Issues involved
There may be inconsistencies between the librarians’ revered philosophy of informational freedom and the ethical rules of scientific study regarding the appropriateness of employing data generated from immoral or dishonorable testing. The medical and library sectors were aware of this dispute in 1995 when publications asserted that the people depicted in the drawings from Eduard Pernkopf’s topographische Anatomie Eines Menschen were Holocaust survivors (Oyinbo et al.). Few have contested the Pernkopf atlas’ authenticity, artistic merit, or instructional usefulness. Still, some have said that using such individuals violates professional ethics guidelines because it involves inhumane and demeaning mistreatment of subjects or disdain for a decomposing body. The book was attempted to be taken out of medical libraries. This report analyzes the Pernkopf atlas’s past and the controversies surrounding it. Reporting on the findings of a study of academic health libraries on their handling of the Pernkopf atlas, this article also discusses the humanitarian ramifications of these concerns and how they relate to librarian duties.
Many people agree that Pernkopf’s Anatomy is a masterwork among conventional morphological atlases and is the ultimate expression of color anatomic illustrative example, in the phrases of one of its most devoted students. As a result, the original piece created for the atlas is a significant part of anatomy’s scientific and cultural history (Oyinbo et al.). The importance of the gathering is further enhanced by the unbreakable links between the work and its primary originator and Austria’s Nazi past. The collateral nerves are depicted in great detail on anatomical plates in Pernkopf’s atlas of physiology. Due to the author’s connection to the “Third Reich” and the probable portrayal of Holocaust victims, its use is debatable. It has not been determined how utilizing this atlas to guide surgical outcomes might be unethical.
Kant Moral Theory
Goodwill is the only object, in Kant’s view, that is good in and of itself. Our actions are motivated by our will, which also establishes their motive. When anything behaves out of duty, it is excellent. Kant believes that the only object with intrinsic value is goodwill. When considering the other things we value, these things are only good with restriction. We appreciate the knowledge, for instance, but it can occasionally be exploited to create crimes worldwide. The same is true of bravery. Although a suicide attacker also demonstrates bravery, we value it. So, courage can only be beneficial occasionally (Oyinbo et al.). Many instances come to mind. As a result, Kant asserts that goodwill is the only perfect thing or the only object with inherent value. So long as the will fulfills its obligations, it is good.
Kant distinguishes between acting from obligation and acting in line with commitment because he understands that it can be challenging to ascertain someone’s intentions. Let’s use the scenario of three young men who spot an older woman needing assistance from across the street to demonstrate this contrast. Man A decides to assist the woman across the street since he knows he would feel bad all day if he didn’t. Since Mrs. Wilson is his neighbor and Mrs. Wilson bakes the tastiest cookies in the neighborhood, Man B chooses to assist the woman across the street. Man B helps her because he believes he will be compensated. Man C decides to assist the woman from across the road since it is morally correct to do so, and he is aware of his responsibility to help those in need whenever he can.
The outcome is the same for all three people. The woman is assisted in crossing the roadway. All three young men would be ethically commendable if we were to approach this from the standpoint of utility since, in each situation, pleasure as a well is raised or pain is relieved. Kant, however, believes that only Man C’s activities have moral value since he is aware of the moral obligation and acts following it (Oyinbo et al.). The other two are motivated by anything other than their obligations; they only behave following the law.
Summary
It aids in elucidating key ideas regarding how our bodies work. One can learn about the practical functions of the human body in addition to the theoretical concepts taught in physiology and anatomy programs. The human body has been a source of inspiration for science and the arts throughout history. To comprehend how the body functions, anatomists frequently employ other methods. For instance, kids must understand how genes act and how each cell and organ works. Anatomists often collaborate with other scientists and medical professionals to comprehend how drugs and other illnesses influence the body and find therapies and cures for diseases. Additionally, they collaborate with medical professionals, forensic geologists who use science to help solve a crime, paleontologists who study fossils, and anthropologists looking for the causes of extermination or death.
References
Oyinbo, C. A., Johnbull, T. O., & Atoni, A. D. Anatomy education: the exceptional contributions of Hermann Steve. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPLNW3_pCNM
write