Abstract
Diabetes causes elevated blood glucose levels. The body’s insulin inefficiency causes this. The American Diabetes Association (2021) reports that 11.8% of Marylanders have Diabetes, a shockingly high rate. Maryland needs a population-based diabetes program to reduce morbidity and death. The project will target underprivileged individuals and reduce health inequalities by promoting improved diets, exercise, and healthcare. The behavior change paradigm was the Transtheoretical Model (Stages of Change), and the program planning framework was the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. The program will partner with existing organizations like the Maryland Department of Health Diabetes Prevention and Control Program to leverage resources and expertise. Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound objectives will be evaluated.
Keywords: Diabetes, Morbidity, Mortality, Maryland, Population-based program, Transtheoretical Model (Stages of Change), PRECEDE-PROCEED model.
Introduction
Maryland is still grappling with the widespread issue of Diabetes, which substantially threatens public health. The state suffers from increased prevalence rates, mortality figures, and discrepancies in healthcare among its population. In response to this urgent problem, a program, “Diabetes-Free Maryland,” has been developed to address Diabetes within specific at-risk groups such as racial minorities, ethnic minorities, individuals facing financial constraints, and those residing in disadvantaged locations. This comprehensive initiative combines evidence-based models, frameworks for behavioral change, and collaborative endeavors to foster prevention strategies while encouraging early detection and efficient management of Diabetes (Quanbeck, 2019).
Program Overview
Goals
“Diabetes-Free Maryland” empowers communities with diabetes prevention and management knowledge, resources, and support. The program aims to mitigate the impact of Diabetes by enhancing health outcomes and improving access to healthcare for the target Maryland community (the underprivileged and vulnerable individuals).
Objectives
Increase by 20% within two years the proportion of people in the target demographic who undergo routine Diabetes testing at the program’s completion.
Reduce the prevalence of obesity among the program’s target group by 10% in three years with educational activities emphasizing healthy choices like frequent exercise, a good diet, and monitoring blood sugar. The Transtheoretical model (TTM) or Stages of Change approach will guide behavior change.
Increasing awareness and knowledge with targeted health education programs and workshops. Enhance access to healthcare services and resources.
Program Plan
The Program Plan for “Diabetes-Free Maryland” is rooted in the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, which offers a comprehensive, multi-level technique for health promotion. It includes nine stages, each focusing on a selected component of this system, making plans, and implementing procedures. The first section is a social assessment, in which program planners will conduct a needs assessment to discover social, financial, and cultural aspects affecting diabetes rates in deprived communities in Maryland (Livergant et al., 2021).
The second section involves an epidemiological assessment of diabetic morbidity and loss of life records in the state specializing in risk factors, complications, and healthcare shortages. Phase three is a behavioral and environmental evaluation to examine health, fitness, healthcare practices, and environmental variables which could affect diabetes occurrence.
Phase 4, the educational and organizational assessment, will examine Maryland’s diabetes education and agency assets, consisting of local authorities, institutions, network businesses, healthcare experts, and different stakeholders in diabetes prevention and management (Azar et al., 2017). The fifth segment, administrative and coverage evaluation, will scrutinize policies, regulations, and standards affecting diabetes prevention and treatment inside the country.
After those five preparatory levels, the implementation segment (section 6) will use the collected data to create an in-depth program plan to expand healthcare access, promote recovery and thy nutrients, exercise, and cultural focus (Scott et al., 2019).
Phase seven involves procedure evaluation, tracking this program’s implementation, and identifying development regions. The 8th segment is the impact assessment, wherein the results and impact of this system may be analyzed, specializing in diabetes rates, healthcare access, food regimen, physical activity, and reduced inequalities among disadvantaged groups.
Finally, the 9th segment is outcome evaluation, which observes the program’s long-term outcomes, including behavior modifications and health status enhancements. The interventions to be applied in the program include community education campaigns, diabetes workshops, and physical exercise programs. These projects empower people and groups with understanding and resources for diabetes prevention and management (Rosenquist & Fox, 2021).
Interventions
“Diabetes-Free Maryland” will introduce several initiatives to encourage physical exercise, advocate healthier nutritional selections, and enhance healthcare entry. These encompass network education campaigns to disseminate data about diabetes prevention and control (ADA, 2021), culturally sensitive diabetes workshops for people with Prediabetes (CDC, 2022), and physical exercise packages tailor-made to precise cultural contexts (Luminis Health, 2023). The program’s development and efficacy of these interventions can be monitored by gathering data on vital metrics, player pride, weight problem occurrence, and diabetes screening costs (Rosenquist & Fox, 2021).
Implementation Strategies
The implementation strategies for the program revolve around forming partnerships with existing healthcare offerings. Collaborating with hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations will boom get right of entry to Diabetes trying out, scientific expertise, and affordable treatment options (Maurer et al., 2022).
The program will adopt a culturally touchy method of health training. Tailored fitness merchandising and education initiatives that respect the cultural circumstances of target communities could be implemented doubtlessly together with collaborations with local leaders, multilingual materials, and network workshops (Stubbe et al., 2020).
Partnering with nearby businesses and leisure centers could create physical exercise opportunities. These collaborations may result in putting in sports leagues, exercise applications, and strolling corporations accessible to the target demographics.
This initiative will leverage technology, particularly telemedicine and cell clinics, to boost healthcare and get the right to entry to geographically underserved areas. This method may involve providing far-off consultations, mobile diabetes screening devices, and telehealth services (Anderson & Singh, 2021).
Further, this system will emphasize schooling on vitamins and guide healthier food choices. This might contain partnerships with local farmers’ markets, community gardens, and wholesome meal tasks, potentially putting in cooking training, nutrition seminars, and related sports.
Monitoring and evaluation can be a crucial part of the implementation technique. A sturdy tracking and assessment system can be applied, amassing information on key indicators like diabetes prevalence costs, healthcare utilization, and fitness outcomes to assess the program’s effectiveness and identify areas for development (Evaluation Measures – RHIHub Diabetes Prevention Toolkit, n.d.).
Behavior/Social Change Framework
This program uses the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) or Stages of Change approach to modify behavior (Raihan & Cogburn, 2020). The TTM motivates and supports people at each step of behavioral change. This paradigm encourages better lives, frequent screenings, and diabetes control. The TTM has five change stages: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. In the contemplation stage, people see the need for change but may be hesitant to act. Individuals plan actions during preparation. The program will help participants define achievable objectives, create action plans, and discover obstacles and solutions. People act on their action plans at the action stage. The initiative will include check-ins, tracking tools, healthcare experts, and support groups. People maintain behavioral change in the maintenance stage. Long-term commitment and relapse management will be stressed throughout the program.
Collaboration with Existing Services/Organizations
To effectively lessen diabetes mortality and morbidity, the program will collaborate with diverse present services and organizations in Maryland. The Maryland Department of Health’s Diabetes Prevention and Control Program could be a key partner, contributing knowledge, sources, and coordination (Maryland Department of Health, 2022). This partnership will leverage the branch’s infrastructure, records collection abilities, and public fitness experience to enhance this system’s effect.
Local healthcare practitioners will play an important role in providing access to Diabetes checking out, clinical understanding, and remedy alternatives for program individuals (Maryland Department of Health, 2020). Collaborating with those healthcare givers will utilize their knowledge of diabetes control, affected person networks, and seamless care coordination to guide long-term diabetes control past this system’s tasks.
Engaging community health centers will help reach marginalized communities and deal with fitness inequities (Rosenquist & Fox, 2021). These centers depend on sources of comprehensive healthcare and might assist goal individuals with constrained entry to care. Collaboration with community-primarily based companies will make certain cultural sensitivity and relevance, as those companies possess deep knowledge and connections in the goal communities (Healthy People 2030, n.d.).
Collaboration with local health departments and government organizations will provide treasured assets, information, coverage assistance, and opportunities for coverage reform (Hill-Briggs et al., 2002). These partnerships will enhance software implementation, address systemic barriers to diabetes prevention and management, and work closer to decreasing health inequities.
The program aims to optimize aid usage, enlarge outreach, and leverage accomplice organizations’ know-how, infrastructure, and knowledge through these collaborative efforts. Building sturdy relationships may also contribute to the program’s sustainability beyond its initial implementation.
Collaboration with policymakers
One crucial element of the “Diabetes-Free Maryland” initiative focuses on pushing for policy reforms that encourage the prevention and effective management of Diabetes. By exerting influence over policies concerning food choices, physical activity, and healthcare, this program seeks to establish a supportive environment conducive to healthy decision-making and empower individuals to lead lives free from Diabetes. The program aims to actively involve policymakers at various levels – local, regional, and state – in advocating for policy changes that support diabetes prevention and management goals (TFFRS Diabetes Management: Community Health Workers, n.d.).
The forthcoming approaches will be employed to advocate for policy changes and implement systemic transformations.
Evaluation
Using quantitative and qualitative metrics, the program assessment will examine the degree to which the goals have been attained. Data will be gathered on participant satisfaction, improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to diabetes prevention and management, diabetes screening rates, obesity prevalence, and participant satisfaction. To gather data, surveys, interviews, and medical records will be utilized. The evaluation results will guide future actions and program changes.
Conclusion
“Diabetes-Free Maryland” is an all-encompassing initiative created to tackle the challenges of Diabetes and its inequalities in susceptible communities. Utilizing established behavior change strategies, proven models, and cooperative partnerships, this program seeks to empower neighborhoods by promoting knowledge and improving accessibility to healthcare services and resources. By delivering specialized education and support systems and advocating for policy changes, our goal is a state that eradicates Diabetes while offering fair opportunities for optimal health. We aim not only at community engagement but also sustainability through continual evaluation – ultimately aspiring towards becoming a national model in preventing and managing Diabetes.
References
America Diabetes Association. (2021). The Burden of Diabetes in Maryland. https://diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/ADV_2021_State_Fact_sheets_Maryland_rev.pdf
Anderson, J., & Singh, J. (2021). A Case Study of Using Telehealth in a Rural Healthcare Facility to Expand Services and Protect the Health and Safety of Patients and Staff. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 9(6), 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060736
Azar, F. E. F., Solhi, M., NeJhaddadgar, N., & Amani, F. (2017). The effect of intervention using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model based on the quality of life in diabetic patients. Electronic Physician, 9(8), 5024–5030. https://doi.org/10.19082/5024
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022, September 15). Maryland diabetes profile. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/programs/stateandlocal/state-diabetes-profiles/maryland.html
Centers for Disease Control. (2021). Public health system and the ten essential public health services – OSTLTS. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/publichealthservices/pdf/essential-phs.pdf
Evaluation Measures – RHIHub Diabetes Prevention Toolkit. (n.d.). https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/diabetes/5/measures-for-evaluating
Healthy People 2030. (n.d.). Diabetes – Healthy People 2030 | health.gov. Health.gov. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/diabetes
Hill-Briggs, F., Gary, T. L., Hill, M. N., Bone, L. R., & Brancati, F. L. (2002). Health-related quality of life in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Journal of general internal medicine, pp. 17, 412–419. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11002.x
Livergant, R. J., Ludlow, N. C., & McBrien, K. A. (2021). Needs assessment for creating a community of practice in a community health navigator cohort. BMC health services research, 21(1), 657. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06507-z
Luminis Health Works to Overcome Health Disparities and Improve Diabetes Outcomes. (2023, March 20). Luminis Health. https://living.aahs.org/diabetes/luminis-health-works-to-overcome-health-disparities-and-improve-diabetes-outcomes/
Maryland Department of Health. (2020). Maryland Diabetes action plan executive summary. https://health.maryland.gov/phpa/ccdpc/Documents/Diabetes%20Action%20Plan%20documents/Diabetes%20Action%20Plan%20June%201%202020.pdf
Maryland Department of Health. (2022, February). BRFSS surveillance brief. https://health.maryland.gov/phpa/ccdpc/Reports/Documents/Diabetes%20in%20Maryland%e2%80%94Maryland%20BRFSS%20Surveillance%20Brief%202022.pdf
Maurer, M., Mangrum, R., Hilliard-Boone, T., Amolegbe, A., Carman, K. L., Forsythe, L., Mosbacher, R., Lesch, J. K., & Woodward, K. (2022). Understanding the Influence and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-centered Outcomes Research: A Qualitative Study. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(Suppl 1), pp. 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07104-w
Quanbeck, A. (2019). Using Stakeholder Values to Promote Implementing an Evidence-Based Mobile Health Intervention for Addiction Treatment in Primary Care Settings. 7(6), e13301–e13301. https://doi.org/10.2196/13301
Raihan, N., & Cogburn, M. (2020). Stages of change theory. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556005/
Rosenquist, K. J., & Fox, C. S. (2021). Mortality trends in type 2 diabetes. https://europepmc.org/article/nbk/nbk568010
Scott, S. D., Rotter, T., Flynn, R., Brooks, H. M., Plesuk, T., Bannar-Martin, K. H., Chambers, T., & Hartling, L. (2019). A systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research. Systematic reviews, 8(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1161-y
Stubbe D. E. (2020). Practicing Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility in the Care of Diverse Patients. Focus (American et al.), 18(1), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20190041
TFFRS Diabetes Management: Community Health workers. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.thecommunityguide.org/pages/tffrs-diabetes-management-interventions-engaging-community-health-workers.html
write