Environmental justice, a central tenet of our course, beckons us to reconsider the distribution of environmental benefits and burdens with a lens of equity. It is a call to action against the historical backdrop of environmental racism, where marginalized communities bear the disproportionate weight of pollution and environmental hazards. This form of environmental racism describes the way that pollution and waste are intentionally situated within communities of color, both within the US and globally. This can involve producing toxic materials, like the chemical plant mentioned in the video, or dumping toxic materials. Max Liboiron’s nuanced inquiry into pollution as a form of colonialism prompts a revaluation of the fundamental nature of environmental harm, challenging the notion that pollution is universally defined and underscoring its dependence on societal constructs (Liboiron, 2021). Ettinger’s(2019) analogy characterizes disabled individuals as “canaries in the coal mine,” which further broadens this discourse, portraying them as early indicators of more extensive environmental repercussions (Cohen Ettinger, 2019, p. 13). Within the context of our exploratory analysis, we delve into how these conceptual frameworks enhance our understanding of the cultural text authored by the American Lung Association’s editorial team.
Liboiron’s scholarly contributions prompt a nuanced examination of the notion of pollution. By contending that pollution is a socially constructed rather than an impartial or objective term, Liboiron encourages a critical inquiry into the initial understanding of pollutants (Liboiron, 2021). This perspective proves indispensable in comprehending environmental justice, urging a reconsideration of how the impact of pollution varies among diverse communities. The cultural document aligns seamlessly with this paradigm, accentuating the disproportionate effects of air pollution on communities of color and those with lower incomes(ALA, 2020). As discussed in educational settings, the deliberate placement of pollution sources in these specific areas resonates within the cultural document, illustrating a concrete manifestation of environmental justice challenges in practical scenarios.
As we navigate the intricacies of pollution construed as colonialism, per Liboiron’s discourse, we subtly interrogate entrenched beliefs surrounding environmental detriment. Liboiron posits that pollution is neither immutable nor universally embraced; instead, it manifests as a construct shaped by social and historical contexts (Liboiron, 2021). This perspective invites us to question the assumptions underlying our understanding of pollution, particularly in the context of environmental justice. In the cultural text, the intentional siting of pollution sources in communities of color and low-income areas directly aligns with the colonial aspects of pollution highlighted by Liboiron. The very definition of what constitutes pollution is influenced by power dynamics, leading to a skewed distribution of environmental burdens.
Environmental justice, as discussed in class, centers on the fair distribution of environmental benefits and burdens, emphasizing the right of all individuals to live, work, and play in a clean and safe environment. It recognizes that historically marginalized communities, often composed of people of color and low-income individuals, bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harm. This concept arose in response to environmental racism, which refers to the intentional siting of polluting industries and waste facilities in these vulnerable communities, perpetuating systemic inequalities.
The gendered aspect of environmental justice is often overlooked. Women, particularly those in marginalized communities, bear a significant burden of environmental hazards due to their roles within the family and community. They are often responsible for tasks such as fetching water and gathering firewood, exposing them to outdoor air pollution. Additionally, indoor air pollution from cooking and heating with solid fuels disproportionately affects women and children.
Ettinger’s metaphor expands our understanding of environmental justice by introducing the concept of disability justice. The metaphor of disabled individuals as “canaries in the coal mine” emphasizes their vulnerability to environmental harm as indicators of broader ecological distress (Ettinger, 2019, p. 56). In the cultural text, the emphasis on the health impacts of air pollution aligns with Ettinger’s metaphor. The article discusses the severe health consequences faced by communities living with poor air quality, reflecting the intersectionality of environmental injustice. This connection deepens our understanding of how environmental justice extends beyond racial and socioeconomic lines, embracing disability as an integral aspect.
Applying these concepts to the cultural text illuminates how environmental justice manifests in the real world. The ALA’s article underscores the unequal distribution of environmental burdens by highlighting that people of color are 1.5 times more likely to live in areas with poor air quality than their white counterparts (ALA, 2020). The economic burdens these communities face, such as missed school and work days and increased medical costs, mirror the systemic inequalities highlighted in class discussions and readings.
The economic burdens discussed in the cultural text, such as missed school and work days and increased medical costs, further resonate with Liboiron’s challenge to question the understanding of pollutants and environmental harm. The economic disparities resulting from environmental injustice become apparent, reinforcing the colonial aspects of pollution. The unequal distribution of environmental burdens is not solely an environmental issue but a socioeconomic one, perpetuating systemic inequalities.
In proposing policy steps, the cultural text becomes a blueprint for enacting environmental justice principles. The call for the formulation, execution, and enforcement of laws and policies aligns directly with Liboiron’s assertion that the conception of pollution is not neutral but shaped by societal norms (ALA, 2020; Liboiron, 2021). The emphasis on cleaning up pollution sources and prioritizing disproportionately burdened communities during the transition to cleaner energy sources echoes the need for a decolonial approach to environmental issues, as proposed by Liboiron.
In conclusion, the theme of environmental justice, enriched by insights from class readings, serves as a critical framework for understanding the disparities in exposure to environmental hazards. The cultural text “Environmental Justice: Addressing the Burden of Air Pollution,” becomes a tangible application of these concepts, illustrating the real-world implications of environmental injustice. The intentional siting of pollution sources, the intersectionality of its impacts, and the proposed policy measures in the cultural text resonate with the core principles of environmental justice discussed in class.
References
Liboiron, M. (2021). Pollution Is Colonialism. Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1jhvnk1.4
Ettinger, M. C., Health Justice Commons, & Sins Invalid. (2019). A Call to Action from Survivors of Environmental Injury: Our Canary’s Eye View at the Crossroads of Disability and Climate Justice.
Editorial Team. (2020, August 26). Environmental Justice: Addressing the Burden of Air Pollution. American Lung Association. Retrieved from https://www.lung.org/blog/environmental-justice-air-pollution
write