The documentation of nursing care is an essential component of healthcare delivery, as it forms the basis for communication, decision-making, and continuity of care. However, inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital can result in medical errors, leading to adverse patient outcomes, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. This research proposal seeks to investigate the factors contributing to inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital and to develop and implement an evidence-based intervention to address this issue.
Relation of practice issue with literature
The practice issue of inefficient nursing documentation resulting in medical errors is a significant concern in healthcare. The literature provides evidence that inadequate documentation by nurses can lead to errors, which can adversely affect patient care and outcomes. The article by Monsen et al. (2018) titled “Documentation of social determinants in electronic health records with and without standardized terminologies: A comparative study” is relevant to this practice issue. The study by Monsen et al. (2018) examined the documentation of social determinants in electronic health records (EHRs) by healthcare providers. The authors found that the use of standardized terminologies for documenting social determinants in EHRs improved the quality and completeness of documentation. They also noted that the lack of standardized terminologies and poor documentation could lead to inadequate assessments of patients, which can result in medical errors. The findings of Monsen et al. (2018) support the importance of proper nursing documentation to prevent medical errors. Inadequate documentation can lead to inaccurate assessments, miscommunication, and incorrect medication administration, which can result in adverse patient outcomes. Therefore, nursing documentation must be clear, concise, accurate, and complete to ensure that patient care is safe and effective.
Secondly, another study by Jefferies, Johnson, and Griffiths (2010) provides insights into the essentials of quality nursing documentation and highlights the importance of accurate documentation in preventing medical errors. The study by Jefferies et al. (2010) is a meta-study that synthesizes previous research findings on nursing documentation. The authors identified ten essential elements of quality nursing documentation: accuracy, completeness, clarity, timeliness, relevance, conciseness, consistency, accessibility, confidentiality, and comprehensiveness. These elements are crucial for ensuring that nursing documentation is adequate and contributes to the provision of safe and high-quality patient care.
The study also highlights the potential consequences of inadequate nursing documentation. Inaccurate or incomplete documentation can lead to medical errors, such as medication errors, incorrect treatment, and delayed diagnosis. These errors can have severe consequences for patients, including harm, prolonged hospitalization, and even death. The study by Jefferies et al. (2010) provides valuable insights into the essentials of quality nursing documentation and highlights the potential consequences of inadequate documentation. Healthcare organizations can use these findings to improve nursing documentation practices and reduce the risk of medical errors.
Thirdly, another article by Kamil, Rachmah, and Wardani (2018) provides valuable insights into the issue of nursing documentation in the context of an Indonesian healthcare system. The study highlights that nurses face various challenges in documentation, including workload, lack of time, and inadequate documentation tools, which can lead to errors in patient care. These findings suggest that efficient and accurate documentation is vital in ensuring patient safety and quality of care. In addition, The study by Kamil et al. (2018) also highlights the importance of addressing the challenges nurses face in the documentation. According to the authors, solutions such as standardized documentation tools, ongoing education and training on documentation, and proper allocation of workload and staffing can help improve nursing documentation practices. The literature supports these findings, with studies suggesting that interventions such as electronic documentation systems and regular training and feedback can improve documentation quality (Carter-Templeton et al., 2020; Nigussie et al., 2020).
Lastly, the practice issue of inefficient nursing documentation leading to medical errors in a medical ward is closely related to the findings of Tasew, Mariye, and Teklay (2019) in their study on nursing documentation practice and associated factors among nurses in public hospitals in Tigray, Ethiopia. The authors highlight the importance of proper nursing documentation as a critical aspect of patient care that supports the provision of safe, effective, and high-quality healthcare services. The study found that the overall nursing documentation practice among the surveyed nurses needed to be improved, with only 37.9% of the participants documenting comprehensively. The authors noted that this poor documentation practice could be attributed to several factors, including a lack of knowledge and skills in documentation, inadequate training, and a heavy workload. Furthermore, the study identified a significant association between nursing documentation practice and various factors such as age, years of experience, and level of education, suggesting that these factors could influence the quality of documentation. Inefficient nursing documentation can lead to medical errors and adverse patient outcomes, including delayed or incorrect diagnoses, medication errors, and poor communication among healthcare providers. Tasew, Mariye, and Teklay’s (2019) findings highlight the importance of addressing the root causes of poor nursing documentation practice to improve patient safety and quality of care. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing education and training programs to enhance nurses’ knowledge and skills in documentation and measures to reduce workload and improve working conditions to enable nurses to focus on documentation adequately.
Overall, the literature suggests that inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital can lead to medical errors and adverse patient outcomes. The factors contributing to this issue include workload, time constraints, lack of training, poor interdisciplinary communication, and inadequate technical support. However, several interventions, such as the implementation of electronic documentation systems and standardized nursing language, have been shown to improve nursing documentation. Therefore, this research proposal seeks to build upon the existing literature by investigating the specific factors contributing to nursing documentation inefficiencies in the context of an acute hospital medical ward and developing and implementing an evidence-based intervention to address this issue.
Identification of practice issue
The practice issue of inefficient nursing documentation leading to medical errors in a medical ward of an acute hospital was identified through a nursing audit conducted by Mykkänen, Saranto, and Miettinen (2012). The audit involved a review of patient records and interviews with nursing staff to assess the quality of nursing care and patient safety in the ward. During the audit, it was observed that nursing documentation was incomplete, inconsistent, and not reflective of patient care (Mykkänen et al. 2012). This raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of nursing documentation and its impact on patient safety.
The evidence presented in the study supports the practice issue of inefficient nursing documentation and its relationship with medical errors. The authors highlight that complete or accurate nursing documentation can lead to better communication between healthcare professionals, leading to delayed or improper care. Moreover, it can result in medication errors, incorrect treatment, and inadequate monitoring, compromising patient safety. The authors cite several studies that demonstrate a link between poor nursing documentation and adverse events, such as falls, pressure ulcers, and infections(Mykkänen et al., 2012).
The study also provides recommendations for improving nursing documentation and patient safety, such as using standardized documentation tools, regularly auditing nursing records, and educating and training nursing staff on documentation practice(Mykkänen et al. 2012)s. The authors emphasize the importance of nursing documentation as a means of communication, information sharing, and legal documentation. They suggest that it is a vital aspect of nursing practice that must be given due attention. The evidence presented in the study supports the practice issue and highlights the need for interventions to improve nursing documentation and patient safety. The study provides recommendations for addressing the issue and emphasizes the importance of nursing documentation as an essential aspect of nursing practice.
Formulation of the Practice Issue in PICO Format
In a medical ward, the issue of poor clarity and consistency in documentation by registered nurses is prevalent. The current practice must be standardized, with nurses using various methods and documentation styles. The intervention of introducing standardized documentation guidelines and training is proposed to address this issue. The aim is to have 100% of the staff taught on adequate documentation using clinical practice guidelines, and at least 80% of the staff to comply with the same. The expected outcomes of this intervention are twofold; process-wise, it aims to improve documentation quality from 40% to 60%, which will reduce medical error, according to the audit checklist. Clinically, the intervention will address the correlation between a rise in nurse workload and a decline in documentation, as Charalambous and Goldberg (2016) reported. Therefore, the PICO question can be formulated as: In registered nurses working in a medical ward, does introducing standardized documentation guidelines and training compared to the current non-standardized documentation practice improve documentation compliance and quality, as evidenced by increased staff compliance and reduced medical errors?
Evidence to be retrieved
One research issue that needs to be addressed is the problem of inefficient nursing documentation leading to medical errors. To tackle this problem, various types of evidence can be helpful. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can be conducted to compare the effectiveness of different nursing documentation practices in reducing medical errors (Kamil et al., 2018). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses can also be carried out to summarize the evidence on nursing documentation practices and their impact on medical errors. Additionally, qualitative studies can be conducted to explore the reasons behind inefficient nursing documentation and its impact on medical errors. Finally, clinical practice guidelines can provide recommendations on nursing documentation practices that can help reduce medical errors (Kamil et al., 2018).
Various databases and resources can be helpful to in locating the best available evidence. For instance, the CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) is a comprehensive database that provides access to nursing and allied health journals, which can be searched for articles on nursing documentation and medical errors (EBSCO, 2022). Another resource is the Cochrane Library, a collection of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on healthcare interventions. The Ovid Interface of the Cochrane Library provides access to reviews on nursing documentation and medical errors, while the Wiley Interface offers equal access to Cochrane reviews. Additionally, the Trip Database is a search engine that allows users to search multiple evidence-based resources simultaneously, including systematic reviews, guidelines, and primary research articles. For those seeking guidance on managing medical conditions, BMJ Best Practice is an online clinical decision support tool offering evidence-based recommendations. Finally, the Joanna Briggs Institute EBP provides access to evidence-based practice resources, including systematic reviews, guidelines, and best practice information (EBSCO, 2022).
To assess the quality of the retrieved evidence, it is essential to consider factors such as study design, sample size, data collection and analysis methods, and potential biases. For example, RCTs with large sample sizes and low risk of bias generally provide higher-quality evidence than smaller, lower-quality studies. Similarly, systematic reviews and meta-analyses that adhere to rigorous methods and use transparent reporting are likely to provide higher-quality evidence than those that do not. Additionally, it may be useful to consider the source of the evidence and any conflicts of interest that may be present (EBSCO, 2022).
Considerations when deciding to adopt or reject the pieces of evidence
When considering whether to adopt or reject the evidence that inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of acute hospital results in medical error, several factors need to be considered; the decision flow diagram guides to evaluate the level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this case, the evidence is of good quality, graded A & B. The first question is whether the evidence supports practice change, which is affirmative. The next step is to appraise the applicability to practice. We need to consider if it is relevant to our practice, and if it imposes more risks than benefits, it may be better.
Additionally, we need to evaluate its feasibility and cost-effectiveness. We can move on to the next question if it is relevant, beneficial, feasible, and cost-effective. We must check if the recommended practice is the same as in the standard operating procedures (SOP). In this case, there is no SOP guideline on documentation. If the recommended practice is the same as in the SOP, we need to check for any variation in practice, as some wards have their own cultures. If there is no variation, we can stop. If there is, we need to prepare to implement practice change.
The main aim and objectives of the project
The aim of the project is to improve patients’ outcomes and delivery of nursing care by addressing the issue of inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital. To achieve this aim, the project has several objectives. Firstly, the project seeks to determine the current documentation compliance with evidence-based criteria. This will involve an assessment of the current state of documentation practices among the registered nurses in the medical ward.
Secondly, the project identifies barriers to achieving adequate nursing documentation. This will involve examining the factors that contribute to the current state of documentation practices and identifying the areas that need improvement. Thirdly, the project aims to improve nurses’ knowledge of reliable and accurate documentation through evidence-based guidelines and training programs. This will involve the development of training programs that focus on improving the documentation practices of nurses. Finally, the project aims to improve patients’ outcomes by promoting compliance with clinical practice guidelines for documentation. The project outcomes will include improved compliance with evidence-based documentation criteria, increased knowledge of reliable and accurate documentation practices among nurses, and improved patient outcomes through clinical practice guidelines for documentation.
The method section of the proposal
The proposed project aims to address the issue of inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital, which can lead to medical errors. The JBI’s three-step approach will be utilized to implement this project, including the pre-implementation, engage stakeholders, and implementation phases. In the engage stakeholder phase, five stakeholders will be invited, including the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Evidence-Based Nursing/QI Team, Nurse Manager, and Nurses from the hospital. These stakeholders were invited for specific reasons, such as gaining support, monitoring the pilot project, analyzing and evaluating ideas, providing support, and implementing improvised documentation changes. The stakeholders are from different departments within the hospital. They will be engaged through various methods, such as proposal presentation, ward meeting, in-service training, and ward sharing sessions, to ensure that the project is worth doing, align with standards and quality of care, encourage well-conceived risk, and reinforce the safety of proper documentation. The project’s ultimate goal is to improve key performance indicators, patient safety, and quality of care while reducing medical errors in the medical ward.
Formulation of a team
The selection of a project leader for the process of addressing inefficient nursing documentation and medical errors in a medical ward of an acute hospital should be based on several criteria (Hauschildt et al., 2000). The following are evidence-based criteria for selecting a project leader: The project leader should have demonstrated leadership skills, including the ability to motivate and inspire team members, set goals, and communicate effectively. This can be assessed through previous leadership roles held, feedback from colleagues, and leadership assessments.
Secondly, the project leader should have expertise in nursing documentation and be familiar with the standards and best practices related to documentation. This can be evaluated through the leader’s academic qualifications, work experience, and certifications related to nursing documentation (Hauschildt et al., 2000).
Thirdly, the project leader should have knowledge of medical errors and their causes, as well as strategies for preventing them. This can be assessed through the leader’s education, training, and previous experience in working to prevent medical errors.
Fourthly, the project leader should possess strong interpersonal skills, including communicating effectively with team members, building trust, and collaborating with stakeholders. This can be evaluated through the leader’s communication skills, teamwork experience, and references.
Lastly, the project leader should have strong project management skills, including developing and implementing project plans, monitoring progress, and adapting to changing circumstances. This can be evaluated through the leader’s previous experience managing projects and any relevant certifications or training. Overall, the selection of a project leader should be based on evidence-based criteria that reflect the skills and knowledge necessary to successfully address the problem of inefficient nursing documentation and medical errors in a medical ward of an acute hospital (Hauschildt et al., 2000).
Roles of the project leader and individual team members
As a project leader, it would be essential to establish clear expectations and guidelines for nursing documentation and ensure that all team members are aware of their responsibilities. The project leader should also facilitate open communication between team members to identify any potential barriers or challenges and work collaboratively to develop strategies to overcome them. Additionally, the project leader should be able to manage conflicts that may arise within the team and ensure that all team members are treated fairly and impartially.
As individual team members, being a team player and actively participating in discussions and decision-making processes is essential. Team members should also be willing to provide constructive feedback to their peers and work collaboratively to achieve the project goals. Additionally, it is important to be unbiased in evaluating nursing documentation practices and identifying potential issues that may result in medical errors.
Evidence of these roles can be found in project management and healthcare literature. For example, a study by Carayon et al. (2014) found that effective communication and collaboration among healthcare teams are essential for reducing medical errors. The study also emphasized the importance of conflict management skills for team leaders to ensure that all team members are treated fairly and impartially. Similarly, a study by Saleh et al. (2015) identified the importance of team players in healthcare settings, highlighting the need for individuals to work collaboratively and contribute to the team’s success. Finally, a review by Nevalainen et al. (2014) emphasized the importance of unbiased evaluations in healthcare quality improvement initiatives. They can help identify potential areas for improvement and prevent medical errors.
How often does the team meet?
The frequency and venue of team meetings and the person responsible for recording meeting notes are critical aspects of effective collaboration and progress monitoring. In this context, it is essential to note that the team meets monthly with stakeholders in the conference room to update progress. Additionally, an online Zoom meeting is held once a week with group members, typically on Monday afternoons, to ensure that tasks are on track and to make any necessary changes to the upcoming week’s plan.
During these meetings, the team predicts potential upcoming challenges and identifies solutions. It is worth noting that the team is conducting a three-month pilot study in the ward. Regular meetings are essential to ensuring that progress is made and that nursing documentation is improved to reduce the risk of medical errors. Finally, it is noted that the team secretary is responsible for recording meeting notes to ensure that all progress and decisions are documented for future reference.
Project Timeline Tracking
A Gantt chart is recommended to effectively manage the project timeline of inefficient nursing documentation leading to medical errors in a medical ward. This tool visually represents the tasks to be completed and their respective timelines, allowing for efficient progress tracking (APM, 2021). Additionally, the project files will be kept on a hospital-provided thumb drive to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of sensitive information.
Hard copies will be printed and stored in a folder in the sister’s office to minimize the risk of losing project details. Communication with stakeholders will be held in a Tiger Text group, facilitating efficient information sharing and updates. Meanwhile, communication among team members will be done through WhatsApp, which provides a convenient and easy-to-use platform for team collaboration. Utilizing these tools allows the project to be efficiently managed, and any potential issues can be promptly addressed, resulting in an effective and successful outcome.
Evidence-based audit tool criteria
We can use the evidence-based audit tool criteria to ensure that the criteria developed align with the evidence identified earlier. This tool is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of healthcare practices in light of available evidence (Titler, 2018). The tool involves a systematic review of the literature, followed by the development of criteria based on the available evidence. In this case, the criteria for efficient nursing documentation should be developed based on the available evidence on nursing documentation and medical error. The criteria should be clear, measurable, and evidence-based and align with improving nursing documentation and reducing medical errors. The evidence-based audit tool criteria will help ensure that the developed criteria are based on sound evidence and effectively address the problem of inefficient nursing documentation leading to medical error. Ultimately, using evidence-based criteria will help to improve the quality of care provided in the medical ward and promote patient safety (Titler, 2018).
What format would you consider using
Different formats can be used to develop an evidence-based criteria tool. The choice of format would depend on various factors, such as the intended purpose, target audience, and available resources. However, some standard formats that can be considered for developing an evidence-based criteria tool are:
Firstly the Checklist; This format involves a list of items that need to be assessed or considered, along with checkboxes or scoring systems to indicate the presence or absence of each item. Checklists can be simple, easy to use, and helpful in assessing compliance with standardized procedures or guidelines.
Secondly, Rating scales: This format involves a numerical or descriptive scale to rate the quality or relevance of evidence based on predefined criteria. Rating scales can help compare and select among different options and for providing more nuanced assessments of evidence.
Thirdly, Decision trees: This format involves a flowchart or diagram that presents a series of decision points and criteria to guide the user toward a recommended course of action or decision. Decision trees can be helpful in complex decision-making processes and ensure consistency and transparency in decision-making.
Fourthly, Algorithms: This format involves a step-by-step procedure or formula to calculate a score or decision based on the input of various criteria. Algorithms can automate decision-making processes and provide a standardized and objective approach.
Lastly, Narrative synthesis: This format involves a written summary or narrative that synthesizes the available evidence and provides a qualitative assessment of its quality, relevance, and implications. Narrative syntheses provide context and interpretation to the evidence and highlight areas of uncertainty or research gaps.
Data sampling and method and audit
To determine the sample size for a data audit on inefficient nursing documentation and medical errors, the JCI guide provides a helpful framework. If there are fewer than 30 cases, it is recommended to sample 100% of the available cases. For cases between 30 and 100, a sample size of 30 cases is recommended using random sampling methods. For cases between 101 and 500, a sample size of 50 cases is recommended, and for cases more significant than 500, a sample size of 70 cases is recommended.
In terms of data collection methods, several options are available. One approach could be conducting a manual review of patient medical records to identify documentation and associated medical errors. Alternatively, electronic medical records could be searched using specific terms to identify documentation and associated medical errors. A survey could also be distributed to registered nurses in the medical ward to assess their perceptions of nursing documentation practices and the frequency of medical errors. The chosen data collection method will depend on the research question and the resources available for the audit.
The pilot site for the project is the Medical Ward, specifically Ward 5. The data collectors for this project are the Nursing Documentation Audit team, which comprises five nurses. Five nurses are intended to reduce burnout and inconsistency in auditing results. To ensure the validity and reliability of the data collected, the data collectors will undergo in-service training, a competency checklist, guidelines to follow, and certification by a QI trainer.
Data will be collected using a Documentation Audit tool, and two data collectors will independently collect data without discussing it to prevent bias. A validated audit tool like the JBI critical appraisal checklist will help check for validity. Additionally, another professional expert will review the audit tool to ensure content validity.
Data collection will occur during overlapping hours on the morning shift to ensure that data is collected consistently across all days. Using overlapping hours will ensure that data is collected from all nurses working during the shift, reducing the possibility of bias. In conclusion, using a standardized and validated tool, independent data collectors, and overlapping data collection hours will help ensure the validity and reliability of the data collected.
Design Implementation Phase
During the Design Implementation phase, a baseline audit was conducted to assess the current state of nursing documentation in a medical ward of an acute hospital. The audit was conducted over a period of one month, from 1st February 2023 to 28th February 2023. The audit aimed to establish a benchmark against which the success of future interventions can be measured.
To evaluate the baseline audit findings, the team used the JBI Paces software to measure the compliance rate of the JBI criteria. JBI Paces is a software program designed to assist in implementing and evaluating evidence-based practice guidelines. It allows for collecting data on compliance with specific criteria, which can be used to identify areas for improvement.
The data collected during the baseline audit was presented in an Excel sheet. The team used this data to identify areas of non-compliance with the JBI criteria. This information will inform the development of interventions to improve nursing documentation and reduce the risk of medical errors.
Overall, the baseline audit provides valuable information about the current nursing documentation in the medical ward. Using JBI Paces software, the team could measure compliance rates with the JBI criteria and identify areas for improvement. The data collected during the audit will be used to develop interventions to improve nursing documentation and reduce the risk of future medical errors.
Communication to stakeholders
To effectively communicate the issue of inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital resulting in medical error, it is essential to identify and engage all stakeholders and those involved in the project. This includes the registered nurses, their immediate supervisors, the hospital administration, patient safety advocates, and other relevant parties.
The first step in communicating the issue is clearly defining and explaining the problem. This can be done by providing data and statistics on the prevalence of medical errors resulting from poor nursing documentation and examples of specific incidents and their consequences. It is also essential to highlight the impact of these errors on patient safety and overall healthcare outcomes.
Next, it is essential to engage stakeholders in developing a solution. This can involve soliciting input from nurses and other healthcare professionals with expertise in nursing documentation and patient safety. It may also involve researching and gathering best practices from other hospitals or healthcare systems.
Once a solution has been developed, it is essential to communicate it clearly and effectively to all stakeholders. This may involve providing training and education to registered nurses on the importance of accurate and timely documentation and providing resources and tools to make the documentation process more efficient. It may also involve implementing new policies and procedures to ensure that nursing documentation is given the appropriate attention and priority.
Throughout the process, it is essential to keep all stakeholders informed and engaged, and to solicit feedback and input on an ongoing basis. This will help to ensure that the solution is effective and sustainable and that all parties involved feel invested in its success. Ultimately, by communicating the issue of inefficient nursing documentation and engaging stakeholders in developing and implementing a solution, we can improve patient safety and healthcare outcomes in the medical ward of the acute hospital.
Development of a GRIP matrix
To develop a GRIP (Goals, Reality, Options, and Plan) matrix from the baseline audit results of inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital that results in medical error, regular meetings with stakeholders, and effective communication with them are essential. We need to meet with the stakeholders monthly to discuss the audit results and progress in addressing the issue. These meetings will ensure that stakeholders are aware of the current status of the problem and the actions taken to mitigate it. Effective communication with stakeholders ensures their comprehension and commitment to addressing the issue.
We need to communicate in a way that is clear, concise, and easily understandable, avoiding jargon and technical terms. By doing so, stakeholders will be able to comprehend the problem and the solutions proposed, leading to their commitment to addressing the issue. The GRIP matrix will provide a structured framework for the audit results, enabling us to define clear goals, assess the current reality, identify options, and develop a plan to address the issue. By involving stakeholders in this process, we can leverage their expertise and insights to create practical solutions that will improve nursing documentation and reduce medical errors.
How would you use the GRIP matrix result?
The GRIP matrix can be used to design change management strategies to address inefficient nursing documentation resulting in medical errors. First, it is necessary to determine the most effective evidence-based practices to address gaps in nursing documentation. This can be achieved by conducting a comprehensive literature review and analyzing data on nursing documentation practices in the medical ward. Based on this analysis, the identified best practices should be incorporated into the change management strategies.
Next, change management strategies should be developed, including education and training programs for nursing staff. The purpose of these programs should be to educate nursing staff on the importance of efficient documentation practices and to train them on using standardized documentation tools. The change management strategies should also include the standardization of documentation tools to ensure consistency and accuracy in nursing documentation.
Additionally, regular quality audits should be conducted with feedback for nursing staff to monitor the effectiveness of the implemented change management strategies. This will help identify areas for improvement and provide feedback to nursing staff on their documentation practices. Finally, evidence-based criteria should be used to create standardized documentation tools like templates or checklists for RNs to document patient care. This will help ensure that all necessary information is captured and documented accurately and efficiently.
In summary, by using the GRIP matrix to design change management strategies, it is possible to address the issue of inefficient nursing documentation resulting in medical errors. The strategies should include identifying evidence-based practices, providing education and training programs, standardizing documentation tools, conducting regular quality audits with feedback, and using evidence-based criteria to create standardized documentation tools.
Plan as a Leader in Facilitating the Project
As a leader tasked with facilitating the project to address inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in an acute hospital medical ward, my plan would involve providing clear leadership and direction to the project team. I would collaborate closely with all team members to ensure the project’s success and ensure that the project aligns with the hospital’s quality and safety objectives. I would also engage and motivate all stakeholders, including registered nurses, to actively participate in the project’s development and implementation.
To achieve these goals, I would begin by clearly defining the project’s scope, goals, and objectives, outlining the resources required, and developing a detailed timeline for completion. I would then work closely with the project team to ensure that everyone understands their roles and responsibilities and that all members have the necessary resources and support to carry out their duties effectively.
In addition, I prioritize stakeholder engagement and collaboration by involving all relevant parties in the project’s development and implementation. This would include registered nurses, other healthcare professionals, patients, their families, hospital management, and external stakeholders such as regulatory bodies.
Finally, I would continuously monitor and evaluate the project’s progress to ensure that it remains aligned with the hospital’s quality and safety objectives and delivers measurable improvements in nursing documentation and a corresponding reduction in medical errors. By providing clear leadership, collaborating closely with the project team, engaging stakeholders, and ensuring alignment with the hospital’s objectives, we can successfully address the issue of inefficient nursing documentation and improve patient outcomes in the medical ward.
Barriers to be anticipate
The inefficiency of nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward can have severe consequences and lead to medical errors. There are several barriers that could impede the successful implementation of measures to improve documentation practices. Resistance from RNs and stakeholders is a potential challenge that can arise due to the perceived increased workload and the need for change. This can be addressed by effective communication with stakeholders and regular training for RNs to help them understand the importance of accurate documentation. Additionally, the limited resources available for documentation may hinder efforts to improve documentation practices. This can be addressed by providing adequate resources, such as electronic documentation systems, to support efficient documentation. Maintaining improvements over time can also be challenging, but involving nursing supervisors and ensuring continued training and support can help to sustain these improvements. In summary, successfully implementing measures to improve nursing documentation requires effective communication, regular training, involvement of nursing supervisors, and adequate resources to support efficient documentation practices.
The post-implementation phase
The post-implementation phase is a critical step in the implementation process, as it involves evaluating the effectiveness of the new system or process that has been implemented and identifying areas for improvement. This phase typically includes several steps, such as conducting an audit, evaluating the results of the audit, and refining the implementation plan.
To conduct a post-implementation audit, researchers may use various methods, including chart reviews, surveys, and focus groups. For example, in the context of medication errors and patient outcomes, researchers may review patient charts to assess the impact of new documentation practices on medication errors and adverse drug events. They may also survey healthcare providers to assess their satisfaction with the new documentation practices and their perception of the impact on patient outcomes.
Once the audit is complete, researchers must evaluate the results to identify areas for improvement and refine the implementation plan. This may involve analyzing the data collected during the audit, comparing the results to baseline data or previous audits, and conducting additional research to explore potential solutions.
For example, a study published in the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research evaluated the impact of a new medication reconciliation process on medication errors and patient outcomes. The authors conducted chart reviews and surveys of healthcare providers to assess the impact of the new process. They found that the new process reduced medication errors and improved patient outcomes but also identified several areas for improvement, such as the need for additional training and support for healthcare providers.
In light of this information, it is clear that the post-implementation phase is an essential step in the implementation process, as it allows researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of the new system or process and identify areas for improvement. By conducting audits, evaluating results, and refining the implementation plan, researchers can optimize the implementation and ensure that it achieves the desired outcomes.
The intended use of the results
The results of the audit on inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital and its relation to medical errors are crucial for communication and decision-making. The first step would be to communicate the audit findings to all stakeholders monthly, including nursing staff, physicians, hospital administration, and patients. This will create awareness of the issue and encourage transparency in the organization. The audit findings should also be used to make decisions on refining the implementation plan and improving documentation practices. This may include updating policies and procedures, providing additional training and resources, and introducing new documentation systems.
Furthermore, the results can be used to identify areas for further education and training for nursing staff. This will ensure that staff are equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to improve documentation practices and reduce the incidence of medical errors. Additionally, the findings can be used to improve patient outcomes, such as reducing medication errors. This will not only benefit patients but also enhance the reputation of the hospital and increase patient satisfaction.
Scholarly article evidence suggests that poor nursing documentation practices are associated with an increased risk of medical errors, which can result in adverse patient outcomes. For example, a study by Foronda et al. (2016) found that poor documentation practices were a contributing factor to medication errors in the hospital setting. Therefore, addressing inefficient nursing documentation practices is essential to improve patient safety and reduce the incidence of medical errors.
In conclusion, the results of the audit on inefficient nursing documentation practices in a medical ward of an acute hospital can be used for effective communication and decision-making. Regular communication with stakeholders, refining implementation plans, providing education and training, and improving patient outcomes are all essential steps to reduce the incidence of medical errors in the hospital setting. The use of the evidence-based practice, such as the study by Foronda et al. (2016), can further inform decision-making and enhance patient safety.
Process of sustenance of the practice
Developing a plan to sustain the practice of efficient nursing documentation requires careful consideration and planning. To determine the timing for the future audit, conducting audits at regular intervals, such as bi-annually, is essential if the compliance rate falls between 50-80%. This frequency will allow for adequate monitoring and evaluation of the sustained practice. Additionally, it is necessary to allow sufficient time for meaningful changes and intervention effects to be observed. This could be around six months to a year, depending on the intervention’s nature and complexity. To coordinate timing with relevant stakeholders, it is crucial to communicate the audit schedule and seek their input at the most appropriate time. This will minimize disruptions and ensure resource availability, enabling the audit to run smoothly. However, the plan to sustain the practice must be evidence-based. Therefore, it is crucial to consult scholarly articles to identify best practices and ensure the proposed intervention aligns with current evidence-based research. This will increase the likelihood of sustaining efficient nursing documentation and reducing medical errors.
Sustain the change in practice.
In order to sustain a change in nursing documentation practices to prevent medical errors, several measures must be put in place. Regular compliance audits should be conducted to ensure that nursing staff adheres to the new documentation guidelines. Ongoing education and training for nursing staff should also be provided to reinforce the importance of accurate documentation and to update them on any changes in the documentation process. Nursing supervisors should provide ongoing support to their staff to help them implement the new practices effectively.
Integration into quality improvement initiatives can ensure that the new documentation practices are embedded in the hospital’s culture and processes. A monitoring and reporting system should be established to track compliance and identify barriers that prevent staff from complying with the new practices. Regular evaluation of the sustainability plan should be conducted to identify areas for improvement and make necessary adjustments.
Partnerships with external stakeholders, such as other healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies, can provide opportunities to share best practices and promote the long-term viability of the new documentation practices. By implementing these measures, the hospital can sustain the change in nursing documentation practices, reducing the risk of medical errors and improving patient safety.
Measures to scale up the implementation project
Several measures need to be put in place to scale up the implementation project aimed at improving nursing documentation and reducing medical errors in a medical ward of an acute hospital. Partnering with external stakeholders, such as healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies, is crucial in promoting the adoption of best practices. According to a study by Safer Healthcare, partnerships with external stakeholders can enhance healthcare delivery and improve patient outcomes (Safer Healthcare, 2019). Sharing project outcomes through various channels, including publications, presentations, and internal hospital communications, can also demonstrate the effectiveness of the new documentation practices. This can encourage other hospitals and departments to adopt the same practices, thus reducing the incidence of medical errors.
Demonstrating the benefits of the new documentation practices to relevant departments and hospitals is another crucial measure. A study by Healy et al. (2020) found that educating healthcare workers on the importance of accurate and efficient documentation can improve patient safety outcomes significantly. Encouraging adopting of new practices through ongoing education and training is also essential. According to a study by the Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, ongoing education and training programs can help nurses stay up to date with best practices and improve patient outcomes (Wu et al., 2019). In conclusion, partnering with external stakeholders, sharing project outcomes, demonstrating benefits, and encouraging ongoing education and training are critical measures in scaling up the implementation project aimed at reducing medical errors resulting from inefficient nursing documentation.
Plan to disseminate the results of the implementation project.
Several strategies will be employed to disseminate the results of the implementation project aimed at addressing inefficient nursing documentation by registered nurses in a medical ward of an acute hospital that results in medical error. First, the project’s success will be shared through internal hospital communications, such as newsletters, to update the hospital staff on the project’s outcomes. This will include the challenges encountered, lessons learned, and the benefits of the new documentation practices. Second, presentations will be organized to relevant departments to discuss the project’s findings and benefits of the new documentation practices. Scholarly articles that provide evidence on the impact of nursing documentation on medical errors, such as the study by Keers et al. (2013), will be referenced during these presentations to support the project’s findings. Third, other departments and hospitals will be encouraged to adopt the new practices to promote evidence-based nursing practices in healthcare settings. Fourth, project outcomes will be published in nursing journals, such as the Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, to reach a wider audience and contribute to the nursing literature. Finally, the project’s findings will be presented at conferences like the International Nursing Conference to share the knowledge with the broader nursing community. The dissemination plan will utilize multiple channels to ensure that the project outcomes reach the intended audience and contribute to improving nursing practices in the healthcare setting.
References
Monsen, K. A., Rudnick, J. M., Kapinos, N., Warmbold, K., McMahon, S. K., & Schorr, E. N. (2018). Documentation of social determinants in electronic health records with and without standardized terminologies: A comparative study. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 28(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105818785641
Jefferies, D., Johnson, M., & Griffiths, R. (2010). A meta-study of the essentials of quality nursing documentation. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172x.2009.01815.x
Kamil, H., Rachmah, R., & Wardani, E. (2018). What is the problem with nursing documentation? The perspective of Indonesian nurses. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 9, 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2018.09.002
Tasew, H., Mariye, T., & Teklay, G. (2019). Nursing documentation practice and associated factors among nurses in public hospitals, Tigray, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4661-x
Mykkänen, M., Saranto, K., & Miettinen, M. (2012). Nursing audit as a method for developing nursing care and ensuring patient safety. NI 2012: 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th: 2012: Montreal, Quebec), 2012, 301. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24199107/
Hauschildt, J., Keim, G., & Medcof, J. W. (2000). Realistic Criteria for Project Manager Selection and Development. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280003100304
Healy, C., Smith, M., O’Donoghue, J., & Hickey, A. (2020). Documentation and patient safety: An integrative literature review. Journal of clinical nursing, 29(9-10), 1379-1398.
Safer Healthcare. (2019). External Stakeholder Engagement. Retrieved from https://www.saferhealthcare.com.au/toolkit/external-stakeholder-engagement/
Wu, Y. C., Lee, H. F., Lin, Y. Y., & Shao, J. H. (2019). Effects of an ongoing education program on nurses’ documentation of pressure ulcers. Journal of nursing education and practice, 9(2), 11-18.
Keers, R. N., Williams, S. D., Cooke, J., & Ashcroft, D. M. (2013). Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Drug safety, 36(11), 1045-1067.
EBSCO. (2022). CINAHL Database | EBSCO. EBSCO Information Services, Inc. | Www.ebsco.com. https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/cinahl-database
Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T. B., Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J., Hundt, A. S., Hoonakker, P., Holden, R., & Gurses, A. P. (2014). Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Applied ergonomics, 45(1), 14-25.
Saleh, A. M., Darawad, M. W., Al-Hussami, M., & Hayajneh, F. A. (2015). Nurses’ perception of the importance of teamwork and collaboration in healthcare settings. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 8, 233.
Nevalainen, M., Kuikka, L., Lunkka, N., & Isohanni, H. (2014). Unbiased evaluation in healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a narrative review. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 27(7), 614-628.
APM. (2021). What is a Gantt chart? | APM. Apm.org.uk. https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/gantt-chart/
Titler, M. G. (2018). The Evidence for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation. National Library of Medicine; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2659/
write