Abstract
This paper has a Christian view on abortion, specifically the ruling in the case of Roe v. Wade. It is based on the concept that every life is sacred. While a baby is a person right at conception, the article studies the Christian worldview on the sanctity of life and the foundation for biblical opposition to abortion. Unveiling the scriptural records demonstrates Eve’s humanistic value and dignity from birth to grown people. The Roe v. Wade ruling of the Supreme Court is examined from a Christian point of view as it does not recognize the issue of personhood for the unborn and promotes a lifestyle of comfort rather than the protection of life. This paper endeavors to overturn the Roe v. Wade ruling and to put in place policies that might be good for women and their unborn children. The piece concludes by expressing the significance of preserving a culture of life and hope based on compassion, companionship, and the transfiguring grace of Christ.
Keywords: Roe v. Wade, Christian worldview, abortion, sanctity of life, and biblical references
Introduction
In modern society, there is perhaps no other topic that awakens such intense emotion and debate as abortion. Grounded in the most fundamental views of life as sacred, this debate about abortion goes to the sphere of law, ethics, and religion. For any Christian social worker who keeps high values of love, compassion, and justice, It is right to strongly object to the new policy put in place by Roe v. Wade. BE equipped with the belief that each life matters and that a baby is a person from the beginning. This paper explores the Bible grounds that contradict Roe v. Wade and supports abortion policies that would protect unborn children as well as help women facing unwanted pregnancies.
Christian Worldview on the Value of Life
The moral certainty that each person is made in the image of God stands at the base of the Christian view on the value of human life “ So God created man in his image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Revised Standard Bible Version, 2022, Genesis 1:27). This central idea is based on this hypothesis that every person, independent of age, race, gender, or class, has original value and dignity embedded in them. From a Christian perspective, human life is sacred and precious, as affirmed in the Bible of how God knew and consecrated us before we were born. (Revised Standard Version, 2022, Jeremiah 1:5). Central to this worldview is the recognition of the personhood of the unborn child and the mention of shedding innocent blood, “There are six things which the Lord hates, seven which are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,” (Revised Standard Version, 2022 Proverbs 6:16-17). As a consequence, then, Christians see abortion as contrary to God’s design and wish since it is a direct termination of the life that God created. Furthermore, Christianity embeds the obligation to safeguard and shield the powerless, including the unborn, which is illustrated by the teaching of Jesus on love, mercy, and justice. Therefore, viewing the issue from a Christian perspective means that in addition to opposing abortion, we should also strive to promote practices and policies that protect the value and dignity of every human being, from conception to natural death. Additionally, Jesus of Nazareth is the most outstanding example of a person who teaches about the equality and dignity of each person no matter what social status and values others assign.
The Ministry of Jesus is portrayed by compassion, mercy, and especially dignification to humanity, which is seen in how He ministered to people from all backgrounds. He was the defender of mocked, outcast, and repented, a healer of body and soul. About the Christian worldview on life values, Christians are charged to defend the sanctity of all kinds of life by advocating for justice, compassion, and humanity towards the dignity of humans. This includes advocating for the rights of the unborn, caring for the needy, and supporting the policies and programs that ensure the life of humans from the point of conception till natural death (Latt, 2019). Christians express the teaching of love, mercy, and justice, embodied in the Biblical image of God as creator, by becoming a living witness to the recognition of the value of the individual.
Roe v. Wade: A Contradiction to Christian values
Roe v. Wade is a Christian value violation because it does not respect the sanctity of life as proclaimed in Christian teachings. At the heart of Christianity stands the conviction that every life is sacred and precious, created by God in His image (Firth, 2019). On the other hand, Roe v. Wade compromises this fundamental principle by legalizing abortion, hence condoning the termination of unborn life. From a Christian point of view, Roe v. Wade fosters a culture of death and disrespect for the intrinsic value and dignity of all human beings, even as embryos (Cohen,2022). By allowing abortion until the point of viability, the verdict disregards the unborn child as a person and reduces their worth in society. This law is against biblical teachings, which uphold the existence and individuality of the unborn.
Furthermore, Roe v. Wade creates an environment where self-determination due to individual preference is promoted over the sanctity of life and the triumph of justice. Opposing abortion becomes challenging because a denial of a woman’s choice embodies the belief that the unborn child is disposable as opposed to a precious gift from God. Moreover, Roe v. Wade has had effects way beyond legalizing abortion. Ultimately, it has formed a social outlook where life is not considered sanctity, and society’s moral backbone is undermined (Hull, 2022). Through the regularization of abortion and making it a matter of individual preference rather than morality, Roe v. Wade has denatured society and erased the inherent tragedy of abortion by undermining the moral roots of a fair and merciful society.
Briefly speaking, Roe v. Wade is a breakaway from the Christian values of love, compassion, and care for life. It is a matter of promoting death and disregard for the most helpless members of society (Moyer, 2021). Therefore, the task of the Christians is to contest this decision and to push for the policies that stand for the sanctity of life from conception till natural death, which coincides with the principles of justice, mercy, and love taught by Jesus Christ.
Policy Position: Opposing Roe v. Wade
As a Christian social worker, my policy stance is definitely against the Roe v. Wade case, and I am in support of its repeal and adoption of policies that match the Christian values and ones that give preference to the protection of unborn life and holistic well-being of women with unplanned pregnancies. This is centrally the Christian tenet of the sanctity of the life of each human being, which includes that of the unborn child given by God (Clarke, 2021). The Bible unequivocally affirms the value and dignity of every individual, regardless of age or stage of development, as each person is fearfully and wonderfully made in the image of God. Subsequently, abortion within the Roe v. Wade legalization is a sad exception to this primary belief since it allows the intentional elimination of innocents and disregards the intrinsic value of the unborn.
Next, opposing Roe v. Wade must be done to ensure that the biblical mandate of caring for the vulnerable and protecting the voiceless is not violated. Throughout Scripture, God commands His people to advocate for justice and show compassion towards those in need, including the unborn (Pomerantz, 2019). By disputing Roe v. Wade, Christians prove their loyalty to protecting children born in the womb whose right to fight for themselves has not been exercised yet, thus speaking out for those who are voiceless.
Going against Roe v. Wade means giving women’s welfare top priority, especially in cases of unwanted pregnancy. Abortion should no longer be viewed as a way out of crisis pregnancies; instead, Christians should promote pregnancy assistance services and other options that do not result in abortion, thus empowering women to choose life for themselves and their unborn children. We will develop these services, which comprise antenatal care, maternal health, adaptive resources, and counseling services (Pomerantz, 2019). These will help women make well-informed decisions without opting for abortion.
Furthermore, to oppose Roe v. Wade, one must address the structural problems in society that lead to unintentional pregnancies and abortions. This consists of dealing with problems such as poverty, lack of health care, limited sex education instruction, and community stigmatization of unplanned pregnancies (Tobón, 2023). Through tackling these systemic problems, Christians will be able to establish a culture that rewards life at all stages, providing practical ways and resources to resolve the fundamental issues behind abortion.
While seeking to abolish Roe v. Wade, Christians should also engage in compassionate communication and social work with those who have suffered from abortion by offering them support, healing, and redemption, which comes through Christ’s transforming love. Many women and men experience spiritual and emotional wounds resulting from abortion (Miller-Naudé, 2022). Therefore, Christians must show their forgiveness and grace, guiding them through healing and restoration in Christ (Robinson, 2022). Finally, Roe v. Wade should not be opposed because of policy only but because it is a matter of Christian moral values. By proclaiming policies that protect the sanctity of life and give primary attention to the welfare of women and unborn children, Christians can bring a society where each life is cherished, considered valuable, and protected (Ziebertz, 2018). This way, we become incarnations of Christ’s love, mercy, and justice, becoming the beacons of hope in a world where abortion emanates the darkness.
Conclusion
As a Christian social worker, I stand for the sanctity of life and promote the well-being of individuals and families. Hence, I oppose the policy established by Roe v. Wade while supporting policies based on Christian values. The Christian worldview upholds the belief that all life has worth and that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception, which concurs with the scriptural teachings of love, compassion, and justice.Overturning Roe v. Wade is not just a matter of policy but also a demonstration of our whole commitment to protecting the rights of the unborn and assisting women facing unplanned pregnancies. By supporting the overturn of Roe v. Wade and the provision of alternatives to abortion, like all the necessary support services, adoption options, and prenatal care, we will be able to construct a society that treasures and safeguards every life.As Christians, we are called to show compassion and love towards those who have gone through abortion, sharing hope and healing Christ as the source of all transformation. Education, advocacy, and care with compassion can provide a platform where all lives are honored, valued, and protected. Ultimately, this can reflect the love and compassion of our Savior, Jesus Christ.
References
Clarke, D., & Mühlrad, H. (2021). Abortion laws and women’s health. Journal of Health Economics, 76, 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102413
Cohen, I. G., Reingold, R. B., & Gostin, L. O. (2022). Supreme Court ruling on the Texas abortion law. JAMA, 327(7), 621. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0050
Holy Bible : NRSV, new revised standard version. Revised Standard Version Bible. (2019) http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA88419209?l=ja
Firth, D. G. (2019). Psalm 139: A study in ambiguity. Old Testament Essays, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2019/v32n2a13
Hull, N. E. H., & Hoffer, P. C. (2021). Roe v. Wade. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nnwhh9
Latt, S. M., Milner, A., & Kavanagh, A. (2019). Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries. BMC Women’s Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y
Miller-Naudé, C. L., & Naudé, J. A. (2022). The Revised Standard Version (1952) and its revisions as a linear emergence of the Tyndale–King James Version tradition. Theological Studies/Teologiese Studies, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7647
Moyer, L. P. (2021). “She Blinded Me with Science”: The Use of Science Frames in Abortion Litigation before the Supreme Court. Justice System Journal, 43(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2021.1927266
Robinson, G. E., Brown, K. M., Grigoriadis, S., Nadelson, C. C., Feldman, N., Dhami, N., Benders-Hadi, N., Mittal, L., & Wald, M. (2022). The Mental and Physical Health Impacts of Overturning Roe v Wade. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 210(12), 891–893. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000001596
Pomerantz, T., Bergin, A., Miller, K., Ziegler, C., & Patel, P. D. (2019). A Problem-Based learning session on pregnancy options, counseling, and abortion care. MedEdPORTAL. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10816
Tobón, A. L., McNicholas, E., Clare, C. A., Ireland, L. D., Payne, J. L., Simas, T. A. M., Scott, R. K., Becker, M. P., & Byatt, N. (2023). The end of Roe v. Wade: Implications for Women’s mental health and care. Frontiers in Psychiatry, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045
Ziebertz, H., & Zaccaria, F. (2018). Euthanasia, Abortion, Death Penalty and Religion – The Right to Life and its Limitations: International Empirical Research. Springer.
Ziegler, M. (2022). The End of Roe v. Wade. American Journal of Bioethics, 22(8), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2075962
write