Abstract
Based on Carl Jung’s psychological theories, Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Myers developed the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a popular personality evaluation instrument. The MBTI improves communication, teamwork, and self-awareness. The essay introduces the MBTI, its history during World War II, and its extensive application in professional and personal settings. The paper then discusses the sixteen MBTI personality types based on four fundamental traits: extraversion vs. introversion, intuition vs. sensing, feeling vs. thinking, and judging vs. Perceiving. Each dimension reveals a person’s preferred manner of interacting with the world and making decisions.
My MBTI results show an ENFJ personality with Extraversion, Intuition, Feeling, and Judging. The ENFJ’s strengths include connecting with others, anticipating possibilities, and supporting others, and areas for growth, balancing empathy and objectivity, are examined. The essay compares the MBTI results to my self-perception and communication style. The essay emphasizes the ENFJ description’s correctness in revealing my skills and preferred social interactions. Finally, I discuss the MBTI’s role in my development. It stresses using the exam for self-improvement rather than personality description. MBTI emphasizes understanding human complexity and appreciating differences, which leads to effective teamwork and personal fulfillment.
Introduction
Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Myers invented the MBTI. This was built upon the mental theories of Carl Jung. This tool was developed during the Second World War to discover people’s optimal occupations. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is extensively utilized in professional environments and alternative situations to improve self-knowledge and support productive exchange and partnership (Sari, 2019). This essay discusses the MBTI’s history, dimensions, my results, an analysis of the results, and personal views on the assessment’s correctness.
Historical Background of the MBTI
The psychological assessment was formulated using the theories of Carl Jung. This was further developed with the help of Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Myers Briggs. During World War II, they aimed to help people choose suitable careers. This personality test organizes behavioral patterns into four categories, each comprising two conflicting choices. The following choices cause sixteen specific personalities (Vaida, 2019). These provide people with important information about their inborn propensities and potential sectors for advancement.
The evolution of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator stemmed from the theories of Jung that gave priority to thinking abilities and perspectives. Katharine C. Briggs and Isabel B. Myers built upon these ideas to construct a valuable instrument to assist individuals in acquiring self-perception and enhancing their human interactions. Gradually, the MBTI became popular and is now widely utilized as a global personality assessment tool.
The Various Dimensions of the MBTI
This assessment measures character traits based on four main aspects. The initial aspect signifies Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I), which dictates if people get their energy from the world outside or the internal realm of thinking and introspection. The other dimension, Intuition (N) vs. Sensing (S), explores how people process facts (Sari, 2019). This examines whether they depend on theoretical possibilities, sequences, specific facts, and sensory evidence.
The third element, Feeling (F) vs. Thinking (T), studies decision-making styles. People who prefer Feeling base their decisions on personal values and empathy. People who tend to Logic favor objective evaluation and logical reasoning in the context of decision-making. The third dimension, Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P), indicates how people approach the outside world. People who prefer a preference for Judging are typically methodical, goal-driven, and determined (Vaida, 2019). People who favor Perceiving, however, demonstrate increased flexibility, adaptability, and open-mindedness in their actions.
Description of My Own MBTI Results
After finishing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test, my MBTI type is determined to be the ENFJ personality type. The results show subtly liking for extraversion, intuition, feeling, and judging traits. In my ENFJ nature, It is said that I am extroverted, caring, and insightful. I possess an intense longing to lend a hand and provide assistance to people. I excel in social environments and commonly come across myself as a leader. I am compelled through my natural talent to interact with individuals and perceive their wants. Being an intuitive person, I usually concentrate on potential and future results. I frequently look for patterns and deeper meanings in the knowledge shared with me. Furthermore, how I decide is affected by my sentiments and principles. I work hard to select options that promote peace and healthy connections.
As an ENFJ, I have a natural inclination for the organization. I can make firm decisions, being inclined towards a structured framework and ensuring order in my personal and professional endeavors. Moreover, being an ENFJ, I experience satisfaction by engaging with others and collaborating to achieve shared objectives. We can generate a more peaceful and prosperous consequence by utilizing every person’s distinct ability and viewpoint. Understanding plays a crucial role in my social exchanges. I can effortlessly perceive the feelings of individuals nearby, thus enabling me to reply with comprehension and empathy.
Moreover, my instinctive nature allows me to predict possible obstacles and foresee inventive approaches to challenging dilemmas. I possess an inherent gift for encouraging and motivating people. Frequently, I assume guidance positions, aiding persons in accomplishing their complete capacity. Being organized and determined, I love planning and setting up tasks to secure efficiency and output. This applies to both my personal experiences and team arrangements. The description provided by MBTI for ENFJ matches my encounters and thoroughly comprehends the key attributes and behaviors that define my personality.
Analyzing the Findings of the MBTI
The results from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator align with how I see myself and my communication with my surroundings. This particular personality type perfectly represents my extroverted disposition and sincere curiosity in forming connections with people regarding emotions. I endorse the analysis’s explanation of my empathic predispositions entirely. I genuinely care about the welfare of individuals and dedicate time and dedication to comprehending their sentiments and necessities. Moreover, the instinctive aspect of the ENFJ personality demonstrates my capacity to go beyond the current and imagine likely future events (Jirásek et al., 2021). That is especially useful during the process of finding solutions and the act of deciding methods.
The identification by the MBTI of myself as someone who exhibits ENFJ characteristics also brings attention to possibilities for further progress. For example, my intense inclination for emotion and the longing to maintain harmony may cause obstacles in forming neutral selections, particularly in conditions that require complex options. Comprehending these possible challenges will support me in dealing with these kinds of situations better. This can also assist me in achieving stability amidst empathy and neutrality. Furthermore, the portrayal of the ENFJ character as determined and structured acts as a prompt for the relevance of sustaining a framework while at the same time accommodating versatility in the face of changing situations (Sari, 2019).
The results of the MBTI give a complete and precise depiction of my temperament. It provides helpful information regarding my strong points, opportunities for improvement, and favored methods of communicating with the surroundings and other individuals (Kavut, 2020). By accepting this comprehension, I can exploit my abilities effectively while consistently working on self-improvement. This involves cultivating deeper connections and positively impacting my personal and work life.
Conclusion and Lessons Learned
Taking part in the personality assessment was a revealing adventure. Exploring my ENFJ characteristics has bolstered my grasp of my strong points and shortcomings. Identifying my preferences and propensities has permitted me to leverage my abilities. During my self-improvement, I have achieved to utilize fully of my skills. This personality test additionally emphasized the variety within individuals, and the disparities strengthen human interactions and collaborative processes.
Although the MBTI provides valuable perspectives, applying it as a foundation for personal advancement is essential. This should never be observed as a strict interpretation of my personality. By embracing the intricacy of human character, I can admire the uniqueness of individuals. This enables me to cultivate more inclusive and empathetic ties in personal and career contexts. Comprehending my character category has given me a base for ongoing personal growth and has inspired me to esteem the range of others. It has been pivotal in the search for efficient teamwork and individual satisfaction.
References
Jirásek, I., Janošíková, T., Sochor, F., & Češka, D. (2021). Some specifics of Czech recreation and leisure studies students: Personality types based on MBTI. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100315
Kavut, S. (2020). Carl Gustav Jung: Kavramları, Kuramları ve Düşünce Yapısı Üzerine Bir İnceleme Carl Gustav Jung: A Study on His Concepts, Theories and Philosophy. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (UKSAD), 6(2), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.620975
Sari, D. M. (2019). Personality development of Holden Caulfield in JD Salinger’s The Catcher in The Rye (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim). http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/id/eprint/22133
Vaida, M. F. (2019, October). Collaborative education teams development using alternative methodologies. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 223-227). https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369280
write