Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

The Purpose of the Meeting, Key Participants, Key Agenda Items, and Meeting Logistics

The Senate Finance Committee heard UNOS and organ donation and transplant problems. According to the report, testing, shipping, and communication issues caused fatalities and useless organs. The Committee noted that UNOS has managed the organ donation and transplant system for many years with no other bids. The Committee found startling allegations, including mislabeled organs, failed testing, and delayed communication. One in four kidneys is wasted annually, killing thousands of Americans waiting for transplants. The witnesses at the hearing included Brian Shepard, CEO of UNOS, who defended the organization’s mission and efforts to improve the system, health care providers, an organ transplant patient, and an advocate. Other witnesses, such as transplant organization CEO Diane Brockmeier, highlighted worries about UNOS’s lack of urgency and responsibility, inadequate technology, and insufficient organ donor screening (C-SPAN, 2023). A transplant institution executive director, Barry Friedman, voiced concerns about UNOS policy-making openness, organ waste rates, and conflicts of interest. Calvin Henry, a lung transplant recipient, and patient advocate, stressed openness and improvements in organ procurement and transplantation. The Senate Finance Committee indicated bipartisan support for system change, making UNOS responsible for patient deaths and outcomes. The hearing highlighted significant organ donation and transplant system deficiencies and asked for changes to guarantee patient safety and fair access to life-saving organs.

Background information and a description of the committee

The Senate Finance Committee oversees tax, revenue, and expenditure bills. The Senate’s oldest and most potent committee was founded in 1815. The committee oversees finance, taxes, commerce, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and other government entitlement programs. The Senate Finance Committee drafts, amends, and votes on fiscal and economic measures. It works closely with the House Ways and Means Committee, which has comparable fiscal responsibilities in the House (C-SPAN, 2023). These committees affect the nation’s finances and economy. The majority party dominates the committee. The committee usually has 26 members and matches the Senate’s party composition. The committee chairman—often a prominent majority party member—sets the agenda and legislative goals. The Senate Finance Committee investigates, holds hearings, and analyzes government agencies and programs for efficiency, effectiveness, and compliance with laws and regulations. This committee may seek information and reports from government agencies, industry experts, and stakeholders to inform policy choices. The Senate Finance Committee’s organ donation and transplant hearing shows its commitment to solving crucial healthcare challenges. This hearing reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and its monitoring of organ transplantation, revealing patient safety, organ waste, and technical inefficiencies. The group identifies issues and proposes legislative changes to enhance the organ donation and transplant system.

One specific topic that was discussed at the meeting and an explanation of the committee process

The Senate Finance Committee convened a hearing on U.S. organ donation and transplant concerns. The hearing focused on United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), which manages the organ donation and transplant system. The committee found testing, shipping, and communication mistakes that caused fatalities and useless organs. The hearing included UNOS CEO Brian Shepard, healthcare practitioners, and an organ transplant patient and advocate. Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Wyden highlighted system mismanagement and ineptitude. Reform was needed to enhance patient safety and organ transplant success.

The hearing addressed many significant issues:

  • Failures in Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs): OPOs, which procure and transport organs, made many mistakes and were unaccountable. OPOs were accused of blood type mismatching, missing flights, abandoned organs at airports, and delayed patient health situations (C-SPAN, 2023).
  • Obsolete and Insecure IT System: UNOS was condemned for utilizing obsolete and inefficient IT systems. Unreliable technology delayed organ placements, missed life-saving transplants, and raised organ waste rates (C-SPAN, 2023).
  • Lack of Transparency and Accountability: UNOS was criticized for its policy-making process and conflicts of interest. Board members felt compelled to side with UNOS leadership, suppressing dissent.
  • Organ Discard Rates: One in four kidneys from dead donors were discarded, wasting organs and missing life-saving prospects (C-SPAN, 2023).

Witnesses and senators demanded immediate measures to address these challenges and enhance organ donation and transplantation. Transparency, accountability, and contemporary technology were highlighted to save more lives and minimize transplant wait times.

An analysis of the key stakeholder positions related to the topic discussed

The Senate Finance Committee hearing on organ donation and transplants included significant organ transplantation stakeholders. UNOS CEO Brian Shepard defended UNOS’s objective to enhance the national organ transplant system. He noted that the method had saved lives but needed improvement. However, Diane Brockmeier, CEO of a regional organ procurement organization (OPO), voiced concerns about patient safety and urgent reform. She questioned UNOS’s lack of urgency, responsibility, and openness in organ loss and transportation. A transplant institute executive director, Barry Friedman, questioned UNOS’s technology and decision-making process, advocating for more openness and patient advocacy. Calvin Henry, a transplant recipient and patient advocate, advocated for openness and efficiency in organ donation and transplantation. Stakeholders have mixed opinions on UNOS and the organ transplantation system, underlining the need for changes and accountability.

Key interactions that occurred at the meeting

Several significant stakeholder interactions during the Senate Finance Committee hearing on organ donation and transplantation highlighted the system’s intricacies and problems.

Shepard vs. Brockmeier: UNOS CEO Brian Shepard and OPO CEO Diane Brockmeier sparred over organ placement responsibility and transparency. Shepard defended UNOS’s oversight and noted transplant increases. Brockmeier, however, voiced worries regarding patient safety and organs being lost or not collected owing to inefficiencies. This conversation highlighted the need for stronger UNOS-OPO communication and collaboration to improve organ placement efficiency and transparency (C-SPAN, 2023).

Barry Friedman’s data request: Transplant centers’ Barry Friedman sought organ placement data to reduce inefficiencies. Real-time data would help transplant clinics make better judgments and prevent organ waste. This proposal spurred talks regarding data management and how better stakeholder data sharing may enhance the system (C-SPAN, 2023).

Calvin Henry’s testimony: Calvin Henry, a transplant patient, and advocate, discussed his experience and stressed the necessity of patient perspectives in organ transplant talks. His comments humanized the discussion and reminded stakeholders that their actions affect patients and their families. This meeting reminded me to emphasize patient needs and safety in system changes and enhancements (C-SPAN, 2023).

Committee chairs Chuck Grassley and Ron Wyden asked all stakeholders essential questions. They asked about individual organ discards, patient outcomes, and solutions. Stakeholders in the organ transplant system were held responsible by senators.

Potential reforms: The group discussed improving organ donation and transplant systems. These included data exchange, accountability, and patient-centricity. Stakeholder discussions on these reform initiatives revealed their feasibility and effect v.

The Senate Finance Committee hearing saw stakeholders engage in intense debates and meaningful reform talks. These encounters showed the complexity of the organ transplant system and the need for teamwork, openness, and patient-centered decision-making to enhance outcomes for transplant patients (C-SPAN, 2023).

Outcomes of the meeting, including the specific topic focus

The Senate Finance Committee’s organ donation and transplant conference had significant results. The seminar highlighted organ transplant system issues such as organ location, accountability, and patient safety. Specifically, the meeting resulted in:

  • Awareness: The gathering raised awareness among legislators and the public about the urgent need for organ donation and transplant changes.
  • Stakeholders agreed that UNOS, OPOs, and transplant facilities should share more data. Real-time data would optimize organ distribution and reduce waste.
  • Focus on patient-centered approaches: A patient advocate’s testimony stressed the importance of patient viewpoints in decision-making, pushing stakeholders to seek more patient-centric initiatives (C-SPAN, 2023).
  • Accountability: The forum called for more accountability and transparency in the organ transplant system to keep all parties accountable.

The gathering was a first step toward improvements that might improve organ donation and transplantation and save more lives.


In conclusion, the Senate Finance Committee discussion on organ donation and transplantation helped highlight organ transplant system difficulties. Key parties discussed and testified that organ distribution, efficiency, and patient safety needed significant revisions. The conference agreed on data sharing, patient-centered care, and system accountability. The forum encouraged stakeholder engagement and open communication to improve organ transplantation and save more lives. Policymakers must use these lessons to improve organ donation and transplantation.


C-SPAN. (2023). Senate Hearing on Organ Donation and Transplants |


Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics