Managing Employment Relations and Conflict Resolution in Wehaul

Introduction:

This report looks into the ER at WeHaul, a made-up firm that recently went through a drawn-out legal battle. The purpose of this report is to offer an evaluation of the company’s approach to ER, to analyze the roots of the conflict, and to provide suggestions for mending fences and bolstering the company’s ER strategy to avoid similar conflicts in the future.

WeHaul is a trucking and logistics firm that uses blue-collar drivers and office staff. After numerous worker complaints went unanswered, the union that represents them, the Union of Transport Workers (UTU), filed a formal grievance against the corporation. There needs to be more reliability in the lorry fleet, health, and safety issues relating to back and muscle strain, no raises since 2020, difficulties in hiring and retaining staff, and the delegation of HR duties to less seasoned depot managers.

It is impossible to overestimate the importance of the employees’ concerns. Organizational success and employee satisfaction both depend on mutually beneficial working relationships. When ER fails, it can harm productivity, retention, morale, and job satisfaction. Unresolved employee complaints can also lead to industrial disputes, which can be costly and disruptive to business operations.

This report aims to improve WeHaul’s ER procedures by critiquing the company’s current methods, determining what led to the conflict, and suggesting solutions. The paper intends to help WeHaul avoid future conflicts by contributing to the resolution of the current one.

Research Questions/Objectives:

1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of WeHaul’s approach to employment relations, as evidenced by the case study and academic literature?
2. What are the root causes of the dispute within WeHaul, and how have these factors contributed to the breakdown in employee relations?
3. How effectively has WeHaul managed the dispute, and what are the implications of their management approach on employee relations?
4. Following the dispute, what recommendations can be made to restore positive employee relations within WeHaul?
5. What recommendations can be made to improve WeHaul’s overall approach to employment relations to prevent future conflicts and enhance employee satisfaction and productivity?

Literature Review:

Employment relations (ER) and employment law are ever-evolving, multifaceted endeavors with the overarching goal of better understanding and managing the dynamic connection between employers and employees. It is essential to explore relevant scholarly literature covering similar circumstances and themes to fully understand WeHaul’s approach to ER and the underlying concerns.

Critical Concepts in Employment Relations:

1. Employee Voice: According to Duggan et al. (2020), the term “employee voice” refers to the various ways in which workers can make their thoughts, feelings, and complaints heard at work. Trade unions, work for councils, and employee surveys are all examples of collective and individual types of representation. Harmonious ER and solving workplace problems require robust employee voice mechanisms.
2. Collective Bargaining: Collective bargaining refers to negotiations between an employer and an employee’s representative, such as a labor union, to determine working conditions (Doellgast and Benassi, 2020, p. 239). It is vital in settling disagreements and guaranteeing that workers are treated fairly and equitably. Wages, hours, and company practices are all fair game for collective bargaining.
3. Employee Engagement: When workers are engaged, they feel an intrinsic value in their work and the company. Engaged employees are more likely to be enthusiastic about their work, productive, and content in their positions. Improved productivity and morale in the workplace may result from well-implemented ER policies and procedures (Engdaget, 2020).

4. Health and Safety: In ER, the welfare of workers is of utmost importance. Companies must ensure their workplaces are risk-free places to work in order to uphold their legal and ethical obligations. Adverse effects on worker morale, increased absenteeism, and possible legal action against the company might occur from ignoring health and safety problems (Obiekwe and Eke, 2019, p.4).

Theoretical Frameworks in Employment Relations:

1. Unitarist Perspective: According to the unitarist approach, employers and workers should work together for the benefit of both parties because their interests are aligned (Kaufman et al., 2021, p.204). It is predicated on the idea that disagreements are usually short-lived and can be settled via open dialogue and shared knowledge of the organization’s goals.
2. Pluralist Perspective: The pluralist viewpoint acknowledges that there might be tensions between management and staff due to competing interests (Boxall, 2021, p.834). Trade unions and other forms of collective representation are held up as examples of how to achieve power balance and equitable results through collective bargaining.

3. Human Resource Management (HRM): HRM refers to the practice of strategically managing an organization’s people resources in order to realize those goals. It stresses encouraging and supporting employee growth and participation in organizational decision-making (Opatha, 2021). The results of employee relations (ER) investigations might be affected by HRM practices, including performance management and training initiatives.

Analysis of Literature in Light of Research Questions/Objectives:

WeHaul’s approach to ER and the root causes of the controversy are illuminated by the studied literature. It emphasizes the need for channels where workers can have their voices heard in order to address issues and settle conflicts. There has been an increase in complaints, and the case study suggests that this is partly due to the lack of a structured system for collective conflict settlement. The research also highlights the importance of employee engagement and the function of ER practices in creating a pleasant workplace.

Workers’ morale and contentment at WeHaul are undoubtedly hampered by the company’s inability to raise wages, its aging fleet, and its health and safety problems. Employees may become disengaged and less productive as a result of these issues. Unitarianism, pluralism, and human resource management are three theoretical frameworks that offer unique insights into ER management. WeHaul’s initial answer demonstrates a more unitarist approach by minimizing staff complaints and highlighting personal accountability. Taking this tack could make it more difficult to resolve conflicts and add stress to the working environment.

Analysis of the Company’s Approach to Employment Relations:

A critical analysis of WeHaul’s ER practices can be carried out based on the data presented in the case study and the knowledge gleaned from the literature review. This evaluation will examine how the company’s approach affects employee happiness, output, and other success metrics.

Strengths of the Company’s Approach to ER:

1. Initial Response to Grievance: The company’s initial reaction to the complaint was controversial, but it demonstrates that they are open to discussing the issues the workers expressed. This exemplifies an awareness of the value of open lines of communication and a determination to find answers to problems.

2. Devolution of HR Responsibilities: Delegating some HR responsibilities to depot managers may have been done to give them more say in organizational matters. Inspiring a sense of ownership and accountability in depot managers may lead to more efficient emergency response processes (Bhandari et al., 2020).

Weaknesses of the Company’s Approach to ER:

1. Lack of Formal Collective Dispute Resolution Procedure: A major flaw is a standardized process for resolving group disagreements. The growing list of complaints is evidence that the current need for more organization makes it challenging to have productive discussions and raises tensions (Rahim, 2023). The corporation must set up a structured collective bargaining and conflict resolution process.
2. Inadequate Response to Employee Concerns: The company’s response to the employee’s complaints, as demonstrated by Sharron Jones’s initial answer, is dismissive and does not address the merits of the issues highlighted. This strategy ignores the value of employee feedback and could increase discontent and resistance.

3. Neglect of Health and Safety Issues: The corporation has a severe flaw of its indifference to employee health and safety issues, especially as they pertain to worn-out car seats and the injuries they cause. Ignoring such concerns not only endangers employees’ health but also shows a need for more dedication to meeting legal requirements and maintaining a safe workplace.

Impact on Employee Satisfaction, Productivity, and Key Outcomes:

The way the company handles ER has had several unfavorable effects on morale, output, and other metrics:

1. Decreased Employee Satisfaction: Dissatisfaction among workers is exacerbated by management’s inability to address their problems, salary stagnation, and a disregard for worker health and safety (Stone et al., 2020). The complaints from workers show a rising level of discontent with their working conditions, pay, and treatment.
2. Lowered Productivity and Engagement: Employee engagement and output may suffer if a proper collective conflict resolution system is lacking and the corporation responds dismissively to employee complaints. When workers do not feel heard and appreciated, they may lose interest in their jobs and become less dedicated to the success of the company as a whole (Clack, 2021, p.1001).
3. Increased Employee Turnover: The company has a problem with recruiting and retention, as seen by the high turnover rate among its drivers. Employees may be prompted to look elsewhere for better compensation and working conditions due to a lack of raises and unanswered complaints. Retaining new employees constantly is expensive, disruptive to business, and could harm morale (Kossek et al., 2021).

4. Potential Legal and Reputational Consequences: The company’s legal responsibilities and reputation are jeopardized due to disregarding health and safety concerns. Accidents, injuries, and legal claims can occur in the workplace if these problems are not adequately addressed. Furthermore, a negative reputation for not caring about employees might hurt the company’s image, making it less appealing to new employees and customers (Priskila and Darma, 2020, 267).

Analysis of the Root Causes of the Dispute:

Several factors contributed to the prolonged and contentious conflict at WeHaul. In order to better comprehend the consequences of the dispute for the company’s approach to ER, we will analyze the data supplied in the case study and draw insights from the literature review.

1. Communication Breakdowns: Positive ER requires constant communication (Perloff, 2020). There were significant breaches in communication between staff and management at WeHaul. Sharron Jones ‘ contemptuous attitude toward staff concerns reflects the absence of open and honest communication channels. The argument was fueled by the employees’ rising frustration and mistrust due to the lack of communication between management and staff.
2. Implications: The misunderstandings show how important it is for the organization to invest in better communication methods. Meetings, feedback systems, and other outlets for employee input help keep lines of communication open so that problems can be solved and trust can be built between management and staff. Employee satisfaction can be raised and disputes reduced through the use of open channels of communication (Dodanwala et al., 2022, p3).
3. Power Imbalances: Tensions and confrontations can arise when there is an imbalance of power in the workplace (Patton, 2020). WeHaul looks to have a top-down management approach to ER, as HR duties have been delegated to depot managers. This top-down methodology may have unintentionally contributed to power disparities, making workers feel their opinions did not matter.
4. Implications: Creating a safe and welcoming workplace depends on people recognizing and resolving power disparities. The business might benefit from a more open and inclusive approach to making decisions and resolving issues. Employee representation, collective bargaining, and employee participation in decision-making are all ways to accomplish this (Zhou et al., 2019, p.253). Conflicts between employees and managers can be reduced by giving workers more autonomy and a significant say in company decisions.
5. Inadequate Employee Voice Mechanisms: There is needs for more effective employee voice mechanisms at WeHaul, as evidenced by the lack of a structured collective dispute resolution procedure. Employees may have felt they had few options for voicing complaints and resolving differences within the company, as evidenced by their decision to file a formal grievance letter through the Union of Transport Workers (UTU).
6. Implications: It is crucial to set up effective channels for employees to air their concerns and resolve disagreements (Cooke et al., 2020, p.100778). WeHaul must establish policies for collective bargaining, conflict resolution, and employee input. Establishing works councils or encouraging robust trade union participation are two examples of how this might be accomplished. The company can create a more positive ER climate by giving workers formal ways to air grievances and participate in decision-making (Wan et al., 2021, p.123500).
7. Differences in Values and Perceptions: Conflicts in the workplace can be exacerbated by differences in values, priorities, and perspectives (Head, 2022). A disconnect exists between WeHaul and its workforce if the corporation ignores worker complaints about wage stagnation and health and safety. This discord can make problems worse and prevent conflicts from being resolved.
8. Implications: The corporation should have an open discussion with workers to understand their points of view and problems better to resolve conflicts arising from fundamentally different ideals. Incorporating staff opinions into decision-making necessitates regularly soliciting and responding to feedback through surveys (Roberson and Perry, 2022, p.755). The organization can better connect its values with those of its employees by promoting a culture of mutual respect and inclusion, which has been shown to affect ER results by decreasing conflicts and increasing productivity positively.

Analysis of the Company’s Management of the Dispute:

A dispute’s resolution and effect on relations between employers and workers depend highly on how it is handled (Van Gramberg et al., 2020, p.393). WeHaul’s approach may be dissected by looking at how the company dealt with the initial complaint and how it has handled the conflict since. It also highlights how top management decisions affect corporate morale, productivity, and other essential metrics.

Strengths of the Company’s Management of the Dispute:

1. Willingness to Engage in Dialogue: The company’s response to the initial complaint showed its openness to further discussion. The response was somewhat divisive, but it did show that the issues presented by workers were being taken seriously. The company’s openness to dialogue is a promising sign for a satisfactory resolution to the dispute.
2. Recognition of Individual Responsibility: The company’s answer emphasized personal accountability, especially car seats. Although this method may have come out dismissive to workers, it recognizes the significance of individual accountability in upholding health and safety requirements. Employees may become more safety-conscious if reminded of their duty (Adusei and Tweneboah-Koduah, 2019, p.8).

Weaknesses of the Company’s Management of the Dispute:

1. Lack of Timely and Adequate Response: The company’s response to the initial complaint and its following measures demonstrate a failure to address the employee’s concerns promptly and appropriately. The issue escalated because of the slow reaction, which stoked already high levels of suspicion and anger among workers. The company’s management style is severely flawed because of how slowly it handles employee complaints (Daniel, 2019, 375).
2. Dismissive Attitude towards Employee Concerns: The company’s initial reaction and subsequent actions betrayed a cavalier disregard for the worries of its workers. This condescending attitude ignored the seriousness of worker complaints, which only inflamed tensions. An antagonistic connection between the corporation and its employees results from an attitude like this, which lowers morale, trust, and commitment among workers (Kaufman et al., 2021, 65).
3. Failure to Address Collective Concerns: The company’s handling of the conflict showed that it needed a proper mechanism for simultaneously dealing with complaints from multiple people. With a formal process, it was easier for employees to voice their concerns and have them addressed (Rayner and Lewis, 2020, 497). The corporation failed to fix the real problems and make everyone happy by ignoring its employees’ collective worries.

Impact on Employee Relations and Key Outcomes:

The company’s management of the dispute had several negative impacts on employee relations and other key outcomes:

1. Deterioration of Employee Relations: Employee relations were strained due to the dismissive approach and the need for more prompt and effective action. Employees’ trust in management and willingness to work together was damaged by the widespread belief that they were ignored and undervalued. Workplace tension, dissatisfaction, and communication can all increase when employee ties deteriorate (Akhmad et al., 2021).
2. Decreased Employee Morale and Engagement: Employee morale and enthusiasm plummeted due to the company’s management style. Employees became disillusioned due to management’s dismissive attitude toward their concerns and the delay in taking corrective action. Employees with low morale and motivation may be less committed to their work, take more sick days, and be more likely to quit their jobs (Irabor and Okolie, 2019, p.93).
3. Damage to Company Reputation: Reputational harm may result from the company’s callous reactions and a lackluster settlement to the disagreement. Employees’ impressions and comments, both positive and negative, can have an impact on the company’s capacity to recruit and retain top personnel (Pahos and Galanaki, 2019, p. 93). A damaged reputation can also discourage clients and business partners, harming a company’s success.
4. Escalation of the Dispute: The dispute escalated over time due to incompetent management. Communication broke down, tensions between workers and management grew as problems needed to be addressed promptly, and general concerns were disregarded. The issue became more heated as a result, and it also became more expensive to resolve.

 Recommendations for Restoring Positive Employee Relations:

The analysis presented thus far has led to the following set of suggestions for how WeHaul can improve relations among its staff, get to the bottom of what caused the conflict in the first place, and get the lines of communication and trust back open:

1. Establish Formal Collective Dispute Resolution Procedures: Create a systematic process for dealing with employee complaints and resolving disputes in a group setting. Collective bargaining, alternative dispute resolution, and arbitration are all necessary (Gaffar et al., 2021, p.e06690). The corporation can ensure equity, openness, and a well-defined path to resolving disputes by offering such a framework.

Timeline: A task force or working group should develop the collective dispute resolution processes within three months. Within six months, the policies should be disseminated to the staff.

Challenges: Opposition from superiors or workers wary of transition or collective bargaining. To overcome these obstacles, educating all parties involved and establishing widespread agreement will be necessary.

1. Enhance Communication Channels: Create and maintain robust methods of employee-management interaction. Examples are open-door policy, suggestion boxes, employee surveys, and town hall meetings. Provide fast and honest responses to employee questions and comments. Think about how you can leverage digital tools to improve interaction in the workplace and boost productivity (Porter and Fu, 2021).

Timeline: Quickly open up more regular and transparent lines of contact. Schedule regular staff surveys and town hall gatherings throughout the next month.

Challenges: Changing workers’ preconceived notions of how well internal communications work. Regaining employees’ trust will require a genuine commitment to open communication and addressing their issues.

1. Address Power Imbalances: Encourage employee agency and participation in decision-making to level the power playing field. Create employee-representational structures like employee committees and works councils to give workers a say in developing company policies and practices (Amboka, 2023, p. 93). The line between management and employee representatives should be kept as open as possible.

Timeline: Initiate talks within six months with workers and unions to investigate setting up employee representation institutions. The chosen mechanism should be put into action within a year.

Challenges: Disapproval from above or fears that it may slow down decision-making. To overcome these obstacles, promoting a culture of shared responsibility and openly discussing the advantages of employee representation will be necessary.

1. Invest in Health and Safety: Prove your care for workers by resolving any issues they may have with health and safety. Make careful checks of the workplace and its tools, and fix any problems you find. Create and distribute educational materials to spread information about safe working methods. Involve workers in creating health and safety regulations to guarantee adherence (Brauer. 2022).

Timeline: Within three months, conduct a thorough health and safety evaluation. Create and roll out training courses in six months. Maintain constant vigilance and action on health and safety issues.

Challenges: Budgeting for upgrades, overcoming resistance to change, and meeting all applicable regulations fall under this category. Highlighting the long-term benefits of a safe working environment and involving employees can help overcome these obstacles.

1. Foster a Culture of Inclusion and Respect: Foster an environment where everyone is valued and appreciated. Foster a welcoming environment where all employees feel comfortable sharing their ideas and opinions. Honor and appreciate the successes of your staff. Facilitate employee and managerial comprehension and sensitivity through diversity, inclusiveness, and unconscious bias training.

Timeline: Start training on diversity and inclusion by three months from now. Recognize and reward employees’ efforts within six months.

Challenges: Integrating a sense of belonging and respect into the fabric of a company requires overcoming resistance to change and securing the ongoing support of management. These difficulties will require constant reinforcement and progress monitoring.

Recommendations for Improving the Company’s Approach to Employment Relations:

1. Develop a Proactive Employee Relations Strategy:
   1. Develop a plan to improve employee relations that outlines the company’s dedication to doing so, focusing on encouraging open lines of communication, employee participation, and resolving conflicts.
   2. Ensure the plan is consistent with the rest of the company’s values and aims for employee relations (Lopez-Cabrales and Valle-Cabrera, 2020, 100689).
   3. Managers, HR experts, and employee representatives work together to create and implement the strategy.

Timeline: Develop the employee relations strategy within six months, with ongoing review and updates.

2. Strengthen Employee Engagement Practices:
   1. Implement employee engagement initiatives, such as regular employee surveys, focus groups, and recognition programs, to gather feedback, address concerns, and promote a positive work environment (Chanana, 2021, e2508).
   2. Encourage managers to build strong relationships with their teams through effective communication, coaching, and career development opportunities.
   3. Provide employees with opportunities for growth and development, fostering a sense of belonging and investment in the company’s success.

Timeline: Begin implementing employee engagement practices immediately, with ongoing efforts to sustain and improve employee engagement.

3. Enhance Conflict Resolution Processes:
   1. Develop a comprehensive conflict resolution policy that outlines clear steps for addressing conflicts at various levels, from informal discussions to formal mediation or arbitration.
   2. Train managers and HR professionals in conflict resolution techniques to effectively manage and resolve conflicts fairly and impartially (Bercovitch, 2019).
   3. Establish a culture that encourages early intervention and mediation to prevent conflicts from escalating.

Timeline: Develop and implement the conflict resolution policy within six months, with ongoing training and support for managers.

4. Invest in Training and Development:
   1. Provide training programs for managers and supervisors on effective communication, conflict management, and employee relations.
   2. Offer specialized training on diversity, inclusion, and unconscious bias to foster a culture of respect and equality in the workplace.
   3. Support ongoing professional development opportunities for employees to enhance their skills and knowledge, promoting job satisfaction and career growth.

Timeline: Begin implementing training programs immediately, with ongoing support and evaluation of their effectiveness.

5. Establish Mechanisms for Employee Feedback and Participation:
   1. Implement regular feedback mechanisms, such as suggestion boxes, anonymous surveys, or employee forums, to gather employee input on organizational policies, practices, and decision-making.
   2. Encourage employee representation through works councils or elected employee representatives to ensure their voices are heard in decision-making.
   3. Actively involve employees in developing and reviewing policies and procedures that directly impact them, promoting transparency and inclusivity (Luu, 2019, 406).

Timeline: Establish feedback mechanisms and employee representation within one year, with ongoing efforts to enhance employee participation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research has examined the WeHaul employment relations conflict and offered suggestions for improving the company’s approach to employment relations and mending strained connections with its workforce. Communication, employee involvement, and dispute resolution were highlighted as areas of improvement for the company’s ER operations. Because of these flaws, the argument escalated, and staff morale and output suffered. In order to mend fences, the corporation should work on strengthening internal lines of communication, encouraging greater participation from workers, and instituting more productive approaches to resolving conflicts.

In addition, management should take the initiative to improve ties with workers and encourage a constructive atmosphere at the office. Training, improved employee participation, and the establishment of feedback systems are all things the organization can do to improve communication, employee engagement, and conflict resolution, all of which contribute to a more effective ER strategy. Though challenging to implement, these suggestions will benefit the organization and its stakeholders through enhanced communication, higher output, and a happier workplace.

References

Adusei, C. and Tweneboah-Koduah, I., 2019. After-sales service and customer satisfaction in the automobile industry in an emerging economy. Open Access Library Journal, 6(1), pp.1-21.

Akhmad, B.A., Suryadi, B. and Rajiani, I., 2020. Communicating the dissatisfaction in the workplace among public sector employees: loyalty and neglect as an alternative model of responses. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21.

Amboka, A.A., 2023. Employee Relations and Trade Unions in Kenya. In Employee Relations and Trade Unions in Africa: A Critical Approach (pp. 93-118). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Bercovitch, J., 2019. Social conflicts and third parties: Strategies of conflict resolution. Routledge.

Bhandari, D., Neupane, S., Hayes, P., Regmi, B. and Marker, P., 2020. Disaster risk reduction and management in Nepal: Delineation of roles and responsibilities. Kathmandu: Oxford Policy Management.

Boxall, P., 2021. Studying mutuality and perversity in the impacts of human resource management on societal well‐being: Advancing a pluralist agenda. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(4), pp.834-846.

Brauer, R.L., 2022. Safety and health for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.

Chanana, N., 2021. Employee engagement practices during COVID‐19 lockdown. Journal of public affairs, 21(4), p.e2508.

Clack, L., 2021. Employee engagement: Keys to organizational success. The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being, pp.1001-1028.

Cooke, F.L., Schuler, R. and Varma, A., 2020. Human resource management research and practice in Asia: Past, present and future. Human Resource Management Review, 30(4), p.100778.

Daniel, C.O., 2019. Effects of job stress on employee’s performance. International Journal of Business, Management, and Social Research, 6(2), pp.375-382.

Dodanwala, T.C., Santoso, DS and Yukongdi, V., 2022. Examining work role stressors, job satisfaction, job stress, and turnover intention of Sri Lanka’s construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, pp.1-10.

Doellgast, V. and Benassi, C., 2020. Collective bargaining. In Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 239-258). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R. and McDonnell, A., 2020. Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), pp.114-132.

Engadget, H., 2020. EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND ITS IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE: THE CASE OF DEBRE BERHAN WOOD PROCESSING FACTORY (Doctoral dissertation).

Gaffar, S., Karsona, A.M., Pujiwati, Y. and Perwira, I., 2021. The concept of procedural law regarding the implementation of collective agreements with legal certainty in termination of employment in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), p.e06690.

Head, BW, 2022. Wicked problems in public policy. Springer International Publishing.

Irabor, I.E. and Okolie, U.C., 2019. A review of employees’ job satisfaction and its effect on their retention. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 19(2), pp.93-114.

Kaufman, B.E., Barry, M., Wilkinson, A. and Gomez, R., 2021. Alternative balanced scorecards built from paradigm models in strategic HRM and employment/industrial relations and used to measure the state of employment relations and HR system performance across US workplaces. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), pp.65-92.

Kaufman, B.E., Barry, M., Wilkinson, A., Lomas, G. and Gomez, R., 2021. Using unitarist, pluralist, and radical frames to map the cross-section distribution of employment relations across workplaces: A four-country empirical investigation of patterns and determinants. Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(2), pp.204-234.

Kossek, E.E., Gettings, P. and Misra, K., 2021. The future of flexibility at work. Harvard Business Review.

Lopez-Cabrales, A. and Valle-Cabrera, R., 2020. Sustainable HRM strategies and employment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Human resource management review, 30(3), p.100689.

Luu, T.T., 2019. Building employees’ organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: The role of environmentally-specific servant leadership and a moderated mediation mechanism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), pp.406-426.

Obiekwe, O. and Eke, N.U., 2019. Impact of employee grievance management on organizational performance. International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 5(1), pp.1-10.

Opatha, HHDNP, 2021. A simplified study of definitions of human resource management.

Pahos, N. and Galanaki, E., 2019, March. Staffing practices and employee performance: the role of age. In Evidence-based HRM: a global forum for empirical scholarship (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 93-112). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Patton, C.M., 2020. Breaking the health-care workplace conflict perpetuation cycle. Leadership in Health Services.

Perloff, R.M., 2020. The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. Routledge.

Porter, M. and Fu, Y., 2021, July. UML-based Design of Vendor and Employee Management System. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.

Priskila, S. and Darma, G.S., 2020. Employee Perception of Brand Value in the Jewelry Industry. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 23(2), pp.267-278.

Rahim, M.A., 2023. Managing conflict in organizations. Taylor & Francis.

Rayner, C. and Lewis, D., 2020. Managing workplace bullying: The role of policies. In Bullying and Harassment in the workplace (pp. 497-519). CRC Press.

Roberson, Q. and Perry, J.L., 2022. Inclusive leadership in thought and action: A thematic analysis. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), pp.755-778.

Stone, R.J., Cox, A. and Gavin, M., 2020. Human resource management. John Wiley & Sons.

Van Gramberg, B., Teicher, J., Bamber, G.J. and Cooper, B., 2020. Employee voice, intention to quit, and conflict resolution: Evidence from Australia. ILR Review, 73(2), pp.393-410.

Wan, X., Liu, X., Du, Z., and Du, Y., 2021. A novel model used for assessing supply chain sustainability integrating the ANP and ER approaches and its application in marine ranching. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, p.123500.

Zhou, Y., Fan, X., and Son, J., 2019. How and when matter: Exploring the interaction effects of high‐performance work systems, employee participation, and human capital on organizational innovation. Human resource management, 58(3), pp.253-268.