Group therapy provides an opportunity for healing and growth among marginalized populations. By bringing together individuals facing similar challenges, group therapy facilitates community building, normalization of experiences, and peer support. Group therapy sessions bring a much-needed sense of community to participants who have felt like outsiders or have been unable to connect with others in ways that bring satisfaction and healing. Human connection is something we all desperately need. Groups help keep members accountable for reaching personal goals. Having a regularly scheduled group provides routine, which is critical to recovery. Group therapy also helps build social skills in a controlled environment. Attending groups allows members to help others by sharing their stories and healthy coping strategies. This essay examines considerations in developing therapy groups for one marginalized community: troubled teens. Troubled teens face challenges, including substance abuse, truancy, recklessness, and defiance. Group therapy offers stability, empathy, and skill-building for these vulnerable youths. This essay outlines best practices for creating an empowering group environment holistically addressing troubled teens’ multidimensional needs. The discussion focuses on planning, implementation, evaluation, collaboration, societal analysis, and developmental considerations.
Contextual Background
According to Downey & Crummy (2021), troubled teens often come from unstable homes marked by adversity like abuse, neglect, domestic violence, caregiver mental illness, and substance abuse. Many struggle with untreated mental health problems like depression, anxiety, trauma, and conduct disorders (Memiah et al., 2022). Financial instability and involvement with the justice system are also typical, exacerbated by racial, economic, and social inequities.
Group therapy effectively addresses these interconnected issues. Psychoeducational groups build critical life skills and social support (Malhotra & Baker, 2022). Cognitive-behavioral groups target unhealthy thought and behavior patterns underlying substance use and conduct problems. Adventure therapy builds trust, communication, and self-efficacy through challenging physical activities. Regardless of the specific approach, a shared priority is cultivating hope, empowerment, and community.
Group Planning
Thoughtful planning is vital to designing groups tailored to troubled teens’ unique needs and backgrounds. A priority is ensuring cultural competence, empowerment, and inclusivity across all aspects of group development (Bourke & Titus, 2020). America’s growing diversity demands group facilitators exhibit cultural fluency to serve marginalized youth from diverse backgrounds effectively. Materials should be carefully reviewed to feature representations of diverse communities at accessible reading levels using inclusive language. Physical spaces may require ADA accommodations like ramps and seating choices.
Recruiting facilitators boasting lived experiences fosters trust and psychological safety for vulnerable sharing – providing relatable role models overcoming similar adversity (Remtulla et al., 2021). This validation helps teens see leaders who conquered the challenges they now face. Beyond relatability, ideal facilitators should hold clinical qualifications like licensure, group work expertise, and trauma-informed training.
Considering structure, convenient scheduling, and locations reduces complex transportation barriers (Cochran et al., 2022). Groups should still be intimate enough to share profoundly but sufficiently for peer connections. Research indicates that groups of five to eight strike this balance for troubled teens.
Interactive skill-building activities, creative projects, sensory approaches, and movement maintain engagement while targeting self-efficacy. For instance, for relationship-building pairs, art therapy, emotional processing, stress-discharging games, and trust-centered communication materials make attendance fun as they rebuild critical life skills. A regular pattern with active elements satisfies multidimensional needs, restoring hope to marginalized teens.
Group Implementation
Running therapy groups necessitates cultural competence, clinical skills, and a focus on group dynamics. Leaders need to find a balance between empathic support and boundaries
This implementation can be challenging for troubled teens who have faced instability and rejection. Influential leaders exhibit compassion while upholding behavioral expectations and modeling healthy relationships (Jiang et al., 2022). Providing abundant encouragement and positive reinforcement fosters teens’ motivation to change, as consequences often breed resistance.
When introducing changes to foster member safety and inclusion, leaders should understand and adapt to the existing organizational culture. For example, building on existing norms and rituals while gradually implementing new practices can ease the transition. Remaining open and humble when receiving feedback will also smooth the process. Leaders must make good on any promises to members, maintaining trustworthiness. They should continually reflect on their role and be willing to evolve their approach based on member input.
Leaders must also be ready to address complex trauma histories and mental health needs that surface. It is vital (Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 2019) to have protocols that ensure outside clinical support in emergencies. Another critical priority is promoting emotional and physical safety in the group space. Leaders should encourage norms of respectful sharing and watch out for the developmental dynamics that might marginalize participants (Center, 2018). Activities should be organized so that each teen feels their voice and contribution are equal. The celebration of diversity leads teens to accept differences instead of judging them. Regular confidentiality reminders foster trust to disclose vulnerabilities. Backup protocols for crisis responses such as substance use relapse, abuse disclosures, or suicidal intent are also fundamental.
Group Evaluation
Evaluating group outcomes and processes is vital to engaging in continuous quality improvement. Quantitative surveys can track progress on goals like reduced substance use, improved school functioning, and decreased criminal behavior. However, measurement tools must be evaluated for cultural and developmental appropriateness to avoid pathologizing language (King et al., 2020). Alternatively, qualitative interviews and participant journals could allow for more detailed personal growth stories. Rich insights for improvement can also be obtained from gathering group feedback during the final sessions. These are program elements’ cultural responsiveness and empowerment orientation, not simply individual symptom changes that should be evaluated.
Program evaluation allows for continually improving group outcomes and processes through data and member feedback. Sample quantitative survey questions might assess reduced risky behaviors and improved academic and family functioning using rating scales. Qualitative prompts elicit experiences of personal growth from group participation. “State how you are more supported after entering the group.” ‘Explain what effect participation in a group has on your coping at school or home.” Technology such as online participant portals allowing session reactions, goal reviews, and activity ratings provides continuous evaluation. Teens may be more comfortable anonymously giving candid feedback using electronic means than face-to-face.
For continuous monitoring, member check-ins allow one to measure engagement and correct problems quickly. Leaders can stop activities to ask teens how the group is going for them. The check-ins should evaluate the relevance of topics and activities and deeper feelings like safety, belongingness, or peer connection. Besides, leaders can also monitor participation rates and consistency. Reviewing input every five sessions allows prompt adjustments to content, approach, or group composition so that programming remains teen-oriented rather than institutionally focused. The tracking metrics, such as attendance rates, participation frequency, and achievement of goal-oriented activities, provide objective data for guiding discussions about improving member engagement. Though evaluation components need to maintain ethics of confidentiality, aggregating collective feedback motivates member responsibility in forming an enabling group climate. Seeking input ensures the group remains dynamic and teen-centered over time. Evaluation informs adaptations to serve members’ evolving needs and priorities better.
Participant Issues
In addition to careful planning and implementation, group leaders must be prepared to compassionately navigate interpersonal issues and crises that may arise along the way. For example, inconsistent attendance is expected among troubled teens, given the chaos many face in housing, family relationships, and mental health (Noble et al., 2023). Establishing protocols for following up with absent members communicates care and allows collaborative problem-solving. Checking in after absences helps teens feel remembered and valued.
Some teens may also struggle to engage and bond with peers initially, requiring sensitive facilitation of relationships. Leaders can foster connections through paired sharing activities where teens discover common interests, hopes, and challenges. The group process may also evoke painful personal histories, emotions, or conflicts as teens share their stories and confront past traumas, family problems, and mental health issues. Skilled leaders closely monitor responses, reaching out to provide empathic one-on-one support and clinical referrals when warranted (Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021). Having emergency counseling available during sessions reassures teens in managing overwhelming feelings as they arise. Ultimately, members’ well-being and safety take priority over group cohesion or agenda, and leaders must be ready to intervene with care.
Collaboration with Other Agencies
Given troubled teens’ involvement in multiple social systems, collaboration across community agencies and institutions is vital for sustainable change. For example, partnering with schools can help align disciplinary policies with therapeutic goals and provide access to on-site counseling support. Ongoing communication ensures teens are not punished for opening up (Richter et al., 2022). Coordinating with social workers streamlines needs assessments, crisis intervention, and referrals for family support, housing, public benefits, and mental health treatment. Furthermore, leader outreach helps juvenile justice stakeholders like probation officers and judges consider rehabilitation alternatives to incarceration whenever possible.
Of course, such cross-sector collaboration has challenges, including navigating different philosophies, confidentiality rules, and resource constraints. However, an ecological perspective recognizes the inextricable influence of schools, healthcare, family, and the justice system on marginalized teens’ well-being and outcomes (Moore et al., 2023). Care coordination across these key entities can ultimately help stabilize teens’ lives, address unmet needs, and reinforce positive goals and gains made in group therapy. Building open communication and shared purpose among partners takes time but is essential.
Social Systems Integration
While cross-sector collaboration focuses on teens’ immediate social systems, leaders must complement this with a social justice lens that critiques broader societal and institutional structures. For example, inadequate mental health care access and quality disproportionately affect marginalized communities, including low-income and minority teens (Kourgiantakis et al., 2023). Restrictive school policies also funnel distressed students into the justice system rather than the counseling system. At the macro level, racial and socioeconomic injustices permeating education, healthcare, child welfare services, and the justice system all contribute to this troubling overrepresentation of teens of color among what is known today as the ‘troubled teen’ population. Taking apart these stratified, unequal systems involves a united political act. However, group leaders play a significant role in facilitating the process of contextualization for teens to restore some sense of empowerment and agency and start positive change.
More specifically, the group leader can promote discussions regarding how societal prejudices and obstacles might reduce teens’ well-being and opportunities. This consciousness-raising enables teens to perceive their difficulties not as a personal fault but in the context of society. The leader can then encourage teens to participate in social justice issues, such as volunteering for advocacy groups, protests, and activism. At the individual level, a leader helps teens locate allies and mentors who can encourage their growth and guide them through complex systems. Through this multifaceted approach, the leader prepares adolescents to deal with present threats and initiate beneficial systemic reform.
Social Systems Integration
Collaboration helps teens address their proximate systems; however, leaders should also apply a social justice lens, critiquing larger societal structures. For instance, poor access to mental health care is more pervasive in marginalized communities, such as low-income and minority teens (Colizzi et al., 2020). Group leaders should promote additional services in schools and communities as a remedial measure for this void. At a macro level, racial disparities that permeate the education, child welfare, and justice systems funnel teens of color into a ‘troubled teen’ trajectory at more excellent rates. Dismantling these stratified systems requires collective action, but group leaders can play an important part. At a minimum, the group’s peer support provides teens with empowerment and hope for creating change. Groups may facilitate opportunities for members to share their stories and advocate for youth rights. By situating problems in unjust systems rather than individual deficits, groups help teens reclaim their agency amid disempowering narratives. Leaders play an essential role in nurturing this critical consciousness and belief in one’s ability to effect change.
Unique Developmental Considerations
In addition, leaders must be prepared for challenges unique to working with adolescents. Teens actively form identities, push boundaries, and seek autonomy, requiring flexible limit setting. Leaders must balance holding teens accountable for unsafe behaviors while remaining non-judgmental about typical development. Teen group members can help define fair expectations and consequences through collaborative discussion. Modeling and rewarding responsibility instead of punishment teach teens to own their actions. Teens who do not have mature coping skills and whose neural development is inadequate may also find it hard to contain intense emotions. The group space should be secure enough to allow teens to take risks and share their vulnerabilities with others (Downey & Crummy, 2021) Psychoeducation provides developmentally appropriate emotional awareness and regulation through modeling, practice, and peer reinforcement. Leading with empathy, curiosity, and guidance helps integrate caring authority figures into teens’ lives to compensate for past relational harms.
Adolescence is a phase of identity creation and exploration that has the potential to surface as boundary-testing or risk-taking behavior. The developing frontal lobe executive functioning in adolescents results in increased emotional reactivity and problems with self-regulation of intense feelings. They need empathetic support and skills training to channel this energetic developmental phase effectively. Group leaders also need to set policies that will support and encourage positive behaviors without making teens feel ashamed because it is normal for them to question rules and roles. For instance, motivational interviewing focuses on personal values alignment instead of labeling outright defiance as problematic. Brainstorming incentive programs where members receive points towards prizes for completing group tasks together increases buy-in. Games that teach emotional identification skills, followed by small group practice of regulation tactics such as paced breathing, guided imagery, and sensory grounding, allow teens to implement learning.
On the other hand, if leaders want to meet adolescents’ increased need for social connections, they have to balance structured activities with unstructured peer bonding. Developmentally-specific psychoeducation should include issues such as trusting relationships, sexuality, risky behaviors, self-advocacy, and family bond rebuilding in the future vision of dreams. However, leaders must observe the replies because introspective sharing might cause distress as teens have limited coping reserves. Contingency safety plans are made for personal disclosure debriefs with a one-on-one counselor when such a process traumatizes members.
Personal Reflection and Future Aspirations
On a personal level, working with marginalized teens aligns with my vocational values of empowerment and social justice. Through my past volunteer work, I have witnessed firsthand the criminalization of teens struggling with trauma, discrimination, and lack of opportunity. I aim to counteract unjust narratives by helping teens build self-worth and the capacity to thrive. Group therapy provides a powerful forum to heal and grow through community. In the future, I would like to learn how to co-facilitate teen support groups with experienced leaders. I will keep learning about adolescent development, group dynamics, and cultural competency. I also aim to remain open and humble, understanding that my cultural position as a white woman with privilege is different from the marginalized youth population I hope to serve. However, I can provide genuine concern, understanding, and a tendency to advocate for holding systems instead of teens responsible for shortcomings. My ultimate aspiration is to design and facilitate my support groups to empower youth who are gifted but troubled.
Conclusion
Ultimately, group therapy acts as a decisive stage towards healing and empowerment among disadvantaged youths who have been victims of hardship. In particular, troubled teens will benefit significantly from the community-building activities of groups, skills development, and hopefulness. On the other hand, the effective implementation of teen therapy groups takes a lot of planning, cultural competence, clinical skills, and developmental sensitivity. Group leaders should give compassionate support and structure, work with community collaborations to coordinate care, or help teens put their struggles into a broader societal framework. Carefully and deliberately, group leaders can create hope in the most vulnerable teens by planting seeds of resilience and change. From the perspective of prospects, I am looking forward to getting practical training and practice in leading teen support groups. I want to create spaces for marginalized youth where they can write new, disempowering stories, regain control over their futures, and unleash the great potential within them outside of therapy. As I proceed, I plan to develop as an advocate, ally, and change agent, walking alongside fearless young leaders.
References
Bourke, J., & Titus, A. (2020, March 6). The key to inclusive leadership. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/03/the-key-to-inclusive-leadership
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2019). Trauma-Informed Care: A Sociocultural Perspective. Nih.gov; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207195/
Center. (2018). Chapter 7. Clinical Issues, Challenges, and Strategies in Intensive Outpatient Treatment. Nih.gov; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64101/
Cochran, A. L., McDonald, N. C., Prunkl, L., Vinella-Brusher, E., Wang, J., Oluyede, L., & Wolfe, M. (2022). Transportation barriers to care among frequent healthcare users during the COVID pandemic. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14149-x
Colizzi, M., Lasalvia, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2020). Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: Is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care? International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9
Downey, C., & Crummy, A. (2021). The impact of childhood trauma on children’s well-being and adult behavior. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtd.2021.100237
Jankelová, N., & Joniaková, Z. (2021). Communication Skills and Transformational Leadership Style of First-Line Nurse Managers about Job Satisfaction of Nurses and Moderators of This Relationship. Healthcare, 9(3), 346. NCBI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030346
Jiang, M., Gao, K., Wu, Z., & Guo, P. (2022). The influence of academic pressure on adolescents’ problem behavior: Chain mediating effects of self-control, parent–child conflict, and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(954330), 954330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954330
King, D. L., Billieux, J., Carragher, N., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2020). Face validity evaluation of screening tools for gaming disorder: Scope, language, and over pathologizing issues. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00001
Kourgiantakis, T., Markoulakis, R., Lee, E., Hussain, A., Lau, C., Ashcroft, R., Goldstein, A. L., Kodeeswaran, S., Williams, C. C., & Levitt, A. (2023). Access to mental health and addiction services for youth and their families in Ontario: perspectives of parents, youth, and service providers. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00572-z
Malhotra, A., & Baker, J. (2022). Group therapy. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549812/
Memiah, P., Wagner, F. A., Kimathi, R., Anyango, N. I., Kiogora, S., Waruinge, S., Kiruthi, F., Mwavua, S., Kithinji, C., Agache, J. O., Mangwana, W., Merci, N. M., Ayuma, L., Muhula, S., Opanga, Y., Nyambura, M., Ikahu, A., & Otiso, L. (2022). Voices from the Youth in Kenya Addressing Mental Health Gaps and Recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095366
Moore, S., Long, A. C. J., Coyle, S., Cooper, J. M., Mayworm, A. M., Amirazizi, S., Edyburn, K. L., Pannozzo, P., Choe, D., Miller, F. G., Eklund, K., Bohnenkamp, J., Whitcomb, S., Raines, T. C., & Dowdy, E. (2023). A roadmap to equitable school mental health screening. Journal of School Psychology, 96, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.11.001
Noble, C., Schudlich, T. D. R., & Schudlich, E. D. R. (2023). Family Chaos, Interparental Conflict, and Preschooler Adjustment: Comparing Mediation and Moderation Models. The Family Journal, 106648072311570. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231157021
Remtulla, R., Hagana, A., Houbby, N., Ruparell, K., Aojula, N., Menon, A., Thavarajasingam, S. G., & Meyer, E. (2021). Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06232-7
Richter, A., Sjunnestrand, M., Romare Strandh, M., & Hasson, H. (2022). Implementing School-Based Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review of the Literature Summarizing the Factors That Affect Implementation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063489
write