The 2020 presidential campaign in the United States was among American history’s most controversial and provocative. The voting occurred during an international global epidemic, civil upheaval, and a highly polarized political landscape. After the elections, there were pervasive accusations of fraudulent voting, raising serious questions about the validity of the outcomes. Professor John Sides delivered an address named “Explaining the 2020 Election,” in which he conveyed information and findings to assist us in comprehending the presidential contest results.
Sides commences his first presentation by addressing the 2020 electoral outcomes, where he remarks that even though Joe Biden was elected president, Donald Trump obtained 74 million votes. Sides contends that Trump’s popularity stems primarily from his foundation, which comprises most white working-class electorate and evangelical Christians. He also points out that Biden received help from a various demographic of voters, which include subgroups of university voters and neighborhood women. This argument about the election results is persuasive to me. His evaluation is consistent with what we understand about the sociodemographic characteristics of the proponents of the contestants. Trump’s assistance has consistently been dominated by white working-class voters and evangelical Christians, whereas Biden’s came from a more multifaceted electorate.
Another argument that Sides made concerning the US presidential election in 2020 is that the challenges the voters experienced in this process were similar to those of other years. He claims that the election process is neither a referendum on President Trump’s ability to handle the deadly COVID-19 virus nor a reaction to his initiatives. Sides contends that the leadership contest was molded by similar variables that have previously affected voting, such as the financial system, incumbent status, and partisanship. Sides offers proof that supports his claim, such as election trend analysis, exit voting data, and population data. A correlation between casting a ballot trend in 2016 and 2020 is among the most persuasive proof he displays. Sides observes that voting trends changed comparatively slightly between the two administrations, with the majority of the electorate electing for the identical political group. He believes that this demonstrates that the incidents of the last four years had little impact on the electorate’s views and choices.
Furthermore, despite the complaints of fraudulent voting by previous Donald Trump and his proponents, Sides asserts that the electoral process was primarily democratically conducted. To provide evidence for this, he made substantial citations in the research studies and articles that did not discover any proof to show that the election had any irregularities or fraud during the election process. Among the various reports that he cites, a study by the Cybersecurity, and Infrastructure Security Agency was among them the report that calls the voting process.
Therefore, my perception of Sides’ arguments concerning the impartiality of the 2020 presidential election is compelling. This is because no evidence of rampant fraud was provided to prove that the election was not fairly done; various individual investigations and analyses discovered that is substantial. The actuality that various individual investigations and analyses discovered no proof of vote rigging or discrepancies in the election process is substantial. Furthermore, the fact that several pending lawsuits by Donald’s legal staff were rebuffed by courts countrywide, even those that Republican-appointed jurists filed, implies that the assertions of fraudulent voting were not backed up by proof. Moreover, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has decreed the 2020 voting process as “the most reliable in the history of the American residents.” This bureau is responsible for safeguarding the country’s electoral facilities, taking their findings seriously.
It is, therefore, vital to consider the performance and authenticity of the information presented by Sides when assessing his scientific proof. In particular, Professor Sides’ data comes from new credible sources and is considered trustworthy. It is worth noting that, nevertheless, that information can be perceived in a wide range of manners, and Sides’ conclusion about the information could be debatable. Regarding the variables mentioned by Sides, it is evident that divisiveness was an important aspect that played a critical role in evaluating the voting results. The data Sides cite demonstrates that political allegiance is a powerful indicator of voting behavior.
I consider Sides’ scientific proof compelling. His investigation is grounded in empirical evidence consistent with other 2020 US presidential election studies. Other intellectuals, for instance, have discovered that Donald trump’s management of the global pandemic, which is covid-19 was a large determinant in his capitulation and that Biden was capable of rallying the electorate in pivotal population subgroups such as neighborhood and the black electorates. Sides’ evidence also explains how Biden could win in customarily Rural states and why Trump succeeded in keeping his foundational framework of white, operating electorate loyal. However, Sides’ evaluation still needs improvement since it does not mention the effects of third-party contestants or attempts to intimidate voters, which are both factors that could have had significant repercussions. Furthermore, his evaluation is primarily grounded in nationwide trends, with no attention paid to single-state interactions or electorate social behavior. While I believe Sides’ rebuttals and scientific proof are persuasive, it is important to note that various individuals may disagree with his assumptions; some of them are Trump voters, for instance, may contend that the presidential election was taken from him, even though there isn’t enough proof to back up this assertion. Furthermore, some may claim that the substantial voting participation rate was due to variables besides the global pandemic, including accelerated exuberance for one applicant compared to another.
Reference
Explaining the 2020 U.S. Election https://youtu.be/vachRC5k39g.
write