Some time ago, I needed a new smartphone, and after thinking it over for a while, I finally narrowed my choice to “ABC Galaxy X”, a flagship model by a well-established brand. Here, the decision-making process followed the normal rational decision-making process, stepping through distinct stages and finally making its way toward an informed choice.
Problem Realization: The first step was the realization of a new Smartphone. The phone I used had become slow to operate, and the camera was also giving me another performance than a new one for taking photographs. The problem to solve has already been defined: a high-performing smartphone with a quality camera.
Generate Alternatives: I considered different models of premium smartphone brands. The alternatives could be ABC, DEF, and GHI model variants. Technical specifications, camera features, battery life expectancy, and user reviews are relevant variables. ABC Galaxy X had an excellent camera system and processor and got approval from the users regarding performance.
For every generated alternative, step 3 involved doing an evaluation. In this step, I went into technical specifications, such as detailed explanations ranging from camera resolutions to processor speeds exhibited by storage capabilities and display quality. User reviews were equally important as they gave feedback on how users experienced their smartphones. In this regard, the ABC Galaxy X was applauded for consistency in the quality of camera functionality, processing speed, and friendly interface.
Making the Decision: The analysis led to a decision to purchase the Galaxy X. Its superiority in camera in-camera, powerful technical specifications, and reliability from the brand in developing quality smartphones guided the decision. The decision was re-asserted to maximize the smartphone for high-quality photography and overall performance.
Implementing the Decision: At this stage of implementation, I could buy an ABC Galaxy X. Purchasing the phone at this stage, I was thinking about options for a warrant that could be available, independent add-ons purchasable from the phone, as well as support service for customers offered in my story. This decision was much facilitated by nothing else other than buying from a well-established retailer with a firm return policy.
Mostly followed the rational decision-making process, traceable non-rational models, and biases (Adinolfi 20). We omitted less salient attributes during decision-making and selectively focused on critical characteristics such as camera resolution and processor speed, hence bounded rationality. There also would have been a minor form of confirmation bias as I was looking for further confirming information to support going with the support of y X.
Reflecting on the decision, it is a great rational choice. ABC Galaxy X exceeded all expectations to provide a tremendous photography experience and smooth performance. This was effective in making this decision because the dissatisfaction was the need for a more advanced phone to take photos and carry out other activities (Nica et al. 35).
However, the experience also emphasized the significance of continuous technological advancements. In a fast-paced world of tech, having the general know-how of emerging technologies and factoring in the future-proof functionalities might make the chodevice’svice’s lifespan pontifically; the decision was rational in choosing the smartphone that covered all the identified needs and the set expectations of the user. Such proactive awareness will be built into such decisions to enhance the chosen device’s adaptability and satisfaction.
Work Cited
Adinolfi, Paola. “A journey around decision-making: Searching for the “big picture” across disciplines.” European Management Journal 39.1 2021: 9–21.
Cheong, Hyuk Jun, and Yunjae Cheong. “Updating the Foote, Cone & Belding grid: Revisiting the product classifications of the FCB grid for online shopping and contemporary consumers’ decision making.” Journal of Advertising Research 61.1 2021: 12–29.
Nica, Elvira, et al. “Artificial intelligence decision-making in shopping patterns: Consumer values, cognition, and attitudes.” Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 17.1 2022: 31–43.
write