The concept of race has undergone a significant transformation in recent times, challenging its traditional understanding as a biological category. Instead, race is now widely recognized as a social construct influenced by historical, cultural, and societal factors. This essay critically evaluates two key perspectives: race as a social kind and race as phenomenological. The former asserts that race is a product of social construction, shaped by cultural norms and historical processes. In contrast, the latter views race as a product of individuals’ interactions with others, systems and society. By examining the convincing aspects and potential limitations of these viewpoints, we can deepen our understanding of race and its implications for human biological diversity.
Race as a social kind is a perspective that emphasizes the social construction of racial categories. According to Sundstrom (2002), this perspective claims that race is not an inherently biological reality but a product of societal norms, cultural beliefs, and historical processes. This understanding of race as a social kind is based on a metaphysical pluralist ontology that allows for the reality of both naturally occurring and constructed kinds and recognizes the importance of different ontologies for different domains of science and knowledge (Sundstrom, 2002). Additionally, racial distinctions are not objective and fixed but contingent upon social and cultural contexts. The characteristics attributed to different racial groups are socially constructed and subject to change over time.
The development of race as a social kind can be traced back to the colonial era, when the categorization of people into distinct racial groups served to justify systems of power and oppression (Glasgow, 2010). Racial classifications were used to justify slavery, colonization, and discriminatory policies. These historical processes solidified the notion that race is a significant social category, influencing individuals’ lives and shaping societal structures. The implications of race as a social kind are far-reaching. Racial categories influence various aspects of life, including education, employment, healthcare, and criminal justice. McPherson (2015) states that individuals are often assigned social meanings and stereotypes based on their perceived racial identity, which can impact their opportunities, experiences, and interactions within society.
Supporters of race as a social kind highlight several key arguments. Firstly, they emphasize that racial categories vary across different societies and cultures, highlighting the constructed nature of race (Carbado & Rothmayr, 2014). This perspective contends that racial boundaries and definitions are fluid and subject to social and historical dynamics. Additionally, proponents of race as a social kind argue that racial identities are heavily influenced by social interactions, cultural beliefs, and institutional practices. Racial classifications shape individuals’ sense of self and group belonging, influencing their experiences, identities, and opportunities. They emphasize that race is not merely an individual attribute but a social identity that carries collective meanings and experiences (Andreasen, 2000).
Furthermore, proponents of race as a social kind argue that racial categories are not fixed or inherent but are constructed and defined within specific social and historical contexts. Sundstrom (2002) argues that different societies have developed their own systems of racial classification, often through the influence of factors such as colonialism, migration, and cultural interactions. This, therefore, suggests that race is a product of human social imagination and cultural interpretation rather than a biologically determined characteristic.
Finally, Carbado and Roithmayr (2014) insist on the emphasis placed by this perspective on the role of cultural and social factors in shaping individuals’ racial identities. The development of one’s racial identity is influenced by cultural norms, traditions, language, and social practices. How an individual perceives and experiences their racial association can be shaped by these factors. For instance, how one may adopt cultural practices or behaviours attributed to their perceived race is a demonstration of the impact that societal and cultural dynamics have on moulding our sense of racial belonging.
In spite of the numerous arguments proposed in favour of the perspective, critics of race as a social kind raise several counterarguments and limitations. M’charek (2013) contends that although race is socially constructed, it cannot be completely separated from biology. Throughout history, human populations have developed heritable variations in response to diverse habitats and selective forces. These genetic dissimilarities are frequently coupled with physical attributes such as skin pigment or the vulnerability to certain health conditions. Hence, considering race exclusively a social construction might result in overlooking the biological genuineness of wide-ranging genetic diversity within humans. Additionally, because categorizations based on race are arbitrary and subjective, overcoming inequality amongst races can be problematic. Without clear boundaries or definitions, it becomes difficult to accurately measure and monitor disparities or design effective policies to address them.
Moreover, the perspective of race as a social kind can inadvertently reinforce essentialist thinking and the reification of racial categories. By emphasizing the socially constructed nature of race, there is a risk of downplaying or disregarding the lived experiences and struggles faced by individuals based on their racial identities (Marks, 2017). The focus on social construction can lead to the perception that race is purely a matter of perception and imagination, potentially undermining efforts to address systemic racism and racial inequalities. Striking a balance between understanding race as a social construct and recognizing the biological and lived realities can provide a more comprehensive understanding of race and its implications.
On the other hand, in addressing the different perspectives regarding the definition of race, the concept of race as phenomenological comes to light. According to Lee (2014), the perspective of race as phenomenological emphasizes the subjective and lived experiences of individuals within racialized contexts. It emphasizes the role of race in defining one’s self-perception, identity formation, and interactions with the social world. This viewpoint acknowledges that race is a lived reality that shapes people’s everyday experiences as well as their sense of inclusion or exclusion.
Race as phenomenological highlights the embodiment of race, emphasizing how racial identities are inscribed on individuals’ bodies and shape their experiences in society (Lee, 2014). Racialized experiences include encounters with racism, discrimination, and microaggressions, which can have profound impacts on individuals’ self-esteem, mental health, and overall well-being. The phenomenological perspective recognizes that race is not solely a social construct but a deeply embodied and felt phenomenon.
Furthermore, the idea that race is phenomenological is a critical aspect which lies in the acknowledgement of intersectionality. Velez and Spencer (2018) observe that this understanding highlights how race connects with other identity dimensions, namely gender, class, and sexuality, to shape people’s experiences. This viewpoint comprehends that a person’s experience of race is contingent on multiple social structures and hierarchical systems operating simultaneously. It recognizes that individuals can hold intersecting identities and face unique challenges and privileges based on the interplay of these categories.
Supporters of race as phenomenological argue that it promotes empathy and perspective-taking by acknowledging and centring the lived experiences of marginalized racial groups. By recognizing the subjective experiences of individuals within racialized contexts, it encourages empathy, understanding, and solidarity across different racial groups (Koonce, 2012). This perspective challenges the dominant narratives and fosters a deeper appreciation for the diverse ways in which race is experienced.
Additionally, supporters of the concept recognize how the phenomenological perspective recognizes that individuals have subjective agency in shaping their racial identities and experiences. Ngo (2016) argues that it emphasizes that individuals actively engage with and respond to their racialized contexts, exercising agency in navigating and challenging systems of oppression. This perspective highlights the resilience, resistance, and transformative potential of individuals within racialized communities, as they navigate and contest racial inequalities and discrimination.
Despite the various positive elements of the perspective highlighted above, a number of critics have proposed arguments in opposition. Robinson-Wood et al. (2015) raise concerns about potential essentialism and individualism. They argue that while it is crucial to acknowledge and validate individual experiences, there is a risk of assuming that all individuals within a particular racial group share the same lived realities. As such, they state that this approach may overlook the diversity and heterogeneity within racial groups and reinforce stereotypes or generalizations.
Additionally, some critics contend that a purely phenomenological approach may overlook the historical and collective aspects of race. Moreover, critics argue that a purely phenomenological approach may inadvertently reinforce a colour-blind perspective, as it focuses primarily on individual experiences without critically examining the structural power dynamics and disparities based on race (Giwa & Greensmith, 2012). By focusing solely on individual experiences, there is a risk of neglecting the broader social, historical, and political contexts that shape racial dynamics. They conclude by stating that a comprehensive understanding of race should consider both the individual experiences and the larger structural forces at play.
The social constructionist perspective emphasizes the role of cultural and social factors in shaping racial identity. It acknowledges that race is not solely determined by biological traits but is influenced by language, customs, and societal norms (Sundstrom, 2002). This recognition highlights the complexity of racial identities and challenges the notion that race is a fixed and inherent characteristic. Moreover, understanding race as a social kind encourages a critical examination of the ways in which power dynamics, historical events, and social institutions contribute to the construction and maintenance of racial categories.
The phenomenological viewpoint acknowledges that individuals’ encounters with race are deeply rooted in their unique perspectives, histories, and interactions with others. This perspective highlights the importance of acknowledging and validating individuals’ lived experiences of race, which can contribute to a greater understanding of the complexities and nuances of racial identity (Velez & Spencer, 2018).
In addition, it highlights the importance of intersectionality to understand these experiences better. It recognizes that individuals’ experiences of race are influenced by other social factors, such as gender, class, sexuality, and ability. Henceforth this approach offers more depth and complexity to our comprehension of these occurrences while also recognizing the ways by which multiple different elements that makeup identity interact with one another.
The perspectives of race as a social kind and race as phenomenological share several similarities in their approach to understanding race and racial identity. While they may have distinct emphases, both perspectives contribute to a broader understanding of the complex nature of race as a social construct. One similarity is that both perspectives acknowledge the influence of social factors in shaping racial identity. They recognize that race is not solely determined by biological traits but is deeply intertwined with social, cultural, and historical factors. Second, both perspectives recognize that racial identity is fluid and subjective, shaped by individuals’ lived experiences and personal interpretations.
Additionally, both perspectives consider the intersectionality of race with other social factors. They recognize that individuals’ experiences of race are influenced by factors such as gender, class, sexuality, and ability. Both concepts also challenge essentialist views of race that posit it as a fixed and inherent characteristic. They reject the idea that race is solely determined by biological or genetic factors. Instead, they emphasize the social and contextual construction of race, highlighting the malleability and variability of racial identities.
Alternatively, the two perspectives have distinct differences. For instance, while race as a social kind focuses on the social and cultural factors that contribute to the construction and maintenance of racial categories, the perspective of race as phenomenological centres on the lived experiences and subjective perceptions of individuals in relation to their racial identity (Lee, 2014). In addition, while the social kind perspective provides a broader analysis of the social and structural aspects of race, the phenomenological perspective adds depth and richness to our understanding by centring on the individual’s unique experiences and perspectives.
In conclusion, the evaluation of race as a social kind and race as phenomenological provides valuable insights into the complex nature of race. Both perspectives contribute to our understanding of race, but they also have their limitations. The social kind perspective may overlook the challenges of defining clear boundaries for racial categories. Similarly, the phenomenological perspective runs the risk of overemphasizing individual experiences and neglecting structural factors that perpetuate racial inequalities. Moving forward, further research and dialogue on race should continue to explore these perspectives and their implications for understanding human biological diversity.
References
Andreasen, R. O. (2000). Race: Biological reality or social construct? Philosophy of Science, 67(S3), S653-S666.
Carbado, D. W., & Roithmayr, D. (2014). Critical race theory meets social science. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 149-167.
Giwa, S., & Greensmith, C. (2012). Race relations and racism in the LGBTQ community of Toronto: Perceptions of gay and queer social service providers of colour. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(2), 149-185.
Glasgow, J. (2010). A theory of race. Routledge.
Haslanger, S. (2014). Race, intersectionality, and method: a reply to critics. Philosophical Studies, 171(1), 109-119.
Koonce, J. B. (2012). Oh, those loud Black girls!” A phenomenological study of Black girls talking with an attitude. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(2), 26-46.
Lee, E. S. (Ed.). (2014). Living alterities: Phenomenology, embodiment, and race. Suny Press.
Marks, J. (2017). Human biodiversity: Genes, race, and history. Routledge.
M’charek, A. (2013). Beyond fact or fiction: On the materiality of race in practice. Cultural anthropology, 28(3), 420-442.
McPherson, L. K. (2015). Deflating ‘race’. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(4), 674-693.
Ngo, H. (2016). Racist habits: A phenomenological analysis of racism and the habitual body. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(9), 847-872.
Robinson-Wood, T., Balogun-Mwangi, O., Fernandes, C., Popat-Jain, A., Boadi, N., Matsumoto, A., & Zhang, X. (2015). Worse than Blatant Racism: A phenomenological investigation of microaggressions among black women. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 9(3).
Sundstrom, R. R. (2002). Race as a humankind. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 28(1), 91-115.
Velez, G., & Spencer, M. B. (2018). Phenomenology and intersectionality: Using PVEST as a frame for adolescent identity formation amid intersecting ecological systems of inequality. New Directions for Child and adolescent development, 2018(161), 75-90.
write