Effective care coordination is essential for managing chronic health conditions such as Diabetes Mellitus (D.M.) (Sapra & Bhandari, 2023). In the context of managing Diabetes Mellitus (D.M.), the preliminary care coordination plan has outlined physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations to address the multifaceted needs of patients. The comprehensive care coordination plan will now design patient-centered health interventions and timelines to effectively manage three key healthcare issues associated with Diabetes: physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations.
Physical Considerations
To optimally address D.M., the patient-centered intervention will focus on regularly monitoring blood glucose levels, adherence to prescribed medications, and consistent follow-up appointments (Adu et al., 2019). This intervention aims to maintain optimal blood glucose levels to prevent hyperglycemia-related complications. Personalized dietary plans will also design blood sugar level control and exercise routines tailored to the individual. The nutritional programs will consider the patient’s preferences, restrictions, and cultural background to ensure their feasibility and adherence.
Practitioners will guide patients to monitor their blood glucose levels daily and maintain a fasting blood sugar level between 80 and 90 mg/dL, with post-meal levels kept below 140 mg/dL (Nakrani et al., 2020). The implementation of this intervention will commence right after diagnosis and will persist throughout the patient’s diabetes management journey. Scheduling regular follow-up appointments will assess progress, adjust treatment plans if necessary, and address any concerns.
The ethical decision to ensure that patients receive regular cardiovascular screenings like electrocardiograms and stress tests addresses the potential cardiovascular risks associated with Diabetes (Araki et al., 2020). While this decision may involve potential financial costs and time commitments, it is imperative to prioritize patients’ well-being and early detection of cardiovascular issues. This decision raises ethical questions about the equitable distribution of resources, as access to cardiovascular screenings may vary based on factors such as insurance coverage and geographic location.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes provisions emphasizing preventive care and wellness services for chronic conditions like Diabetes (Sasank et al. Reddy Reddivari, 2019). This policy provision underscores the importance of regular cardiovascular screenings and encourages the inclusion of such services in care coordination. This policy implication reflects a commitment to proactive healthcare interventions that align with evidence-based practices.
The care coordinator would prioritize discussing the significance of cardiovascular screenings and their role in the early detection of potential cardiovascular issues. Changes to the plan involve adjusting the frequency of screenings based on evidence of optimal timing for risk assessment. Explanation of this change serves as a means to provide timely intervention and prevent complications. Educating patients and their families about the rationale behind the change emphasizes the benefits of early detection and proactive management.
Designing learning sessions on cardiovascular health will align them with the blood pressure and cholesterol control recommendations outlined in Healthy People 2030 (2020). Basing these sessions on evidence-based guidelines and including interactive discussions and practical demonstrations will facilitate knowledge retention. We will inform the content of the learning sessions with the latest research on cardiovascular health to ensure that participants receive accurate and up-to-date information.
Psychosocial Considerations
The psychosocial intervention will involve patient education to impart knowledge on self-care practices, emphasize medication adherence, and enable the recognition of symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Establishing emotional support mechanisms addresses the increased risk of depression and anxiety in individuals with Diabetes (Duinkerken et al., 2019). Patient education sessions will include information on the importance of adhering to medications and monitoring blood glucose levels to prevent complications. Furthermore, we will provide strategies to recognize and manage symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.
Patient education sessions will commence upon diagnosis and continue regularly to reinforce self-care practices. Emotional support mechanisms, such as support groups and counseling, will be accessible to patients throughout their diabetes management journey. Holding monthly support groups allows patients to connect, share experiences, and learn from each other’s coping strategies (Pienaar & Reid, 2021). Counseling sessions will be available as needed to address individual concerns and challenges.
The ethical decision to provide emotional support mechanisms, such as support groups, acknowledges patients’ psychological challenges when managing Diabetes (Hapunda, 2022). This decision recognizes the need to foster emotional well-being and provide a safe space for patients to share their experiences and struggles, promoting a sense of belonging and empowerment. It raises ethical questions about confidentiality and privacy within support groups, as participants may share personal information and sensitive experiences.
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) mandates that insurance plans provide equal coverage for mental health and substance use disorder services (Mojtabai et al., 2020). This policy has implications for addressing the increased risk of depression and anxiety in individuals with Diabetes, ensuring that mental health support is an integral part of the care coordination plan. This policy implication recognizes the interconnectedness of physical and mental health and underscores the importance of holistic care.
The care coordinator would emphasize the importance of joining support groups and attending counseling sessions to address the psychological challenges of managing Diabetes. Changes to the plan may involve incorporating new coping strategies based on the latest evidence in managing stress and anxiety. Communicating the rationale for these changes enhances emotional well-being. Patients and their families will be informed about the evolving nature of psychological support, emphasizing the incorporation of evidence-based strategies to improve coping and emotional resilience.
We will assess educational sessions on stress management and emotional well-being by comparing them with best practices from the literature on mental health interventions. These sessions will incorporate evidence-based coping strategies and will provide participants with tools to manage the psychological challenges of Diabetes effectively. The learning sessions will promote active engagement and skill-building, empowering participants to apply evidence-based strategies daily.
Cultural Considerations
Cultural considerations will entail crafting personalized nutrition plans that align with the patient’s dietary preferences and restrictions. Furthermore, educational materials will be provided in the patient’s preferred language to overcome potential language barriers. Emphasizing sensitivity to cultural stigma involves culturally sensitive communication and support (Alaofè et al., 2021). Nutrition plans will incorporate culturally familiar and acceptable foods for the patient while promoting healthy eating habits. Translating educational materials into the patient’s preferred language ensures comprehension and engagement.
We will incorporate cultural considerations into the care coordination plan and consistently maintain them throughout the patient’s diabetes management. Educational materials will be provided at the initial diagnosis and follow-up appointments to ensure patients can access essential information in their preferred language. Cultural sensitivity training for healthcare providers will also be ongoing to promote respectful and effective communication.
The ethical decision to offer educational materials in the patient’s preferred language aligns with the principle of cultural competence and patient-centered care (Stubbe, 2020). By addressing language barriers, patients can fully comprehend and actively participate in their care, ensuring their autonomy and understanding of the diabetes management plan (Dineen-Griffin et al., 2019). This decision raises ethical questions about the adequacy of translated materials and the responsibility to provide accurate and culturally sensitive information.
The Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) Standards by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services emphasize the importance of providing care that is respectful of and responsive to cultural and linguistic needs (Handtke et al., 2019). This policy underscores the ethical decision to offer educational materials in the patient’s preferred language and culturally sensitive communication. Additionally, the policy implication reflects a commitment to reducing health disparities and promoting equitable access to care.
The care coordinator would prioritize discussing the provision of educational materials in the patient’s preferred language and the significance of cultural sensitivity. Changes to the plan involve tailoring educational materials to align with cultural norms and beliefs. Clarifying the need for these changes ensures that the patient fully comprehends and engages with the care plan. Patients and their families will be engaged in discussions about cultural considerations, highlighting the importance of personalized care that respects individual values and preferences.
We will integrate cultural competence training for healthcare providers into the learning sessions to ensure that providers are equipped to deliver care that respects patients’ cultural beliefs and practices (Dragomanovich & Shubrook, 2021). Best practices from the literature on cultural competence will inform the content and delivery of these sessions. The learning sessions will emphasize the importance of cultural awareness, sensitivity, and humility, encouraging participants to adopt practices that enhance patient-centered care.
Conclusion
In summary, this comprehensive care coordination plan builds upon the preliminary plan by designing patient-centered interventions, considering ethical decisions, identifying relevant health policy implications, describing priorities for patient discussions, and aligning teaching sessions with best practices. By adhering to evidence-based guidelines and focusing on patient needs, this plan aims to provide holistic and effective care for individuals with Diabetes Mellitus.
References
Adu, M. D., Malabu, U. H., Malau-Aduli, A. E. O., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2019). Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation. PLOS ONE, 14(6), e0217771. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217771
Alaofè, H., Yeo, S., Okechukwu, A., Magrath, P., Amoussa Hounkpatin, W., Ehiri, J., & Rosales, C. (2021). Cultural Considerations for the Adaptation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education Program in Cotonou, Benin: Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168376
Araki, E., Tanaka, A., Inagaki, N., Ito, H., Ueki, K., Toyoaki Murohara, Imai, K., Sata, M., Sugiyama, T., Ishii, H., Yamane, S., Kadowaki, T., Issei Komuro, & Koichi Node. (2020). Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases in people with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a consensus statement jointly from the Japanese Circulation Society and the Japan Diabetes Society. Diabetology International, 12(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-020-00471-5
Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019). Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of primary health care practice self-management support strategies. PLOS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220116
Dragomanovich, H. M., & Shubrook, J. H. (2021). Improving Cultural Humility and Competency in Diabetes Care for Primary Care Providers. Clinical Diabetes, cd200063. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-0063
Duinkerken, E., Snoek, F. J., & Wit, M. (2019). The cognitive and psychological effects of living with type 1 diabetes: a narrative review. Diabetic Medicine, 37(4), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14216
Handtke, O., Schilgen, B., & Mösko, M. (2019). Culturally competent healthcare – A scoping review of strategies implemented in healthcare organizations and a model of culturally competent healthcare provision. PLOS ONE, 14(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219971
Hapunda, G. (2022). Coping strategies and their association with Diabetes specific distress, depression and Diabetes self-care among people living with Diabetes in Zambia. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01131-2
Healthy People 2030. (2020). Heart disease and stroke – healthy people 2030 | health.gov. Health.gov. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/heart-disease-and-stroke
Mojtabai, R., Mauro, C., Wall, M. M., Barry, C. L., & Olfson, M. (2020). Private health insurance coverage of drug use disorder treatment: 2005–2018. PLoS ONE, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240298
Nakrani, M. N., Wineland, R. H., & Anjum, F. (2020, July 25). Physiology, Glucose Metabolism. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560599/
Pienaar, M. A., & Reid, M. (2021). A diabetes peer support intervention: Patient experiences using the Mmogo-method®. Health SA Gesondheid, 26. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1512
Sapra, A., & Bhandari, P. (2023, May 29). Diabetes Mellitus. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551501/
Sasank Isola, & Anil Kumar Reddy Reddivari. (2019, November 13). Affordable Care Act (ACA). Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549767/
Stubbe, D. E. (2020). Practicing Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility in the Care of Diverse Patients. FOCUS, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20190041
write