The leadership within any organization highly decides the performance of that organization. Considering the situation and organizational culture, applying the right leadership style is essential for leaders striving to deliver the most significant performance. Three major leadership styles are quite different regarding how to deal with employees. These are transformational, transactional, and servant leadership. Each style has unique characteristics, strengths, and the proper contexts for usage. It is essential to assess transformational, transactional, and servant leadership, focusing on the effects on employees’ engagement and performance across various organizational contexts.
Importance of Appropriate Leadership Style
The right leadership style used is crucial in influencing employee engagement and performance. Leadership styles directly affect organizational culture and employee motivation as it determines productivity. Transformational leadership can motivate employees to surpass their expectations, resulting in innovation and commitment (Northouse, 2021). On the other hand, Transactional leadership is also centered on the reward and penalty that can be utilized to enhance efficiency in certain situations. Another aspect of servant leadership is that it places employee well-being at the center and facilitates a culture of trust and loyalty. Every theme creates a distinctive work environment that stimulates employee performance and engagement.
Definitions of Leadership Styles
Transformational leadership is when a leader works with the team to determine how the change is required. Thus, it gives an idea to head the change using inspiration and implementing change in partnership with dedicated individuals of a team. This leadership style is defined by the leader’s ability to inspire and motivate followers to overcome their interests to serve the organization or a more significant cause (Asbari, 2020). It results in increased employee involvement and creative and efficient inputs.
Transactional leadership is a leadership style centered on the transactions or interactions between the leaders and their followers. This leadership style is distinguished by a clear structure of incentives and punishments directly related to the performance of subordinates. It concentrates on keeping the normal operations run smoothly. Leaders give incentives for the accomplishment of tasks or goals agreed upon. Rewards can be tangible, like bonuses and promotions, or intangible, like recognition and praise.
Servant leadership is a philosophy in which the leader’s primary purpose is to serve. A very sharp contrast is presented here from the traditional leadership approaches, which concentrate on the accumulation and exercise of power by the top of the hierarchy (Schwantes, 2016). Servant leaders place the utility of their team members, stakeholders, and the community first above their own. They develop and empower subordinates to realize their potential and the organization’s goals. Servant leaders are self-aware that there is a broader impact on the organization.
Main Differences
Transformational, transactional, and servant leadership are three different ways of leading teams and organizations. Transformational leaders encourage people to go beyond their limits when stimulating creativity and change, building around vision and personal growth. Transactional leaders are based on achieving specific outcomes through a structured system of rewards and sanctions, preferring efficiency and clear expectations. Servant leadership is notably different as it prioritizes the needs of the team members first; hence, it tries to serve rather than lead in the traditional sense, and the team members’ growth and well-being are the primary focus. Every style has its competency and circumstance in which it is feasible.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Transformational leadership’s biggest strength is the inspiration and motivation it provides to employees, thereby resulting in enhanced innovation and performance. Nevertheless, setting visionary goals tends to focus on operational issues, which can influence short-term effectiveness. Transactional leadership efficiently sustains order and attains specific performance goals, which fits into environments needing consistency (Northouse, 2021). The downside is that it may kill employees’ creativity and natural motivation by heavily relying on external rewards. Servant leadership promotes a sense of community and mutual participation by creating a focus of the leader on the needs of the team members. This approach generates increased loyalty and trust within the organization.
Situational Effectiveness
Transformation leadership appreciates environments of innovation and versatility, for instance, technology firms or those firms carrying through a drastic transformation. The approach is much less practical for highly regulated industries where compliance and consistency are essential since its focus on venturesome change may miss important procedural and detailed aspects.
Transactional leadership is appropriate in structured environments, such as manufacturing plants or military operations, as the goals and tasks are clear-cut, and efficiency and reliability are needed (Holst, 2021). Nevertheless, in the area of creativity or organizations demanding flexibility and innovation, this type may impede creativity and motivation, making it relatively less effective.
Servant leadership performs excellently in service-oriented industries, non-profits, and organizations, with employee development and customer satisfaction as significant priorities. It cultivates a supportive atmosphere and boosts morale. However, servant leadership may not give the assertiveness needed to take decisive action in high-risk or crises demanding expedient, decisive leadership.
Conclusion
A comparison of transformational, transactional, and servant leadership styles shows an inherent capacity to offer pros and cons. It considerably influences employee participation and organizational performance. Transformational leadership performs well in igniting change and creating innovation; hence, it best fits dynamic surroundings. Transactional leadership, focusing on clear expectations and rewards, is successful in formal situations that need precise rules and smooth operations. Servant leadership is good in the society of community and ethical practices. These leadership styles are effective depending on the organizational context and the particular needs of employees.
References
Asbari, M. (2020). Is transformational leadership suitable for future organizational needs? International Journal of Social, Policy, and Law, 1(1), 51–55.
Holst, G. M. (2021). Transactional, Instrumental, and transformational leadership: What is more effective for an Industry 4.0 transformation? (Master’s thesis, University of Twente).
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice (5th ed.). Sage.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Schwantes, M. (2016, September 1). 10 Compelling Reasons Servant Leadership May Be the Best, Says Science. Inc.com. https://www.inc.com/marcel-schwantes/10-convincing-reasons-to-consider-servant-leadership-according-to-research.html
write