Parent styles or the methods parents choose to raise their children significantly impact child growth and wellbeing. Researchers have acknowledged that parenting techniques are influenced by various cultural and individual factors, even though research frequently highlights the advantages of a firm approach to parenting, which blends warmth and age-appropriate control. To better understand how cultural norms, individual experiences, and psychological resources influence parenting techniques, this synthesis essay looks at the many viewpoints offered in six academic sources.
Researchers have examined how cultural values influence the kinds of parenting practices and forms of discipline that are considered appropriate in a particular community through several studies. Authoritarian and controlling parenting styles are often encouraged in collectivistic societies that value obedience and compliance to authority, as evidenced by the works of Bornstein and Lansford (2010) and Garcia et al. (2019). As opposed to this, authoritative parenting approaches that provide children with appropriate levels of independence are more in line with individualistic societies that place a high importance on autonomy and self-control. However, as Bornstein and Lansford point out, most contemporary countries display a fusion of individualistic and collectivistic tendencies that dynamically shape parenting standards.
Scholars have examined how individual factors, including parents’ attachment styles, histories, and psychological wellbeing, influence parenting orientations and cultural backgrounds. According to research by Baumrind (2013) and Rostad et al. (2014), securely bonded parents who have personally experienced responsive caregiving are more likely to parent their children with warmth and sensitivity while promoting their independence. On the other hand, people who experience psychological stress or insecure attachments could find it difficult to refrain from using strict, authoritarian punishment that is at odds with the needs of a kid’s development.
By combining these viewpoints, scholars such as Pinquart and Kauser (2018) promote an “autonomy-supportive” parenting style as the best Way to promote healthy child development in various settings and cultures. This adaptable approach respects the child’s increasing autonomy as they progress through developmental stages, combining gentle punishment and nurturing. This paper sheds light on the complex dynamics influencing good parenting practices by reviewing the academic research on cultural impacts, individual variances, and the benefits of autonomy-supportive methods.
Firstly, numerous academics have emphasized how cultural norms significantly influence parenting practices. According to Bornstein and Lansford (2010), parenting approaches that are seen as appropriate are influenced by the degree to which a culture values individualism or collectivism. Individualistic cultures embrace authoritative parenting practices that promote self-regulation and independence, while collective societies favour authoritarian parenting styles emphasizing obedience, rigorous punishment, and low autonomy for children. Bornstein and Lansford, however, advise against oversimplifying cultures as being only individualistic or collectivistic because most modern nations have a combination of these tendencies.
Research from empirical investigations supports the idea that parenting styles are influenced by culture. As a result of cultural norms that place a premium on deference to authority and family duties, Garcia et al. (2019) discovered that Hispanic American parents of Dominican and Puerto Rican descent were more likely to employ authoritarian control and protective parenting approaches. This research supports the claim made by Bornstein and Lansford (2010) that authoritarian parenting approaches that emphasize obedience and deference to authority are more common in collectivistic cultures.
To illustrate the link between cultural norms and parenting behaviours, I summarize the research from Bornstein and Lansford (2010) and Garcia et al. (2019) in this section. The authoritarian parenting approaches that prioritize respect and obedience to authority are often encouraged by collectivistic cultures, as both sources emphasize. Garcia et al.’s empirical study offers proof of this tendency within Hispanic-American families of Dominican and Puerto Rican descent.
Secondly, scholars have noted that individual factors are just as crucial in influencing parenting techniques as cultural standards. Baumrind (2013) highlights how early experiences and relationships with caregivers shape parents’ attachment types. When raising their children, securely attached people with responsive and attentive parenting are likelier to show warmth, compassion, and encouragement for individuality. This supports Pinquart and Kauser’s (2018) claim that emotional intelligence and solid psychosocial health make caregivers more capable of using authoritative methods that combine appropriate control and kindness. Contrarily, unresponsive or inconsistent providing care during their upbringing may have made insecurely attached parents struggle to build healthy attachments and constructive discipline. This could have contributed to the use of harsh, authoritarian discipline techniques among parents dealing with significant life stressors or mental health issues, as noted by (Rostad et al., 2014).
The relationship between parents’ attachment patterns and parenting orientations demonstrates the strong influence of early life experiences on later caring abilities. According to Baumrind’s (2013) research, parents who provide responsive parenting to their children during their youth may better meet their children’s requirements for age-appropriate autonomy support and nurturing. Authoritative parenting calls for systematic supervision and delicate attunement, which may be difficult for people whose insecure attachments result from uneven or negligent care.
Pinquart and Kauser (2018) and Rostad et al. (2014) have provided insight into psychological aspects that may support or impede healthy parenting practices and attachment influences. Parenting under severe stress, with mental health disorders such as anxiety or depression, or with drug abuse problems increases the likelihood that parents may adopt strict, authoritarian discipline that is not to their child’s developmental needs, according to research by (Rostad et al.,2014). Parents may find it challenging to maintain the emotional control, patience, and consistency of response that authoritative parenting requires due to the psychological loads and compromised coping mechanisms associated with these issues.
However, psychological resources like vital psychosocial functioning, emotional intelligence, and efficient stress management techniques were found by Pinquart and Kauser (2018) to be associated with successful authoritative parenting. Even during complex events, parents with high emotional intelligence can respond to their children’s emotional and behavioural issues, show empathy and flexibility, and refrain from using punitive or reactive disciplinary measures. Those may more efficiently supply a steady, caring environment that supports authoritative parenting with good psychosocial health and flexible coping mechanisms.
Combining these viewpoints shows that parental disciplinary strategies and the ability to provide age-appropriate autonomy support can be significantly impacted by individual-level factors such as attachment stability, psychological health, and emotional resources. Societal factors shape parenting conventions, but personal histories and psychological compositions also influence the variety of parenting techniques in families and cultures.
Thirdly, while experts contend that effective parenting necessitates flexibility and attentiveness to a child’s changing demands across different life stages, authoritative parenting is frequently linked to excellent developmental results. According to Pinquart and Kauser (2018), it is improbable that rigid adherence to a particular parenting style can produce the best outcomes in all situations and developmental stages. They favour “autonomy-supportive” parenting, which blends respect for the child’s autonomy with appropriate boundaries and care. This is consistent with Baumrind’s (2013) view that parents should modify their approaches to their children’s changing demands, finding a balance between giving them structure and a certain amount of age-appropriate autonomy.
This is further supported by Rostad et al. (2014), who observe that children flourish when parents can modify their methods of discipline and level of autonomy-granting to meet the changing demands of their developing child. According to their findings, young infants need a steady foundation of responsiveness combined with setting boundaries. Thus, an authoritative mix of strict control and loving may be helpful. Nevertheless, when kids reach middle childhood and get stronger at self-control, a more liberal approach that gives them more psychological leeway can help them become more independent and capable of making their own decisions.
Rostad et al. (2014) and Pinquart and Kauser (2018) highlight the need to reassert parental authority during adolescence—a unique transitional time characterized by greater risk-taking and identity exploration—while honouring the adolescent’s growing autonomy. To help kids navigate the difficulties of this developmental stage, Pinquart and Kauser recommend preserving affection and emotional sensitivity at this time and offering clear expectations, continual involvement, and suitable monitoring.
Parental adaptability and awareness of their children’s changing developmental needs are crucial, as shown by the convergence of viewpoints from Baumrind (2013), Rostad et al. (2014), and Pinquart and Kauser (2018), authentically good parenting is constantly adjusting techniques to strike an age-appropriate balance between control, nurturing, and autonomy support—rather than dogmatically following a one-size-fits-all punitive approach.
It is acknowledged that children’s requirements for structure, independence, and parental engagement change as they grow from infancy through adolescence, which is why autonomy-supportive parenting is so important. This approach combines warmth with responsible limit-setting and respect for growing self-leadership. A logical image of perfect parenting as a dynamic, continuous process of modification catered to the child’s changing capacities and developmental stages is created by combining the views of several academics.
Remaining aware of these shifts and modifying their degrees of supervision, control, and autonomy-granting needs is essential for effective parenting. It is imperative to strike a balance between flexibility and balance to promote optimal growth in the mental, emotional, and behavioural dimensions during childhood and adolescence. Truly ideal child results may depend on parents’ willingness to regularly assess and adjust their disciplinary strategies according to their child’s evolving demands, even while authoritative parenting offers a solid foundation. Parents must continue recalibrating their parenting techniques in response to their child’s changing developmental terrain, which calls for continued sensitivity, adaptability, and commitment. A steadfast commitment to this dynamic, focused on children’s approach, is essential to maximize good outcomes and nurture children’s overall well-being.
Finally, it is clear from analyzing the various viewpoints found in numerous academic sources that a complex interaction between personal characteristics, societal standards, and the changing developmental needs of children influences parenting practices and their efficacy. A subtle, flexible adherence to supportive independent behaviours is necessary for effective parenting, even while some broad themes, like the advantages of an authoritative parenting style, surface.
Differences in parenting practices between nations can be attributed to cultural attitudes that favour individuality over collectivism, as researchers such as Bornstein and Lansford (2010) and empirical investigations by Garcia et al. (2019) and Way et al. (2019) have shown. Individualistic civilizations align with authoritative approaches that balance firmness and support for children’s autonomy, whereas collective cultures encourage authoritarian, obedience-oriented ways. These impacts are unique, though, as most countries display a combination of these inclinations.
The factors at the individual level that might help or hinder good parenting techniques are just as important. Baumrind (2013) and Rostad et al. (2014) highlight how parents’ warmth, sensitivity, and support for autonomy as caregivers are greatly influenced by their attachment patterns, individual experiences of providing responsive or neglectful care, and psychological wellbeing. Authoritative parenting requires careful, nurturing instruction, best applied by those with vital psychosocial functioning and solid bonds.
Combining these observations, scholars such as Pinquart and Kauser (2018) suggest that the best Way to foster healthy development in various circumstances and cultures is to take an “autonomy-supportive” approach. This adaptable approach to parenting skillfully combines respect for children’s developing self-governance with stern, age-appropriate discipline as they age.
Most importantly, academics from various sources concur that the best parenting practices are dynamic and call for ongoing recalibration and modifications to meet children’s changing requirements as they mature. Effective parents need to be aware of these developmental milestones and adjust their levels of control, nurturing, and autonomy support properly during a child’s early years, childhood, and turbulent adolescent years, as discussed by Rostad et al. (2014), Baumrind (2013), and Pinquart and Kauser (2018).
A logical picture of parenting as a dynamic, continuing process of striking a balance between essential components—warmth, structure, autonomy support—in response to individual circumstances and cultural roots arises from synthesizing these disparate academic viewpoints. Although an authoritative base is essential, the autonomy-supportive model’s combination of love and boundaries adapted to children’s changing needs is required to promote beneficial outcomes.
In conclusion, the study shows that excellent parenting necessitates flexibility and understanding the many variables influencing these important caregiving tasks. Using this synthesis, academics clarify a route toward the best possible childrearing that combines psychological fortitude, cultural humility, and a keen awareness of children’s developmental milestones. Parents can adeptly manage the constantly shifting currents of their children’s development by paying attention to these insights.
Reference
Baumrind, D. (2013). Authoritative parenting revisited: History and current status. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 11–34). American Psychological Association.
Bornstein, M. H., & Lansford, J. E. (2010). Parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), The Handbook of Cultural Developmental Science (pp. 259-277). Psychology Press.
Garcia, A., Khunti, K., Acosta, E., Lin, J., & Choklingam, A. (2019). Family life influences parenting behaviours and child emotional wellbeing: A population-based household survey among urban ethnic minority families in the Bronx. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 54(2), 173–184.
Pinquart, M., & Kauser, R. (2018). Do the associations of parenting styles with behaviour problems and academic achievement vary by culture? Results from a meta-analysis. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000149
Rostad, W. L., Silverman, P., & McDonald, M. K. (2014). Daddy’s little girl: Risk status and daughter’s respect for superiors. Journal of Family Violence, 29(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9570-2
Way, N., Santos, C., Ni-Ya Ren, E., & Kim-Cohen, J. (2019). Exploring cultural differences in the development of shared parent and child-specific attributes. Child Development Perspectives, 13(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12321
write