Introduction
Multinational corporations (MNC) involvement in the economic development of host countries is a dynamic and controversial issue (Itu and Atiye, 2023). It illustrates the complex interaction between corporate roles and the growth of the hosts. One organization that demonstrates this association is Shell, a global energy giant in Nigeria. Shell’s presence in Nigeria has been around for decades and has dramatically changed the course of the country’s economy. The company’s role in the Nigerian oil sector has been a source of economic growth (Onwurah, 2023). However, it has passed multiple criticisms. On the positive side, the study highlights a case of monetary stimulus, technology transfer, and employment, which has positioned Nigeria as an important player in the global energy landscape. However, the issues of environmental degradation, social tensions, and accusations of unethical practices cast a shadow over the consequences of Shell’s involvement.
The essay draws upon theories of global governance, power dynamics, and the taxonomy of power to scrutinize how Shell’s actions in Nigeria intersect with political, economic, and societal dimensions. It further explores the strategies MNCs employ in engaging with non-market activities, analyzing Shell’s initiatives in the context of political, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and stakeholder engagement strategies. Additionally, the examination of the effects of corporate power on development in host states emphasizes the relationships between economic interests, political influence, and societal well-being.
As the paper explores the complexities of Shell’s involvement in Nigeria, it aims to provide a broader understanding of how MNCs affect host countries while considering the positive contributions to growth and the negative consequences requiring attention and development.
The Impact of Multinational Corporations on Economic Development
The presence of MNCs in the global economy has raised questions about whether their presence in host countries enhances or undermines prospects for economic development (Onwurah, 2023). Shell’s involvement in Nigeria is a good example that shows both the positive and negative sides of MNC influence on a host country’s financial path. Notably, MNCs have the potential to stimulate economic development in host countries through various means. They bring foreign direct investment (FDI), introduce advanced technologies, and create employment opportunities, as Ezeani (2023) says. For instance, the entry of Shell into Nigeria during the 1950s was a major turning point in the country’s oil industry. The company’s expertise in oil exploration and production contributed to the growth of Nigeria’s petroleum sector, making it one of the key players in the global energy market.
Shell’s infrastructure and technology transfer involvement also improved Nigeria’s economic stature. However, constructing pipelines, refineries, and other facilities did not just enhance the country’s energy infrastructure; it created a ripple effect by stimulating complementary industries (Turner, 2023). The Shell operations in Nigeria thus faced numerous challenges because of some factors that threatened them. Alternatively, the operations of multinational firms may adversely impact the host nations’ economic advancement if not properly managed. One such issue relates to the “resource curse” phenomenon whereby oil-rich countries often face financial mismanagement and political instability, as Adeleke et al. (2023) highlight. For instance, Shell’s activities in Nigeria have been characterized by the same challenges.
Environmental degradation and social issues are among the most criticized elements concerning Shell’s activities in Nigeria (Abimbola and Dele, 2015). The company has reported allegations about oil spills, gas flaring, and pollution, which puts local ecosystems and the lives of individuals who depend on agriculture and fishing at risk, as Adimbola and Dele (2015) further say. Additionally, these environmental challenges disrupt the immediate surroundings and broadly hinder economic growth by undermining different industries that can perpetuate poverty in affected areas.
As initially stated, accusations of corruption and unethical practices have further contributed to a poor relationship between Shell and the Nigerian government (Isaac et al., 2020). In Nigeria, there has been an instance of a resource curse through mismanagement of oil revenues because some politicians, instead of using such funds for development purposes, have pocketed them. As a result, this misuse of resources has limited potential positive impacts on Nigeria’s economic development, which would be possible if MNCs like Shell were involved. Apart from ecological and managerial concerns, Shaqiri, Mehmeti, and Ceku (2019) say MNCs can also increase income disparities within host countries. However, the employment opportunities they create often serve to widen the gap between rich and poor, leaving only a few privileged members of society while most people are left out. For this reason, Shell’s activities in Nigeria have attracted criticism for their role in inequality, such as an inadequate local workforce and biased revenue allocation.
Theories of Global Governance
Global governance, as a concept, involves the overseeing of international matters through institutions, norms, and processes concerned with their coordination (Mashima, 2024). Theories of global governance define modalities to look at, measure, or evaluate some international acts being taken by actors, such as MNCs, in activities that involve them globally.
Liberal Institutionalism
Liberal institutionalism argues that international institutions significantly shape state behavior (Koening-Archibugi, 2019). The theory of institutions implies that in the case of MNCs, liberal bodies can function as mechanisms to govern and direct corporate behavior globally. Empowerment and Constructive Social Initiatives Organisations like the United Nations (UN) continue to be viewed as opportunities that enable them to promote responsible business practices feasible for the parties involved, as Rodgers et al. (2019) say. Regarding Shell in Nigeria, a theory of liberal institutionalism would mean that global governance should have sufficiently regulated the company’s operations to ensure environmental viability, social responsibility, and ethical standards. However, the truth has been the opposite, with evidence of environmental degradation, social conflicts, and difficulties in governance indicating possible weaknesses among international institutions to help control MNCs’ behaviors.
Marxist Approaches
Marxist theories of global governance focus on the importance of economic structures and power relations in influencing international matters (Kochhar, 2018). Some critics argue that multinational corporations exploit weaker nations and contribute to global inequality in their quest for profitability. Considering the case of Shell in Nigeria, a Marxist view would concentrate on resource exploitation, income inequality, and the perpetuation of dependency relationships.
Shell’s business activities in Nigeria have been criticized for causing social and economic imbalance (Kamasak, James, and Yavuz, 2019). In the case of oil resources’ extraction has been linked with a “resource curse,” where funds obtained from natural wealth do not translate to comprehensive economic policing. Instead, it often serves a few elites while fostering social strife and wealth disparities.
Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs)
TANs are trans-border coalitions of NGOs, activists, and other stakeholders acting unison to affect global governance (Koenig-Archibugi, 2019). They focus on human rights, environmental sustainability, and corporate responsibility, advocating for norms and regulations that hold MNCs accountable. In the case of Shell in Nigeria, TANs have been very significant to knowledge campaigns regarding environmental destruction and human rights abuses related to the operations of this company (Lynn, Rosati, and Murphy, 2021). TANs use public opinion and international pressure to influence global governance mechanisms, centering on civil society’s role in ensuring MNCs are accountable for their behavior.
As was initially highlighted, Shell has helped Nigeria’s economy grow due to employment, development in infrastructure, and foreign direct investment. From a liberal institutionalist perspective, this company’s operations align with the argument that proper “business is good” (Kamasak, James, and Yavuz, 2019). It can help foster economic development through effective global governance. Also, Shell’s operations have enabled the transfer of modern technologies, thus increasing Nigeria’s ability to run and manage the oil industry effectively (Hernández Guzmán and Hernández García de Velazco, 2024); this is in line with liberal institutionalism, in which multinational corporations positively influence the transfer of knowledge and skills to host countries, thus helping accumulate human capital.
Contrastingly, the negative environmental impact of Shell’s operations in Nigeria, including oil spills and gas flaring, raises questions about the effectiveness of global governance mechanisms in regulating MNC conduct (Lynn, Rosati, and Murphy, 2021). Despite international norms and agreements, the company’s activities have led to significant environmental degradation, challenging the efficacy of liberal institutionalism in handling ecological practices.
Social tensions, disputes over land use, and accusations of inadequate community engagement have accompanied Shell’s involvement in Nigeria. The governance challenges, including allegations of corruption and unethical practices, underscore the limitations of global governance mechanisms in ensuring responsible corporate behavior (Dan and Yan, 2024). Marxist perspectives highlight the role of economic structures in perpetuating inequalities, as evidenced by the “resource curse.” TANs have played a role in shedding light on the human rights violations linked to Shell’s activities in Nigeria; this emphasizes the significance of society and transnational advocacy in shaping governance (Mashima, 2024). Even the persistent existence of these problems raises doubts regarding the ability of TANs and international institutions to hold corporations accountable for their actions effectively.
Corporate Engagement in Non-Market Activities
Outside market activities include the interactions between companies and external entities, like governments, NGOs, and society (Shaqiri, Mehmeti, and Ceku, 2019). Companies implement strategies beyond the market to navigate regulations, address issues, and establish relationships beyond typical market dynamics.
Political Strategies
Many corporations utilize strategies to exert their influence and mold the landscape; this entails engaging with bodies to advocate for policies that align with their interests (Abimbola and Dele, 2015). Shell has been involved in discussions with the government regarding regulations and economic agreements. Throughout the years, the company has skillfully maneuvered through the environment to ensure conditions for its operations (Mclntyre, Shephard, and Waganer, 2021). However, this engagement has faced criticism due to accusations of exerting influence and an unequal distribution of benefits within Nigeria’s oil industry.
Partnership and Collaborations
Developing partnerships and fostering collaborations with market entities such as NGOs and civil society organizations is a proactive approach to tackling social and environmental issues (Kushi and McManus, 2018). Shell has partnered with various stakeholders in Nigeria, including NGOs and local organizations, to address social and ecological concerns. For instance, the Global Memorandum of Understanding (GMoU) in the Niger Delta region represents a collaborative effort between Shell, local communities, and NGOs to promote community development (Flaig, Kindström, and Ottosson, 2021). While these initiatives aim to address certain concerns, they have also faced skepticism and criticism for not fully addressing the root causes of community grievances.
Corporate Social Responsibility
CSR is an approach companies adopt to participate actively in areas beyond the market, demonstrating their dedication to practices and concerns related to society and the environment (Lynn, Rosati, and Murphy, 2021). Shell’s CSR projects in Nigeria encompass network improvement tasks, training, and health packages. These tasks illustrate a commitment to social and environmental duty (Rodgers et al., 2019). However, critics argue that CSR efforts can now and then function as mere public family members’ sporting events, diverting attention from the wider social and environmental demanding situations related to the corporation’s operations.
Stakeholder Engagement and Dialogue
Effective engagement with stakeholders, such as local communities and civil society, is important for organizations operating in non-marketplace environments. Stakeholder engagement is an integral part of Shell’s technique in Nigeria (Kochhar, 2018). The organization continuously communicates with local groups, governmental bodies, and civil society agencies to resolve issues and locate solutions. However, the effectiveness of these engagements has been questioned, with a few communities feeling that their problems need to be correctly addressed, leading to tensions and conflicts.
Transparency and Disclosure
Corporations often undertake transparency and disclosure to build trust and exhibit duty (Kamasak, James, and Yavuz, 2019). Transparency has been a contentious difficulty for Shell in Nigeria. The organization has faced criticism for not needing to be more transparent on environmental impact tests, revenue bills, and important statistics. Significantly, improved transparency should build trust with the government and civil society, demonstrating a commitment to openness and accountability.
Litigation and Legal Strategies
Corporations might also lodge felony strategies to navigate disputes and demanding situations arising from non-marketplace issues (Dan and Yan, 2024). Shell has encountered criminal challenges in Nigeria, including proceedings related to environmental damage and human rights abuses. Legal techniques have been employed to navigate these challenges, as Dan and Yan (2024) further highlight. However, the results have varied. Legal court cases frequently draw interest to corporate domains’ wider ethical and social implications, impacting the organization’s recognition.
Shaping Policy and Market Outcomes
The dynamics between groups, states, worldwide corporations, and civil society play a pivotal role in shaping rules and market results (Mashima, 2024). Understanding power associations within this framework calls for exploring the taxonomy of power, which entails examining how entities exert influence and control over resolution formulation techniques.
Corporations
Companies, especially multinationals like Shell, have enormous economic power. Their influence generally comes from economic strength, technological power, and market dominance (Koenig-Archibugi, 2019). In the case of Shell in Nigeria, corporate financial power can determine policy and market outcomes. The economic advantage affecting regulatory framework and monetary policy in negotiations with the Nigerian government can influence policy decisions as it involves the impact of taxes, resource-sharing agreements, and environmental regulations. According to Barnett and Duvall (2005), remunerative power enables firms to be policymakers and decision-makers. Thus, Shell’s involvement in Nigeria shows how financial resources can translate into impact, shaping oil and gas industry policies.
States
States wield political power and use legal frameworks, laws, and government institutions to influence policy and market outcomes (Kushi and McManus, 2018). In the case of Shell in Nigeria, the Nigerian government has considerable political power and regulates the oil industry through policies and agreements. However, the balance of power is complex, as the economic importance of oil revenues can create a dependency that affects the government’s ability to plan effectively, as Doris and MI (2018) say. Importantly, political power enables states to enact laws and regulations, but economic dependence on oil revenues can affect the government’s ability to assert control over corporations.
International Organizations
International institutions, such as the United Nations and the World Bank, exercise formal and sometimes constitutional power worldwide. They set standards, guidelines, and expectations that affect public and corporate behavior (Mclntyre, Shephard, and Wagner, 2021). For Nigerian Shell, compliance with international environmental and human rights standards can be a source of pressure and potential obstacles. Importantly, normative power enables multinational organizations to shape the behavior of both states and corporations by establishing global standards and expectations.
Public Association
The public includes NGOs and grassroots groups, which exert power through advocacy, mobilization, and public opinion. The public is key in highlighting environmental and social concerns related to Shell’s operations by harnessing the potential of public discourse and activism in Nigeria (Rodgers et al., 2019). Barnett and Duvall (2005) say that mobilization power allows civil society to bring attention to critical issues, influencing public opinion and, in turn, shaping policies and market outcomes. Shell’s operations in Nigeria significantly reflect the power dynamics between companies, countries, international organizations, and civil society. The company’s financial clout has led to good negotiations with the Nigerian government, which has influenced policies in the oil industry (Koenig-Archibugi, 2019). However, while wielding political power, the Nigerian government must balance economic interests with the need for effective legislation.
Nevertheless, international organizations set standards that affect Shell’s practices, particularly environmental sustainability and human rights. The power of community mobilization focused on the negative impacts of Shell’s activities, forcing the company to address environmental concerns and engage in community development planning in various fields, as Doris and MI (2018) say. The division of power in this context illustrates the complex association of economic, political, legal, and administrative forces, which shape the policy and market implications associated with Shell’s involvement in Nigeria.
Corporate Power and Development in Host States
Firms’ impact on growth in emerging international economies is multiplex (Itu and Atiye, 2023). MNCs steered by profit motives significantly influence host countries’ economic, social, and environmental conditions.
Economic Impact
One of the main areas where companies can express themselves is financially. Like Shell, companies can contribute to economic growth through investment, job creation, and technology transfer (Onwurah, 2023). Shell’s presence in the oil sector in Nigeria has been a key driver of economic growth. The company’s investments in infrastructure, technology, and human capital have contributed to the development of the oil sector, making Nigeria a key player in the global energy market.
However, the economic impact has its challenges. The “resource curse” phenomenon is often associated with countries with natural resources, where economic growth is hampered by corruption, mismanagement of funds, and over-reliance on one side (as Ezeani (2023) highlights. In the case of Nigeria in the 1990s, despite high oil revenues, the country struggled with economic reforms.
Social and Environmental Consequences
Corporations can also affect the social and ecological impact of development. For instance, environmental degradation, human rights violations, and social conflict have plagued Shell’s operations in Nigeria (Turner, 2023). Oil spills, gas flares, and poor community engagement have greatly affected residents, affecting their livelihoods and well-being.
Adeleke et al. (2023) say that the social and environmental challenges associated with Shell’s operations in Nigeria highlight the importance of responsible corporate behavior. Power dynamics between firms and host countries tend to place the burden of mitigating negative externalities on the latter. Importantly, faced with economic pressures and challenges, the Nigerian government sometimes struggles to enact stringent regulations to hold companies accountable for their actions.
Political Influence and Governance
Corporate power extends into politics and influences governance structures and decision-making processes. Allegations of corruption and improper conduct with Shell and the government in Nigeria raise questions about the integrity of the political systems (Abimbola and Dele, 2015). Economic interests and political power can sometimes lead to policies prioritizing corporate profits over broader social improvements.
Abimbola and Dele (2015) further say that a “revolving door” phenomenon, in which individuals move between public and private sector positions, can further establish corporate influence in political parties, leading to policies that favor corporations in the public interest. Governments have the delicate task of balancing attracting foreign investment and protecting the interests of the host state and its citizens.
Local Economic Disparities and Inequalities
Although companies contribute to economic growth, profits are not always distributed equally. Shell’s involvement in Nigeria is criticized for exacerbating local economic disparities (Turner, 2023). Employment opportunities and wealth are often concentrated at the top, impoverishing many communities near oil fields. Unfortunately, such inequality can create social tensions, potentially impeding social progress.
The power dynamics between businesses and communities highlight the need for inclusive development policies that ensure equitable distribution of benefits (Isaax et al. (2020). If genuine and effective, CSR policies play a role in bridging these gaps. However, their efforts are underpinned by the companies’ commitment to move beyond symbolic gestures and engage in meaningful and sustainable development efforts.
Conclusion
Shell’s financial support, technological upgrades, and job creation have undoubtedly played a role in positioning Nigeria as a dominant player in the global energy market. Foreign direct investment and technological advances have strengthened the domestic oil sector and, to some extent, stimulated supporting industries. However, environmental damage caused by oil spills, gas flares, and poor community engagement is a vivid picture of the negative consequences of corporate activity. Accusations of human rights violations, governance challenges, and local economic inequalities exacerbating regional economic inequalities reflect the complex link between corporate power and broader social development. The “resource curse” phenomenon looms large, showing the vulnerability of nations heavily dependent on a single sector, in this case, oil.
Furthermore, the power dynamics between Shell, the Nigerian government, international organizations, and civil society highlight the critical association needed for sustainable development. Political influence, governance structure, and economic advantage are required, sometimes covering environmental and social considerations. Thus, Shell’s involvement in Nigeria is a compelling case indicating the potential benefits and pitfalls of corporate capacity in development; this adds to the importance of host countries’ externalities and the strong economy while protecting its people’s and the environment’s interests. The insights in this paper should inform future engagement and advocate for a balanced, transparent, and inclusive approach in the interests of both companies and the countries in which they operate.
References
Abimbola, O.S. and Dele, A.O., 2015. Multinational corporations and economic development in Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Policy and Management, 1(2), pp.16-24.
Adeleke, A.A., Petrus, N., Ayuba, S., Yahya, A.M., Ikubanni, P.P., Okafor, I.S., Emmanuel, S.S., Olosho, A.I. and Adesibikan, A.A., 2023. Nigerian Biomass for Bioenergy Applications: A Review on the Potential and Challenges. Journal of Renewable Materials, 11(12).
Barnett, M. and Duvall, R., 2005. Power in international politics. International organization, 59(1), pp.39-75.
Dan, L. and Yan, L., 2024. Urban Governance Transformation Under the Background of Ecological Civilization Construction. In Eco-Politics and Global Climate Change (pp. 133-151). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Doris, F. and Ml, LM, 2008. The Power of Business. Business and Politics, 9(3), pp.1-19.
Ezeani, E.C., 2023. Mechanisms Used by Multinational Oil Companies. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 15, pp.185-214.
Flaig, A., Kindström, D. and Ottosson, M., 2021. Market-shaping strategies: A conceptual framework for generating market outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, pp.254-266.
Hernández Guzmán, D. and Hernández García de Velazco, J., 2024. Global Citizenship: Towards a Concept for Participatory Environmental Protection. Global Society, pp.1-28.
Isaac, K.S., Ibidunni, A., Kehinde, O.J., Ufua, D., Elizabeth, K.B., Oyo-Ita, D. and Mathias, C.M., 2020. The role of multinational corporations in global economic practice: Literature review. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 23(5), pp.619-628.
Itu, M. and Atiye, E.D., 2023. Community relation strategies and sustainable development: a study of Shell Petroleum Development Company Limited (SPDC) and her host communities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Journal of Global Social Sciences, 4(15), pp.227-249.
Kamasak, R., James, S.R. and Yavuz, M., 2019. The interplay of corporate social responsibility and political activity in emerging markets: The role of strategic flexibility in non-market strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(3), pp.305-320.
Kochhar, S., 2018. Corporate diplomacy as an engagement strategy of the non-market business environment. The Handbook of Communication Engagement, pp.347-356.
Koenig-Archibugi, M., 2019. Global governance. Edward Elgar.
Kushi, S. and McManus, I.P., 2018. Gender, crisis and the welfare state: Female labor market outcomes across OECD countries. Comparative European Politics, 16, pp.434-463.
Lynn, T., Rosati, P. and Murphy, B., 2021, January. Does size matter? Non-market social and political engagement by accounting firms in the# Brexit discourse on Twitter. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 58-84). Routledge.
Mashima, A., 2024. Bottlenecks in the theory of good governance: Reflections on the COVID-19 crisis. In Evolution of the United Nations System (pp. 120-132). Routledge.
McIntyre, A., Shepard, M. and Wagner, M., 2021, May. Can automatic retention improve health insurance market outcomes? In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 111, pp. 560-566). 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203: American Economic Association.
Onwurah, O.O., 2023. Socio-Ecological Responsibilities of Shell in Nigeria in the Era of the UNGPs: Potentials of a Textual Study. Available at SSRN 4510134.
Rodgers, P., Stokes, P., Tarba, S. and Khan, Z., 2019. The role of non-market strategies in establishing legitimacy: The case of service MNEs in emerging economies. Management International Review, 59, pp.515-540.
Shaqiri, M.Q., Mehmeti, I. and Çeku, O.M., 2019. Transnational Corporations and Their Role in Economic Development. International Journal of Management Excellence (ISSN: 2292-1648), 12(2), pp.1830-1834.
Turner, T., 2023. Commercial capitalism and the 1975 coup. In Soldiers and oil (pp. 166-198). Routledge.
write