Factors That Led To Change In SICU Practice
According to Sammer and James (2011), the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) or hospital-acquired ailments was the major element that contributed to the governance of Hospital Hope intervening to alter the strategies in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU). CLABSI are serious diseases that arise when pathogens, primarily microbes, invade a patient’s body on medication via the blood system while connected to indwelling catheters (Tang et al., 2014). In many instances, this happens when Medicare providers fail to observe medical regulations and procedures when inserting lines into patients and ensure that the lines have been thoroughly disinfected. Furthermore, CLABSI arises when healthcare professionals fail to employ proper infection containment protocols when checking the patients’ lines and changing their dressings routinely. Patients afflicted with CLABSI exhibit infection-related manifestations including high pyrexia, irritation, and redskins around central lines (Tang et al., 2014), and serious illnesses such as care facility acquired pneumonia and low blood sugar, as Mrs. Jackson did (Sammer & James, 2011).
The adverse consequences of CLABSI on patient welfare and the credibility of medical facilities prompted Hospital Hope’s administration to implement a number of remedial steps to guarantee that such circumstances would not occur repeatedly in the future (Sammer & James, 2011). In terms of the overall impact of CLABSI, chronic infections cause patients to be hospitalized for longer periods of time, escalating healthcare expenses and fatality risks (Sammer & James, 2011; Haddadin et al., 2020). It is projected that around 250,000 individuals in the United States get contaminated with bloodstream diseases each year (Haddadin et al., 2020). CLABSI rates in ICUs are projected to be around 0.8 infections per 1000 indwelling catheters performed daily. Further research undertaken by the Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium across 700 ICUs from almost 50 countries found that the incidence of CLABSIs is 4.1 infections per 1000 central lines performed daily. The majority of these illnesses are caused by the existence of intravenous catheters.
Hospitals typically utilize one of two categories of central lines: constricted catheters, which are medically placed into the femoral vein or inner jugular, particularly during heemofiltration or radiotherapy; and non-tunneled catheters (Berman et al., 2017). Non-tunneled catheters are subcutaneously placed temporary peripheral lines that are typically used for less persistent infections and have been documented to be the predominant source of CLABSI illnesses (Haddadin et al., 2020). One to two weeks after the catheter was put into the patient’s body, pathogens from the convalescent’s skin spread to her veins through the catheter’s outer interfaces. In the absence of dermal passages on the skin, which usually happens with constricted catheters, creating inflammatory reactions that create a barrier to prevent bacteria movement, CLABSI infections occur with non-tunneled catheters. After ten days, the development of CLABSI is triggered by intraluminal pollutants from the medical provider’s arms, which may have become infected due to a failure to observe the prescribed precautionary measures for entering the hubs. It is because of this that clinicians and others in the medical field should be careful when they do standard patient evaluations.
Type of Framework
As a medical institution professional in need of a practice shift, I would establish the “situation background assessment recommendation (SBAR) discourses” (Sammer & James, 2011) paradigm as the most crucial approach. According to( Sammer and James (2011), this guideline facilitates evident and straightforward interaction among members of various interdisciplinary teams. It provides for the highest level of esteem while sharing knowledge and exchanging prospects, such as rapid healthcare professional evaluation, which allows for the management of undesirable occurrences.
Ethics enhances legitimacy in health-care information transmission by improving judgment processes and enabling the development of trust among involved parties (Burgener, 2020). Ethics serves as a foundation for identifying what is wrong and right, guaranteeing that opposing parties construct a communication foundation that results in the intended shared agreement (Alert, 2017). When effective ethical communication is lacking, the institution’s reputation, moral well-being, and ambition suffer. These factors have an impact on personnel morale, which is mirrored in patients’ sentiments regarding the institution, culminating in a decrease in income (Burgener, 2020). The hospital’s behavior is subject to scrutiny by clients, authorities, shareholders, labor unions, parliamentarians, and environmental groups, all of whom are impacted by healthcare activities. Ethical communication is honest and offers all the necessary facts. It achieves this by allowing parties to specify the nature of the link between individuals, divisions, and institutions. In contrast, unethical interactions include disinformation, omission of vital information, and hoaxes.
Assessment of medical framework deficiencies has been undertaken, constructed, and managed in a way that structures medical institutions to guarantee that all patients receive the best care possible using optimal navigation and availability of data in contemporary healthcare networks (Golden et al., 2017). This form of discovery would be included in the institution to guarantee that data exchange is done efficiently and that any developing patient health concerns are addressed immediately. Patients’ data, medication administration regimens, and equivalents of comprehensive programs are input into the menu of medication timesheets in the infrastructure programs. Procedures, regulations, and standard operating procedures would be chosen from a drop-down menu of rules, procedures, and tactics that are enforced.
Individuals’ healthcare would be monitored by the network’s laws and guidelines, regulations, and clinical procedure guiding principles (Golden et al., 2017). These approaches would be available to hospital staff, healthcare providers, and professional bodies for review, authorization, and administration, ensuring accountability if data were not correctly disseminated. The healthcare communication platform regulations would comprise care administration methods, patient care metrics, and algorithms. Based on the evidence acquired, an official healthcare management authority would develop regulations and ideas (Golden et al., 2017).
Finally, efficient communication is a foundation in healthcare institutions that strive to provide the best care possible. Ensuring that all hospital workers may voice their concerns about patient care will significantly reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired illnesses. It will be easier for people to use treatments that cut down on the amount of time they are sick and how quickly they can get better if they are recorded quickly.
References
Alert, S. E. (2017). Inadequate hand-off communication. Sentinel Event Alert, 58, 1-6.
Berman, A., Snyder, S., Levett-Jones, T., Burton, T., & Harvey, N. (2017). Skills in clinical nursing. Pearson Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Burgener, A. M. (2020). Enhancing communication to improve patient safety and to increase patient satisfaction. The Health Care Manager, 39(3), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000298
Golden, S. H., Hager, D., Gould, L. J., Mathioudakis, N., & Pronovost, P. J. (2017). A gap analysis needs assessment tool to drive a care delivery and research agenda for integration of care and sharing of best practices across a health system. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.10.004
Haddadin, Y., Annamaraju, P., & Regunath, H. (2020). Central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI). In StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. US.
Sammer, C., & James, B. (2011). Patient safety culture: The nursing unit leader’s role. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No03Man03
Tang, H. J., Lin, H. L., Lin, Y. H., Leung, P. O., Chuang, Y. C., & Lai, C. C. (2014). The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection. BMC Infectious Diseases, 14(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-356
write