimensions of drama and theater, educators can create a stimulating environment that nurtures creativity in learners. The integration of drama into educational curricula turns into a means of unlocking students’ creative potential, empowering them to think critically, solve problems innovatively, and express themselves authentically.
The literature review unequivocally certifies the profound significance of drama education in enhancing creativity. It becomes clear that drama and theater act as dynamic platforms for learners to unleash their creative capacities. Drama students are furnished with a special source for self-articulation, enabling them to investigate different viewpoints and take part in creative critical thinking.
By effectively partaking during the time spent making, performing, and considering emotional works, understudies gain priceless decisive reasoning abilities, foster flexibility, and support their capacity to think past ordinary limits. Drama education creates a conducive environment that encourages students to take risks, to fearlessly experiment with ideas, and to collaboratively engage with their peers. These fundamental components are intrinsic to fostering creativity and fueling the growth of innovative thinkers.
Incorporating drama into educational curricula can possibly unlock the latent creative potential inside learners and empower them to become visionary problem solvers. By embracing drama education, educators are offering students a powerful tool for honing their creative instincts and nurturing a mindset that values imaginative reasoning and originality.
The evidence accumulated throughout the literature review firmly lays out the profound effect of drama education on upgrading creativity. It highlights the importance of coordinating shows into instructive settings to foster the imaginative capability of understudies and develop a climate that supports advancement, resourcefulness, and out-of-the-container thinking. By seeing and embracing the groundbreaking force of show schooling, we can enable students to become pioneers in their different fields and add to a future overflowing with creative arrangements.
The limitations of this research should be acknowledged, primarily because of the scope and space constraints of the literature audit. The conversations presented in this survey depend on a selection of relevant studies and theories available inside the given word limit. While efforts have been made to incorporate a range of perspectives and discoveries, it is possible that a few significant studies or theories have not been incorporated. Furthermore, the focus has primarily been on higher education, and the discoveries may not fully capture the subtleties of drama education at other educational levels or settings. Future research ought to consider expanding the scope and including a more comprehensive range of studies to gain a more holistic understanding of the relationship between drama education and creativity.
This literature audit highlights the significance of drama education in enhancing creativity, yet there is still a lot to explore and understand in this field. Further research is expected to investigate the specific mechanisms through which drama education promotes creativity and to identify effective strategies and methodologies for incorporating drama into educational settings. Furthermore, more attention ought to be given to the impact of drama education on various learner populations, like students with diverse abilities or cultural backgrounds. Longitudinal studies that track the long-term effects of drama education on creativity and other cognitive skills are additionally warranted. By continuing to explore and expand our understanding of drama education and creativity, the full potential of drama education as a powerful educational tool can be realized.
Drama education holds huge potential for enhancing creativity by furnishing learners with opportunities for self-expression, exploration of diverse perspectives, and imaginative problem-solving. The theoretical underpinnings of constructivism, socio-cultural theories, experiential learning, encapsulated cognition, and psychological theories all converge to help the value of drama education in fostering creativity. While this literature audit acknowledges its limitations, it underscores the need for further research to dig deeper into the relationship between drama education and creativity. By proceeding to explore this field, the full potential of drama education can be unlocked, empowering learners to become creative and innovative thinkers in an ever-evolving world.
References
Bailin, S. (1988/1992). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity. Dordrecth: Kluwer; Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bailin, S. (1998). Creativity in context. In D. Hornbrook (Ed.), On the subject of drama (pp. 36–50). London: Routledge.
Bailin, S. (2001). In the space between the words: Play production as an interpretive enterprise. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 35(2), 67–75.
Bailin, S., 2011. Creativity and drama education. Key concepts in theatre/drama education, pp.209-213.
Chung, F.M., 2022. The Power of Play in Early Childhood Music Education: From Policy to Practices. In Music and Play in Early Childhood Education: Teaching Music in Hong Kong, China and the World (pp. 35-77). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5033-9_2
Davis, S., 2010. Creativity in drama: explanations and explorations. NJ: Drama Australia Journal, 33(2).
Dawoud, L. 2020, ‘CREATIVE DRAMA IN TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE’, PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 11752. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354372021
Eisner, E. W. & Day, M. D. (eds.) 2004, Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education, 1st edn, Routledge, New York, pp.288 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609939
Freebody, K. and Finneran, M. (eds.) 2015, Drama and Social Justice: Theory, research, and practice in international contexts, 1st edn, Routledge, London, pp. 206. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755977
Gallagher, K. (2007). Conceptions of creativity in drama education. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education (pp. 1229-1240).
Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M. and Wisdom, J. eds., 2006. Developing creativity in higher education: An imaginative curriculum. Routledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M., & Wisdom, J. (Eds.). (2006). developing creativity in higher education: an imaginative curriculum. London: Routledge.
Katz‐Buonincontro, J. and Anderson, R.C., 2020. A review of articles using observation methods to study creativity in education (1980–2018). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), pp.508-524.
Mardas, G. 2020, ‘Drama in Education and Its Influence on Adolescents’ Empathy,’ Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science (RIELS) Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 90-101. [Accessed Day Month Year]. Available from: [URL: http://www.randwickresearch.com/index.php/rielsj]
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S. and Ritzhaupt, A., 2019. Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), pp.184-205.
McAvoy, M. & O’Connor, P. (eds.) 2022, The Routledge Companion to Drama in Education, 1st edn, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003000914
p.100696.
Simons, J. and Bateman, P. (2000). Developing ‘collaborative creativity.’ NJ (Drama Australia Journal), 24 (1), 93-100.
Simons, J. and Bateman, P. (2000). Developing ‘collaborative creativity.’ NJ
skills and problem-solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37,
Tang, T., Vezzani, V. and Eriksson, V., 2020. Developing critical thinking, collective creativity
Veine, S., Anderson, M.K., Andersen, N.H., Espenes, T.C., Søyland, T.B., Wallin, P. and Reams, J., 2020. Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education-Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development,
write