Introduction
My focus was on challenges facing the LGBTQ+ community in relation to health care, as the story is not yet completed. The study shows ways that this group overcame racial/gaze, social stigmatization, and poor policy with regard to accessing high-quality health care. These barriers form the very foundation of health service delivery and practice. Therefore, they are systemic problems that have to be addressed.
My finding shows that discrimination in health care is one of the greatest barriers to LGBTQ+ people. This shows up in multiple ways, ranging from denial of care completely to subtle biases in medical advice and treatment. To my discovery, this form of discrimination is actually against human rights and denies the individuals in need of such medical care access.
I also realized that the communication barrier was another problematic issue through my research. Non-inclusive communication lines with LGBTQ+ patients by healthcare providers lead to ignoring vital problems that pose risks to the life of the LGBTQ+ population. I discovered this communication gap is quite an important factor that hinders the provision of personalized as well as effective healthcare.
My research also stresses the importance of wider healthcare policies that are fair to all. Policies regarding the health of the LGBTQ+ community are lacking as they often neglect specific factors important in their healthcare accessibility. As part of my findings, I firmly suggest policies that acknowledge and encompass the unique healthcare requirements of people from sexual minorities.
I specifically look at the discrimination, lack of relevant communication, and missing policies that hinder proper healthcare for the LGBTQ+ community in my paper. My efforts are directed towards pointing out ways of creating a conducive environment that guarantees equal healthcare provisions to this group through policies that focus on inclusiveness and effective communication techniques. Therefore, healthcare providers should take note and act towards enhancing healthcare access to all LGBTQ people and creating an equal healthcare system.
Literature Review
My comprehensive study of heterosexist barriers facing the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning population to obtain healthcare included a careful analysis of five primary peer-reviewed journal studies that brought varied insights concerning the complex problems entailing discrimination, societal perceptions. This discusses these studies and how systemic barriers can be improved to enhance LGBTQ + health care experiences.
Healthcare discrimination has been a major issue affecting the LGBTQ+ population. For this analysis, I depend upon Herek (2009), who exposed serious discrimination against gay people among medical personnel. The research provided evidence of why such discrimination does not lie solely on the shoulders of bad individuals, who happen to be doctors.html. In its presentation, it showed how discrimination extended from simple denial of care to giving poor services coupled with societal stigma toward homosexuals.
My subsequent research into the transgender experiences, specifically the work by Smith et al. (2015), reveals an alarmingly common occurrence of discriminative practices within health service provision. Their study demonstrated that many transgender individuals were denied treatment and or made uncomfortable by healthcare practitioners because their gender did not match their biology. Such discrimination is not only in line with the violation of basic human rights but also drives transgender individuals away from getting needed healthcare, resulting in an increased number of untreated health problems within this group.
Another issue that concerned me a lot as part of the researched issues had to do with the effect of the existing social behaviors towards LGBTQ+ persons and its influence on the accessibility of quality healthcare services for this group of people. According to Garnett et al.’s 2011 paper, it is possible to reveal that such societal norms are actually among healthcare disparity factors. In my experience, such fears of prejudice and discrimination force most LGBTQ+ patients to conceal their sexual orientation and gender identity from healthcare professionals. This camouflage impedes open communication, which may subsequently result in misdiagnosis or inappropriate management. Society also has a huge impact on the provision of adequate and appropriate healthcare to the community.
Inclusive health care policies are one such crucial solution that came out strongly in my research. Alcaraz et al. (2019) discussed the shortcomings of current policies meant for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and queer. Although some strides have been made, the majority of the health care policies do not specifically mention non-discrimination because of sexual orientation/gender identity and neither give adequate guidance for providers towards addressing the unique needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or questioning (Additionally, Lopez and Johnson (2020) further underscored the importance of policy in the health care experiences of LGBTQ+ persons. The researchers argued that inclusive policies not only protect LGBTQ+ people against discrimination but these are also necessary in stimulating physicians to study LGBTQ+ health problems.
This review of the literature provides an overview of the main challenges confronting LGBTQ+ in the healthcare sector. These studies bring out a strong case of discriminatory behaviors in healthcare policy, adverse societal attitudes, their negative consequences, and the need for inclusive healthcare policies. Therefore, it is imperative that the healthcare system works alongside the policymakers in order to break down these obstacles to the access of healthcare by the LGBTQ+ community. Together, the study calls for integration of policy reforms, education and attitude reorientation to bring about fair and inclusive health care for all people regardless of their sexual orientations and/or identities. The analysis not only addresses existing problems but also opens new opportunities for further investigation into equal healthcare access within the realm of LGBTQ+.
Methodology
For this research focusing on the healthcare experiences of the LGBTQ+ community, I opted for a qualitative research methodology due to its ability to adequately capture the richness and nuances of people’s views and experiences. My study focused on understanding the intricate interpersonal dynamics and barriers experienced by LGBTQ+ persons in health care settings. Therefore, I chose a methodology that relied on specific narrative data—a most appropriate way for my research.
The qualitative approach guided me on ways that I have used in interpreting subjective information obtained from my participants, giving me deep insight into experiences, emotions, and the sociocultural factors that influence their healthcare systems. My qualitative method was different from quantitative ones that focus on numeric data and generalization. It instead emphasized better comprehension, detailing the complications and nuances of individual health matters and job relations within medicine.
In terms of this study, I had the opportunity of conducting in depth interviews with two important participants who both belong to LGBTQ+ community for different views about their healthcare experiences. To ensure confidentiality and comfort, I used pseudonyms for the participants: The patient was represented by ‘Alex ‘and the healthcare provider was ‘Jordan ‘.
As a patient in the LGBTQ+ community, Alex contributed immensely from their first-hand experience of the healthcare system. In particular, they were asked about their encounters with healthcare providers, cases of discrimination/supportiveness and how did these affect their health condition. Alex’s story revealed the emotional and mental challenges associated with seeking medical care as a person in the LGBT community. It also outlined the issues and what patients expect from such systems.
However, Jordan, the healthcare provider participant, presented an alternative albeit equal standpoint. The role that Jordan played as a professional in the system offered insights into the difficulties in providing quality, caring for the LGBTQ+ patients. The professionals discussed such topics as gaps in the knowledge and training in relation to LGBTQ+ health issues, systemic barriers within the healthcare settings, and their viewpoints on how the service providers can improve health care to cater for the LGTBQ community.
The researchers utilized virtual platforms like video conferencing tools in conducting the interview. This approach was selected as it offered comfort and confidentiality since the topics discussed were sensitive to discuss in public view and it was convenient (Tabassum et al. 2019). Communication was more open and franker in a virtual environment, with participants feeling comfortable within their own environment.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the aim of both leading the conversation and leaving room for ad-lib discussions. My set of open-ended questions on my research study was crafted in order to generate discussions about discriminatory experiences, communication with health care professionals, and recommendations on how to improve healthcare quality and accessibility among the members of the LGBTQ+ community. The interview questions formed the basis for the interaction with the study subjects but also allowed them flexibility to shift into different directions that they found pertinent and share information and opinions uninhibitedly.
After the interviews, the data obtained was transcribed verbatim and extensively analyzed in terms of themes. I analyzed the interviews for patterns and common threads. Here, I highlighted similar experiences that were expressed by participants. Also, I included some unique insights of the study participants. By applying such meticulously careful process, I came up with important revelations regarding how health care is experienced by LGBTQ+ people, revealing opportunities and possible amendments for improvements in health policy/practice.
Results
My research into healthcare experiences by members of the LBGTQ+ community shed light on various issues through detailed interview reports between ‘Alex’, a gay patient, and ‘Jordan’, a healthcare provider, providing a clear picture of the existing situation regarding health care for gender diverse people. They help to understand what obstacles exist or even what strategies should be taken for better health care for residents of these communities and neighborhoods.
One notable finding based on the interviews revealed that many LGTQ+ people face discrimination at healthcare settings. Alex outlined a number of examples of disparate treatment, which ranged from subtle bias to overt denial of care based on sexual orientation or sex. As Alex narrated his experiences, they often led to feelings of marginalization, undervaluing and exclusion in a health care setting. Speaking from Jordan as a professionally qualified individual, he confessed that the issue was based on ignorance and insensitivity towards the medical demands for LGBTQ+ people. In summation, they stated these biases were not only in their overt acts, but in subtle ones as well and this subtle bias could potentially have a huge effect on the quality healthcare.
Another important theme from my study was communication challenges facing LGBTQ+ individuals and their health care providers (Malik et al., 2019). Alex was not comfortable talking about any issue relating to their queer identification with healthcare providers and feared they will meet insensitivity or prejudice. Most of that time, patients avoided giving vital pieces of health information due to this feeling of discomfort. Likewise, Jordan argued that most health care providers may not have the appropriate training to communicate in an open manner that is affirmative towards the LGBTQ2+ patients. It was concluded that the existing gap in training and awareness impairs professionals’ capacity to provide holistic and responsive care.
An important finding on the effects of discriminatory experiences in health care setting. Alex openly discussed the fear, suspicion, and reticence about seeking medical treatment as a result of these experiences. The study revealed that there is a lasting impact of emotional trauma to themselves where they experience extreme nervousness every time they go for a medical checkup. Moreover, Jordan recognized the psychological effects on LGBTQ+ patients caused by discrimination and poor communication. Such experiences were likely to result in patients avoiding healthcare, delayed healthcare, or poorer healthcare outcomes.
Thus, my research concluded that there is a central necessity for inclusive and sensitive health-care practices. Alex stressed the need for extensive training of healthcare providers on LGBTQ-inclusive care and cultural competency, coupled with initiatives to practice inclusiveness, including use of appropriate language and demonstration of hospitality. Jordan called for a change of system and insisted on making it compulsory for everyone involved in healthcare to undertake training on LGBTQ healthcare.” Such measures aimed at improving the quality of care among LGBTQ-plus patients in addition to establishing an appropriate healthcare environment.
The study highlighted a number of intricate difficulties that gay and lesbian seekers face when obtaining high-quality medical services. Some of these difficulties comprise widespread discrimination, communication problems, and massive psychological implications, which suggest that healthcare systems should be made a bit more all-inclusive and responsive to cultural specifics. The study suggests a broad-based methodology to better healthcare for the LGBTQ+ population, including public policy, training, and education on LGBTQ+ health matters. These essential matters should be taken into consideration for the development fair and patient-centered health care system that does not depend on a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. In doing so, this study helps in general efforts of improving healthcare available and quality aimed towards the LBGTQ+ community.
Discussion and Proposed Solutions
In this regard, data from the interviews involving ‘Alex’, an LGBTQ+ client, and ‘Jordan’ a health care provider can prove to be vital in exposing these common problems before coming up with possible effective responses. A close examination of such findings highlights persistent heterosexism in care settings stemming from discrimination, poor communication, and the absence of affirmative approaches.
The prevalent bias shown during the interviews, from very mild prejudice to explicit non-admittance of treatment, reveals a broader problem within health care, which extends beyond individual discriminatory attitudes. Alex said that such discrimination is made even worse when he discovers that the immediate experience is not just affecting him, but it will have long-term psychological effects on the community. Additionally, the discussed communication barriers also highlight that there are huge gaps in the capacity building of health care providers who rarely get the skills to engage effectively and sensibly with their LGBTQ+ patients. Lack of understanding of communication within the healthcare environment makes it difficult for people that belong to the LGBTQ+ group be able to see that they are seen or heard as well as being respectful. Consequently, this negatively affects their willingness to seek treatment while also keeping vital health information confidential
These insights provide two main solutions the LGBTQ+ community faces in healthcare (Ramsey et al. 2022). First, it is essential to conduct extensive sensitivity and awareness training of healthcare workers about LGBTQ+ healthcare. This type of education should include more than just healthcare challenges that are particularly prevalent among the LGBTQ + people, and should incorporate larger issues such as cultural sensitivity and effective communication approaches. The program intended is meant to give these health providers the right techniques and wisdom which they will use in designing an accommodating and friendly setting that incorporates all possible needs of the LGBTQ population in its delivery of service.
Furthermore, there is an urgent demand for public support to enact legislation against discrimination, and explicit patient’s rights for the LBGTQ+ society. This should be accompanied by policies that will change into a healthcare system which does not discriminate based on sexual orientation of gender but rather encourages equal access to quality care for the LGBTQ+ population. The policies should include rules that require sensitivity training, impose antidiscrimination laws, as well as procedures on what to do when an LGBTQ+ person is subjected to unfair treatment.
These are solutions that I will view as possible for individuals and small groups whose efforts constitute a grassroots approach. Healthcare professionals are encouraged and should lead on sensitization programs within an organization. It is expected that medical practitioners should push for the inclusion of LGBTQ+ health issues in professional development programs. Likewise, individual and small advocacy groups could contribute significantly to healthcare policy development together with policymakers, healthcare institutions, and members of recognized.
My research points out that it is necessary to change the way health care is offered in the LGBTQ+ community (Kamen et al., 2023). Therefore, providing comprehensive sensitivity training for providers in health care industry and advocating for inclusive policies will help us create a healthcare system that will not only recognize but support the needs of LGBTQ+ individuals. They are critical steps towards providing an equal care that is not differentiated by their sexual orientations and gender identity.
Conclusion
Therefore, as I conclude my research on healthcare for the members of the LGBTQ+ community, I would like to underscore again the thesis that this community suffers from discrimination, communication difficulties, and lack of adequate policy. This study is important for bringing light into these issues and offering practical measures to tackle them. From interviews conducted with ‘Alex’ the LGBTQ+ patient and ‘Jordan’ the healthcare provider, my research shows that there are various forms of discrimination in health care that range from mild bias to outright refusal based upon sexuality or gender identity. One of the barriers encountered was communication gaps that existed between the physicians and the LGBTQ+ patients, which usually resulted in the withholding of information, an aspect that negatively affected the healthcare quality. As if this was not enough, these experiences had huge psychological impact that resulted in mistrust and lack of desire to visit health institutions among LGBTQ+ individuals. Using these insights, I proffered two key measures. First, healthcare professionals will need extensive training in order to ensure sensitivity and awareness on LGBTQ+ issues. The training must center around understanding, as well as effective communication with LGBTQ+ patients. Moreover, calling for policy shifts will help develop explicit anti-discrimination policies and patient’s rights for the LGBTQ+ community. Their aim should be to introduce a comprehensive inclusion policy where everybody, regardless of their sexual preferences, can get treatment. Healthcare stakeholders, namely policymakers, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups, should embrace these measures and jointly improve LGBTQ+ healthcare access. By putting together such concerted efforts, we can have a healthcare system which is not only inclusive, but also respectful and responsive, to the LGBTQ+ community. Acknowledging commitment and action is critical with regard to moving toward equitable health care available to everyone; this study provides a starting point with regard to changing health practices and insurance policies.
Reference
Cook, M. T., Haddow, P., Kirton, S. B., & McAuley, W. J. (2020). Polymers Exhibiting Lower Critical Solution Temperatures as a Route to Thermoreversible Gelators for Healthcare. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(8), 2008123. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202008123
Henriquez, N. R., & Ahmad, N. (2021). “The Message Is You Don’t Exist”: Exploring Lived Experiences of Rural Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) People Utilizing Health care Services. SAGE Open Nursing, 7, 237796082110511. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608211051174
Kamen, C., Dizon, D. S., Fung, C., Pratt-Chapman, M., Agulnik, M., Fashoyin-Aje, L. A., Jeames, S., Merrill, J. K., Smith, K. T., & Shail Maingi. (2023). State of Cancer Care in America: Achieving Cancer Health Equity Among Sexual and Gender Minority Communities. JCO Oncology Practice, 19(11), 959–966. https://doi.org/10.1200/op.23.00435
Malik, S., Master, Z., Parker, W., DeCoster, B., & Campo-Engelstein, L. (2019). In Our Own Words: A Qualitative Exploration of Complex Patient-Provider Interactions in an LGBTQ Population. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 2(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.7202/1062305ar
Md. Ruhul Kabir, & Chan, K. (2023). “They were quick, insipid, and stuck to the typical medical checkups”: A Narrative Study on Women’s Expectations and Experiences of Maternity Care in Bangladesh. Journal of Patient Experience, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231215607
Ramsey, Z. S., Davidov, D. M., Levy, C. B., & Abildso, C. G. (2022). An etic view of LGBTQ healthcare: Barriers to access according to healthcare providers and researchers. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 34(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2022.2042452
Tabassum, M., Kosiński, T., Frik, A., Malkin, N., Wijesekera, P., Egelman, S., & Lipford, H. R. (2019). Investigating Users’ Preferences and Expectations for Always-Listening Voice Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369807
write