Several coaches have found success with what is known as a “transformational coaching” style. Instead of focusing on teaching specific skills or completing certain tasks, this method emphasizes assisting individuals in achieving development and change.
Is natural grass safer than artificial turf for Athletes? This research subject may benefit from the transformational coaching approach because it emphasizes internal change and mobilizes individuals to take charge of their own progress. As a coach, you may use transformational techniques to assist your athletes in sorting through their feelings regarding the relative safety of playing on natural grass and artificial turf. Next, you may advise them to lessen their vulnerability to harm while playing on either surface. To further reduce injury risk, a transformational coach may aid players in developing more self-awareness and confidence (Lawrason, 2019). Athletes can better judge which playing floor is lovely for them primarily based on their experiences and values and are encouraged to take responsibility for their improvement. Because of its many advantages, the transformational coaching approach has much to offer regarding professional value for coaches. First, the transformational coaching approach prioritizes client connections and places a premium on the client’s development and evolution (Lawrason, 2019). This type of coach works closely with their clients to help them define and articulate their values, beliefs, and desired outcomes before crafting a personalized action plan to get them there. By taking this tack, trainers may establish stronger bonds with their customers, improving performance and boosting satisfaction levels.
Statement of the problem.
Despite growing popularity as a grass substitute, there is disagreement on whether artificial turf is as safe as natural grass for use in sports grounds. Some research shows that accidents are greater common on artificial turf, whilst other research finds no vast difference between the two styles of surfaces. The query of whether or not natural grass or artificial turf poses a greater risk of damage to athletes, and the factors that affect such risks, want to be investigated. This study aims to compare the injury rates of athletes playing on natural grass and artificial turf and identify the factors that contribute to these differences.
Research question to be tested: why natural grass is safer than artificial turf for athletes?
Literature review
Athletes’ safety should always be a top priority, and the playing field is essential. There have been a few dialogues over the relative protection of artificial turf and natural grass in sporting fields. This study will compare and contrast the studies on the relative safety of natural grass and artificial turf for athletes and present both pro and con arguments for their respective positions. Artificial turf has been demonstrated to increase the chance of injury compared to herbal grass. College football players were more likely to have anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries when playing on artificial turf than when playing on natural grass, according to research by Siddiqui et al. (2022). Another study by Paliobeis et al. (2021) indicated that as compared to natural grass, artificial turf notably expanded the chance of injury for football gamers. Liu (2021), on the other hand, reported that high school football players were as likely to sustain injuries on artificial turf or natural grass. Since the surface is harsher and less forgiving than natural grass, more abrasions, friction burns, and joint injuries may occur on artificial turf. Gosnell et al. (2022) discovered that excessive injuries such as lacerations and bruising have been more common for football players on artificial turf than natural grass, suggesting this is the case. Similarly, Calloway et al. (2019) observed that artificial turf multiplied the occurrence of ankle injuries among girl soccer gamers compared to natural grass. Proponents of artificial turf, however, claim that it is more durable than natural grass because it can survive extensive use and extreme weather conditions and offer a stable playing surface. In addition, according to a few research, there is no difference in injury quotes between natural grass and artificial turf. In college football, as an example, Gosnell et al. (2022) found no statistically vast distinction in harm rates between natural grass and artificial turf. Calloway et al. (2019) came to a similar conclusion, reporting that the field quality did not have any bearing on the frequency with which female college soccer players were injured.
In conclusion, there is conflicting evidence on whether athletes are safer on natural grass or artificial turf. Some research has connected artificial grass with growth in precise types of injuries; however, different studies pointed to elements other than the playing surface as essential contributors to injury rates. While making judgments concerning the safety of playing surfaces for athletes, coaches, athletic trainers, and administrators should consider a number of aspects, including the kind and quality of the playing surface and the characteristics of the particular athlete.
References
Siddiqui, S., Cardenas, J. B., Cuevas, M., & Hinojos, B. (2022). Athlete Perceptions of Hydration When Competing on Natural Grass Versus Artificial Turf in Extreme Heat Conditions (Doctoral dissertation).
Paliobeis, A., Sivasundaram, L., Knapik, D. M., Labelle, M. W., Olson, M., Karns, M. R., … & Voos, J. E. (2021). Injury incidence is higher on artificial turf compared with natural grass in high school athletes: a retrospective cohort study. Current Orthopaedic Practice, 32(4), 355-360.
Liu, Z., & Jim, C. Y. (2021). Playing on natural or artificial turf sports field? Assessing heat stress of children, young athletes, and adults in Hong Kong. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103271.
Calloway, S. P., Hardin, D. M., Crawford, M. D., Hardin, J. M., Lemak, L. J., Giza, E., … & Baldwin, W. W. (2019). Injury surveillance in major league soccer: a 4-year comparison of injury on natural grass versus artificial turf field. The American journal of sports medicine, 47(10), 2279-2286.
Gosnell, G. G., Gerber, B. A., Guyton, G. P., & Gould, H. P. (2022). Playing Surface and Injury Risk: Artificial Turf Vs. Natural Grass. In Injury and Sports Medicine. IntechOpen.
Lawrason, S., Turnnidge, J., Martin, L. J., & Côté, J. (2019). A transformational coaching workshop for changing youth sport coaches’ behaviors: a pilot intervention study. The Sport Psychologist, 33(4), 304-312.
write