Introduction
Mexico had several upheavals and revolutions in the nineteenth century, some minor and others major. These battles have shaped church-state relations. The church-state dispute caused the Cristero Rebellion and War of Reform in 1858. A random and cumulative process ended these violent conflicts, but they mostly succeeded in obscuring rather than resolving their underlying causes. With their declaration of independence, the liberals began the first round of conflict, which various proponents of a powerful, secular state continued throughout the twentieth century. The disagreement became a cultural war with opposition to governmental neutralization and church reform. Since Spanish colonization, the Catholic Church and the Mexican government have clashed. The Catholic Church remained powerful after Mexico’s independence in the nineteenth century. The Catholic Church was influential during the colonial era. Throughout the 1920s, Mexico’s government fought Catholic militants in the Cristero War. Tens of thousands perished before a ceasefire ended the war. The Church and Mexican government disagree on church-state separation. The president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, is a secularist who has resisted party efforts to blur religion and State. The Mexican Bishops’ Conference’s reluctance to distribute a moral teaching manual has brought Church-State conflict to the forefront. Yet, the Church is no longer the dominating force it once was in Mexico since its power and influence have substantially decreased over the past few decades.
Historical context 1
A significant left-leaning political force in Mexico is MORENA. The party is frequently described as populist and anti-neoliberal. Since 2018, it has been in power in Mexico. The Movimiento Regeneración Nacional, for which the phrase “brown-skinned” is an abbreviation, has Spanish roots (National Regeneration Movement). It references Mexico’s Roman Catholic patron saint, Our Lady of Guadalupe (La Morena). In 2011, three-time presidential candidate and current Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) founded the organization and formally registered it as a political party in 2014. On December 12th, 2017, Yeidckol Polevnsky took over as the party’s head. In preparation for the 2018 general elections, it established the alliance Juntos Haremos Historia (Together we will make history) with the Labor Party, a left-leaning party, and the Social Encounter Party, a Christian conservative party. With 53% of the vote, it won the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.
They supported the Pact for Mexico, often known as the “Pact against Mexico,” because they agreed with Pea Nieto. “I won’t vote for a party that raises taxes and gasoline costs. The PRD’s request for higher fuel costs is reprehensible, given that Mexicans earn the lowest wages in North America and that gasoline is already more costly in Mexico than in the US. On December 13th, PES officially joined MORENA-PT, renaming the coalition Juntos Haremos Historia (English: Together We Will Make History). When the agreement was signed, the three factions settled on López Obrador. One hundred fifty parliamentary districts, 32 Senate seats, and 75 members from the PT and PES were up for election. The three parties formed an unofficial alliance to support Lopez Obrador’s victory in the presidential race and the division of the parliamentary seats. In the 2015 assembly elections, MORENA ran for the first time as an official political party. With 21 proportionate and 14 district seats, it boosted its representation in the House of Commons by 35 individuals.
In Early January 2019, nine PRD lawmakers defected from the party. They joined López Obrador’s MORENA-led coalition, providing the government with a two-thirds majority and enabling the approval of fundamental revision. The party gained seven members in the House of Deputies in the June 2021 midterm elections, while MORENA’s alliance lost seats in the lower chamber of Congress. While maintaining a simple majority, the governing party could not win the required two-thirds legislative supermajority.
Talking of Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s religious beliefs, The majority of discussions of López Obrador’s dynamic political image focus on his conflicts with the extreme faction, which refused to concede loss following the 2006 election, and the arch-pragmatist, who presided over as mayor of Mexico City from 2000 to 2005. Notwithstanding López Obrador’s purposeful obscurity, the candidate’s religious convictions have come to light. A notable example of this is the moral structure of February. Lopez Obrador, according to a priest named Miguel Concha, who knows him well, regularly takes communion at his Church on the day that marks the passing of his first wife.
As Concha stated to Catholic News Agency earlier this year, Andrés Manuel is a devoted Catholic who is “very welcoming of the religious and nonreligious viewpoints of all individuals.” Religious organizations in Mexico frequently refrain from publicly endorsing certain politicians during election seasons for fear of being accused of breaking the separation of religion and State, which the Constitution guarantees. Recently, Blancarte asserted that he is a pantheist in the publication Milenio. Every deity and spirit he worships will be present in the National Palace if he wins. The experienced leader, who is sometimes referred to as a “firebrand,” has constantly pledged “peace and love” during this campaign, regardless of the specifics of his views. This has occasionally been uttered with a wink, yet it has been said seriously in other instances.
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador contacted Pope Francis to express regret for the Catholic Church’s part in conquering the Americas. He asked the Pope for something similar twice in less than two years. President Lopez reiterated his opinion that the Catholic Church should give a full apology to the indigenous people that were affected by the most inglorious actions which were aimed to Plunder their territories and enslave them from the Conquest of 1521 until the recent past” in a letter that was made public on October 10th 2020.
Spain said that the invasion of the Americas in March 2019 was unwarranted and that López Obrador should apologize on behalf of the Catholic Church and the Spanish monarchy. Pope Francis expressed regret for the Church’s part in Bolivian history when he visited there in 2015. As he put it, “ not only by its own sin but also the crimes done against the ancient peoples before the so-called conquest of the Americas, “the Church had harmed its members. In addition, this year celebrates the 200th anniversary of Mexico’s triumph against the Spanish. A notable Catholic figure who opposed the idea of an apology, Bishop Miguel Alba Diaz of La Paz, Mexico, recommended López Obrador to ask for forgiveness for the persecution of the Catholic Church in the previous century. In a message to Pope Francis, the president asked that historical artifacts be shipped to Mexico for the occasion in 2021. Priests Miguel Hidalgo Costilla and José Mara Morelos Pavón, two excommunicated heroes of the independence fight, also sought to be readmitted by the Church.
Historical context part 2
The Catholic Church in Mexico has a long history dating back to the Spanish invasion (1519–21), and it still significantly influences Mexican culture today. Several significant remnants of Spain’s dominion over the nation are the Civil Code, Spanish as the official language, and the country’s colonial architecture. Priority status belonged to the Catholic Church until approximately the middle of the eighteenth century. Throughout the colonial period and the first few decades of the Mexican Republic following independence in 1821, it served as the only recognized Church. After gaining freedom, the Church became active in politics, including nonreligious ones. The Catholic Church had a major part in Mexican history, but post-1900 scholars have ignored it. The early post-revolutionary Catholic Church was related to political power. Therefore it has been studied. But, the Catholic Church and other religious elites, which operated independently of the State and were repressed, have not been researched. Cohesive leadership groupings in Mexico, especially State and political ones, have seldom been studied. These communities frequently have strong institutional foundations, ideals that diverge from those of politicians, and self-government. But, as a result of the leadership’s exchanges, researchers have learnt more about the group and the extent of its links to the Mexican political establishment. The Catholic Church and the government have no recognized relationships, and nothing is known about its current leadership, objectives, or organizational structures. This stands in sharp contrast to the connections that politicians from the other party, corporate executives, military officials, and even academic institutions have with the present government.
Talking about The Mexican Revolution “Cristiada”, From 1910 to 1920, Mexico underwent a profound social and political transformation known as the Mexican Revolution. Political corruption, social inequality, and elite wealth and power drove the insurrection. The 1926–1929 Cristero War, also known as the Cristiada, was a key event in the Mexican Revolution. Mexican Catholic peasants and religious organizations rebelled against the government during the Cristiada because they disapproved of its attempts to repress religion. The elements of the 1917 Mexican Constitution that were perceived as unfriendly to the Catholic Church are thought to be the root reasons for the Cristiada. These laws required state-run priest registration, the seizure of church property, and limitations on religious instruction. Catholics, who viewed these events as a component of a larger effort by the Mexican government to challenge their faith and way of life, were outraged on a vast scale.
The uprising started in 1926 when the government applied the Constitution more severely. In defence of their Catholic beliefs and way of life, many peasants took up guns, to which the Catholic populace reacted immediately and vehemently. During the deadly Cristiada, both sides brutally and violently attacked one another. The Catholic Church was forced to make substantial compromises to reclaim some of the prestige and power it had lost, but by 1929 the government had effectively put down the uprising. Many Catholics in Mexico still resent the government for its conduct during the conflict. The revolution, which contributed to the country’s secular character and paved the path for a more democratic and inclusive society, is largely responsible for modern Mexico.
Although the devastating loss of life, the Cristero War is largely responsible for Mexico’s present infrastructure and way of life. The Cristero War had a role in the secularization of Mexican society. The 1917 Mexican Constitution severely restricted the Catholic Church by designating it a secular state. The Cristero War was one way that many Catholics protested against these limitations. Eventually, the rebels were put down, and Mexico’s secular character was restored. Second, the Cristero War may be credited with helping to create a more democratic and open society in Mexico. The battle brought to light both Mexico’s urgent need for political and economic transformation and the extreme social and economic disparity that existed there. In response to these requests, the Mexican government changed several of its social and economic policies. We can draw the conclusion that the Cristero War aided in the development of nationalist sentiment in Mexico. Both sides developed emblems and catchphrases that tapped into a sense of Mexican identity during the battle, which was characterized by a strong sense of patriotism and nationalism on both sides. The broad adoption of national pride laid the foundation for a more peaceful and cohesive Mexican society.
On the other hand, Mexico had to put in a lot of effort and wait a very long time to become a secular state free of the Church and the colonizer. This trend advanced significantly with the adoption of the 1917 Mexican Constitution. A constituent assembly established during the Mexican Revolution of 1916 drafted the Constitution. Professionals, farmers, and academics from all facets of Mexican society were among the attendees. From 1917 to 1920, Venustiano Carranza crafted the Mexican Constitution. Carranza led the Mexican Revolution and sought a secular, democratic, and modern nation. The 1917 Mexican Constitution was considered as anti-Catholic since they declared Mexico secular. These laws required state-run priest registration, the seizure of church property, and limitations on religious instruction. The Constitution’s Church-State separation provisions have been updated recently. These improvements ensured that Mexicans could practice their faith without government interference. In 1992, Mexico’s president no longer had to be Catholic. A 2013 law abolished the Catholic Church’s corporate structure.
History Context 3
The MORENA party’s Mara Soledad Luévano Has proposed legislation that would erode Mexico’s constitutional guarantee of the separation of Church and State. Since the 1917 Constitution, this split has shaped Mexico’s social and political structure. The bill would have allowed the Catholic Church to participate in broader public life. President Lopez says, According to reports, it would relax church property ownership restrictions, allow “conscientious objections” to faith-related laws, encourage church-state cooperation on social, cultural, and economic growth, and give religious groups more immediate access to all mainstream press, such as TV, radio, and newspapers. Religious leaders could hold services in army facilities, hospitals, and clinics. Without President López Obrador’s support, the initiative is unlikely to succeed. The Catholic Church and the Mexican government have long conflicted. Benito Juarez, a 19th-century reformist who believed religion dominated Mexican society, inspired López Obrador. The “Cristiada” civil war began in the early 20th century when the State violently assaulted the Roman Catholic church.
President Andrés Manuel López Obrador revoked the law because he respects secular Mexico and his fondness for Benito Juárez Benito Juárez. Opposing the motion will preserve church-state separation and prohibit the government from promoting religion. MORENA members have criticized López Obrador’s move, saying it violates the party’s values. Some party members have pledged to resign, while others have demanded a no-confidence vote on the leader. López Obrador’s appointment is unlikely to be welcomed by the Church. President López Obrador has battled with various institutions, the Catholic Church being the latest. The Church’s rejection diminished López Obrador’s legitimacy and power, and this choice might further deteriorate the ties between the two organizations.
The conflict between Church and State in Mexico
Church-state ties in Mexico have a complicated past characterized by conflict and collaboration. The Catholic Church significantly impacted the Mexican government and society throughout the colonial era when Church and State were linked. Yet, during the Mexican War of Independence, when the Church was viewed as a symbol of Spanish dominance, a drive toward a more secular administration started. The wall separating religion and State was built under a new Mexican constitution in 1857. The nation became formally secular in the Mexican Revolution and the Constitution of 1917. By prohibiting it from owning property or getting involved in politics, this Constitution curbed the authority of the Church and turned Mexico into a secular state. Notwithstanding these initiatives, disagreements exist between the Mexican government and the Catholic Church. The Church also opposes immoral laws. The Church and government have tried to curb its social and educational impact. Mexico’s secularization has reduced the Church’s political influence. Due to the government’s efforts to limit the Church’s public role, the Church’s support or opposition of a democratic politician no longer matters.
Conclusion
This paper has examined the conflicts between the Church and the Mexican government, focusing on how they still exist today. Despite Mexico’s declared secularism, the Church continues to have a significant cultural and societal impact on the nation, although it has little political power. At this point, it is unclear how much conflict will continue in Mexico between the Church and the State. Despite the government’s commitment to secularism, the Catholic Church continues to play a significant role in Mexican society. Notwithstanding the guarantee of the separation of Church and State provided by the Constitution, it is difficult to foretell how any future political figure may attempt to restore the Church’s power. Differences between the Catholic Church and the government frequently reflect tensions in Mexican politics and culture. The government must defend secularism and the separation of Church and State, notwithstanding the importance of religion to Mexico’s culture and society.
Bibliography
Tuckman, Jo. “Mexico’s leading presidential candidate embraces many religions.” NCR: National Catholic Reporter. (June 2018) https://www.ncronline.org/news/mexicos-
leading-presidential-candidate-embraces-many-religions
Sánchez-Talanquer, Mariano, and Kenneth Greene. “Latin America’s Shifting Politics: Mexico’s Party System Under Stress”. Journal of Democracy 29, no. 4 (October 2018): 31-42.
Hootsen, Jan-Albert. “Mexican Church Anticipates ‘Cordial’ Relations with Incoming President López Obrador.” America (New York, N.Y.: 1909) 219, no. 3 (2018): 1–3.
Orsi, Peter. “Mexico president opposes bill to end Church-State Separation”, AP NEWS.
Associated Press. (2019) https://apnews.com/article/c39b5a509f4cb63caeff57bd242b316e
Argen, David. “Mexican bishops won’t distribute government morals guide.” The Boston Pilot. (July 2019) https://www.archbalt.org/mexican-bishops-wont-distribute-government-
morals-guide/?print=print
Mariano, Ana Paula. “México – Diputados debaten: Estado laico vs. Asociaciones religiosas.” Diario Jurídico. (December 2019).
Olson, Madeleine. “Blurring the Division Between Church and State in AMLO’s Mexico”
NACLA. (2020) https://nacla.org/news/2020/02/10/Church-and-State-AMLO-Mexico
CNA, Church in Mexico backs bill expanding freedom of religious groups. Catholic News Agency. Catholic News Agency. (2020) https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/43192/church-in-mexico-backs-bill-expanding-freedom-of-religious-groups
Hoffman, Matthew C. Does the Catholic Church owe an apology for the conquest of the New World? The Catholic World Report. (October 2021).
Agren, David. “Vatican official visits Mexico to mark 30 years of diplomatic ties.” NCR:
National Catholic Reporter (April 2022). https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/vatican-official-visits-mexico-mark-30-years- diplomatic-ties
Silva, Walter Sanchez. “Mexican Bishops to country’s President: We’ve done our jobs as Pastors.” CNA: Catholic News Agency (July 2022)
Secondary Sources
Ávila Luis Herrán, “Las Falsas Derechas: Conflict and Convergence in Mexico’s Post-Cristero Right after the Second Vatican Council,” The Americas 79:2 (2022), 321-350.
Blancarte, Roberto J. “Recent Changes in Church-State Relations in Mexico: An Historical
Approach.” J. Church & St. 35 (1993): 781.
Cabrera, Luis. “The Mexican Revolution: Its Causes, Purposes and Results.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 69 (1917): 1–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804613.
Camp, Roderic Ai. “The Cross in the Polling Booth: Religion, Politics, and the Laity in
Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 29, no. 3 (1994): 69–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2503943.
Diaz, Bishop Pascual. “State Vs. Church in Mexico.” The North American Review 225, no. 842 (1928): 401–8.
Kloppe-Santamaría, Gema. “Martyrs, Fanatics, and Pious Militants: Religious Violence and the Secular State in 1930s Mexico,” The Americas 79:2 (2022), 197– 227.
Misra, Amalendu. “My space/Mi espacio: Evangelical Christianity and identity politics in
Mexico.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 31, no. 1 (2012): 65-79.
Swiggett, Glen Levin. “Conflict of Church and State in Mexico.” World Affairs 99, no. 1 (1936): 40-42.
Serrano, Javier Saldana.”The Unnecessary and Restrictive Constitutional Amendments concerning Religious Freedom in Mexico,” Brigham Young University Law Review 2013, no. 3 (2013): 553- 567
Pomerleau, Claude. “The changing church in Mexico and its challenge to the state.” The Review of Politics 43, no. 4 (1981): 540-59.
write