Multiculturalism encourages people of diverse backgrounds and beliefs to live together peacefully. Concern over the effects of globalisation on ethnic and religious variety, as well as the need of preserving traditional ways of life, has gained momentum in recent years. All around us, messages advocating globalisation and the advantages of a more unified globe crowd our minds. The fact that there are still groups that place a premium on maintaining their own cultural traditions is something we should never lose sight of. Helena Norberg-Hodge has devoted her life to promoting regional economies and customs via her work as an activist, writer, and filmmaker. The harmful effects of modernization on premodern cultures are important themes in her work. This article will analyse Norberg-research Hodge’s on the Ladakh area of India, focusing on the many cultural perspectives she brings up on the topic of labour and the economy.
In the 1970s, Norberg-Hodge made his first trip to Ladakh, a mountainous area in India. She was instantly taken aback by the Ladakhi people’s distinct culture and lifestyle, which they had managed to preserve for decades. Villagers historically met their own material needs without resorting to currency. Individuals were able to construct their own homes from the resources available nearby (Norberg-Hodge, p.139). They traded for salt, the only non-local commodity they need. Money was spent sparingly and mostly on a few splurges a year.
But, with the unexpected rise of a global monetary economy, the Ladakhis find themselves more reliant, even for necessities, on a system governed by distant powers. They are at risk because of the choices of others who are unaware of Ladakh’s existence. There would be repercussions for the Indian rupee if the dollar’s worth fluctuates. This places Ladakhis, who rely on money for survival, under the authority of global financial administrators. That made them dependent on the territory they had formerly ruled over. The Ladakhis people were oblivious to the fact that the new economy may lead to dependency, even in situations when having more money seemed to be a benefit.
Norberg-Hodge realised while still residing in Ladakh, India (a region recognised for its unique cultural traditions and way of life) that the Ladakhi had a fundamentally different view on labour than many Western societies. In Ladakh, working is valued for its own sake, not as a means to an end of amassing a personal fortune, but as a means of contributing to and guaranteeing the existence of the local society. In many Western cultures, work is considered as an individual endeavour, which stands in striking contrast to the emphasis on community-focused employment seen in the East. To “create something of ourselves” or “get ahead in life,” we are taught, we must work hard. Several problems, such as burnout, loneliness, and a sense of meaninglessness, may result from taking such an individualised view of the workplace.
On the other hand, Ladakhis believe that labour is fundamentally based on the concept of community. Humans labour not only for themselves but also for others in their immediate social and familial spheres. By prioritising the happiness of the group as a whole, individuals are more likely to work together towards a common goal. To be fair, not every culture places as much value on the community as Ladakhi culture does. Yet, there is much to be gleaned from this scenario outside of the workplace. Through learning about and appreciating other people’s cultural backgrounds, we may grow as individuals and as a species.
Many residents of Ladakh were left helpless and exposed to the whims of the economy since they relied on it for all of their necessities. They focused more on the currency that allowed them to buy staples like barley (Norberg-Hodge, p.141). Nonetheless, they were hesitant to invest because of concerns about the long-term worth of their possessions. The phrase “Everyone is growing so greedy. Money was never important before, but now it’s all people can think about ” was warned to be avoided while speaking to Norberg-Hodge by a. Until now, money never even entered most people’s minds, but today it seems to be the only thing on their minds.
The Ladakhis have always been aware of their own personal obligations and the finite nature of their environment. On the other hand, in Western societies, the new economic system has isolated people from nature. There has been a rise in the number of jobs that need a salary in the city, away from the water and soil that sustains life. It was plain to see how many people lived on the land in the community. There is a limit to how much any one place can produce, therefore it’s clear that population control is essential. The birth rate is of little consequence in the cities nowadays; all that matters is how much money a person has. In addition to buying more food, having more money would allow you to cultivate your cash crops much more quickly. Seems like there was no end to the money (Norberg-Hodge, p.142). Jammu and Kashmir Bank told residents, “Your money grows quickly with us.”
Helena Norberg-fieldwork Hodge’s in Ladakh ultimately sheds light on how various societies frame the concepts of labour and economics from a fresh vantage point. She claims that the Ladakhi has created a prosperous society by valuing cooperation above the competition in their economic practises. Rather than seeing work as a means to an end (earning money), people see it as a means to a larger end (contributing to the community and the greater good). This is in contrast to the Western value placed on labour as a means to an end, namely material achievement and wealth. Norberg-insights Hodge stresses the need of creating more sustainable and fair economic systems that take into consideration various cultural views on labour and the economy.
Works Cited
Norberg-Hodge H. Learning from Ladakh page 139 – 141.
Guiding question
What lessons can we learn about diversity, the need of preserving local cultures and traditions in the face of modernity, and the need to adapt to a changing world from the Ladakhi people’s unique approach to sustainability and cultural resilience?