Part 1. Employee Monitoring
Define and explain wrongful termination.
When employers unlawfully dismiss employees, it becomes a wrongful termination case. This happens when laws protecting workers’ labor rights, policies set by authorities, and agreed terms within the employment contract are violated by employers. This situation may include discrimination based on age, race, or gender; retaliation for reporting employer misconduct and violations regarding contractual commitments; breach regarding related state and federal laws protecting employee rights.
Discrimination-based wrongful termination happens when employers fire employees based on race, gender identity or expression, religion, age, disability status, and other traits legally protected by employment laws. For example, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination. At the same time, The Americans with Disabilities Act protects disabled individuals from being discriminated against at workplaces hence firing someone based on these grounds is considered illegal and unfair. Firing employees who engage in legally protected activities such as reporting criminal activity or filing grievances without cause constitutes retaliatory termination, hence unallowed.
In addition, if one has an employment contract that outlines conditions required before a proper termination of their terms, violating these guidelines leads to wrongful termination. When faced with such situations, one can resort to legal action tools available, including recourse measures like reinstatement and compensation. For leading advice concerning workplace violations, it is advisable to consult workplace violence experts or seek professional legal guidance.
Explain and support your conclusion using only Arizona employment laws.
We must analyze pertinent legal principles to assess whether John was wrongfully terminated following the Arizona employment law procedures. First and foremost, it is essential to highlight that Arizona follows at-will employment guidelines, which facilitate either party(employer/employee) to end their work relationship without reason, provided they do not break any laws without employment contracts or collective agreements existing in question. The outcome of this phenomenon offers companies a considerable amount of discretion.
Secondly, despite companies having relatively immense autonomy concerning firing their employees through the doctrine of at-will employment, there are certain exceptions created by law in light of public policies and infringement upon protected activities (Aroyewun, 2021). Protected workplace rights may include reporting suspicious situations like online-linked discrimination allegations and lodging anti-discrimination complaints, among many others. In John’s situation, his critical post linked with the company’s CEO, Elon Money, on Instagram was the driving reason behind his ensuing termination (Buchanan, 2019). We must validate if John’s social media post indeed comes under protected territory and if not legal.
Social media posts regarding workplace policies and criticisms do not come under any particular statutes within Arizona’s labor regulations. Being an un-contracted at-will worker gives employers broad powers over employees like John, who alleged that Instagram posts prompted dismissal for events besides illegal discrimination and retribution-related actions that are well-protected overall from termination. Hence & after examining all the available data about John’s situation, representative findings suggest that his dismissal does not comply with any discriminatory/retaliatory features discriminating against exceptional traits/activities. Regardless of what seems in compliance with Arizona labor regulations, Terminating John falls within their legal purview. Verifying our specific requirements requires consultation with an experienced counsel in employment law for your unique situation.
Part 2. Ethics
Explain and support your response using Christian Worldview and biblical ethics.
Determining whether termination is ethical after an employee posts sensitive content online necessitates considering various perspectives and morals involved. Within a Christian perspective guided by Biblical standards guiding morality, several ethical principles exist that may guide decision-making while tackling matters like these:
Initially, Christian ethics fosters a belief in inherent worth possessed by each person as a creation in God’s image, calling for displaying respect towards employees alongside dignity and fairness. Employees’ respectful treatment is vital to maintain such dignity that might be jeopardized when employers rush to terminate employment for posting dissenting opinions online.
The second principle respected within Biblical ethics stipulates valuing honesty and truthfulness in human interactions (Combe & Robson, 2021). If John conveyed his honest opinion reflecting shifts noticed within the office via Instagram or other platforms, terminating his employment might lead to an atmosphere where honesty is curtailed and transparent communication is stifled.
Thirdly Christianity emphasizes forgiveness and grace, regarded as crucial concepts encouraging growth and reconciliation. Personnel management could consider initiating a dialogue on alternative solutions rather than jumping into immediate termination. An interaction aimed at understanding concerns raised by employees would work better.
Lastly, the Biblical commandment guides loving neighbors as oneself while seeking justice throughout employee-employer relationships. Employers should consider the overall approach reflecting their decision’s impact on personnel facing workplace critique before making decisions (Zonder & Houghton, 2022). Firing someone consequences due to expressing views through social media may be viewed as insensitive punitive measures without providing comprehensive responses satisfactory addressing raised grievances.
From a Christian worldview and biblical ethics standpoint, terminating John solely due to his social media post could conflict with ethical considerations. A better alignment with Christian values would involve encouraging open dialogue, seeking understanding and forgiveness, and pursuing just resolutions that maintain the employee’s dignity. Acknowledging diverse ethical perspectives alongside organizations’ internal policies and standards concerning social media use is essential. Guaranteeing mutual respect between employers and employees while safeguarding respective interests necessitates establishing explicit expectations about communication conduct.
References
Aroyewun, M. (2021). Wrongful Termination of Employment in Nigeria: A Case for Reinstatement of Private Sector Employees. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4228254
Buchanan, D. D. (2019). Defining Wrongful Dismissal: The Alberta Schism. Alberta Law Review, 57(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2567
Combe, M. M., & Robson, P. (2021). A review of the first wrongful-termination orders made under the Private Housing (Tenancies) (Scotland) Act 2016: Do they sufficiently protect those misled into giving up a tenancy? Juridical Review, 88–102. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/76675/
Zonder, E. J., & Houghton, E. J. (2022). Terminated ASU Women’s Lacrosse Coach Files Retaliation and Wrongful Termination Lawsuit. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/hp-fac-pubs/24/
write