Introduction
In a time ruled by connections and social media, it is clear how important social media sites are in making stories worldwide. However, this new connection brings many problems. It is mainly shown by the spread of misinformation everywhere. Misinformation is when people mistakenly share wrong or confusing information, while disinformation means intentionally sharing false stories to control others. On the other hand, malformation is when facts are spread with the intent to hurt. This often involves showing them in the wrong way.
The relationship between social media sites and the spreading of mis/dis and mal-information significantly affects people worldwide. It goes beyond different countries and peoples, too. This discussion looks closely at how social media sites help spread mis/dis and misinformation worldwide, especially in America, Russia, and China. As these countries use social media as battlefields for spreading information.
The several-sided effects of mis/dis and mal-infoormation on social media can change people’s beliefs and trust in society and the more significant political world. According to Cooke (2021), one can spot effects beyond screens by straightening out the complicated mix of misinformation and misinformation. These changes impact things like how democracy works, people staying together in society, and relationships between countries. This test aims to give clear views on the complex connection between social media sites and wrong information. It shows their impacts on America, Russia, and China.
Mis/dis and Mal-information and Social Media Manipulation
Mis/dis and Mal-information and things done on social media have become significant effects all over the world. They have lots of effects on people, communities, and countries talking to each other worldwide. Stoddart talked about this significant issue, while Bradshaw and Howard studied planned campaigns of social media trickery. Their work showed that these activities are happening all around the world.
The work of Stoddart et al. (2021) tells about the big problem of mis/ dis and mal-information and highlights how it affects people worldwide. Everywhere, people use social media. This has made it easy for wrong information to spread quickly and make false stories popular. The talk looks deeper into the details of mis/dis and mal-information. It shows it takes work to understand these things well. It shows that the need to understand the methods used and why false information is being spread. Bradshaw and Howard’s (2018) report gives a detailed list of planned social media control activities in 48 countries. This shows that these efforts are planned and widespread. It discusses a worldwide scene where people like government offices or political groups work smartly together to change the public’s thoughts. A central part is figuring out the usual tricks used in these efforts. According to the journal, How and why does misinformation spread? (2023) Misleading information campaigns often involve making and spreading false news or lies. Sensational and low-quality news, known as junk news, helps share fake stories. Lies and fake news are purposefully shared to trick people. Both methods use the fast spread of social media sites, allowing false news to become popular quickly.
Misinformation campaigns also use things like censoring and controlling to spread false information. By taking control of the story and quieting those who disagree, tricky people try to change how to talk in public so it fits with what they want. Social media sites, first seen as ways to share information freely, have accidentally turned into paths for planned efforts to change how people think (Kyza et al., 2020). These campaigns want to stop opposing views and make changes in the world of politics. The effects of these methods reach more than just single people; they also affect society and world politics. It is terrible when people lose faith in news, government groups, and science because misinformation makes it harder to make intelligent choices. Messing with public opinion worldwide can change who wins elections, affect laws, and even lead to trouble in society.
The report by Bradshaw and Howard (2018) shows how social media manipulation efforts worsen the problem of mis/dis and mal-information worldwide. Recognizing shared ways shows that the need for big plans to fight the harmful impact on people and communities everywhere. Dealing with these problems needs teamwork between governments, tech businesses, and intelligent people to make everyone understand how digital things work. This will also help protect from the trickery in today’s information world.
Russian Influence
The “Kremlin’s Trojan Horses” (2016) report shows a clear picture of Russia trying to sway things around the world. They do this by becoming friends with politicians in Europe and beyond who think like them. This intelligent action includes setting up an extensive system of Trojan Horses – political friends linked to Russia’s outside goals. The main aim is to get into political areas, make rules, and spread a different view that supports Russia on world order.
An essential part of Russia’s power plan is its good use of social media platforms to make its political messages louder and reach broader goals in global politics. Russia’s methods go beyond just promoting pro-Russian stuff. They use a variety of ways to cause trouble and disagreement on significant, controversial issues. Russian trolls and automatic bots are very important in this plan. They purposefully join online areas to twist public talk. According to Vosloo (2021), by Using social media, Russia pushes its political goals and weakens the essential parts of democratic communities. Spreading pro-Russian stories and stirring up fights lowers trust in newspapers, groups, and science. This wearing out is very clear. It is about changing how people talk, making election systems deficient, creating unfair policy creation, and causing trouble in markets – all planned to reach specific political or strategic goals.
The Kremlin’s plan in the West uses already existing worries about censorship. This makes society even more split up and creates a world where people do not trust each other (Weismueller et al., 2023). Polyakova et al. (2016) show how politics, social media trickery, and the broader effects on trust worldwide are connected. These activities are not just about propaganda; they mean a direct attack on the basic ideas of openness, responsibility, and honesty that democratic systems are set up with (Westerman et al., 2013). Significantly, Russia’s influence campaigns can affect trust in news information and the honesty of scientific facts. Using scare tactics about censorship and spreading false information, people doubt everything more often. When trust lessens, so does belief in democratic methods and institutions supporting free societies. The actions of Polyakova et al. (2016) show how important it is for democratic places to see and fight the many problems Russia’s interference causes. Maintaining trust and honesty in institutions involves strengthening protections against social media lies, insufficient information, and bitter strategies. This way, communities can protect the ideas necessary for running a democracy safely in this changing digital time.
U.S. National Security and Russian Interference
The very detailed report made by the United States Senate about “Putin’s asymmetric Assault on Democracy” (2018) carefully shows how Russia, under Putin, who was once a KGB spy, used its methods to try and control things. Russia’s extensive weapons are not just computer hackers and state spy groups. It also includes organized crime parts that show Putin, the influential leader in Russia’s money control machine, is after both power dominance and cash improvement plans in their more comprehensive strategies.
The main part of Russia’s one-sided attack is smartly using social media platforms. They change these online spaces into places to spread lies and make sorted content louder. The main goal is to weaken democracies, create problems within communities, and break down the bases of Western friendships. Russia’s method tries to spread many conflicting stories simultaneously (Bursztyn et al., 2019). This worsens divisions in American society as well as China and creates doubt about Western rules, groups, and how democracy works. Russia wins by using a mix of fancy tricks that make it hard for people to separate truth from lies, a sickness caused by wars against information (Connell & Vogler, 2017). Using computers to break into private systems, sharing secret emails publicly, and using fake accounts on social media sites make up a detailed plan. This method combines online actions with mind tricks in both physical and digital realms. The way these methods work together makes it very hard to stop the many different dangers that Russia’s unfair attack brings.
The study shows that current efforts to fight Russian influence on social media are scattered and need to be. Understanding the seriousness of it all, people are asking social media companies to be stricter in watching their platforms for harmful, state-backed stuff. However, According to Demarest (2023), Russia’s secret way of organizing its information warfare powers often uses people like contractors and ex-criminals through helpers. This makes it hard for Moscow to be blamed if actions are found out because they can say they did not do them.
In the United States and China, democratic organizations face significant issues when trying to stop Russia’s unequal attack through social media. There is a need for everyone – including politicians, tech people, and community groups – to work together. This will help in protection from risks and make nations stronger against attacks or problems that can twist democracies in harmful ways (Helmus et al., 2018). the need to make social media rules and ways they work more precise and team up with experts in learning to create tools for spotting fake news. There should also be a focus on making strategies that affect what Russia decides. The fight against Russia’s unequal attack on democracy through social media needs a planned and joined effort (Lindsay, 2015). It is essential to see how the world of fighting with information is changing. The need forstrong protections for democracy, like in America and China, against significant challenges from Russia using clever tricks that they have made).
Comparative Analysis – U.S., Russia, China
In the big battle of global information, America, Russia, and China are essential parts. They all use social media to control how people think or act on sports strategy goals.
United States
The US, a prominent leader in technology creation, knows that social media is crucial for fighting wars. They focus on this and use it to guide their actions today. The U.S. uses social media, news sharing, and propaganda to change people’s thoughts and actions. According to Lindsay et al. (2015), An essential part of its plan is to spend much time fighting against mis/this and misinformation campaigns, which could hurt the process of democracy. However, the U.S. needs help with its information war activities, especially regarding platforms like TikTok. According to research (Ellis, 2023), The growth of TikTok has caused real worries about privacy and possible links to China. This led the U.S. to carefully manage this complex area by protecting democratic values with great care. This problem shows that the U.S. needs to skillfully use social media to share information while protecting people’s privacy and keeping their democracy safe from threats.
Russia
Groups of social media accounts tied to Russia and Belarus make stories bigger that fit their country’s goals on a big scale (Nye, 2016). The group known as the Internet Research Agency from Russia uses the same tricks in important events like the 2016 U.S. election. They are commonly seen trying to change how people think and act using online methods. What differs from Russia’s information war plan is its reactive action, especially in 2014. This happened more because some Western countries reacted to the Ukraine problem. This approach lets Russia take advantage of any weakness it sees in its enemies. It adjusts what it says to cash in on political conflicts between countries (Robinson et al., 2015). By smartly using social media, Russia wants to push its big plan goals and stay important on the world’s scene. The complex connection between technology, information warfare, and big country moves makes the changing online world hard to understand.
China
China, understanding social media as having both good and bad sides, carefully uses platforms like TikTok and WeChat for information warfare. Its bright mis/dis and misinformation campaigns are a cheap and effective way to fight an unfair battle. According to Demarest (2023), Taiwan is a test place for China. There, they make and improve ways of attacking using false information spread through social media. China’s way shows they know how powerful information warfare can be in changing global stories and political successes. In China, social media platforms are big in sharing mis/dis and mal-information. The Chinese government often uses these platforms to make the Western media look bad and spread state stories. During the COVID-19 pandemic, China used its world media control to spread good stories about how it handled the situation. They also made Western newsgroups look bad.
Similarities
All three countries understand the strength of social media in forming worldwide opinions and affecting political matters. They use these platforms for information warfare, knowing the significant effect of stories on public beliefs (Zeitzoff, 2017). The three countries also share mis/dis and mal-information but do it with different levels of skill and reach. They grow stories that match their world power goals using groups connected to governments. Using disinformation to reach political goals shows an intelligent plan about how well it works.
Differences
The United States uses a more responsive way, proactively fighting false news campaigns and focusing on safeguarding democratic values. The nation concentrates on making stories that match democratic rules but face problems. A prominent example is TikTok, which makes people worry about privacy issues and keeping their personal information safe. Russia, however, does the opposite and uses social media as a significant tool. According to Boichak and Hoskins (2022), social media is used to spread false news and meddle in other countries’ politics from within those nations. Its information warfare is mostly a reaction, going up in response to weaknesses seen against its enemies. This was clear during the Ukraine fight in 2014.
China uses a careful plan, seeing social media as both good and bad. It cleverly uses tools like TikTok and WeChat for information warfare. It spreads tricky false news using smart misinformation as a cheap way to fight in different ways from regular armies. China wants to change stories worldwide, with Taiwan being a place to practice spreading fake news through social media (Kalpokas & Kalpokiene, 2021). The problems of mis/dis and mal-information and messing with social media are related to the more extensive cyberspace fighting. This battle happens on computer screens worldwide, affecting governments’ laws, soldiers’ and spies’ jobs, and global orders worldwide.
Misinformation and Social Media Manipulation in the Cyber Landscape
In the age of computers, social media websites can significantly impact people’s thoughts. They are also used to affect politics and start wars with facts. Bad information campaigns, done to share wrong or confusing stuff on purpose, usually work well on these big platforms because they can reach many people quickly. People and groups use these campaigns to twist stories, affect elections, and weaken belief in systems.
Role of Cyber Espionage
Spying on computer systems becomes essential for completing cyber war activities. People often hear about fake news on social media, but secret activities like spying and stealing important information happen quietly behind the scenes. The data gathered in cyber spying helps create more extensive and robust online battle plans (Boichak & Hoskins, 2022). It gives essential information about bad guys’ weaknesses, plans, and abilities. This helps set the stage for more attacks later on.
Enabling Cyber Warfare
In its most potent form, cyber war goes beyond the digital world to target critical structures like bridges and power stations. It also impacts communities in a way that changes how countries act around each other. The information found in cyber spying jobs gives actors the power to find and use weaknesses in a target’s computer security (Corradini, 2020). These smarts can start nasty attacks on essential services and money systems or even change public feelings with trickier and more focused lies.
Hybrid Warfare and Information Operations
The link between cyber espionage and information warfare is even more stressed when discussing hybrid war. According to Marwick and Lewis (2017), Hybrid warfare is a mix of normal military moves, cyber warfare, and mis/dis and mal- information. Cyber spying gives essential information for planning these complex campaigns. By getting into networks, taking secret information, and knowing other countries’ cyber weaknesses – states can join together to plan big hybrid warfare strategies that mix average battles with those on computers. This makes it hard to tell where one ends and the other begins. The problems of false information and control on social media are critical parts of the more extensive world cyber defense field. Cyber spying is like a trigger that helps get the information needed for more significant online attacks (Petratos, 2021). This includes different kinds of war tactics using both cyber and traditional methods. It’s essential to understand this close connection. the need when making big cybersecurity plans that deal with the many problems of state and non-state groups in a changing digital world.
Effects on Users Governments and Societies
In the always-changing world of technology, social media websites are now vital ways to talk and share information with other people. However, the two-sided nature of these platforms becomes clear. They become great places for false information (mis), wrong data sharing (dis), and lousy info spreading (mal). A deeper look into social media platforms’ role in daily life reveals their effects.
Social Media as Amplifiers of Mis/Dis and Mal-Information
With their fast sharing of information and user-made content picked out by computer algorithms, social media sites help to increase misinformation and disinformation. According to Stanescu (2022), these big worldwide sites cover a vast area where actual or confusing facts can quickly get to many different people.
United States
In the United States, social media platforms significantly influence public opinion and political discourse. According to Bradshaw and Howard (2018), The decentralized nature of information dissemination on platforms like Twitter and Facebook facilitates the rapid spread of accurate and misleading information. Political polarization and the echo chamber effect amplify is/dis information, fostering an environment where divergent perspectives intensify and influence public perceptions and attitudes.
Russia
Russia, with a plan to gain an advantage, has used social media sites to push its big-picture goals. Groups like the Internet Research Agency have planned mis/dis and mal -information attacks on local and foreign audiences (Hjorth & Adler-Nissen, 2019). Social media is vital for making trouble, shouting about things that split people apart, and spreading ideas close to Russian goals. The main aim is to break trust in democratic groups and create confusion worldwide.
China
China understands the usefulness of social media sites for power reasons. It uses them not just to control its people but also as ways to impact the world. Services like TikTok and WeChat let a blend of blocking content, government-controlled stories, and intelligent sharing happen. According to Hjorth and Adler-Nissen (2019), China makes the way other countries think about it according to its political beliefs, simultaneously using these platforms for two jobs.
Effects on Users and Wider Society
The significant influence of misinformation on people and whole communities is profound and complex. In a time when there is too much information, people have to search through loads of content. They often need help to tell if something is true or not clearly. This flood of information makes it hard for people to decide based on facts. Users need help telling accurate and false information apart (Lukito, 2019). One significant effect is the loss of trust, an important part needed for democratic societies to work well. As wrong information spreads, belief in regular media sources, places, and even the broader idea of truth is constantly attacked. This harmful effect goes beyond personal opinions and helps create societal divisions. Too many different stories cause people to have more and more disagreements. This weakens friendships and creates doubt and mistrust in society. According to (Perse & Land, 2016), This loss of trust is a significant danger to democracy because people who do not believe might lose faith in usual institutions. This can lead them away from doing civic duty and weaken the part that holds it together – democratic ways. the need to work together as media, institutions, and society. Many issues can be solved if everyone learns how to read between the lines of news articles, check facts properly and critically, and. think it makes people strongly think about information from newspapers or television shows.
International Implications
On an international level, using social media on mis/dis and malformation can significantly affect friendships between countries, trust worldwide, and how strong democracies are. Spreading lies on purpose causes problems with other countries, changes how people see the world’s politics, and influences working together across borders (Zhuravskaya et al., 2020). The connection of social media sites makes problems more significant, going beyond countries and affecting what is known worldwide. Ultimately, social media sites play a big part in sharing information. This fits into the world of sharing news today. The unique ways of the United States, Russia, and China show how these platforms can change and be competent in world politics. As social media keeps changing, handling these problems is essential for a more educated and robust global information-sharing system. The need for solid plans, at both country and world levels, is evident as people around the globe face tricky details of false information.
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Cyber Security
Cyber safety is a big problem that needs different ways of thinking from many fields to tackle the high-level difficulties in the online world. Old ideas about being safe do not stay in physical areas anymore; now, the world of computers on the internet is a significant place to fight. Working together across different fields is essential for dealing with this complicated place.
Role of Spycraft
Spying, which comes from getting secret information and doing hidden activities, is very important in understanding and fighting threats on the internet. Intelligence groups use computer knowledge, human help, and spy tricks to find out who is behind cyber-attacks and how they can fight back (Lukito, 2019). Cyber safety experts and spy workers must work together to understand why cyber-attacks happen. Then, they can make good defenses against them.
Integration of Intelligence Agencies
Intelligence agencies, which usually look after country security, have grown to deal with the troubles caused by modern technology. Adding cybersecurity people to intelligence groups makes them better at guessing and dealing with online threats (Hjorth & Adler-Nissen, 2019). Working together across different fields helps understand better the changing ways bad people use computers. This makes our defenses stronger and quicker in dealing with these threats.
International Cooperation
Cyber threats go past country borders, so the need for help from other countries to reduce dangers. Working with intelligence organizations from other countries helps share information about dangers, suitable methods, and ways to protect computer systems (Hajli, 2016). Setting up rules and deals worldwide is crucial to get everyone working together against online dangers. This will make sure that the internet remains safe around the whole globe.
Role of Social Media Platforms
Responsibility of Social Media Platforms:
Social media sites, essential information spreaders, have a big job in tackling and reducing the sharing of wrong or harmful messages. According to Hajli (2016), spreading fake stories on these platforms can harm trust in society, how elections happen, and relationships between countries. Social media companies need to see themselves as information guardians and work hard to reduce the harmful impact of false information.
Preventing Exploitation by Technology Companies:
Big tech firms, which own and run social media sites, play a crucial role in stopping their platforms from being used for the wrong reasons. Using fancy computer methods and artificial brains to discover fake news and then delete it is essential. According to Jin et al. (2014), These companies need to put money into strict rules for checking their content, fact-checking everything, and working with outside experts. This helps make sure that the facts shared on these platforms are accurate.
Balancing Innovation and Security
Tech companies need help to balance new ideas with safety. Social media platforms give new ways to connect and share information. However, they also help to spread wrong facts quickly. To help ground protect against harmful use, a critical effort must be made to keep people safe Polyakova et al. (2016). This also stops harming society.
Regulatory Measures
Governments and regulatory bodies are critical to ensure social media platforms take responsibility. Making rules that say technology companies must be open and responsible for their content can encourage them to stop wrong information before it spreads. More rigid rules can stop people from carelessly spreading fake news on social media. Cybersecurity’s mix of skills is critical to handling the different problems that come with online threats. Working with spying, know-it-all agencies, and friends from other countries makes individuals better at figuring out, stopping, and dealing with hack attacks. (Westerman et al., 2013). At the same time, social media websites and tech firms need to accept that they have a role in preventing false information from spreading too fast. They must find how innovation can go along with keeping online information safe. The teamwork of these different ways is essential to create a safe and robust internet world all around the globe.
Conclusion
In the changing world of global information fighting and online security, things like spying on people on big social media sites affect what regular folks can do. Even more critical is how countries relate with each other, which is all connected by these issues. The spreading of misinformation on social media platforms is not limited to countries. It shapes stories, changes actions, and impacts the basics of fair elections. This complete check has gone through the complex issues caused by these things. They mainly focus on how the United States, Russia, and China handled them. Social media platforms, praised for being great ways to chat, have become both boosters and fields of global warfare. They let out mis/dis and mal-information. It is not just wrong- but can also be dangerous misinformation that spreads like wildfire on these platforms. The U.S., Russia, and China maneuver in this area for different reasons. These big countries act like how they do because of their goals on the world stage. The effect on people and communities is significant, making trust go down and creating split opinions among groups of different views worldwide. It also changes how countries see one another from a political standpoint internationally.
In cybersecurity, working with spies and intelligence groups from different countries is very important. Spycraft helps collect information, so adding knowledge of computer security to intelligence-gathering groups makes a complete picture of online threats. Working together is very important. This helps fight online dangers affecting more than one country and allows for work jointly toward making the internet a safe place for everyone worldwide. Social media sites, being powerful ways for sharing information, have a significant duty to stop the spread of wrong facts. Tech firms must work hard to stop bad things happening on their systems. They must be cautious with fresh ideas and safety problems together. Rules or laws are important to make these sites take care of content properly.
Dealing with different ways of thinking is very important in handling the many issues caused by mis/dis and mal-information It is important to know that these problems are connected at the national and global levels. This helps us make a strong worldwide information system for all to be safe. As societies find ways to handle the hard parts of being in a digital age, working together between governments and tech companies is very important. Also key are actions by intelligence groups. They also need smart people to work together and create a safe place where information can be believed.
References
Boichak, O. and Hoskins, A. (2022). ‘My war: participation in warfare.’ Digital War. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-022-00060-7.
Bradshaw, S. and Howard, P.N. (2018). ‘THE GLOBAL ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGNS.’ Journal of International Affairs 71(1.5), pp. 23–32. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26508115.
Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G., Enikolopov, R. and Petrova, M. (2019). Social Media and Xenophobia: Evidence from Russia. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w26567.
Connell, M. and Vogler, S. (2017). Russia’s Approach to Cyber Warfare. Available at: https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/dop-2016-u-014231-1rev.pdf.
Cooke, N.A. (2021). ‘A Right to be Misinformed? Considering Fake News as a Form of Information Poverty’. Advances in Librarianship, pp. 45–60. doi https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020210000050002.
Corradini, I. (2020). ‘The Digital Landscape’., pp. 1–22. doi https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43999-6_1.
Demarest, C. (2023). China, Russia will use cyber to sow chaos if war starts, Pentagon says. Available at: https://www.c4isrnet.com/cyber/2023/09/12/china-russia-will-use-cyber-to-sow-chaos-if-war-starts-pentagon-says/.
Ellis, J.R. (2023). Information Warfare in Technocratic Times. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/display/book/9781529228731/ch001.xml (Accessed: 2 January 2024).
Hajli, N. (2016). ‘Ethical Environment in the Online Communities by Information Credibility: A Social Media Perspective.’ Journal of Business Ethics 149(4), 799–810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3036-7.
Helmus, T.C. et al. (2018). Russian Social Media Influence: Understanding Russian Propaganda in Eastern Europe. Rand Corporation. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dFZWDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Russian+Influence+on+social+media&ots=1Tmv2vQG6Y&sig=iaB32qBn3bjQWUBO6CUhGxk5hlo (Accessed: 2 January 2024).
Hjorth, F. and Adler-Nissen, R. (2019). ‘Ideological Asymmetry in the Reach of Pro-Russian Digital Disinformation to United States Audiences.’ Journal of Communication 69(2), pp. 168–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz006.
How and why does misinformation spread? (2023). Available at: https://www.apa.org/topics/journalism-facts/how-why-misinformation-spreads.
Jin, Y., Liu, B. & Austin, L.L. (2014). ‘Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management.’ Communication Research 41(1), 74–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423918.
Kalpokas, I. and Kalpokiene, J. (2021). ‘Synthetic Media and Information Warfare: Assessing Potential Threats.’ The Russian Federation in Global Knowledge Warfare, pp. 33–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73955-3_3.
Kyza, E.A. et al. (2020). ‘Combating misinformation online: re-imagining social media for policy-making.’ Internet Policy Review 9(4). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/combating-misinformation-online-re-imagining-social-media-policy-making.
Lindsay, J.R. (2015). ‘The Impact of China on Cybersecurity: Fiction and Friction.’ International Security 39(3), 7–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00189.
Lindsay, J.R., Cheung, T.M. & Reveron, D.S. (2015). China and Cybersecurity: Espionage, Strategy, and Politics in the Digital Domain. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wQN1BgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=US+Russia+and+china+cyber+warfare&ots=g0_4ljyfRy&sig=yTwIOcvfjuvE5iMEs3t4IwOlT1Q (Accessed: 2 January 2024).
Lukito, J. (2019). ‘Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three U.S. Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017’. Political Communication 37(2), 1–18. doi https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661889.
Marwick, A. & Lewis, R. (2017). Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Available at: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017-05/apo-nid135936.pdf.
Meserole, C. (2018). How misinformation spreads on social media—And what to do about it. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-misinformation-spreads-on-social-media-and-what-to-do-about-it/.
Nye, J. (2016). ‘Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace.’ Journal of Cyber Policy 1(2), 44–71. Available at: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/isec_a_00266.pdf.
Panahi, S., Watson, J. and Partridge, H. (2015) ‘Information encountering on social media and tacit knowledge sharing’. Journal of Information Science 42(4), pp. 539–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515598883.
Perse, E.M. & Lambe, J. (2016). Media Effects and Society. Routledge. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=W8bLDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=effects+of+social+media+on+society&ots=G_SJiSLfKI&sig=LrVf6qN8EIXoJQ6JwtnJ7tq3oOk (Accessed: 2 January 2024).
Petratos, P.N. (2021). ‘Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: Cyber business risks.’ .’siness Horizons 64(6). doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.07.012.
Robinson, M., Jones, K., & Janicke, H. (2015). ‘Cyber warfare: Issues and challenges.’ Computers & Security 49(49), 70–94. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2776275.
Stanescu, G. (2022). ‘Ukraine conflict: the challenge of informational war.’ Social Sciences and Education Research Review 9(1), 146–148. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1195548.
Vosloo, S. (2021). Digital misinformation/disinformation and children. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/stories/digital-misinformation-disinformation-and-children.
Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Gruner, R.L., Wang, S. and Conversation, T. (2023). Misinformation is rife and causing more profound polarization—here’s how social media users can help curb it. Available at: https://phys.org/news/2023-07-misinformation-rife-deeper-polarizationhere-social.html.
Westerman, D., Spence, P.R. & Van Der Heide, B. (2013). ‘Social Media as Information Source: Recency of Updates and Credibility of Information.’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(2), 171–183. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/2/171/4067516?login=true.
Zeitzoff, T. (2017). ‘How Social Media Is Changing Conflict.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(9), pp. 1970–1991. Available at: https://www.zeitzoff.com/uploads/2/2/4/1/22413724/zeitzoff_how_social_media_jcr.pdf.
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M. and Enikolopov, R. (2020). ‘Political effects of the Internet and social media.’ Annual Review of Economics 12(1), pp. 415–438. doi https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239.
Stoddart K. et al. (2021). ‘Mis/dis and mal-information: Who-why and its effects and effectiveness,’ CYTREC (Swansea University) discussion, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YtVs-LeR6M.
Bradshaw S. & Howard P.N. (2018). ‘Challenging Truth and Trust: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation’, http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/cybertroops2018/. The Oxford Internet Institute (OII) has many exciting and relevant open-source reports.
Polyakova A., Laruelle M., Meister S., and Barnett N. Foreword by Sikorski R. (2016), ‘The Kremlin’s Trojan Horses Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom’ 3rd Edition, The Atlantic Council, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/kremlin-trojan-horses/.
Putin’s Asymmetric Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for U.S. National Security A Minority Staff Report, Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate (2018), https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/FinalRR.pdf.
write