Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Is the Matrix of Long-Term Memory Throughout Childhood Affected by Age, Distress, and Attachment?

Introduction

The development of long-term memory throughout adolescence is one of the most significant elements of psychology study because it explains how memories stay intact and enable us to remember them as we grow up. The growth of long-term memory throughout this era is crucial to understanding cognitive development and developing treatments for memory disorders. The study topic for this essay is: Is the matrix of long-term memory throughout childhood affected by age, distress, and attachment? At what rate is it recommended and retained? This research topic examines how distress affects memory consolidation, how aging affects memory performance, and how attachment security affects memory. Researchers might examine whether older adolescents have better memory recall than younger teenagers or whether crucial period stress affects memory retention over time (Gonzalves et al., 2022). Additionally, studying attachment patterns and memory consolidation throughout adolescence may reveal individual differences.

Literature Review Body

Age-related Changes in Long-term Memory

We must include age-related changes in long-term memory to understand adolescent memory development. Longitudinal studies show that 9–12-year-olds have more real memories and are more resistant to fraudulent ideas. Paz-Alonso and Goodman found that older children at Time 2 had a smaller ratio of past or present tense verbs, suggesting stronger resistance to peer influence. These results support prior research showing older children had fewer memory problems hours to days following an occurrence. Howe found that younger children are more impacted by social connections than older children within the same age range.

Time-related triumphs in a memory trial are particularly obvious when comparing current performance. Most children aged 3–5 score poorly in non-suggestive and suggestive laboratory settings, but memory performance between Time 1 and Time 2 shows discrepancies (Bauer et al., 2003). At Time 1, preschoolers have strong memories, but older children at Time 2 have better memories and stronger resistance to suggestibility, indicating a gradual memory development during adolescence. The mismatch between past studies and current findings suggests that age is critical in neuroscientific theories of adolescent long-term memory development (Schneider & Ornstein, 2019). One must include developmental changes when assessing the psychometric qualities of a test for children and adolescents since age enhances the ability to resist social influence and remember information accurately. These age-related changes have biological and psychological effects, notably in legal applications that use children’s eyewitness recall to rule out perjury.

Impact of Distress on Long-term Memory

Stress’s impact on long-term memory is a prominent teenage memory problem. Studies have shown that memory hits at critical stages like preschool may affect memory retention over time. (Bauer et al., 2003) examined how stress shortly after a stressful incident improves young children’s memory performance. Adolescents are more affected by unhappy memories than adults. Some study suggests that sadness may increase emotional memory, especially in older adolescents, by enhancing adolescent memories of painful events. Older children with greater distress levels during important early communication (the Preschool Attachment Coding System or PACS) are more likely to remember events vividly as teens (Gonzalves et al., 2022). This may be because it strains concentration, and older children can better remember knowledge over time.

The longitudinal investigations show that discomfort and memory function vary with aging. In Time 1, younger kids with more outstanding distress ratings were better at recalling the incident than those with low distress scores (Mast et al., 1980). Even yet, some years later, at Time 2, older children who were more disturbed were more likely to describe the incident adequately, whereas those who were less affected forgot it (Gonzalves et al., 2022). Understanding the significance of emotional events in long-term memory consolidation shows that adolescent memory consolidation is a complicated link between personal experiences and memory preservation. This illustrates the importance of affective variables in memory research and proposes that we should concurrently study how critical emotional events impact memory formation. These findings also help us understand memory consolidation and retrieval during adolescence, crucial to understanding memory resilience and vulnerability in emotional distress.

Attachment and Memory Performance

Children’s long-term memory and receptivity to suggestion depend on attachment security. Memory development in adolescents is influenced by attachment security. (Gonzalves et al., 2022) children with secure attachment and greater distress levels had good memory recall, showing that emotional events strongly influence attachment type. Research suggests that well-attached adults have better-coping abilities for stressful events, increasing their childhood memory recall. Secure attachment involves emotionally controlled expressiveness, trust, and comfort in partnerships. Distressed memory formation may be less resilient in securely linked children but more resilient in unattached youngsters (Bauer et al., 2003).

Children with neither high nor low attachment anxiety nor high distress during PACS Preschool Attachment Coding System (PACS) showed better memory recall in adolescence (Schneider & Ornstein., 2019). The findings suggest that attachment security and individual attachment characteristics buffer the adverse effects of distress on learning performance throughout adolescence. Attachment’s effect on memory performance reveals essential information regarding teenage memory consolidation. Secure attachment types are associated with adaptive emotional reactions and stronger long-term memory. However, an insecure attachment type may be more sensitive to stressful experiences’ deleterious effects on memory consolidation throughout adolescence, resulting in worse memory performance. The complex processes of adolescent memory development are better understood due to the combination of attachment security mode and memory competency. This supports emotional factors and individual attachment differences in memory processes research and suggests new ways to study memory vulnerability and resilience in the face of emotional stress.

III. Conclusion

The articles explained how different ages, stress, and connections affect memory retention and suggestibility in adolescence. Longitudinal studies and research show how emotional experiences and attachment ties affect memory with aging. This academic article reviews the relevant literature to answer the research question: What are the properties of long-term memory throughout adolescence, and how do age, distress, and connection impact memory retention and suggestibility? We found that younger children are more affected by memory impairment and recommendations, indicating that age-related memory consolidation alterations influence these processes. However, overpowering is also visible at sensitive ages, such as preschool, and may significantly decrease memory capacity, especially in older children, highlighting the complex link between emotional events and memory recall. Attachment security was crucial to opponents’ adolescent memory functions. The children with attachment security had better memory recall, showing that attachment security protects memory consolidation from distress. Our understanding of long-term memory development implies that further research is needed to understand adolescent memory mechanisms. The link between age-induced instrumental stress and attachment may help explain memory development and suggest strategies to preserve adaptive memory functioning at this critical developmental time. We can learn psychology by increasing our understanding of how people encode, retain, and remember information over time.

References

Bauer, P. J., Wiebe, S. A., Carver, L. J., Waters, J. M., & Nelson, C. A. (2003). Developments in long-term explicit memory late in the first year of life: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices. Psychological science14(6), 629-635.

Gonzalves, L., Chae, Y., Wang, Y., Widaman, K. F., Bederian‐Gardner, D., Goodman‐Wilson, M. … & Goodman, G. S. (2022). Years later, children’s memory and suggestibility: Age, distress, and attachment. Applied Cognitive Psychology36(5), 1034–1048.

Mast, V. K., Fagen, J. W., Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Sullivan, M. W. (1980). Immediate and long-term memory for reinforcement context: The development of learned expectancies in early infancy. Child Development, pp. 700–707.

Schneider, W., & Ornstein, P. A. (2019). Determinants of memory development in childhood and adolescence. International Journal of Psychology54(3), 307-315. 10.1002/ijop.1250

 

Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

APA
MLA
Harvard
Vancouver
Chicago
ASA
IEEE
AMA
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics