Project management in higher education institutions such as the University Of Huston College Of Technology is always among the most challenging organizational management practices. Therefore, as technology has seen exponential development in recent years, it is becoming more essential for large organizations like institutions of higher education to endorse technology and maximize its use in managing projects. According to the Project Management Institute, organizations will grow their project management by more than 30% if they prioritize technology in managing their projects. New technology will help the University Of Huston College Of Technology with an increased rate of completing its projects on time, with quality work, and within budget.
When researching technological applications in project management, it will be essential to define various terms that are associated with the topic clearly. Correct and appropriate definitions of terms are essential activities in independent research to bring out the relevance of the relationship between new technology and project management. There are crucial terms such as hybrid project management and software for project management. It is also essential to know what organizations mean when they talk of having work that is project-based and structured. Other terms include principles of project management, organizational structure, project automation, natural language processing (NLP), artificial intelligence, and machine learning, which will be studied further in the study.
When conducting independent studies, factual arguments and positions are essential, and therefore, the use of data becomes an important activity. According to the topic, it is essential to understand the correlation that statistics have on the future and present application of new technologies on organization project management. For example, it is reported that around 20% of organizations prefer using modern technology to manage their projects. With such statistics, the use of technology to manage projects in organizations could indeed grow by 30% more in the coming five years. Similarly, indeed, the income following the use of technologically superior project management software may have grown by $ 1 billion from 2020, which was at $ 3.5 billion.
For this independent research, qualitative and quantitative research will be carried out. Since the topic involves a lot of literature reviewing and comprehensive analysis, this combination of methods is the best approach. When conducting research of such a magnitude, case-by-case analysis case-by-case by be required to see how other organizations similar to the one in question for this study have navigated the application of technology in their project management activities. Therefore, essential data gathering with enough statistical and analytical value will also be valuable for making projections on how situations may turn out in the coming years. Additionally, research studies that include a combination of qualitative and quantitative research always have the possible information that promotes better insight formation and realistic conclusions.
The comprehensive research on the topic of using new technologies to change project management at the University of Houston College of Technology will be based on the study and understanding of various management and leadership theories. Theories such as the trait theory of leadership describe why people who behave in a certain way are better leaders, and others are not. The contingency theory of leadership will be reviewed comprehensively to understand various situations that require various kinds of leaders. In the sector of management, there exist theories such as the bureaucracy theories, and others like the human relations theory among others will be used to describe how various leaders could be utilized in various management positions to make technology work best for the management of vital projects of the organization under this independent research.
Conclusion
Conclusively, the literature described above based on the topic will be essentially valuable in my independent study because reviewing and organizing such a comprehensive study will assist me in developing the best ideas for my final paper. For example, analyzing the use of technologically superior systems in large organizations, such as project management software, will be quite easy given the available data that exists in other literature that has been selected as sources for reference. On the other hand, I would like to acknowledge that approaching project management through the lenses of new technology is quite a new idea that has not been massively explored for a long time, and therefore, long-term consequences of transforming project management for large organizations such as the University of Houston College of Technology cannot be predicted effectively, since the technological tools that are highly depended on are still under development such as artificial intelligence and machine learning among others.
References
Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles, and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1), 6-14.
De Oliveira, J. M., de Almeida Jurach, G., Pinto, R. S., & Kerchirne, L. M. (2017). Project offices and the federal universities: a study on project management in the context of higher education institutions. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 8(3), 18-28.
Engel, C., Ebel, P., & van Giffen, B. (2021). They are empirically exploring the cause-effect relationships of AI characteristics, project management challenges, and organizational change. In Innovation Through Information Systems: Volume II: A Collection of Latest Research on Technology Issues (pp. 166-181). Springer International Publishing.
Galli, B. J. (2021). Statistical tools and their impact on project management–how they relate. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 9(2).
Gehring, D. R. (2007). Applying traits theory of leadership to project management. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 44-54.
Martinsuo, M., & Ahola, T. (2022). Multi-project management in inter-organizational contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 813-826.
Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2017). Project management: a strategic managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Niederman, F. (2021). Project management: openings for disruption from AI and advanced analytics. Information Technology & People, 34(6), 1570-1599.
O’Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative research in health care, pp. 102–111.
Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. International journal of nursing studies, 48(3), 369-383.
Pinto, J. K. (1998). The Project Management Institute Project Management Handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
Shelley, A. W. (2015). Project management and leadership education facilitated as projects. International journal of managing projects in business, 8(3), 478–490.
Söderlund, J. (2004). Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. International journal of project management, 22(3), 183-191.
Söderlund, J. (2010). Knowledge entrainment and project management: The case of large-scale transformation projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(2), 130-141.
Söderlund, J. (2012). Project management, interdependencies, and time: Insights from Managing Large Systems by Sayles and Chandler. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 617-633.
Vasilienė-Vasiliauskienė, V., Butviliene, J., & Butvilas, T. (2016). Project-based learning: the complexity and challenges in higher education institutions. Computer Modelling & New Technologies, 20(2), 7-10
write