Introduction
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt are the countries that border the tiny Middle Eastern nation of Israel. Since its establishment in 1948, it has generated controversy since it is the only country in the world with a majority of Jews. Its participation in numerous violent conflicts, its possession of Palestinian Territory, and the continuous discussion about its status as a colonial state are the main causes of this. The public is still divided on this issue, which is just as vital today as it was when the state was founded.
With the founding of the current state of Israel in 1948, it has been said that it is the only nation in the Middle East to have emerged from a colonial undertaking. Since then, the government of that country has adopted a policy of strengthening and expanding its hold on the Palestinian populace, which has resulted in the eviction of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes and the creation of a control system akin to apartheid. As a result, there has been a protracted confrontation between Israel and the Palestinians, with each party asserting that they have a rightful claim to the Territory. For many years, this conflict has played a significant role in the political and social dynamics of the area as well as the global world.
Regarding Israel, most of the settlers were Jews, and the need for the Jewish people to have their own country played a significant role in the state’s creation. Following World War II, the U.N. acknowledged the Jewish people’s right to found a state in the area, and Israel was formally recognized as a sovereign nation in 1948. Since then, the state has gotten involved in a succession of military confrontations that have forced hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to flee their homes (Rouhana and Sabbagh-Khoury, 2019, pp 527-550). This has led to concerns over whether the founding of Israel constituted a type of colonialism.
The idea of a colonial state is supported by the evidence that Israel’s founding was largely motivated by foreign people’s desire to have their nation and that the state was imposed on an occupied population. On the one hand, it is the only country in the world that was founded to serve as a homeland for a particular people, the Jewish people, and the only state that identifies itself as a Jewish state. On the other hand, it was founded due to Jewish immigrants who colonized the area, many of whom had nationalistic or religious goals. Israel has also been charged with carrying out actions typical of colonialism, such as displacing Palestinians from their homes and imposing restrictive laws and regulations on them. Additionally, many of the Israeli government’s policies have been compared to efforts to uphold a colonial culture by maintaining the Jewish majority in the nation.
Political, Social, and Historical Context
Israel’s colonial status has been a subject of intense discussion for many years. Israel was founded in 1948, not long after World War II ended and the United Nations was created, making this dispute even more difficult to resolve (Salamanca et al., 2012, p.g 1-8). The continuous occupation of Palestinian Territory, which has called into doubt the legitimacy of the Israeli state, has muddled this discussion even further.
The Age of Exploration in the 15th century, when European countries started sending out expeditions to seek and explore new places, is when colonialism first emerged. This method resulted in settling areas and enslaved native populations (Rouhana and Sabbagh-Khoury, 2019, p.g 527-550). A state that has developed as a result of colonization is referred to as a “colonial state.” Colonial states are typically defined by a dominant group of settlers who have imposed their own political, economic, and social institutions on the native population.
The British were responsible for overseeing the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine as part of the mandate. The British were also supposed to see to it that the rights of the Palestinian people were upheld (Sabbagh-Khoury, 2022, p.g 44-83). Following World War II, the British left Palestine, and the United Nations took over the administration of the area. The United Nations split the country into two states—one Jewish and one Arab—in 1947. While the Arab countries opposed this resolution, most Jews in Palestine welcomed it. Israel gained control of the bulk of the region after a war with the Arab countries sparked by its declaration of independence in 1948. (Hakim et al., 2022). Israel has been at war with the Arab countries and the Palestinians ever since because they are considered a threat to the Israeli sovereignty of the region. It is important to consider the historical, political, and social background to fully comprehend the dispute over the colonial status. The Ottoman Empire, which had dominated the area since the 16th century, was in charge of the Territory before the state of Israel was founded (Ben Youssef and Tamari, 2019, pp 73-87). As part of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the British seized control of the area in 1917 and retained it until Israel was established in 1948.
Numerous Jewish villages were built in the area during this time. This was largely because the Jewish people had been driven out of the site in 70 C.E. and had been trying to go back ever since. Due to the creation of these communities, a considerable rise in the Jewish population resulted from the immigration of Jews from Europe and the Middle East (Hawari and Plonski, 2019, p.g. 155-175). The Zionist movement, which sought to build a Jewish homeland in the area, was born as a result of the late 19th century.
Early in the 20th century, the Zionist movement gathered momentum; by 1945, more than 600,000 Jews were living there. As a result, there was more pressure on the British government to acknowledge the Jewish people’s right to form their state. The horrors of the Holocaust, which resulted in the deaths of millions of Jews in Nazi concentration camps, added to this strain (Tatour, 2019). The decision to divide the area into two states—one Jewish and one Arab—was made by the U.N. in 1947. The Arab governments disagreed with this choice, created by the Jewish leadership, and this disagreement led to the Arab-Israeli War in 1948. The Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank were all under Israeli occupation after the war concluded in 1949. This occupation has been an endless source of contention and denounced internationally and in multiple U.N. resolutions. The Jewish people’s yearning for their homeland played a significant role in creating the state of Israel. This desire continues to be a major motivator in the discussion of whether or not Israel is a colonial state. The idea of a colonial state is supported by the evidence that Israel’s founding was largely motivated by foreign people’s desire to have their nation and that the state was imposed on an occupied population. Critics of this claim point out that the Jewish people have lived in the area for a very long time and have never stopped and that the state of Israel is a real country (Abu-Saad, 2019, pp 96-116). One of the most contentious issues in world politics is whether or not Israel is a colonial state. This dispute is complicated and multifaceted. It is crucial to consider the historical, political, and social environment in which the state was founded to comprehend the disagreement fully. The effects of the ongoing occupation of Palestinian Territory and its part in the discussion must also be considered (Veracini, 2019, pp 568-581). In the end, the argument about Israel’s colonial status will likely rage on for many years and will undoubtedly be a sensitive and divided topic. No matter which side of the argument one supports, it is obvious that the subject is crucial and deserves to be discussed courteously and seriously.
Economic and Religious Factors
When analyzing the issue of whether Israel is a colonial state, there are more aspects to take into account, in addition to the political background. Two of the economic and religious variables have been in play. Israel’s economic policies have drawn criticism because they are perceived as favoring its Jewish population over the Palestinian population (Karkabi, 2021, p.g 966-986). Additionally, Israel has come under fire for elevating its religious customs and beliefs above those of the Palestinians. The question of whether Israel is a colonial state has been debated due to these elements and the political environment.
The historical, political, social, economic, and religious considerations must be considered to comprehend the argument surrounding Israel’s colonial status. I will examine the economic and theological issues pertinent to the discussion in this essay and present my findings regarding the nature of the state. Given that the issue’s political and economic aspects are motivated by the Jewish people’s yearning for their state, they are intertwined (Allouche, 2019, p.g 75). The Ottoman Empire, which had dominated the area since the 16th century, was in charge of the Territory before the state of Israel was founded. Most of the population was rural and dependent on subsistence farming at this time, and the region’s Economy was mostly based on agriculture.
Due to the inflow of Jewish immigration from Europe and the Middle East and the subsequent rapid population growth, the creation of the state of Israel profoundly affected the region’s Economy (Dana, 2020, p.g 192-204). As a result, the Economy transitioned from being primarily agrarian to becoming more industrialized, with the growth of factories and other manufacturing facilities. Due to the displacement of numerous rural communities to make way for the new factories, this change had a tremendous influence on the local populace.
Jewish immigration also had a huge impact on the region’s Economy since they brought large sums of money used to finance the growth of industry and infrastructure (Braverman, 2021, pp 3-27). Additionally, with the help of this wealth, the government could spend money on social services like healthcare, education, and other things, raising overall living standards in the region.
The discussion also involves theological considerations in addition to economic ones. The Jewish people’s yearning for their homeland played a significant role in creating the state of Israel. This desire continues to be a major motivator in the discussion of whether or not Israel is a colonial state. The Jewish population has been in the area for a long time and has maintained a significant religious attachment to the land (Raz-Krakotzkin et al., 2021, pp 33-53). After the Holocaust, when many Jews attempted to return to the area in order to start over, this link was further strengthened. In the argument over whether or not Israel is a colonial state, the religious ties to the Territory are also a significant factor. The idea of a colonial state is supported by the evidence that Israel’s founding was largely motivated by foreign people’s desire to have their nation and that the state was imposed on an occupied population. The Jewish people have lived in the area for a very long time, and continuously, therefore the state of Israel is a genuine nation, say those who disagree with this premise. The argument regarding Israel’s colonial status is ultimately complicated and multifaceted and will likely last long. In this argument, the economic and theological aspects play a significant role, and it is crucial to consider these aspects while forming an opinion (West, 2022, p.g 1-9). It is obvious that the topic is vital and deserves to be discussed in a scholarly and polite manner, regardless of which side of the argument one supports.
International Responses
One of the most contentious issues in world politics is the long-running argument over whether or not Israel is a colonial state. The topic has generated much discussion in international forums and has been the focus of multiple United Nations resolutions (Myers, 2019, p.g 1-29). The continued occupation of Palestinian Territory, which has called into doubt the legitimacy of the Israeli state, has muddled this discussion even further. One of the first international bodies to discuss Israel’s colonial status was the United Nations. The decision to divide the area into two states—one Jewish and one Arab—was made by the U.N. in 1947. The Arab governments disagreed with this choice, created by the Jewish leadership, which led to the Arab-Israeli War in 1948 (Imseis, 2020, pp 1055-1085). The Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank were all under Israeli occupation after the war concluded in 1949. Numerous U.N. resolutions and worldwide censure have been issued against this occupation, which has long been a contentious issue. Resolution 3379, adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1974, said, “Zionism is a type of racism and racial discrimination.” The U.S. and other Western nations fiercely opposed this resolution because they saw it as a direct assault on the legitimacy of the State of Israel (Allou, 2020, p.g 24-41). The decision was ultimately overturned in 1991, but not before it prompted a heated discussion about Israel’s colonial status. Several other international organizations have added their perspectives to the debate, in addition to the United Nations. The Israeli occupation of Palestinian Territory has drawn harsh criticism from the European Union, frequently urging Israel to terminate the employment. In addition to denouncing the occupation, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has urged the world community to acknowledge the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.
The International Criminal Court also has something to say in the argument regarding Israel’s colonial character. The International Criminal Court (ICC) began looking into whether or not Israel’s involvement in the fighting amounted to a war crime in 2015 (Strawson, 2019, p.g. 33-44). The investigation was widely regarded as a success for the Palestinian people and has intensified pressure on Israel to terminate its occupation of Palestinian territories.
The discussion surrounding Israel’s colonial status is nuanced and complex, likely to last many years (Seidel, 2019, pp 727-746). There is a growing consensus that Israel must stop its occupation of the Palestinian Territories from being recognized as a legitimate country. The international reaction to this debate has been mostly unfavorable. No matter which side of the argument one supports, it is obvious that the topic is crucial and deserves to be discussed respectfully and serious
U.N. Resolution
In 1974, the General Assembly of the United Nations enacted Resolution 3379, which stated that “Zionism is a type of racism and racial discrimination (Abusneineh, 2021, p.g 96-113).” The United States and other Western nations fiercely opposed this resolution because they believed it to be an attack on the legitimacy of the State of Israel. Despite having already triggered a heated discussion about Israel’s colonial status, the resolution was ultimately overturned in 1991. By a vote of 72 to 35, with 32 abstentions, the solution—which was proposed by the Soviet Union and several Arab nations—was accepted. The U.S. vehemently opposed the resolution, claiming it was a “vile and racist attack” on the state of Israel. Many nations who abstained from the vote, including the U.K. and France, claimed that the resolution was unfair and biased and failed to consider the Jewish people’s legal right to self-determination.
The resolution was utilized as a potent weapon to delegitimize the state of Israel and was viewed as a significant triumph for the Arab states (Pressman, 2020, p.g 476-498). The resolution was also considered a show of solidarity with the Palestinians and played an important role in the ongoing discussion over Israel’s colonial status. The Israeli and Palestinian governments signed the Oslo Accords in 1991, which led to the resolution’s eventual repeal. As a significant roadblock to the peace process was removed, the resolution’s repeal was viewed as a huge triumph for the Israeli administration (Mosler, 2020, p.g 340). Reconciliation between the two sides was greatly aided by the repeal, which also eliminated a significant reason for international criticism of the state of Israel.
However, the discussion about Israel’s colonial status has remained a point of contention even after Resolution 3379 was repealed. But the resolution marked a significant turning point in the discussion by emphasizing the necessity for a fair and impartial approach to the subject. No matter which side of the argument one supports, it is obvious that the issue is crucial and deserves to be discussed courteously and seriously.
Zionism
Based on the idea that Jews have a right to self-determination in their ancestral homeland of Palestine, Zionism is a political movement that dates back to the late 19th century. The move was primarily motivated by the Jewish people’s desire to establish their own country, which has been a significant motivating force in the discussion of whether or not Israel is a colonial state.
Theodor Herzl, an Austrian-born Jew and founder of the movement, claimed that having one’s nation was the only way for Jews to be free from anti-Semitism and persecution. Early in the 20th century, the movement gained momentum; by 1945, more than 600,000 Jews were living in the area (Pappe, 2019, pp 179-191). As a result, there was more pressure on the British government to acknowledge the Jewish people’s right to form their state.
The Zionist movement played a significant role in creating the state of Israel, influencing opinions about whether or not Israel is a colonial state (Hawari et al., 2019, pp 155-175). The idea of a colonial state is supported by the evidence that Israel’s founding was largely motivated by foreign people’s desire to have their nation and that the state was imposed on an occupied population. Critics of this claim point out that the Jewish people have lived in the area for a very long time and have never stopped and that the state of Israel is a real country.
Conclusion
I believe Israel is a colonial state after considering the historical, political, social, economic, and religious aspects pertinent to the discussion. The Jewish people’s desire to have their homeland was a major motivator for the creation of the state. This desire plays a significant role in the discussion of whether or not Israel is a colonial state. The fact that Israel continues to occupy Palestinian Territory and the countless U.N. resolutions denounce it only supports this claim.
In the end, it is obvious that the argument over Israel’s colonial status is complicated and multifaceted, and it is certain to last for many years to come. No matter which side of the argument one supports, it is critical to remember that this is a serious problem that calls for courteous and informed discussion. Israel is a colonial state, in my opinion, and the international community must continue to work for a fair and long-lasting settlement in the region.
Reference
Abu-Saad, I., 2019. Palestinian education in the Israeli settler state: Divide, rule and control. Settler Colonial Studies, 9(1), pp.96-116.
Abusneineh, B., 2021. (re) producing the Israeli (European) body: Zionism, anti-Black racism and the Depo-Provera Affair. Feminist Review, 128(1), pp.96-113.
Allouche, J., 2019. State building, nation making and post-colonial hydropolitics in India and Israel: Visible and hidden forms of violence at multiple scales. Political Geography, 75, p.102051.
Allen, E., 2020. Veganwashing Israel’s dirty laundry? Animal politics and nationalism in Palestine-Israel. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 41(1), pp.24-41.
Ben-Youssef, N. and Tamari, S.S., 2018. Enshrining discrimination: Israel’s nation-state law. Journal of Palestine Studies, 48(1), pp.73-87.
Braverman, I., 2021. An introduction of environmental justice, settler colonialism, and more-than-humans in the occupied West Bank. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(1), pp.3-27.
Dana, T., 2020. Localizing the Economy as a Resistance Response: A Contribution to the “Resistance Economy” Debate in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 15(2), pp.192-204.
Hawari, Y., Plonski, S. and Weizman, E., 2019. Seeing Israel through Palestine: knowledge production as anti-colonial praxis. Settler Colonial Studies, 9(1), pp.155-175.
Imseis, A., 2020. Negotiating the Illegal: On the United Nations and the Illegal Occupation of Palestine, 1967–2020. European Journal of International Law, 31(3), pp.1055-1085.
Mosler, M., 2020. Autocrats in the United Nations General Assembly: A test of the decoy voting hypothesis (No. 340). ifo Working Paper.
Myers, D.J., 2019. Threat Perception and Strategic Response of the Regional Hegemons: A Conceptual Overview. Regional Hegemons, pp.1-29.
Pappe, I., 2019. The Israeli Nationality Law: A Blueprint for a Twenty-first Century Settler-Colonial State. Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies, 18(2), pp.179-191.
Pressman, J., 2020. History in conflict: Israeli–Palestinian speeches at the United Nations, 1998–2016. Mediterranean Politics, 25(4), pp.476-498.
Raz-Krakotzkin, A., Rouhana, N.N. and Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N., 2021. Religion and Nationalism in the Jewish and Zionist Context. When Politics Are Sacralized: Comparative Perspectives on Religious Claims and Nationalism, pp.33-53.
Rouhana, N.N. and Sabbagh-Khoury, A., 2019. Memory and the Return of History in a Settler-colonial Context: The Case of the Palestinians in Israel. Interventions, 21(4), pp.527-550.
Rouhana, N.N. and Sabbagh-Khoury, A., 2019. Memory and the Return of History in a Settler-colonial Context: The Case of the Palestinians in Israel. Interventions, 21(4), pp.527-550.
Sabbagh-Khoury, A., 2022. Tracing settler colonialism: A genealogy of a paradigm in Israel’s sociology of knowledge production. Politics & Society, 50(1), pp.44-83.
Salamanca, O.J., Qato, M., Rabie, K. and Samour, S., 2012. Past is present: Settler colonialism in Palestine. Settler Colonial Studies, 2(1), pp.1-8.
Strawson, J., 2019. Colonialism. Israel Studies, 24(2), pp.33-44.
Tatour, L., 2019. Citizenship as domination: Settler colonialism and the making of Palestinian citizenship in Israel. Available at SSRN 3533490.
West, G.O., 2022. In search of an economic remnant of resistance: 3 Reigns 24: 12p-t. HTS Theological Studies, 78(1), pp.1-9.
write