Introduction
Within the healthcare domain, Registered Nurses (RNs) assume a crucial role in enhancing the quality of patient care within clinical environments (Burnes et al., 2020). The importance of proficient leadership abilities in all levels of clinical practice is emphasized by the Nursing and Midwifery Council through the establishment of the Registered Nurse Standards for Practice. The primary aim of this plan is to implement a comprehensive leadership approach specifically designed to overcome a relevant clinical obstacle. The aforementioned problem is shown by the situation occurring at Bluebird Home, a long-term care institution located in the rural region of New South Wales. Following an accreditation visit, it has become apparent that there is a notable deficiency in the implementation of consistent procedures for preventing pressure injuries (Burnes et al., 2020). This proposal aims to outline a carefully selected collection of change leadership methods that are well-prepared to effectively address this concern, while also aligning with the recommendations specified by the accreditation review.
Explanation of Clinical Risk (300 words)
The lack of a standardized pressure injury prevention technique inside Bluebird Home represents a significant and urgent clinical risk that directly affects the well-being and safety of its elderly inhabitants. Pressure injuries, sometimes referred to as bedsores or pressure ulcers, occur due to prolonged pressure on the skin, primarily affecting those with limited mobility. The aforementioned ailments extend beyond basic physical discomfort, resulting in a range of severe effects. These conditions involve severe discomfort, increased vulnerability to infections as a result of decreased skin integrity, extended periods of hospitalization, and in the most severe cases, potential fatality. The increased susceptibility of elderly individuals due to their limited mobility exacerbates the severity of this risk, further highlighting their intrinsic vulnerability to the development of such damaging illnesses.
The divergent strategies employed for pressure injury prevention inside the facility contribute to the heightened risk environment. The utilization of diverse solutions contributes to a heightened probability of people experiencing inadequate treatment due to inconsistencies in the system (Onyeneke & Abe, 2021). The aforementioned circumstance poses a threat to the overall welfare of individuals, compromising the core commitment to ensuring safety within a senior care institution such as Bluebird Home. Furthermore, the consequences are beyond the domain of physical suffering. The impact of pressure injuries on residents in terms of their psychological and emotional well-being should not be underestimated (Burnes et al., 2020). The presence of these injuries not only undermines their physical well-being but also erodes their emotional fortitude, leading to a significant deterioration in their overall life satisfaction. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize the management of this clinical risk with accuracy and promptness. This requires implementing a complete change leadership strategy that considers both the immediate medical implications and the overall welfare of the residents. The issue of clinical risk is a huge challenge in most healthcare facilities and demands serious consideration to address it and avoid possible consequences in the future that include lawsuits and financial losses.
Strategies to Implement the Change
Strategy 1: Collaborative Interdisciplinary Training and Education
The focal point of this discussion pertains to the urgent matter of mitigating inconsistent pressure injury prevention. In this regard, the recommended approach of collaborative interdisciplinary training and education assumes a prominent role (Nilsen et al., 2020). The proposed method aims to surpass hierarchical structures and designated responsibilities, acknowledging the significance of a unified endeavor including all personnel to bring about substantial and impactful transformation. This technique entails implementing extensive training sessions that cover a wide range of staff members, including Registered Nurses (RNs), enrolled nurses, nursing assistants, and other support employees.
Fundamentally, this approach relies on fostering a collective comprehension of the need to prevent pressure injuries. By promoting knowledge regarding the complexities of these injuries, encompassing their etiology, predisposing factors, and preventive strategies, personnel can coalesce around a shared objective. The training places significant importance on the implementation of consistent standards, highlighting the crucial role that each worker has in ensuring the safety and well-being of residents (Erskine et al., 2018). The promotion of inclusion in healthcare settings aims to dismantle conventional boundaries that may hinder collaboration among different roles, thereby cultivating a culture where all individuals collectively take responsibility for patient care.
By current leadership ideas, this strategy is positioned to improve collaboration and communication across the different levels of Bluebird Home’s employees. The training sessions’ interdisciplinary nature cultivates a sense of mutual respect and recognition for the unique contributions brought forth by each function, hence mitigating possible causes of conflict (Erskine et al., 2018). The integration of pressure injury prevention measures not only facilitates the efficient execution of these interventions but also establishes a foundation for a cohesive and cooperative workplace atmosphere. The efficacy of the plan is contingent upon not just the dissemination of knowledge, but also the fostering of a collective dedication to the facility’s overall objective of delivering exceptional care to its inhabitants.
Strategy 2: Leadership Through Communication
When it comes to making plans a reality, nothing is more important than clear and concise communication between all parties involved in the transformation process. Strategy 2, “Leadership Through Communication,” is based on the understanding that an effective change management plan requires a solid communication infrastructure. Bluebird Home’s philosophy is grounded in the knowledge that open and constant communication is crucial for coping with the complexities of change.
A key component of this strategy is maintaining open lines of communication to ensure the timely flow of information. This initiative will be led by nursing leaders, who are at the vanguard of coordinating change. They make sure that every worker is aware of the new pressure injury prevention method and training program by holding regular staff meetings, briefings, and updates (Dumas & Beinecke, 2018). Proactively sharing information like this develops trust and shows that the company cares about its stakeholders’ input into the change.
The technique also accounts for the pushback that transitions of any kind can generate. Leaders in the nursing field can alleviate any fears or questions their employees may have about the new strategy by encouraging open communication (Nilsen et al., 2018). This tactic recognizes the importance of cultivating a culture of inclusivity and engagement in calming nerves and winning over skeptics. Leaders in the nursing profession can foster a culture of open communication and teamwork by providing a forum for staff members to share their perspectives.
The ultimate goal of this method is to promote the power of communication as a force for positive transformation (Rogers et al., 2020). Leaders in the nursing profession may reduce anxiety, dispel misunderstandings, and forge a shared vision by keeping the information pipeline open. As a result, the pressure injury prevention approach is more likely to be put into action, and an atmosphere of open communication is fostered, both of which are essential to good clinical leadership.
Strategy 3: Clinical Champions
The idea of involving clinical champions emerges as a powerful driver in the endeavor to create a transformative change in pressure injury prevention practices at Bluebird Home. The clinical champions, who are recognized for their proven skill and steadfast dedication, play a crucial role in promoting and facilitating the implementation of the new practices (Bonawitz et al., 2020). Through the strategic utilization of their influence, these champions fulfill the dual roles of ambassadors and role models, providing valuable assistance to their peers in effectively navigating the complexities inherent in the process of change.
The crux of this strategy rests in acknowledging that the adoption of change is most optimally achieved when it originates from inside the organization’s members. Clinical champions, who possess extensive knowledge of nursing techniques and patient care, demonstrate the necessary credibility and trustworthiness required to effectively promote acceptance and support among their peers (Tang, 2019). The acceptance of the new pressure injury prevention measures by the individuals in question holds significant importance that goes beyond mere directives, as it fosters a sense of purpose and immediacy among their colleagues.
In addition to fulfilling their advocacy duties, clinical champions assume the responsibilities of mentors and guides throughout the transitional period. Experienced professionals possessing a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and difficulties inherent in clinical practice provide pragmatic perspectives and resolutions that resonate with their peers. The practical assistance they provide encompasses a wide range of activities, including resolving uncertainties and disseminating optimal strategies, effectively reducing the time required to adapt to new circumstances (Dumas & Beinecke, 2018). The utilization of peer-to-peer counseling not only serves to augment the efficacy of the aforementioned technique but also cultivates a collective spirit of camaraderie and solidarity within the nursing personnel.
In summary, the implementation of clinical champions represents a strategic maneuver that leverages internal expertise and leadership to facilitate a smooth transition to the newly introduced pressure injury prevention protocols (Lamm et al., 2018). By utilizing the authority and sway possessed by these champions, Bluebird Home can guarantee that the transition is not only a procedural change but a collaborative undertaking embraced and advocated by its committed nursing staff.
Strategy 4: Continuous Monitoring and Feedback Loop
It has become clear that the strategy of constant monitoring and feedback loop is essential to the long-term success of the pressure injury prevention project in the setting of the ever-changing context of change implementation (Ling et al., 2018). This approach acknowledges that change is cyclical, thus it centers on creating a structure to evaluate the success of the new policies and practices, while also soliciting feedback from frontline workers (Harrison et al., 2021). The cornerstone of this method is regular audits, which serve as checkpoints to determine whether or not employees are following the established pressure injury prevention protocols. These inspections act as neutral yardsticks, highlighting both the areas where changes were effective and those where more work is needed. The facility can learn more about the effects of the modification and whether or not they line up with the anticipated good outcomes through systematic measurement of the outcomes versus the intended goals.
The addition of a feedback loop makes this tactic more dynamic and participatory. This feedback loop serves a greater purpose than simple auditing by providing a forum for employees to discuss lessons learned, ideas for improvement, and obstacles faced in putting new policies into practice. This priceless feedback, gathered from individuals working directly with the inhabitants, offers a fresh look at the implementation’s viability and efficiency (Grol & Wensing, 2020). Staff members will feel more invested and empowered in the company if their opinions are not merely welcomed but actively sought. In addition, the facility is in a prime position to quickly address any new concerns, make appropriate adjustments, and optimize the strategy in light of real-time insights thanks to the feedback loop (Kho et al., 2020). A culture of learning and adaptability is fostered in Bluebird Home through the combined efforts of constant monitoring and a feedback loop technique. The facility understands that transformation is not a static process but rather a journey of continual improvement, and therefore it has built feedback mechanisms into its transformation strategy. The facility’s dedication to employee engagement, education, and resident safety is shown in the plan they’ve adopted.
Strategy 5: Empowerment and Autonomy
A powerful motivator for long-lasting change in Bluebird Home’s pressure injury prevention practices is the approach of empowerment and autonomy. A strong sense of ownership and accountability is fostered by including the nursing staff in the decision-making process regarding these techniques (Caulfield & Senger, 2017). The concepts of transformational leadership, a paradigm that supports the premise that leaders should inspire and empower their teams to catalyze significant transformations, are complementary to this strategy.
The realization that the nurses at Bluebird Home are active participants in determining the standard of care offered rather than merely carrying out orders is a key component of this technique. Their knowledge, perceptions, and viewpoints from the ground are respected and included in the change initiatives by including people in the decision-making process (Caulfield & Senger, 2017). As a result, each nurse develops a strong feeling of ownership and sees themselves as the custodians of the residents’ well-being. As a result of the nurses’ perception that they are co-creators of the care environment, they feel a greater sense of accountability.
This technique, which is based on the principles of transformational leadership, serves as a tool for nurse empowerment by giving them the freedom to express their thoughts, make suggestions for changes, and actively engage in developing protocols. By transcending traditional hierarchies, this empowerment creates a situation where leaders and nurses work together to drive change (Hall, 2021). Leaders may further energize a culture of shared commitment to resident safety and comfort by honoring the autonomy and insights of the nurses. By doing so, they demonstrate their trust and regard for them.
This tactic effectively taps into the intrinsic desire and enthusiasm of the nursing staff, going beyond the implementation of change at the surface level. Their commitment to putting pressure injury prevention measures into action becomes more than simply a requirement; it becomes a sincere desire as they take on the role of architects of their care environment. The integration of the strategy with transformational leadership concepts emphasizes that creating an atmosphere where every employee feels appreciated, empowered, and a vital part of the overall goal is what creates significant change, not just changing regulations and procedures (Harrison et al., 2021).
Conclusion
Bluebird Home’s residents are at serious clinical risk because there are no standardized pressure injury prevention strategies in place there. A strong solution to this difficulty is provided by the combination of the offered change leadership strategies. A complete structure is built to reduce these risks through interdisciplinary training, efficient communication, clinical champions, ongoing observation, and staff empowerment. Together, these tactics strengthen the facility’s dedication to raising care quality and safety (Harrison et al., 2018). The facility is ready to revolutionize its strategy for preventing pressure injuries by encouraging collaboration across many roles, open lines of communication, and a culture of shared accountability. The use of continuous monitoring and the active involvement of clinical champions ensure that the methods continue to be flexible and efficient (Grunberg et al., 2022). The nursing staff is also motivated to be proactive promoters of resident well-being when given more autonomy since it fosters a sense of shared responsibility. This strategic convergence emphasizes the Registered Nurses’ (RNs’) indispensable role as change agents in healthcare settings.
References
Bonawitz, K., Wetmore, M., Heisler, M., et al. (2020). Champions in context: Which attributes matter for change efforts in healthcare? Implementation Science, 15, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01024-9
Burnes, B., Hughes, M., & By, R. T. (2018). Reimagining organizational change leadership. Leadership, 14(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715016662188
Caulfield, J.L. & Senger, A. (2017). Perception is reality: change leadership and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(7), 927-945. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2016-0166
Dumas, C., & Beinecke, R.H. (2018). Change leadership in the 21st century. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(4), 867-876. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2017-0042
Erskine, J., Hunter, D. J., Small, A., et al. (2017). Leadership and transformational change in healthcare organizations: A qualitative analysis of the North East Transformation System. Health Services Management Research, 26(1), 29-37. doi:10.1177/0952484813481589
Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2020). Implementation of Change in Healthcare: A Complex Problem. In M. Wensing, R. Grol, & J. Grimshaw (Eds.), Book Title (pp. xx-xx). Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119488620.ch1
Grunberg, N. E., McManigle, J. E., Schoomaker, E. B., & Barry, E. S. (2022). Leading Change in Health Care. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2022.11.007
Hall J. N. (2021). The COVID-19 crisis: aligning Kotter’s steps for leading change with health care quality improvement. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 12(1), e109–e110. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.71165
Harrison, R., Fischer, S. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2018). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement, and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176
Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement, and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 85-108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176
Kho, J., Gillespie, N., & Martin-Khan, M. (2020). A systematic scoping review of change management practices used for telemedicine service implementations. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 815. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05657-w
Lamm, K.W., Sapp, L.R., & Lamm, A.J. (2018). A Longitudinal Evaluation of Change Leadership within a Leadership Development Program Context. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(3), 121. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I3/R7
Ling, B., Guo, Y., & Chen, D. (2018). Change Leadership and Employees’ Commitment to Change: A Multilevel Motivation Approach. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000199
Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., et al. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses, and assistant nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8
Nilsen, P., Schildmeijer, K., Ericsson, C., et al. (2019). Implementation of change in health care in Sweden: a qualitative study of professionals’ change responses. Implementation Science, 14(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0902-6
Onyeneke, G.B. & Abe, T. (2021). The effect of change leadership on employee attitudinal support for planned organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(2), 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2020-0244
Pant, I., Patro, L., Sedlander, E., Chandrana, S., & Rimal, R. (2022). Monitor to innovate with feedback loops: process evaluation protocol for an anemia prevention intervention. Gates Open Research, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13417.2
Rogers, L., De Brún, A., Birken, S. A., et al. (2020). The micropolitics of implementation: A qualitative study exploring the impact of power, authority, and influence when implementing change in healthcare teams. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1059. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05905-z
Tang, K.N. (2019). Change Management. In: Leadership and Change Management. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8902-3_5
write