Long-run pricing
Long-term expenses build as businesses adjust output levels over time according to expected economic gains or losses. There are no set factors of production over the long term. The costs of land, labor, capital investments, and entrepreneurship differ in producing an item or service over time. For producers, the long term is the planning and execution phase. They evaluate the market’s past, present, and future conditions to decide what to make. When a firm’s mix of outputs generates the necessary commodities at the lowest cost, efficient long-run costs are maintained. Changes in manufacturing production, corporate growth or contraction, and market entry or exit are some long-term choices that affect a company’s expenses.
Short-run pricing
Real-time cost accumulation for short runs occurs throughout the production cycle. Only changeable costs and revenues influence output in the near term; fixed expenses do not affect short-run costs. Variable costs fluctuate along with production. Wages for employees and the price of raw materials are two examples of variable expenses. The short-term costs rise or fall based on variable fees and production rates. Over time, a company will have a better chance of achieving its planned long-term expenses and objectives if it successfully controls its short-term costs.
The major distinction between long-run and short-run costs is that long-run costs have no fixed elements, whereas short-run costs have selected and variable factors. The overall price level, contractual salaries, and expectations all eventually completely reflect the situation of the economy. Due to the compressed period in the short term, these factors only sometimes adapt. A business must set reasonable long-term cost assumptions to succeed. Whether the company will achieve its future financial and production objectives depends on how the short-run expenses are managed.
Business decisions on long-term pricing may involve deliberate moves to foster loyal, repeat business. Long-term pricing choices involve establishing regular and predictable rates that give diverse stakeholders the stability they need without requiring constant monitoring. Long-term pricing aims to achieve better planning and stronger buyer-seller relationships by implementing long-term policies based on anticipated supply and demand. Long-term pricing strategies have a time horizon greater than a year, and their full execution necessitates operating in a market where prices may be established with relative ease. Relationships flourish over the long term when one party sets the pricing standard for the market. The future effects of the price on client relationships should be considered when making pricing decisions for shorter periods, such as a year. The market’s competitive dynamics need short-term pricing changes involving the product mix and output volume. When it comes to pricing strategies, businesses might adjust their plans for the next few months or even days to reflect the current state of the market.
Competition, production, costs, and variable cost are four variables that significantly vary between short-run and long-run pricing strategies. Long-term price decisions are impacted by the company’s particular situation and have several other important differentiating qualities. The long-run system might be used when companies have time to change their production methods and operational costs. Yet, there must be more time to adapt manufacturing processes when dealing with short-run pricing. There are several distinctions between long-term and short-term price choices, including but not limited to the underlying variables, motivations, and implementation goals. Pricing strategies with a longer time horizon aim to develop market stability and consistency, whereas decisions with a shorter time horizon are made in response to the current market environment. Market forces, competition, limited-time offers, supply and demand, and other factors all have a role in the short-term price. Long-term price selections successfully build brand awareness and consumer loyalty because of the ties formed over time.
Describe the cost-plus pricing methodology and contrast cost-plus pricing to the market penetration pricing approach, explaining the benefits and limitations of both systems.
The phrase “cost-plus pricing methodology” refers to the many techniques used to calculate a product’s production cost before applying a markup to establish the selling price. Suppose the market values and purchases the development, producing the selling price by following the various procedures assures that creating a thing or service is durable and lucrative. Setting prices encompassing fundamental areas of manufacturing, administration, marketing, research, and development, as well as direct or indirect costs, is necessary to establish a successful Cost-Plus Pricing Methodology. The many processes involve figuring out the direct expenses, such as labor and raw supplies, and the indirect expenditures, such as rent and utilities. Additional measures include figuring out each product’s potential profit margin and overall costs and setting the selling price following the market. Companies may create and enhance a systematic way to get product prices that assure sustainability using the cost-plus pricing methodology. Several significant variables, including supply and demand, market dynamics, competition, and changes in the cost of manufacturing, influence each product’s final selling price. Due to specific circumstances impacting manufacturing operations, the methodology used by various firms to determine to price for certain items might differ.
Market penetration pricing approach
The market penetration pricing technique ensures the brand achieves a sizable market presence by carefully making its product prices low. Using market penetration pricing first aims to reach broader markets than what would be possible in the absence of deliberate efforts to draw clients. A market’s potential development depends on a product’s price gradually rising as the company brand expands and more consumers become aware of it. By helping potential customers comprehend the items, the market penetration price strategy promotes market share and customer growth. The penetration strategy boosts sales volumes to fund manufacturing and research expenses for potential business expansion. Yet, there are substantial obstacles, including narrower profit margins, a reduced perceived value of the product, and sometimes unhealthy competition when other businesses use similar strategies to increase their market share. Market penetration has potential advantages and drawbacks, but thorough planning helps determine the ideal times and circumstances for implementing the methods.
Contrast Cost-Plus Pricing to Market Penetration Pricing Approach
Cost-plus pricing mostly entails adding a markup to the production costs to make a profit from company operations. Market penetration pricing, on the other hand, purposefully makes items available at cheap rates to expand the market before carefully focusing on profitability. Cost-plus pricing emphasizes how a firm may grow by selling products at set rates that cover costs with profit-friendly margins. In contrast to cost-plus strategies, market penetration methods have profitability limits since, despite increasing sales, the margins are low. The market penetration theory works best for new brands and goods entering a market because they strive for acceptance and relevance. Yet, established organizations seeking to achieve financial goals based on market circumstances might use the cost-plus technique.
Benefits and Limitations of Cost-Plus Pricing & Market Penetration Pricing Approaches
The advantages of cost-plus pricing include simplicity because it fosters client confidence by being plain and transparent about items. The technique ensures that company activities accomplish reimbursement since the goods pay for the costs associated with creating a stable and sustainable financial situation. Cost-plus pricing, however, might result in inefficiency since there are no incentives for increased efficiency and false value representation to consumers. When price-sensitive tactics fail, there may be consumer issues, and the cost-plus strategy needs additional flexibility and product uniqueness. Pricing based on market penetration includes advantages such as growing the market share, acquiring customers, establishing a competitive edge, and enhancing the impact of economies of scale. Yet, the market penetration strategy diminishes profitability, fosters the notion that the items are of low quality, lessens the likelihood that prices will increase, and puts pressure on margins.
Conclusion
The main goal of any corporate operating strategy is to generate profits. Businesses may identify the most efficient operating methodology by carefully analyzing and monitoring the expenses, opportunities, and marketing. Because the economic environment is constant and new ideas keep upsetting the dynamics, combining long- and short-term pricing helps a corporation succeed through many market stages. Each organization needs a solid and trustworthy corporate brand; obtaining such success levels takes strategic planning. As a result, effective planning to use resources and counteract the pressures of rivals aids in corporate growth and future success.
References
Amaral, J.V. and Guerreiro, R., 2019. Factors explaining a cost-based pricing essence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
Avlonitis, G.J. and Indounas, K.A., 2005. Pricing objectives and pricing methods in the services sector. Journal of services marketing.
Gompers, P. and Lerner, J., 1998. Venture capital distributions: Short‐run and long‐run reactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), pp.2161-2183.
Guerreiro, R., Cornachione Jr, E.B. and Kassai, C.R., 2012. Determining The’Plus’ In Cost-Plus Pricing: A Time-Based Management Approach. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(1).
Guilding, C., Drury, C. and Tayles, M., 2005. An empirical investigation of the importance of cost‐plus pricing. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Hughes, J., Knittel, C.R. and Sperling, D., 2008. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. The Energy Journal, 29(1).
Logue, D.E., 1973. On the pricing of unseasoned equity issues: 1965–1969. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 8(1), pp.91-103.
Marn, M.V., Roegner, E.V. and Zawada, C.C., 2003. I was pricing new products. McKinsey Quarterly, (3), pp.40-49.
Peer, S., Verhoef, E., Knockaert, J., Koster, P. and Tseng, Y.Y., 2015. Long‐Run Versus Short‐Run Perspectives On Consumer Scheduling: Evidence From A Revealed‐Preference Experiment Among Peak‐Hour Road Commuters. International Economic Review, 56(1), pp.303-323.
Schmidt, R.A., Wright, H., Schmidt, R.A. and Wright, H., 1996. Pricing Decisions. Financial Aspects of Marketing, pp.197-202.
write