Historical Perspective of Superstition
The phenomenon of superstition has constituted part of human civilization for millennia. It traces its origins to the beliefs and rituals of different ancient cultures. To understand the historical aspect of superstition, one needs to look at its head in ancient times, how it was shaped by religion, how it has moved through time, and how ancient times relied heavily on superstition. Supernatural entities and forces were prevalent among the ancient civilizations, including the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans. This led them to come up with ways that they could please these deities and gain their favor.[1]. For example, the Egyptians had faith that amulets would help them fight against some harmful spirits, while the Greeks used to consult with oracles to see what would happen.
Superstition was also influenced by religion. Religion had many associations with these superstitions. Due to this, many events and natural phenomena came to be thought of as having been created by the activities of gods or divine forces. This caused specific rituals and superstitions such as sacrifices to deities and the belief in myths. One can give the example of how the Romans believed in signs and omens and considered anything natural to be a message from God. However, superstitions have changed over time following different cultural settings. The spread of monotheistic religions such as Christianity and Islam caused some superstitions associated with the old polytheism to be either replaced or adapted to fit well in the context of a new religion, such as belief in malevolent beings and charms developed into demonology and holy symbols for warding off evildoers.
Scientific skepticism began questioning and analyzing prevailing societies’ superstitions as they grew more scientifically literate. However, the Scientific Revolution during the 17th century was a significant challenge to traditional beliefs as it advocated for reasoned explanations for what occurred in nature. With increased scientific know-how, some superstitions are explained, and some are proved wrong. Nevertheless, superstitions remain relevant in one form or another in modern society. Despite scientific advances, some beliefs and rituals that are considered superstition still exist.
Several psychological theories explain how superstitions come about and sustain themselves. Illusory correlation is a standard psychological theory that assumes that people think their existence and non-existence have relationships, although they do not. For instance, putting on a lucky charm in a sports competition and then finally coming out victorious can lead people to believe that the magic worked, which is referred to as ‘the ‘confirmation bias.’ People tend to focus on these cases in which their beliefs seem to come true, ignore other reasons for failure, and consider themselves lucky.
Psychological Theories on Superstition
Humans have always had a tendency towards superstition which significantly dictates their belief system and behavior. Some people might find such beliefs irrational, but many psychological theories attempt to trace and continue explaining the causes of superstitions. This article analyzes two significant theories: Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory and B.F. Skinner’s behaviorism theory to understand psychological elements with superstition.
Freud considered much of human behavior, including superstition, stemming from unconscious desires and unreconciled tensions. Freud outlines that the unconscious mind is critical when analyzing an individual’s beliefs and behaviors.[2]. In the sense that superstitions in this framework represent the suppressed urges and unconscious antagonism of these wishes. Freud’s model argues that people resort to superstitions to help relieve their fears in areas where there are feelings of helplessness or vulnerability. Such a case is when somebody would have nervousness before going for an important job interview leading to them acquiring a superstitious characteristic like using a lucky charm to soothe the worries. Psychologically speaking, superstition is a buffer that ensures predictability in an uncertain scenario. Through Freud’s theory, it is possible to analyze superstitions and expose the inner feelings behind these acts. For example, a person who thinks that stepping on crack is bad luck can be traced to not resolving personal issues with parents or the fear of being hurt by loved persons.
However, another approach comes from the behaviorism theory propounded by B.F. Skinner. According to his perspective, behavior is molded by reinforcement and conditioning. He argues that superstition is behavioral and happens when someone confuses a chance and coincidental occurrence with what they wanted to take place.[3]. According to Skinner’s theory, superstitions are created through a procedure known as operant conditioning or reinforcement. For instance, a baseball player may wear one pair of socks throughout all games, considering they feel lucky to have that pair of socks. Consequently, if the player performs excellently wearing the attires during such a game, they might use them more often. Skinner claims that such an association between the event and the resulting situation should work favorably for individuals. It might strengthen their belief in magical power. Such a superstitious behavior intensifies as the person fears losing this favored result. Thus, a person might still do so, though reasonable thinking would indicate not. Superstitions can also be analyzed using Skinner’s perspective thus explaining why people still believe in such irrational explanations. By reaffirming the intended result, superstitious acts create a chain of action and belief.
Cognitive Theories
Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary theory posits superstition as a strategy of adaptation in dealing with uncertainties while alleviating anxiety. This association of cause and effect with random occurrences could give ancestors an advantage in surviving. Conversely, superstitions may result from an individual relying on previous experiences and over-learning such situations.
Attribution Theory
Attribution theory accounts for the reasons regarding events and results. Superstitions are simple ways to explain outcomes in situations with little or no sense of order. The attributions assist people in regaining control of unexpected occurrences and cases they have little control over.
Illusory Correlation and Confirmation Bias
Illusory correlation denotes the perception of a connection linking various unrelated incidents or variables. They may arise from the “illusion of correlation,” wherein people see associations between their actions and the following happenings. This phenomenon is termed confirmation bias, which tends to pay attention to or remember events supporting established ideas, ignoring one’s contrary opinions.
Cognitive Biases and Superstitions
Availability heuristic refers to a cognitive bias that implies first instances are spontaneously generated while considering any subject-matter issue. This can often be supported by dramatic examples, which then cause people to make exaggerated assumptions about the probability of some event or outcome. When people heavily use the first piece of information they encounter, they are said to have been affected by the anchoring bias.[4]. These superstitions are often rooted in people’s initial beliefs or cultural norms that anchor their subsequent judgments and actions based on the original ideas. Gambler’s fallacy refers to a form of cognitive bias where an individual believes that their probability of winning is higher after several belief in the ability of past results to influence future events gives rise to many superstitious practices relating to luck and chance, such as lucky charms or rituals.
Contribution of Cognitive Processes to Superstitions
It is through superstitious beliefs that people attempt to explain events and phenomena having no apparent reason. Superstitions are developed in individuals when their cognitive processes result in the attribution of unpredictable events to either supernatural ones or some mysterious forces that can’t be explained. Human beings are predisposed towards a dislike for ambiguous situations and uncertainties. Superstition gives some amount of control and assurance to situations that are out-of-control and unknown. It eases nervousness even without a shred of proof. Also, superstitions are typically emotionally based, as they give people hope. Psychological ideas such as the placebo effect postulate that believing in superstitious objects generates good feelings which lowers anxiety levels, making people believe in their power.
Scientific Skepticism Towards Superstitions
Critical analysis of superstitious beliefs
Observing order in chaotic occurrences and linking non-existing causes can make one develop irrational views. Therefore, understanding these cognitive processes helps us understand the basic reasoning behind our superstitious tendencies. Additionally, superstition is also highly influenced by cultural and social issues. Beliefs are usually inherited from one generation to another, embedded into cultural ways of doing things and religious rites. Cultural identity helps people stay true to these beliefs because it is difficult for anyone to challenge them or decide to do away with them.
Debunking common superstitions through scientific inquiry
The scientific skeptics question divine revelations (superstitious beliefs) through empiricism. Scientists disprove many of the superstitious beliefs by undertaking scientific inquiries into their origin and offering reasonable solutions to them. Confirmation bias is one of the reasons behind, for example, people’s beliefs regarding the 13th Friday as an unlucky day explains people tend to recall more negative events that happened in their lives thus ensuring its unluckiness among many.
However, scientific investigation does not find any objective basis for alleged bad luck in connection with this date. Moreover, the concept of “the evil eye” as a superstitious idea claiming a person’s malicious look could damage the personality also can be explained via psychologically based theories such as the ideomotor principle. The principle of unconscious gestures and expressions helps explain how other people’s unconscious gestures and expressions affect their behavior. Nevertheless, peer-reviewed science has come up with nothing to prove that there is any physical harm caused because somebody looked at someone else.
Implications and Insights
Besides the modern developments in science and technology, many people are still very superstitious. Superstition, the source, psychology theory, and how science can explain away superstition, the feature article. Superstition has its roots in human beings’ desire to have order and predictability in an uncertain environment. According to psychological theories, people find patterns even within random events, thus leading to superstition. The search for an explanation is inherent in humans due to wiring and this has created a basis upon which people create many superstitions.
Operant conditioning ensures that people stick to their beliefs thus strengthening the practice of superstition. Whenever an individual feels that if he or she performs a particular action, it is going to result in a desirable consequence leading to the appearance of this desired outcome, likely, the subject will likely again engage in similar behavior. The resultant positivity reinforces the conviction of superstition, despite a lack of causal relationship between the act and the expected end.
Superstition is dispelled through scientific skepticism. Scientists and skeptics base their beliefs on critical thinking, empirical evidence, and logical reasoning challenging the legitimacy of superstitious beliefs. The absence of reliable scientific proof is questioned, and “correlation does not mean causality” is demonstrated. This case study implies that education and rationalism constitute fundamental weapons in fighting against superstitions. Through understanding the psychological bases for superstition, one is in a better position to reason than just believe. It gives people the power to challenge the authenticity of superstitions and instead base their reasoning on proven concepts.
Conclusion
It is essential to understand the causes of superstition. The understanding challenges the beliefs and perceptions of people leading to decisions in light of the available evidence and rationale. Additionally, it dispels the superstitions and the erroneous beliefs that accompany people leading to a more scientific perspective. Finally, by understanding the roots of superstition people overcome the adverse impacts of culturally-based fundamentalisms and mystical activities that are based on illogical perceptions. Future studies should delve more into the cultural and social aspects that inform superstition. Superstition comparisons on different grounds and cultures help understand the belief systems in particular communities.
Annotated Bibliography
Diller, James W. “BF Skinner and behaviorism.” In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, pp. 495-500. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
Hartmann, Heinz. “Psychoanalysis as a scientific theory.” In Psychoanalysis, scientific method and philosophy, pp. 3-37. Routledge, 2020.
Leng, Gareth, and Rhodri Ivor Leng. The matter of facts: Skepticism, persuasion, and evidence in science. Mit Press, 2020.
Rouse, Joseph. Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Cornell University Press, 2018.
Susen, Simon. “Mysteries, conspiracies, and inquiries: Reflections on the power of superstition, suspicion, and scrutiny.” SocietàMutamentoPolitica 12, no. 23 (2021): 25-62.
[1] Leng, Gareth, and Rhodri Ivor Leng. The matter of facts: Skepticism, persuasion, and evidence in science. MIT Press, 2020.
[2] Hartmann, Heinz. “Psychoanalysis as a scientific theory.” In Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy, pp. 3-37. Routledge, 2020.
[3] Diller, James W. “BF Skinner, and behaviorism.” In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, pp. 495-500. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
[4] Susen, Simon. “Mysteries, conspiracies, and inquiries: Reflections on the power of superstition, suspicion, and scrutiny.” SocietàMutamentoPolitica 12, no. 23 (2021): 25-62.
write