Introduction
In recent years, China has experienced significant changes in its economy and population, with rural-urban migration taking place with tremendous intensity. The desire for better jobs, living conditions, and social opportunities drove this migration (Melo and Ames 2016). This migration changed where people live in China and became a considerable focus for policymakers as they tried to address the challenges and opportunities it brings. In China’s rapid economic growth and urbanisation, the design and implementation of policies to manage migration from rural to urban areas are influenced by a complex mix of historical, economic, and social factors (Sun, 2018). Understanding the historical background is essential for understanding the reasons behind these policies. Throughout its history, China has faced issues such as rural poverty, inefficiencies in agriculture, and regional inequalities, compelling the authorities to develop methods to address these challenges. Thus, implementing policies related to rural-urban migration is rooted in a complex historical narrative shaped by the need for economic advancement and social equity.
This essay intends to comprehensively examine the results and effects of China’s policies regarding migration from rural to urban areas, focusing on the specific groups targeted by these policies. Still, it will evaluate the social and economic implications for rural and urban populations. By analysing these policies, the essay aims to thoroughly understand the complexities surrounding rural-urban migration in China and how it has changed the country’s social and economic landscape. Through a detailed analysis, the essay will highlight the successes, challenges, and consequences of these policies for individuals and communities affected by the movement of people within China.
Background
Rural-urban migration in the Pre-Reform era (1949-1978)
In the pre-reform era, Chinese cities derived their distinctiveness in urban transformation from the influence of Mao Zedong’s agricultural strategies and application of the commune system. Qian (2015) argued that urban development was influenced by various forces that communists designed to organise urban conditions and control people’s daily activities to achieve extreme socialist objectives. The result of communes led to the development of an inflexible agricultural-based framework that undermined the individual’s ability to move. The Hukou system introduced in this era significantly created social divisions by restricting rural dwellers from accessing urban facilities (Chan, 2015). This system shaped migration patterns as rural residents needed more opportunities to move to urban regions. The rigorous oversight over agricultural practices and lack of market-oriented policies undermined economic development, creating a setting where rules established by organisations regulated rural-urban migration. Henceforth, the pre-reform era was the cornerstone for opportunities and challenges that defined rural-urban migration in the following decades.
Economic Reforms and Opening-Up (1970s-1980s)
There was a tremendous transformation in rural-urban migration during the period of economic reforms and the opening up of China in the late 1970s and 1980s. Deng Xiaoping argued that for China to achieve capitalism, it must first undergo capitalism, which must be regulated by the state (Moak and Lee, 2015). Deng Xiaoping’s economic policies led to the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs), privatisation, and the introduction of new adaptable economic measures (Butt and Sajid 2018). Due to rapid industrialisation, a massive migration of rural dwellers moved to urban areas to look for employment in the surging manufacturing sector. Many cities became the epicentres of economic activities, attracting many rural migrants looking for better livelihoods. Nonetheless, while the enhanced massive migration reinforced economic growth and made China a global economic hub, it also increased social and economic disparities. Thus, while the reforms stimulated economic development, they also uncovered the importance of harmonising economic growth with social inclusivity.
Hukou System Reforms (1990s-2000s)
The period between the 1990s and 2000s is crucial to the historical context of rural0urban migration since the introduction of Hukou reforms by the government aimed at improving the well-being of rural migrants. Due to the Hukou reforms, rural migrants rose from 21 million in the 1990s to 102 million in 2000 and 221 million in 2010 (Tian et al., 2022). This enabled the fight against poverty as many people from poor rural areas could seek employment and improve their living standards. Regardless of the reforms, the Hukou system is still crucial to China’s labour market and still affects the well-being of migrant workers. Thus, it has not been easy for rural immigrants to settle in large urban centres such as Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou as the Hukou system reforms slow down the process of integrating migrants into cities (Wang, 2020). Thus, a comprehensive approach might be crucial to address the equitable distribution of urbanisation benefits.
Significance of the Policies
The historical evolution of the rural-urban migration policies in China is crucial in comprehending the nation’s socio-economic transformation. The preform era characterised by the commune system was the cornerstone for various migration patterns, thus influencing the agricultural landscape (Qian 2015). On the other hand, the economic reforms in the late 20th century enabled China to become an international economic hub, with rural-urban migration allowing the development of vibrant industries (Butt and Sajid 2018). The relaxation of the Hukou system in the 1990s and 2000s addressed various inequalities, improving migrants’ ability to access urban resources (Raimondo, 2020). Henceforth, the rural-urban migration policies were crucial as they positively impacted the migrants, urbanisation, social structures, and economic equity. These policies highlight the Chinese government’s response to difficulties caused by rapid urbanisation as they try to balance economic growth with social inclusivity and address the needs of a large migrant population.
Policies Overview
Hukou System Reforms
China’s Hukou (house registration) system reforms significantly addressed the enduring disparities between rural and urban dwellers. Traditionally, the Hukou system was discriminatory, limiting rural migrants from accessing social services in urban areas (Chan, 2019). The reforms’ main objective was to exterminate these barriers by easing restrictions and giving rural migrants enhanced essential services such as healthcare and education. However, regardless of reforms in the past years, such as in 2014, it might be critical for the Chinese central government to loosen further the requirements for rural-urban Hukou conversion to aid in eliminating the rural-urban divide and inequalities faced by Hukou holders (Hung, 2022). This shows that despite prior attempts, challenges persist since the intended results of equality have yet to be attained.
Over the years, the Hukou system has undergone various adjustments to address developing issues. For instance, specific human rights concerns linked to the right to freedom and residence led to reforms in the Hukou system (Raimondo, 2020). The comprehensive human rights approach was vital to maintain the stability of China’s economy and society to protect equality. There have been pilot programs that have been essential in testing the efficiency of various policy reforms. For example, the Chongqing urban-rural integration pilot has been used to show how a local experiment can aid in reinforcing policy capacity and enhancing policy design (Qian, 2017). These measurements facilitating iterative changes show effort towards creating a balance between strengthening inclusive urbanisation and coordinating the associated socio-economic challenges.
Urbanisation Incentives
Over the years, Chinese urbanisation policies have undergone tremendous transformations in response to challenges caused by the surge in rural-urban migration. Chen and Liu (2016) asserted that the Chinese government has gradually reversed the discriminatory Hukou-based urbanisation methodology and proclaimed the National Plan for New Urbanization in 2014. This new incentive facilitated the transformation from land-based to people-centric urbanisation, reinforcing equality, diversity, and quality of life for rural-urban migrants. Thus, the main objective of these policies is to create a balance between enabling urbanisation for economic growth and addressing the differences in opportunities and social services between rural and urban dwellers. However, challenges are likely to continue persisting as many immigrants may face in securing equal social well-being opportunities such as education and healthcare.
Updates in policies reveal a need for further modifications to ensure urban incentive policies efficiently address the economic desires of migrants and difficulties linked to urban assimilation. Serious efforts are needed to facilitate governance, such as improving multi-level governance, adherence to the law, improved policy transparency, and integrating rural and urban communities in governance frameworks (Li et al., 2016). Still, it is crucial to solving the problem of land urbanisation occurring faster than population urbanisation since the rate of urban land extension reaches 6.2% per year while the population urbanisation rate only reaches 3.6 % annually (Ji and Zhang, 2019). Henceforth, although rural development and creating new urban centres may reinforce the urban incentives policy, it might be crucial to develop strategies to incorporate rural migrants and residents into urban life.
Poverty Alleviation Programs
China has struggled with challenges caused by rural-urban migration, stimulating the implementation of comprehensive poverty alleviation programs. The Hukou system has been the main focus, with reforms aimed at lessening the urban-rural disparities. Due to the poverty alleviation policy, China’s rural poor population reduced from 77.39 million in 1978 to 5.51 million individuals in 2019, leading to the poverty rate plummeting from 97.5% to 0.6 % (Gao, 2021). Changing the economic framework has been significant in fighting poverty and enabling fairness for rural residents. For instance, urbanisation policies underscored the importance of regulated city expansions and infrastructure development to manage rural-urban migration. Nonetheless, poverty alleviation programs may face criticism as they may hardly address the issues linked to the well-being of rural-urban migrants.
Over the years, China has executed comprehensive approaches toward poverty alleviation programs that facilitate the well-being of rural-urban migrants. Liu et al. (2018) indicated that the programs had targeted sequential poverty alleviation policy improvements from county to village/household levels. This has aided in meticulous policy implementation and ensured the concerned parties are involved. However, such a top-down approach to policy implementation may not fully empower the rural-urban migrants. Still, the technique may encounter challenges such as corruption and faulty targeting. Thus, it might be crucial to conduct effective geographic mapping to find areas needing poverty alleviation programs before implementation.
Economic Development Zones (EDZs)
Economic development zones in China have played a vital role in influencing and responding to rural-urban migration policies. The policy of facilitating the creation of economic development zones in China is one of the primary instruments that have modernised the economy (Xie et al., 2018). The EDZs were crucial to promoting equality as they enhanced development in urban and rural areas. These zones were created to attract investments, create employment, and bridge the gap between urban and rural areas. Nonetheless, establishing zones such as the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone and Shanghai caused the influx of rural migrants, leading to psychological distress among the migrants because of being socially-economically disadvantaged (Wen et al., 2016). Henceforth, it might be essential for the Chinese central government to address the adverse side effects of these zones on the migrants from rural areas to ensure the policy’s success.
While the Economic Development Zones have created employment, they may also have caused various inequalities among the rural migrants. The results of a study showed that EDZ policies designed for specific geographical regions can have different impacts on others (Barbieri et al., 2019). Hence, although the policies may have positive results, they may be ununiform, leading to persistent challenges among rural migrants. For instance, rapid urbanisation caused by these zones can strain facilities and infrastructure in some regions and worsen the issues linked to transportation, housing, healthcare, and environmental sustainability. The Chinese government should continue making necessary policy adjustments to address these challenges. This is because the long-term effects of EDZs on rural-urban migration depend on the government’s ability to balance economic advancement, community integration, and urban development.
Impact Evaluation
Economic Impact
Rural-urban migration policies have significantly impacted China’s economy, influencing income dynamics and employment patterns. The migration policies have caused tremendous changes in China’s wealth distribution and economic opportunities (Sun, 2018). For example, rapid industrialisation and urbanisation have enhanced job opportunities in rapidly expanding cities, leading to higher wages and improved migrant living standards. Nonetheless, some sectors, such as agriculture, have been negatively impacted due to the loss of labour, as many people have migrated to urban areas (Shi, 2018). This has led to disparities in economic well-being since the urban areas experience more growth than the rural areas. Consequently, this raises the issue of income inequalities between urban and rural residents. Hence, policies implemented in the future must consider the effects of massive rural-urban migration, such as persistent rural poverty and income disparities.
Environmental Impact
The rural-urban migration policies in China have applied considerable pressure on the environment due to rapid industrialisation and urbanisation. The surge of rural immigrants has caused high industrial activities and urban extension, leading to environmental pollution. In 2012, the emissions released by rural-urban migrants accounted for 2.8% of the national emissions (Shi et al., 2022). This was due to the intensified use of fossil fuels, leading to pollution, which can affect public health and the environment. In rural areas, a study showed that rural-urban migration increased the possibility of abandonment of forestland, affecting the forest resources in the long term (Duan et al., 2021). Consequently, this may lead to deforestation and land degradation. The Chinese government should incorporate initiatives to regulate industrial emissions, facilitate urban planning, and reinforce green technologies such as using electric cars to address these environmental challenges. Still, there should be a compelling interplay between migration policies, urban growth, and ecological sustainability.
Impact on Social Welfare and Inequality
While the rural-urban migration policies have enabled urban development and economic growth, they have significantly impacted the equity and social well-being of the migrants. Qi (2019) asserted that many problems, such as discrimination and social stigmatisation, have surged due to rural-urban migration. For example, migrants may encounter challenges as they obtain house registration (Hukou) status, undermining their access to social services. Still, although urbanisation may lead to improved access to social facilities such as education and healthcare, the rural-urban divide persists, causing more disparities. This may be due to discrimination and stereotypes due to negative perceptions. For instance, a study showed that children who migrated from the countryside with their parents improved performance in school and better physical health than those who were left behind (Wei et al., 2022). This may be due to the uneven distribution of resources, as the urban areas have better facilities. Henceforth, critical evaluation of the rural-urban migration policies might be crucial to address the dynamic inequalities.
Urbanisation and Infrastructure
Rural-urban migration policies have facilitated mass migration towards the cities and led to rapid urbanisation. Due to the surge in migrants, cities have experienced an increased demand for housing, public services, and transportation, leading to massive infrastructural development (Wenmeng 2018). The need for more robust infrastructure was caused by the strain on the already available facilities. Nonetheless, the challenge has not only been to accommodate the surging number of migrants but also to ensure sustainable urban development. While the migration policies have facilitated rural-urban migration, leading to urbanisation and infrastructure development, the problem of insufficient affordable housing may arise. Consequently, this may lead to soaring house prices, making it difficult for many people to secure living places. Thus, as China tries to balance the upper hand of urbanisation with the essentiality of sustainable infrastructure development, analysis of the impacts of these policies is crucial to enable the design of future guidelines that will aid in creating livable urban spaces.
Challenges
Cultural Obstacles
During implementation, the rural-urban migration policies encountered cultural barriers due to the significant differences between the rural and urban ways of life. China’s large and diverse cultural setting challenges policymakers who try to enhance a smooth transition for migrants. Wang and Yu Benjamin (2019) highlighted that cultural differences are one of the major causes of barriers to labour mobility in China. For example, variations in traditional practices, language, and lifestyle preferences create conflicts that undermine the willingness of rural residents to migrate. The policies in place hardly address the cultural aspects, leading to reluctance from the rural dwellers. Still, the deep-rooted connection to the ancestral lands and enduring communal bonds in the countryside reinforce the resistance to migration. Since the policies are primarily designed at a macro level by the central government, there is a potential to neglect the complex cultures.
Politics
The political environment in China creates complexities that undermine the effectiveness of implementing rural-urban migration policies. The centralised nature of Chinese governance, with decision-making concentrated at higher levels, leads to delays when responding to the needs of migrants (Lam et al. 2015). Delays may lead to inconsistency in policy structure and coordination challenges between national and local authorities, hindering integrative execution. Additionally, although politicians might address the challenges and importance of effective rural-urban policies, conflicting priorities can potentially divert attention from the needs of the migrating population. Also, the local governments, whose primary duty is on the ground execution, may encounter challenges as they try to align regional needs with national strategies. Hence, China should embark on a more responsive approach to ensure efficient policy alignment, effective resource distribution, and collaboration between federal and local governments to reinforce the seamless implementation of rural-urban migration policies.
Economic Obstacles
The economic policies linked to China’s policies on rural-urban migration are a result of complex factors that influence the general migration patterns. Economic disparities between the rural and urban regions pose considerable obstacles regardless of the opportunities in urban areas. Although urban health insurance encourages rural-urban migration among low-income individuals, enrolling migrants in urban pensions deter them from moving to urban areas at a young age (Bairoliya and Miller, 2021). Hence, wage differences and the high cost of living in urban regions are significant determinants influencing the choice to migrate. Also, the lack of sustainable employment options in urban areas reinforces the resistance to migration. This shows that economic problems result from more significant issues within the system, and migration policies need to address these problems. Furthermore, the changes in economic opportunities over time and in different locations make the policy environment more intricate and require a detailed comprehension of the economic dynamics in each region.
Social Implications
Individuals migrating from rural to urban areas impact the familial relationship because separation strains the traditional bond. Tang and Wang (2021) ascertained that when parents migrate, there is less engagement in children’s daily life affecting the well-being of left-behind children. Additionally, the migration of crucial community individuals, such as elders, can cause the breakdown of enduring relationships and social connections. The policies need to deal with these changes, not just focusing on the economic effects of migration but also the significant social disruptions it causes. In urban centres, social challenges such as discrimination and limitations to access to significant social amenities such as education and healthcare undermine the implementation of migration policies. Henceforth, to facilitate the effective implementation of migration policies, the authorities should acknowledge the social implications that might undermine migration and the welfare of individuals and communities.
Recommendations
Investment in Rural Development
Undertaking investments in rural development is a crucial step towards mitigating the challenges and enhancing the results of rural-urban migration policies in China. Governmental investment in rural areas and the strengthening of nonagricultural industries in the countryside positively facilitate urban-rural development (Li and Hu, 2015). By directing resources towards the rural regions, rural-urban migration policies can enable local economies, infrastructure, and vital services. This would improve the living standards and create environments for better livelihoods. Hence, this approach enhances balanced regional development and addresses the leading cause that drives individuals to migrate toward urban areas. However, challenges may arise in terms of efficient allocation and management of resources, which calls for careful balance between various aspects of development.
Integrated Policy Framework
The implementation of a comprehensive policy framework is significant in addressing the challenges faced by rural-urban migration policies in China. For instance, a policy framework on social support is crucial to support families and enhance family strength when solving the social problems caused by migration to urban areas (Wen and Hanley, 2015). By using this method, policymakers can consider economic solutions and take into account various factors that affect migration patterns. However, an integrated framework requires the collaboration of different government agencies so that policies take into account all the essential aspects. Thus, this collaborative effort aids in comprehending the multifaceted reasons for migration. Additionally, it is paramount to involve experts, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and representatives from rural and urban communities in developing comprehensive and enduring policies. Although creating and managing a complex framework for rural-urban migration policies may be difficult, the long-term advantages of promoting a fair and inclusive approach to these policies are much more significant than the initial difficulties.
Social Integration and Inclusivity
Social integration and inclusivity stress the importance of addressing the economic aspects of migration and the social facets essential for enhancing a conducive urban environment. For instance, prioritising affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and educational opportunities during the formulation of migration policies can aid in lessening the challenges associated with their implementation. Chow and Lou (2015) claimed that community-based approaches effectively tackle social exclusion problems for rural migrants. Additionally, conducting cultural exchange programs helps bridge the gap between rural and urban communities, promoting mutual understanding and minimising social tensions. However, it is essential to acknowledge and mitigate the potential challenges of this recommendation, such as reluctance from established urban communities who might be the majority. Furthermore, it is crucial to regularly assess the efficiency of this technique to ensure that social integration initiatives are producing exemplary results. While this suggestion has potential, its success depends on thorough strategising, continuous evaluation, and proactive measures to address probable hindrances.
Skills Development and Education
It is vital to facilitate specific programs that improve people’s skills in the countryside to prepare them for the jobs available in cities. Training and skill upgrading is a vital approach that can aid in formulating rural-urban migration policies since people can quickly secure jobs in urban centres, making it easier to assimilate them into urban life (Wang et al., 2018). This can be achieved by working together with schools, training centres, and industry leaders to give individuals the skills they need to find good jobs. Investing in education in rural areas helps people find work in cities and helps in the community’s general development. However, there are challenges to consider, such as the need for ongoing financial support, making sure the programs are accessible to many people, and adapting to the dynamic job market in cities. Balancing these factors ensures these programs are efficient in the long term and aid in minimising the number of people migrating to the urban regions.
Conclusion
In summary, China’s rural-urban migration policies have evolved significantly over time in response to changes in the nation’s economy, society, and politics. The pre-reform era laid the groundwork for migration patterns, influenced by Mao Zedong’s agricultural strategies and the commune system. The economic reforms of the 1970s and 1980s, led by Deng Xiaoping, resulted in a substantial rural-urban migration that drove industrialisation and economic growth while also widening social and economic disparities. Subsequent reforms to the Hukou system in the 1990s and 2000s aimed to address these inequalities by providing rural migrants with improved access to urban resources, although challenges remain. Various policy measures, such as economic development zones, urbanisation incentives, and poverty alleviation programs, have shaped China’s migration landscape.
Economically, these policies have impacted income, the types of jobs available, and how wealth is distributed in China. Environmentally, the rapid growth of cities has put pressure on resources and led to pollution. Socially, the policies have changed family relationships, perpetuated discrimination, and made it harder for people to fit into society. The main challenge is finding a balance between economic growth, social fairness, and sustainable development. Cultural differences, political issues, economic inequalities, and social consequences make putting these policies into action even harder. To tackle these challenges, investing more in developing rural areas, creating a comprehensive policy involving cooperation from different sectors, prioritising social integration and fairness, and improving skills and education are suggested. These steps aim to create a more fair, inclusive, and sustainable approach to people moving from rural to urban areas in China. As the country looks back on its past policies and plans for the future, it is essential to have a flexible and thorough strategy to deal with the complexities of rural-urban migration and build a peaceful and thriving society.
References
Bairoliya, N. and Miller, R. (2021) ‘Social Insurance, demographics, and rural-urban migration in China’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 91, p. 103615. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103615.
Barbieri, E., Pollio, C. and Prota, F. (2019) ‘The impacts of spatially targeted programmes: Evidence from Guangdong’, Regional Studies, 54(3), pp. 415–428. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1635688.
Butt, K.M. and Sajid, S., (2018) Chinese Economy under Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping. Journal of Political Studies, 25(1), pp.169-178.
Chan, K.W., (2015) Five decades of the Chinese Hukou system1. Handbook of Chinese migration: Identity and well-being, p.23.
Chan, K.W., (2019) China’s Hukou system at 60: Continuity and reform. Handbook on urban development in China, 59.
Chen, S. and Liu, Z. (2016) ‘What determines the settlement intention of rural migrants in China? economic incentives versus sociocultural conditions’, Habitat International, 58, pp. 42–50. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.09.004.
Chow, J.C.-C. and Lou, C.W.-M. (2015) ‘Community-based approaches to social exclusion among rural-to-urban migrants in China’, China Journal of Social Work, 8(1), pp. 33–46. doi:10.1080/17525098.2015.1009137.
Duan, W. et al. (2021) ‘Effects of rural-urban labour migration on household forest management in the context of rural reform and development in China’, Small-scale Forestry, 20(4), pp. 543–568. doi:10.1007/s11842-021-09480-x.
Gao, F. (2021) ‘China’s poverty alleviation “miracle” from the perspective of the structural transformation of the urban–rural dual economy’, China Political Economy, 4(1), pp. 86–109. doi:10.1108/cpe-06-2021-0008.
Hung, J. (2022) ‘Hukou system influencing the structural, institutional inequalities in China: The multifaceted disadvantages rural Hukou Holders Face’, Social Sciences, 11(5), p. 194. doi:10.3390/socsci11050194.
Ji, L. and Zhang, W. (2019) ‘Fiscal incentives and sustainable urbanization: Evidence from China’, Sustainability, 12(1), p. 103. doi:10.3390/su12010103.
Lam, M.W.W., Liu, X. and Schipke, M.A. (2015) China’s labor market in the “New Normal”. International Monetary Fund.
Li, B., Chen, C. and Hu, B. (2016) ‘Governing urbanization and the new urbanization plan in China’, Environment and Urbanization, 28(2), pp. 515–534. doi:10.1177/0956247816647345.
Li, Y. and Hu, Z. (2015) ‘Approaching integrated urban-rural development in China: The Changing Institutional Roles’, sustainability, 7(6), pp. 7031–7048. doi:10.3390/su7067031.
Liu, Y., Guo, Y. and Zhou, Y. (2018) ‘Poverty alleviation in rural China: Policy changes, future challenges and policy implications’, China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(2), pp. 241–259. doi:10.1108/caer-10-2017-0192.
Melo, G. and Ames, G., (2016) Driving factors of rural-urban migration in China (No. 333-2016-14408)
Moak, K. and Lee, M.W. (2015) ‘Deng Xiaoping theory’, China’s Economic Rise and Its Global Impact, pp. 91–115. doi:10.1057/9781137535580_6.
Qi, Z., (2019). An overview of rural to urban migration in China and social challenges. Migration Letters, 16(2), pp.273-282.
Qian, J. (2017) ‘Improving policy design and building capacity in local experiments: Equalization of public service in China’s urban‐Rural Integration Pilot’, Public Administration and Development, 37(1), pp. 51–64. doi:10.1002/pad.1785.
Qian, Z. (2015) ‘From the first five-year plan to the Cultural Revolution: The pre-reform urban transformation of Hangzhou, China’, Planning Perspectives, 30(4), pp. 571–595. doi:10.1080/02665433.2014.995694.
Raimondo, G. (2020) ‘The Chinese Hukou system: Reforming institutions of inequality between the need for roots and the demands of Change’, Revue québécoise de droit international, 32(1), pp. 139–171. doi:10.7202/1070485ar.
Shi, G. et al. (2022) ‘Air pollutant emissions induced by rural-to-urban migration during China’s urbanization (2005–2015)’, Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 10, p. 100166. doi:10.1016/j.ese.2022.100166.
Shi, X. (2018) ‘Heterogeneous effects of rural-urban migration on agricultural productivity’, China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(3), pp. 482–497. doi:10.1108/caer-10-2017-0193.
Sun, L. (2018) ‘A glance on rural–urban migration’, Rural Urban Migration and Policy Intervention in China, pp. 11–38. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8093-7_2.
Tang, Z. and Wang, N. (2021) ‘School disruption of children in China: The influence of parents’ rural–urban migration’, Children and Youth Services Review, 129, p. 106167. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106167.
Tian, M. et al. (2022) ‘Hukou Reform and the “luohu” of rural migrants in Urban China’, Sustainability, 14(23), p. 15683. doi:10.3390/su142315683.
Wang, Q., Ren, T. and Liu, T. (2018) ‘Training, skill-upgrading and settlement intention of migrants: Evidence from China’, Urban Studies, 56(13), pp. 2779–2801. doi:10.1177/0042098018798760.
WANG, S.X. and Yu Benjamin, F. (2019) ‘Labor mobility barriers and rural-urban migration in Transitional China’, China Economic Review, 53, pp. 211–224. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2018.09.006.
Wang, Y. (2020) ‘Institutional interaction and decision making in China’s Rural Development’, Journal of Rural Studies, 76, pp. 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.023.
Wei, L. et al. (2022) ‘Rural–urban migration, family arrangement, and children’s welfare: Evidence from China’s rural areas’, Family Relations, 72(4), pp. 1586–1606. doi:10.1111/fare.12720.
Wen, M., Zheng, Z. and Niu, J. (2016) ‘Psychological distress of rural-to-urban migrants in two Chinese cities: Shenzhen and Shanghai’, Asian Population Studies, 13(1), pp. 5–24. doi:10.1080/17441730.2016.1233655.
Wen, Y. and Hanley, J. (2015) ‘Rural‐to‐urban migration, Family Resilience, and Policy Framework for social support in China’, Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 9(1), pp. 18–28. doi:10.1111/aswp.12042.
Wenmeng, F., (2018) Rural–Urban Migration, Urbanization, And Megacities In China. Rise Of Megacities, The: Challenges, Opportunities And Unique Characteristics, p.175.
Xie, L., Swerts, E. and Pumain, D., (2018) Economic development zones and urban growth in China. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography.
write