Introduction
Multiple information technology interventions have been shown to reduce medication mistakes substantially. Modernized physician order input, computerized clinician information retrieval, robots for administering medication, barcode scanning, pharmacy automation tools, and computerization of the medication management records are a few illustrations. Nevertheless, it is critical to emphasize that technological advances are not a cure. They can also make the task better while making others worse; the overall outcome is thus unpredictable, and it is critical to research their effects. They now have the most significant impact on availing and enabling information accessibility, discovering relationships between bits of info, and performing tedious and repetitive jobs, such as problem inspections. Based on the event that a medication error has harmed a patient due to technology, this paper seeks to ensure a safe teaching atmosphere for both patients and the healthcare staff and explore safeties and judgment support systems incorporated in care delivery technology. Addressing data integrity, ethical standards, and legal research will carry protection, compliance, secrecy, and the protection of individual customers. Address the importance of most vital information as a motivator for change in nursing practices.
HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion
Healthcare businesses must manage the advancement of internet and Compliance issues as more medical personnel utilize cell phones to communicate and cooperate on patient needs. Many standard communication methods are not HIPAA compliant. SMS, Skype, and email are examples of insecure messaging services since copies of conversations are stored on internet providers’ servers, over which a medical provider has no responsibility. The Security Policy lays out a set of technical requirements for HIPAA compliance. Among them are: All Personal Health Information should be secured at rest and in transit. Each healthcare professional who is permitted to view and share PHI must get a “Unique User Identifier” so that its actions may be tracked (Chen & Benusa, 2017). When a smartphone is left unattended, any software used to comply with HIPAA should have an automatic log-off feature to protect information to PHI. There are many more requirements for technological use and HIPAA compliance, but let’s begin with any of these three to see why technological development may not have been HIPAA compliant.
Nurses who utilize blogs, online forums, streaming platforms, webchat forums, and newsgroups to connect with other nurses on an organizational and individual level can benefit from social media in a sensible way that supports pleasant interactions with other experts. Writing and critical reflection have been identified as helpful tools in nursing care. An outlet where nurses may discuss employees ‘ perceptions, incredibly unpleasant ones, can be just as valuable. Engagement in social networking is not a cause for worry as nurses keep their professional duties in mind (Fiedler, 2017). Nurses should be aware of the harms of sharing patient data on social platforms and aware of their profession’s rules, applicable provincial and national principles, and ethical guidelines governing client confidentiality. Clients should want their nurses to act in a way with intentions and with decency. As the report accurately demonstrates, unintentional or purposeful violations of patient confidentiality can cause harm and undermine the critical nurse-patient connection.
Scenario Ending and Recommendations
As per the ECRI Center, at least five clients and healthcare staff have been wounded in the last year due to ct imaging scanning device faults. Many hospitals in the United States use gamma cameras. According to a widely published article, a client at the James J. Peters VA Medical Center in New York City was trampled to death when the gamma camera equipment crashed in 2013. According to Jason Launders, head of operations for ECRI’s health devices group, there have been 40 gamma camera issues every year. General Electric, Siemens, and Royal Philips designed Gamma camera scanning components. According to a GE representative, the business “executed clear and comprehensive examinations for all following components; all service-connected to the recall has been performed, and systems are in continuous operation around the worldwide” about the 2013 incident involving a General Electric Healthcare-made equipment (Thiruvengadathan et al., 2020). The frequency of medical reports associated with gamma cameras increased from 0 that year to five in the last twelve months, notably four in a single month, according to ECRI’s voluntary database. While the proportion may appear low, ECRI believes there are more relatively close that get unreported because no significant injury occurs, according to Launders.
Cardiac stress testing, neuroimaging, computerized tomography, and various other treatments can all benefit from gamma camera scan results. Two big, hefty box-like objects travel around the patient while in an image acquisition to conduct the scan. This desktop mobility brings the imaging gear very near to the subject. The scanning equipment is equipped with sensors that prohibit the gamma camera from approaching too closely. However, according to Launders, those detectors have failed in several instances. It’s like sitting a grand piano inside half an inch of a person with sub-millimeter precision,” he said. For consumer health, hospitals should ensure that the imaging technologist is available for the entire course of a gamma camera scanning device research, which might take ages, according to Launders. As per ECRI, timely imaging technician action has avoided significant injuries in several situations. According to Launders, numerous incidents reported to ECRI happened after a facility declined to answer appropriately to a manufacturer recall. In addition to performing essential maintenance and examinations of gamma photography equipment, hospitals must react promptly to such alerts.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Improving communication between patients and nurses, facilitating medication safety, recording and monitoring, and enhancing the level of therapy through increased accessibility to and obedience to recommendations are all advantages of healthcare information systems. Information can be gathered for quality assurance, grading criteria, health promotion, sickness monitoring, and going reports using health information technology systems. Health information systems are now used by most gynecologists (Simmons et al., 2018). They have quickly gained popularity because of the acknowledgment of their positive advantages and the government designed to encourage their usage. The capacity to retain and download information, the possibility to quickly interact with patient records in a justification; enhanced patient management through steadily increasing comprehensibility, which may reduce the risk of medical errors; and the convenience of retrieving customer records are all advantages health information systems.
Many technology techniques can save a patient’s life; each presents its structured risks. Surgical procedures, radiation treatment, and chemotherapeutics, for instance, can be of benefit and also have adverse reactions. Research work and advertising are needed to bring a new technical improvement to the market and revenue for the producer and supplier; patient satisfaction costs may result. Whenever technology improves, the price mostly shoots, mainly if it provides patients with a solution that they did not have before. At the same time, this will be advantageous for recently curable or severe diseases. Many medical advances are sold by sales agents who are paid to make a sale. They may promptly inform the healthcare insurance practitioner of a new alternative (Fiedler, 2017). However, they may utilize an inducement to persuade a medical care provider to use the innovation or quality model, regardless of whether it is in that individual’s best interests. Electronic Medical Records, for example, is a new electronic system that stores and organizes customer records for sharing with the customer and all health care professionals.
Results of the tests, prescriptions, payment details, and so much more can be included in the health information. It’s convenient, but it also has the potential to cause damage due to the destruction of sensitive patient medical records confidentiality. Ethics is concerned with moral decisions such as the right against wrong or right. These ethical and moral issues affect humans and their interactions. Owing to the industry’s sensitivity in working with livelihood circumstances, ethical challenges in medicine are well-known. Healthcare and technologies have grown entwined in today’s modern era of ubiquitous computers (Hostettler et al., 2017). The aspect of health computing is concerned with using technologies to improve the processing of health data. Privacy, transparency, safety, access, justified damage, least invasive options, and responsibility are the seven principles of informatics morality.
Conclusion and Reflections
In conclusion, technology in the healthcare system has both benefits and losses. The benefits are more than the losses. Healthcare information technology comprises various advancements, from basic charting to intelligent choice-making help and digital healthcare connection. Eliminating human errors, facilitating treatment benefits, increasing coordinated care, boosting practice economies, and collecting data across time are just some of the ways health informatics may help improve and revolutionize healthcare. Finally, technology in healthcare systems enables safety and decreases medication mistakes, severe drug reactions, and sticking to practice rules. There is no reason to suspect that health informatics is an excellent way to enhance safety and quality of care. Still, healthcare institutions must be discerning in which technology solutions they put money in, as studies show that certain technologies have restricted substantiation for helping to improve safety and quality of care.
References
Chen, J. Q., & Benusa, A. (2017). HIPAA security compliance challenges: The case for small healthcare providers. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 10(2), 135-146.
Fiedler, B. A. (2017). Challenges of new technology: Securing medical devices and their software for HIPPA compliance. Managing medical devices within a regulatory framework (pp. 315-329). Elsevier.
Franco, A., Shaker, M., Kalubi, D., & Hostettler, S. (2017). A review of sustainable energy access and technologies for healthcare facilities in the Global South. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 22, 92-105.
Engel, C. C., Hoch, E., & Simmons, M. (2018). The neurological effects of repeated exposure to military occupational blast: implications for prevention and health. RAND ARROYO CENTER SANTA MONICA CA SANTA MONICA United States.
Kumar, K. P., Sundaram, G. S., Sharma, B. K., Venkatesh, S., & Thiruvengadathan, R. (2020). Advances in gamma radiation detection systems for emergency radiation monitoring. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(10), 2151-2161.
write