The efficacy of turning and repositioning in preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers will be determined by analyzing data collected every Wednesday over the past three months. According to the data, there were nine in the first month, eleven in the second month, and eight in the most recent month. The data will be evaluated to identify any trends in the incidence of pressure ulcers on the premises.
The uniformity and consistency of the data collection procedure are crucial to the data’s accuracy and dependability (Bittar et al., 2018). The procedure of data collection will be thoroughly scrutinized to ensure compliance with all standards. This procedure begins with an audit to ensure that all staff have received proper training to collect data consistently and reliably. As part of this method, you will determine whether or not your employees have been adequately trained on data collecting and recording protocols and whether or not they comprehend the importance of the information they are acquiring. Examining the available training materials for clarity and completeness is vital.
Inconsistencies and anomalies in the collected data will also be investigated. To accomplish this, we must review the collected data over time to determine if any notable deviations or trends contradict our strategy to turn and reposition. In the event of discrepancies or errors, the researcher will design and implement solutions in collaboration with the team. Additional training or changes to the data collection procedure will be required to ensure uniformity and standards.
The collected data must be of the highest quality to avoid hospital-acquired pressure ulcers by turning and repositioning. The researcher can be confident that the data collected accurately represents the outcomes of the implementation and can be used to make informed decisions about the implementation’s effectiveness if they first conduct a comprehensive review of the data collection process, identify any issues, and implement corrective action plans as needed.
To ensure that the targeted outcome of reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers is appropriately tracked, it is necessary to review the scorecard to evaluate the success of turning and repositioning (Hasan & Chyi, 2017). We will examine the scorecard closely to ensure it has all pertinent and straightforward information. First, we will determine whether the scorecard design contains mechanisms for collecting the data required to quantify the implementation’s performance. To accomplish this, we must analyze and compare the obtained data to the scorecard to ensure it appropriately reflects the critical performance indicators.
The next stage is determining if the scorecard adequately measures internal pressure ulcer prevention. The scorecard will be evaluated in two primary areas: (1) whether it accurately assesses the number of pressure ulcers acquired in-house, and (2) whether it captures any other pertinent data contributing to the occurrence of in-house pressure ulcers. Next, evaluate how well the scorecard is understood and utilized. To do so, you must confirm that the scorecard’s labelling and instructions are accurate. Examining the available training materials for clarity and completeness is vital.
Using a scorecard established for this purpose, the performance of a program to turn and reposition patients can be evaluated. They would collaborate with the team to fix the scorecard if issues are discovered, ensuring that it effectively captures all essential metrics and is simple to use (Betto et al., 2022). It is essential to have a well-designed and practical scorecard for assessing the implementation’s progress and making educated decisions about enhancing it.
Quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods will be employed to investigate whether turning and repositioning hospitalized patients reduces the incidence of pressure ulcers (Benninger et al., 2020). The researcher would conduct a quantitative analysis of the acquired data using techniques such as regression analysis to identify patterns in the occurrence of pressure ulcers among in-house workers across time. A correlation can be established by comparing the number of pressure ulcers obtained in-house before and after the deployment of turning and repositioning. In addition, the statistical analysis would identify any variables that may have confounded the study’s results.
Quantitative and qualitative approaches to data analysis will be utilized to gain a deeper understanding of the causes of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Staff and patient interviews would highlight the effectiveness of turning and repositioning and any implementation difficulties. To gain a deeper understanding of the viewpoints and experiences of people involved in the execution of the intervention, a qualitative analysis will be performed.
Prevention of pressure ulcers is an essential component of optimal patient care in long-term care institutions. These ulcers can be avoided by turning and repositioning the patient. To appropriately evaluate the effectiveness of this rollout, however, it is imperative that the data collected be of the highest quality and reliability. By combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies, researchers can provide a complete picture of the implementation’s performance and identify improvement areas. Improving the prevention of pressure ulcers acquired within long-term care institutions can improve patient outcomes and encourage providing high-quality care.
References
Bittar, P. G., Carlson, A. R., Mabie-DeRuyter, A., Marcus, J. R., & Allori, A. C. (2018). Implementation of a standardized data-collection system for a comprehensive appraisal of cleft care. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 55(10), 1382-1390.
Hasan, R. U., & Chyi, T. M. (2017). Practical application of Balanced Scorecard-A literature review. Journal of Strategy and Performance Management, 5(3), 87.
Betto, F., Sardi, A., Garengo, P., & Sorano, E. (2022). The Evolution of Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Its Design, Implementation, Use, and Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10291.
Benninger, E., Curtis, C., Sarkisian, G. V., Rogers, C. M., Bender, K., & Comer, M. (2020). Surf therapy: A scoping review of the qualitative and quantitative research evidence. Glob. J. Community Psychol. Pract, pp. 11, 1–26.
write