Abstract
The main policy issue that was covered for this study focused on the central policy of protecting and management of natural resources, wildlife, and endangered species in various countries. This policy is crucial since people have had a personal attachment to the significance of their environment since their whole existence depends on it.
As detriments to nature increase, so do the necessary attempts via political policies increase to safeguard natural resources and protect wildlife in general. We evaluated environmental politics discerning the political ideologies for parties in power to organize themselves and come up with ways in which they can benefit from their environment without causing injury to their environment as well as reducing costs associated with seeking alternative sources of energy at the cost of conservation of natural resources. Additionally, governments usually partake in endeavors that favor political ideology to attract voter-rich areas.
Furthermore, this research examined the complexity of relationships between environmental laws and the protection of endangered species or the conservation of natural resources. We found that it was essential for organizations to cooperate in response to various questions that immensely contribute to our comprehension of the interfaces surrounding political forces and the environment at large. This cooperation in the form of universal policies is essential to ensure all the states are able to conform to uniform policies that will prevent the extinction of endangered species or the replenishment of non-renewable natural resources.
Introduction
One of the major issues confronting ecological and global policymakers nowadays is the absence of agreement on legal substance and many normative concepts that may aid the systematization and design of international environmental rules to ensure the protection of nature’s vulnerable resources and endangered species internationally. It is true that the establishment and execution of unified international law are only feasible when nations and their delegates conform to a set of principles that must be codified. Since the exclusionist worldview inherent in traditional economic frameworks fails to satisfy the objectives of environmental preservation, the need for novel policies and methods are necessary.
Conservation of nature entails caring for and safeguarding natural resources such as forests, water bodies, natural gases, minerals, and fuels so that they remain abundant. Natural resources are classified as renewable or non-renewable. Natural replenishment encompasses renewable energy, such as air, sunlight, and oxygen. Nonetheless, non-renewable energy is extremely rare and difficult to be naturally replenished; these resources take decades or even centuries to be replenished naturally (Battakhov et al., 2019). Coal, natural gas, and oil are examples of non-renewable resources.
The use of natural resources has been critical to humanity’s development and survival (Battakhov et a., 2019; Diakanova et al., 2021; Miha & Vasilka, 2022; Stefaniuk, 2021). Yet, the advancement and growth have resulted in the exploitation of these natural resources, thus, having a need for control action through regulations and enactment of policies. Furthermore, environmental policies necessitate conscientious resource conservation in order to achieve sustainability. If we do not utilize these resources wisely, we risk creating an environmental imbalance and further detriment to nature through the extinction of rare species of flora and fauna.
Extinction of endangered species has caused imbalances in the natural order in the form of floods, climate change, starvation, and drought. As a result, the protection of natural resources and endangered species has become an urgent need critical for human survival. For instance, water is the most vital and precious natural resource on the planet. It is the source of all life. In case of water scarcity, such outcomes would be a greater loss to the vegetative cover and all plant life, as well as soil erosion. For humans, forests dictate natural vegetation. It is the most important natural resource for economic progress. Their importance in the production of fuel, wood, and industrial raw materials cannot be overstated.
In this paper, it will be argued that an ecological paradigm that incorporates the law of unintended consequences and the principle of sustainability can successfully support the development of a broad, universal international law on the environment and, as a result, contribute to the advancement of global well-being and the general protection of natural resources.
Role of politics in the environment.
Political linkages, such as the Iraq war, have emphasized the complexities and contentiousness of natural resource political economics. Much of the US invasion may be explained by imperialism and capitalist control over a critical resource such as oil. These mere examples obviously do not cover every kind of conflict that might emerge over limited natural resources, nor do they explain why natural resources are threatened. The true regimes that organize human cognition and experience aid in making resource extraction understandable as part of a wider control regime that includes technology, rationalities, and institutions. These examples just highlight the importance of natural resources in ensuring the survival and prosperity of various states. Therefore, it is essential to be able to come up with policies that will protect these natural resources and prevention of environmental degradation (Stefaniuk, 2021).
A focus on politics is necessary to comprehend the transition to sustainable energy sources and the ultimate development of environmental policies in regard to the protection of natural resources and endangered species. Fossil fuels continue to rule the energy industry due to a market failure where their negative externalities are not priced (Diakonova et al., 2021). Due to decades of industrial expansion based on fossil fuels, there have been significant structural advantages over less developed, sustainable alternatives like solar and wind power. Government action is thus necessary to change incentives and level the playing field to limit the depletion of unrenewable energy and the scarcity of natural resources (Battakhov et al., 2019). Governments cannot tie the hands of their successors because implementing a sustainable energy transition is a dynamic process.
A key element of the paradigm is the combination of technical learning and electoral competition between two administrations. One government is “green” (pro-renewables), whereas the other is “brown” claim (anti-renewables). A deviation from the cost-minimizing criteria for renewable energy is what is meant by an ideology’s strength. For instance, the Green Party is willing to shoulder some additional energy costs in order to protect the environment and stop climate change. The two governments build policy initiatives in a dynamic way as a consequence of technological advancement, taking into consideration how current policies affect both election outcomes and the future appeal of clean energy to the rival government.
Kraft (2017) argues that political competition and party ideology have a significant impact on the development of environmental policies that support renewable energy when the two parties have varying levels of ideological commitment.
To further understand this concept, consider the example of a green party with strong ideological beliefs towards environmental sustenance, as the green party is prepared to spend a lot of money on renewable energy. Nonetheless, the Brown Party accommodates and compromises by making modest investments in renewable energy while in power in order to prevent a costly “crash” program in renewable energy development. The green party is able to pressure the brown party to compromise because of its strong political commitment to renewable energy and willingness to impose very high costs on society.
This argument holds up well in endogenous elections when voters must choose between two political parties while taking environmental policies into account. While it is clear that public perception of renewable energy may be a key driver for both parties, the fundamental rationale for dynamic tactics is still the same (Kraft, 2017).
Despite voters’ low priority for energy policy towards environmental sustenance, the political rivalry is essential to understanding successful energy transitions. In addition, we provide the surprising result that parties with strong ideologies often respond to electoral challenges more quickly than their less ideological rivals. Although the reasoning behind this conclusion is compelling, it initially appears counterintuitive: a country with a strong ideological commitment to a particular energy policy cannot afford to lose elections because such a party suffers greatly from any deviations from its preferred energy strategy. Politics play a vital role in regard to environmental protection and sustenance of natural resources in regard to the enactment of policies in relation to renewable and non-renewable energy sources.
Management of Natural resources and international Legislation.
Environmental law clearly has a place and a role in the contemporary legal system based on historical precedence. This is owing to a significant change in both the concept of environmental policy, notably in connection to the protection of natural resources and endangered species and its role in the international legal system during the last decade. On the one hand, the world’s environmental philosophy and policies need a thorough rethinking due to the looming detriments on nature caused by climate change. On the other hand, it is connected to growth in societal and environmental consciousness. The core of environmental law is the unifying, logically sound, and scientifically backed unity of legal control over all social interactions with regard to the protection of nature. Attempting to confine the application of environmental regulation to the protection of the human environment is irrational and futile.
A variety of multidirectional aspects impact the position of environmental policy in the modern legal system at the same time. Consider the increasing inclusion of environmental problems and endangered species on the list of legal relations to environmental policies. It is the product of both financial commitments and the expanding legal system. However, there are significant legal and technical issues, notably in the field of nomenclature. It should also be noted that environmental legislation is becoming less significant and contains inherent conflicts, especially due to political affiliations and fossil fuels. These may be accommodated in both the scientific and educational methodological spheres. The evolution of environmental legal language is presently troubled by a variety of serious problems, contradictions, and errors that encompass a lack of a development strategy and an internal system.
Individuals’ current behavior in the field of nature conservation and utilization might be regarded as rational pragmatism in the framework of the consumer idea of interaction between society and the environment. This shows a general decline in interest in environmental issues. It should also be noted that the regulation of relations for the use of nature comes before the regulation of relations for its conservation. As a result, macroeconomic and socioeconomic goals and objectives completely outnumber those connected to environmental protection (Diakanova et al., 2021; Stefaniuk, 2021). However, since its difficulties are not effectively handled, it often has a negative influence on wildlife conservation.
In view of the current needs and problems created by essential environmental policies relevant to the preservation of nature, the need for the enactment of a common international policy in regard to environmental protection must be taken into consideration. These policies, founded on a specific conceptual framework, will provide guidelines for the establishment of a professional network and the arrangement of relevant scientific traditions that will be crucial in the protection of natural resources and endangered species. It is critical to understand the essentiality of international conferences and a body of knowledge formed in the area of environmental law. This would allow professionals all across the world to address environmental concerns unanimously, such as the Kyoto protocol, and come up with uniform policies that will protect the environment and conserve natural resources (Miha & Vasilka, 2022).
In order to protect the natural resources and endangered species threatened by climate change, environmental laws must be enacted in a number of ways. Second, it symbolizes a major modernization of the economic framework for managing wildlife and conserving the environment, such as the protection of natural water bodies or the prohibition of hunting endangered species such as white rhinos in Africa.
States must have the necessary and sufficient environmental power to ensure they conserve natural resources despite the economic value of these resources (Diakonova et al., 2021). It is essential to pay particular attention to the articulation and strengthening of environmental standards as a driver of ecological development and sustainable socioeconomic growth (Stefaniuk, 2021). It is also critical to simplify and remove the red tape involved with awarding permits to natural resource users. These activities will help to create environmental regulations and safeguard the environment.
Having laws on the books at the regional, state, federal, and international levels that safeguard wildlife is essential for the protection of endangered species. Stefaniuk (2021) argues that human activities have been responsible for the disappearance of natural habitats. Furthermore, global warming poses a serious threat to the survival of many species of plants and animals. The major causes of this phenomenon are deforestation, increased agricultural activity, and atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases as a result of mining and the search for fossil fuels (Battakhov et al., 2019).
Many devastating natural catastrophes have been triggered by the altered environment brought on by the earth’s increasing average temperature due to global warming. For instance, Arctic regions have been immensely affected by human activities that have resulted in the threat of global warming (Battakhov et al., 2019). Miha & Vasilka, 2022 argue global warming is real; it may be mitigated by the use of renewable energy sources, recycling, increased tree planting and decreased emissions of greenhouse gases in order to conserve water sources. Because of global warming, severe weather events like hurricanes and droughts are more likely to occur, reducing food supplies and perhaps leading to human and animal mortality. The interstate mutual agreement will ensure the achievement of sustenance goals that will lead to effective economic activities that will lead to environmental sustenance (Diakanova et al., 2021).
Conclusion
This research sought to establish a clear framework relating the conservation of natural resources and protection of endangered species with the key themes of legal issues (justice) and politics. We found there was a significant association between politics and environmental policies. In order to ascertain various convictions that were found in this research, I relied on key central peer-reviewed sources to back various assertions (Diakanova et al., 2021; Miha & Vasilika, 2022; Battakhov et al., 2021; Stefaniuk, 2021; Kraft, 2017). These sources were sentimental in ascertaining various claims in this research.
The approaches in this paper established that environmental legislation was critical to protect natural resources and the insurance that the environment is conserved. In the first place, environmental policies represent a significant upgrade to the traditional economic system of nature management and environmental protection. Corresponding adjustments to the budget on environmental conservation laws were found to be critical towards environmental sustenance towards renewable energy. Having states that have the authority needed to protect their natural resources was also crucial. As a catalyst for long-term socioeconomic development and ecological betterment, environmental norms are worth defining and strengthening in their own policies. In addition, it is essential to streamline and reduce bureaucracy in the issuing of licenses to those who exploit natural resources despite the economic outcomes of natural resources. Taken together, these measures will strengthen environmental protection legislation and improve environmental conditions and the general protection of endangered species.
References
Battahov, P. P., Zankovsky, S. S., Budnikova, Y. E., & Lizikova, M. S. (2019, April). The impact of economic activity on the Arctic environment and legal problems of the protection of its natural resources. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 263, No. 1, p. 012063). IOP Publishing.
Diakonova, A., Efimtseva, T., Mikhailova, E., Rakhmatullina, O., & Salieva, R. (2021, July). Modern trends in international scientific and technical interaction of the EAEU member states in the process of effective use of natural resources, ecology, and environmental protection in the fuel and energy sector. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 808, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing
Miha, J., & Vasilka, S. (2022). Slovenia: An Example of a Constitution Guaranteeing High-Level Protection of Natural Resources and Sui Generis Right to Drinking Water.
Kraft, M. (2017). Environmental Policy and Politics. 10.4324/9781315437057.
Stefaniuk, M. (2021). Environmental Awareness in Polish Society with Respect to Natural Resources and Their Protection (Overview of Survey Research). Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 30(2), 357-379.
write