Social media platforms have access to a considerable amount of personal information. Despite these companies possessing many personal information, many people seem to care less about their privacy. When this information is handled carelessly, it ends up in illegal hands and may be misused. This results in horror when providing information on social media as one is hardly assured that the information they have provided is in good hands. In turn, Facebook privacy breaches may result due to having less care about your privacy provided to social media, making it get into unauthorized hands, leading to the terror of individuals while giving their details.
Firstly, individuals have little concern about their social privacy. Essentially, while people are concerned about information confidentiality, their behaviour seems to show there is little correlation between secrecy alarms and behaviour (Lee et al. 3). Consequently, privacy lethargy can cause people to feel exhausted from hearing endless news about data breaches and therefore they feel it is futile to do anything to protect their data. Many people tend to show that their privacy is their priority, but they rarely work toward protecting it. They always disclose all their data without minding the degree of protection and enhancing the sufficient procedures to protect their data. Hence, people should be cautious about their data by not disclosing their facts and by enforcing settings on social media accounts where this information may leak.
Further, the data on Facebook can be used to profit politicians without their consent. Subsequently, personal data is used, without their knowledge, to aid the political campaigns of conservative candidates in the election. (Facebook and Data Privacy par. 1). A political consulting firm used its data to target political messages that may have influenced the outcome of the elections. While not exactly a data breach, from the public response to this incident, most Facebook users need to be aware of having their personal information used this way. These politicians expend this information to triumph in the elections. Thus, peculiar information should be secured to enhance justice and fairness in elections.
Moreover, many people’s trust was broken; thus, while exposing their personal information, they fear it may land in unauthorized hands. The fissure was remarkable because of its scale, affecting voluminous users and violating the trust of users put in Facebook to safeguard their data (Rosenthal et al. 480). One of the greatest fears people have is information they consider particularly personal or sensitive being shared with people they rarely want to share. In this case, some users may be genuinely uncomfortable about this enormous amount of knowledge held by a single company as it was proved to them by this violation that it may get into illegal hands who may use the information for cyberbullying or for their benefit. Therefore, to give their clients confidence while giving their details, they must also prove how to secure it.
To sum up, the Facebook privacy breach has its roots, implementors, and implications for the firms and companies that request and receive personal details to take it as one of their prior activities to secure the details and keep their privacy. The specific individuals giving their data ought to ensure that their privacy is enhanced by taking the required steps. As per the details, the breach is a result of reckless data handling; if each person plays their role, these acts are scarcely an issue.
Works Cited
“Facebook and Data Privacy in the Age of Cambridge Analytica – the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies.” The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, 30 Apr. 2018, jsis.washington.edu/news/facebook-data-privacy-age-cambridge-analytica.
Lee, Chang Boon, et al. “Sentiments and Perceptions after a Privacy Breach Incident.” Cogent Business & Management, edited by Trevor Wilmshurst, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2050018.
Rosenthal, Sonny, et al. “A Tripartite Model of Trust in Facebook: Acceptance of Information Personalization, Privacy Concern, and Privacy Literacy.” Media Psychology, Aug. 2019, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1648218.
write