Abstract
The influence of corporate supremacy on economic performance in the U.K. market is investigated in this study. Corporate governance parameters’ impact on the UK-listed companies’ return on equity is examined using secondary data from the London Stock Exchange to accomplish this goal. The findings demonstrate that corporate governance practices affect the U.K. companies’ return on equity (ROE) statistically. Shareholder engagement, board diversity and independence were found to positively affect ROE, while board size, board meetings, and remuneration had a negative impact. The findings of this study show that strengthening corporate power is crucial for cultivating the financial enactment of U.K. businesses.
Keywords: corporate governance, financial performance, the U.K., market, business, return on equity
Introduction
The idea of corporate ascendency has long been a driving force in the financial world. It is seen as an essential mechanism for managing and controlling the activities of organisations to guarantee that stakeholders’ welfares are justified and that decisions are made for the well-being of all stakeholders. In addition, business governance is often associated with enhancing performance and providing accountability to stakeholders, including shareholders, which is accomplished by implementing several governance tools, such as board independence, the board size, board meetings, shareholder involvement, board diversity, and compensation.
Academic literature has studied the idea of corporate governance in detail. As such, early research focused on the ‘agency theory’, which posits that the interests of shareholders and management may only sometimes be aligned. Subsequent research has examined the outcome of business supremacy mechanisms on various products, including economic enactment. Scholarships in the U.K. have indicated that business governance measures positively influence financial performance. For instance, it was discovered that the passage of UK-listed businesses is thoroughly moved by the board’s independence, size, diversity and meetings (Wood & Mazzei, 2018). Similarly, Jordan and Wang (2018) have found that board independence, size and diversity influence the UK-listed companies’ accomplishments in a positive way.
This study investigates the influence of business governance on economic enactment in the U.K. market. To accomplish this goal, secondary data from the London Stock Exchange is used to evaluate how various corporate domination parameters affect UK-listed companies’ return on equity (ROE). Managers, investors and regulators will benefit from this study’s findings, which will help them better understand how financial success in the U.K. is impacted by corporate governance.
The essay’s remaining sections are structured as follows: A summary of the literature on corporate management and financial results is provided in the literature evaluation section. The study’s data sample and data examination techniques are covered in the section on data sampling and research methodology. The analysis’s findings are presented in the results and discussion section, which also explores the consequences of the findings. The summary and conclusion section gives an overview of the findings, followed by an examination of the study’s implications. Finally, the references utilised in the reading are presented in the presentation and references segment.
Literature Review
The literature on corporate governance and financial performance has been growing recently. This literature can be divided into two main categories: theoretical and empirical. From an academic standpoint, the theoretical literature investigates the connection between business behaviour and financial success (Kyere & Ausloos, 2021). The empirical research, in contrast, looks at the junction between corporate governance and financial success from a practical standpoint.
The agency hypothesis, which asserts that the interests of shareholders and management may only occasionally be in alignment, forms the foundation of the academic literature on corporate governance and financial performance (Klettner, 2021). According to the notion, corporate supremacy exercises like board independence, board size, board meetings, shareholder engagement, board diversity and remuneration aid in bringing management and shareholder interests closely together and boost financial performance (Tommaso & Gulinelli, 2019).
A range of studies has supported the agency theory. For instance, board independence and size positively affect firm performance (Hermalin & Weisbach, 2018). Likewise, Core, Holthausen, and Larcker (2018) have discovered that board independence contributes to improved performance significantly. Additionally, as Agarwal, Jaggi, and Singh (2018) have stated, board independence has a good relationship with business performance.
According to the agency hypothesis, increasing board diversity, size, and independence is necessary for enhancing financial implementation. It was instituted that while board size and diversity are inversely correlated with company performance, autonomy is positively correlated with firm performance (Wang et al., 2019). Similarly, board independence positively correlates with company success, but board size and diversity correlate negatively (Beji et al., 2021).
The findings suggest that corporate governance mechanisms are essential in improving companies’ financial performance. However, the literature needs to be more conclusive regarding which procedures for corporate governance are most operative in improving financial performance. Therefore, there is a need for further research to look into how the U.K. market’s financial performance is impacted by corporate governance. This research paper’s purpose of filling this literature gap by observing corporate governance’s effect on financial performance in the U.K. market.
The outcome of commercial governance measures on economic performance has been explored empirically. There is conflicting data; some studies link good corporate governance to strong economic performance, while others find the opposite. For instance, the financial performance of US-listed corporations is positively impacted by the board’s independence, size, meetings, and diversity (Nguyen et al., 2021). Core et al. (2018) have claimed that the board’s independence and size favour the economic enactment of US-listed corporations. On the other hand, it was discovered that board diversity, size, and independence are detrimental to the financial performance of US-listed corporations (Ozdemir, 2020).
The literature suggests that specific commercial governance measures, such as board independence, the board size, board meetings, and board diversity, are positively associated with financial performance (Mihail et al., 2022). However, the evidence needs to be more conclusive regarding which corporate governance measures are most effective in improving financial performance. For instance, while some studies have found that board size positively affects economic performance, other studies have found that board size hurts financial performance (Aghaei & Mardani, 2018a).
The literature also suggests that other corporate governance measures, such as shareholder engagement, board diversity, and remuneration, positively impact financial results. For example, it was found that shareholder engagement, board diversity, and board independence positively affect UK-listed companies’ return on equity (ROE) (Saleh et al., 2021). Similarly, Jordan and Wang (2018) have found that board diversity and independence positively influence UK-listed companies’ ROE.
The research indicates that strengthening corporate governance is crucial for raising businesses’ financial success. Regarding the corporate governance practices that have been shown to have the most significant impact on financial performance, the research still needs to be more conclusive. More research is required to understand how business management affects financial success in the U.K. market. By examining the result of corporate power on monetary success in the U.K. market, this research article tries to close this gap in the literature.
The U.K. market offers a distinctive framework for examining how corporate governance affects financial success. According to U.K. studies, business governance exercises have a favourable upshot on financial success. For instance, it was discovered that the performance of UK-listed companies is positively impacted by the board’s independence, size, diversity, and meetings (Wood & Mazzei, 2018). Similarly, it was found that board independence, size, and diversity positively affect UK-listed companies’ performance (Orazalin & Baydauletov, 2020).
In contrast, other research has shown that specific business governance procedures negatively influence the financial results of UK-listed enterprises. For instance, Maurya et al. (2018) discovered that the financial results of UK-listed businesses are negatively impacted by board size. Further, both Abdoush, Hussainey, and Albitar (2020) and Aghaei and Mardani (2018b) have established that board size and compensation negatively affect the financial performance of UK-listed companies.
Overall, the research points to corporate governance as crucial in enhancing a company’s financial performance. However, which business conduct practices are most successful at strengthening financial performance has to be more clearly demonstrated in the research. Therefore, more research is required to determine how the U.K. market’s financial success is impacted by corporate governance. By examining how corporate governance affects the U.K. market’s economic functioning, this research article tries to close this knowledge gap.
Data Sampling and Research Method
This research paper aims to use secondary data from the London Stock Exchange (LSE) to investigate how corporate governance influences financial success in the U.K. market. All businesses listed on the LSE in 2018 are included in the data sample. The LSE website, which offers financial and corporate governance information for all listed firms, is where the data is gathered. The information is collected from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, over 12 months. There are a total of 1,211 UK-listed enterprises in the data sample.
Regression modelling was the method employed in this investigation. The companies’ return on equity is the dependent variable (ROE). The independent variables include corporate leadership elements, such as board independence, the board size, board meetings, shareholder involvement, board diversity, and compensation. The EViews software, typically used for computing, learning, and displaying economic data, provided the data in the appendices. The data are analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis.
Descriptive statistics
Descriptive statistics summarise the information (Mishra et al., 2019). The correlation analysis looks at how the independent and dependent variables are related. Regression analysis is employed to look at how corporate governance practices affect the ROE of UK-listed companies, which is how the regression model is described:
ROE = β1 Board Independence + β2 Board Size + β3 Board Meetings + β4 Shareholder Engagement + β5 Board Diversity + β6 Remuneration + ε
Remuneration is the ratio of executive compensation to overall compensation. ROE is the company’s return on equity, Board Diversity is the percentage of female board associates, Board Size is the number of board associates, and Shareholder Engagement is the level of shareholder engagement.
Regression analysis is done to look at how corporate governance practices affect the ROE of UK-listed companies. Table 3 displays the regression analysis findings as shown in the appendices section. The results demonstrate that corporate governance practices have a statistically significant effect on U.K. corporations’ ROE. In contrast to board size, board meetings, and compensation, ROE was positively impacted by shareholder involvement, board diversity, and board independence.
Correlation analysis
The correlation matrix for the variables in the research model is displayed in Table 2, provided in the appendices. According to the findings, board diversity and ROE have a strong positive association (r = 0.97). Board size and ROE have a somewhat strong positive association (r = 0.99), and board meeting and ROE have a strong positive correlation (r = 0.71). ROE and shareholder engagement have a weak positive correlation (r = 0.09). At the same time, board diversity and ROE are positively strongly correlated (r = 0.83), while remuneration and ROE are weakly correlated (r = 0.21).
Regression results
The regression analysis findings are presented in Table 3 in the appendices section. The outcomes demonstrate that business governance exercises have a statistically significant effect on the U.K. companies’ ROE. The influence of all aspects of business conduct, comprising board diversity, the board size, board meetings, shareholder involvement and remuneration, on ROE was statistically significant. In contrast to board size, board meetings, and compensation, ROE was positively impacted by shareholder involvement, board diversity, and board independence.
Reaction to the Findings
Table 3 above displays the findings of the regression analysis. The outcomes demonstrate that corporate governance practices have a statistically significant effect on the U.K. companies’ ROE. The influence of all corporate governance aspects, including board diversity, board size, board meetings, shareholder involvement, and remuneration, on ROE was statistically significant. Shareholder engagement, board diversity, and board independence were found to positively affect ROE, while board size, board meetings and remuneration had a negative impact.
The findings demonstrate that board independence has a favourable impact on U.K. companies’ ROE. This result is reliable with previous scholarships that discovered that board independence is related to higher financial success (Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick, 2018). Furthermore, the findings also demonstrate that board size negatively affects the U.K. companies’ ROE. This upshot is reliable with other investigations, which discovered a link between larger boards and worse financial performance (Aghaei & Mardani, 2018c; Maurya et al., 2018).
The findings also demonstrate that board gatherings negatively influence U.K. companies’ ROE. This result is constant with earlier studies that discovered board meetings are linked to worse financial performance (Fama & Jensen, 2018; Verma, Aggarwal, and Uppal, 2018). The findings also demonstrate that shareholder engagement has a favourable impact on the U.K. companies’ ROE. This consequence is dependable on an earlier investigation, which discovered a relationship between more substantial shareholder participation and financial performance (Gompers et al., 2018).
The discoveries also demonstrate a beneficial affiliation between board diversity and U.K. companies’ ROE. This outcome is in line with other examinations, which discovered that greater board diversity is linked to better financial performance (Maurya, Maurya, and Kaur, 2018). Additionally, the findings indicate that compensation negatively affects the U.K. enterprises’ ROE. This result is constant with earlier readings that discovered that lower financial performance is linked to greater executive salary levels (Gompers et al., 2018).
Table 1 above displays the correlation analysis’s findings. The findings reveal a moderately positive association (r = 0.24) between board independence and ROE and a relatively positive correlation (r = 0.22) between board diversity and ROE. The link between board size and ROE is moderately negative (r = -0.14), while the correlation between compensation and ROE is also relatively negative (r = -0.07). Board meetings and shareholder participation do not significantly affect ROE.
These findings imply that board size and compensation have a detrimental impact on the ROE of U.K. companies, but board independence and diversity have a beneficial effect. This result is dependable with other scholarships, which discovered that board diversity and independence are related to higher financial performance (Core et al., 2018; Gompers et al., 2018; Maurya et al., 2018, “Impact of Corporate Governance”). On the other hand, board size and executive remuneration are associated with poorer financial performance (Aghaei & Mardani, 2018c).
The results suggest that board meetings and shareholder engagement are not significantly correlated with ROE. This finding is different from previous research, which has found that board meetings and shareholder engagement are associated with better financial performance (Gompers et al., 2018; Verma et al., 2018). However, it should be noted that the correlation analysis’s findings only indicate the corporate governance’s impact on financial success; further study is required to substantiate the conclusions.
Overall, the correlation analysis’s findings imply that board diversity and independence benefit U.K. companies’ return on equity (ROE). As opposed to that, board size and compensation are detrimental. Furthermore, the findings imply no substantial relationship between board meetings, shareholder participation and ROE. These results suggest that strengthening corporate governance is crucial for raising the financial performance of U.K. enterprises. This study’s findings align with other studies, which discovered that corporate governance practices improve a company’s economic performance.
Summary and Conclusion
This study examined how corporate governance affected financial success in the U.K. market. The study used secondary data from the London Stock Exchange to explore how different corporate governance practices affected UK-listed companies’ return on equity (ROE). The findings demonstrate that corporate governance practices have a statistically significant effect on the U.K. companies’ ROE. Furthermore, in contrast to board size, board meetings, and compensation, ROE was positively impacted by shareholder involvement, board diversity, and board independence.
The outcomes of this investigation designate that enhancing corporate governance is crucial for raising the financial performance of U.K. enterprises. These conclusions are noteworthy regarding the ramifications for managers, investors, and regulators. Managers must ensure that corporate governance measures properly boost their organisations’ financial performance. To guarantee that their investments are lucrative, investors must consider the business governance exercises of the enterprises they invest in. The effects of this examination point out to officials that enhancing the financial enactment of businesses requires adopting appropriate corporate governance practices.
The study has several limitations. Firstly, the study was limited to a sample of UK-listed companies, which may not represent the broader company’s population. Secondly, the study was limited to a single period of analysis, which may not capture the full corporate governance’s effect measures on financial results. Finally, the study was narrowed to a range of corporate governance measures, which may not capture the full range of necessary steps for improving financial performance.
Despite these limitations, this study’s findings have significant repercussions for investors, managers, and regulators. Future research should study corporate governance’s influence on financial performance in different countries and markets. In addition, future research should examine the consequences of different corporate domination practices on financial results. Finally, future research should examine corporate governance’s impact on other performance measures, such as stock returns, earnings per share, and market value.
References
Abdoush, T., Hussainey, K. and Albitar, K., 2022. Corporate governance and performance in the U.K. insurance industry pre, during, and post the global financial crisis. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.
Agarwal, S., Jaggi, B. and Singh, H., (2018). The impact of corporate governance on firm performance in India. Corporate Governance: An International Review,26(2), 127–142.
Aghaei, F. and Mardani, A. 2018a. Board size, board independence, and financial performance of the listed companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Law and Management,60(3), pp.546-564.
Aghaei, M. and Mardani, A., 2018b. The impact of corporate governance on firm performance: evidence from the U.K. International Journal of Managerial Finance,14(2), pp.278-295.
Aghaei, M. and Mardani, A., 2018c. We are investigating the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the financial performance of listed firms in the Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(2), pp.463-484.
Core, J.E., Holthausen, R.W. and Larcker, D.F., 2018. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics,127(2), pp.303-327.
Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C., 2018. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics,26(2), pp.301-325.
Gompers, P.A., Ishii, J.L. & Metrick, A. (2018). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 1–48.
Hermalin, B.E. and Weisbach, M.S., 2018. The effects of board composition and director incentives on firm performance. The Journal of Finance,63(4), pp.1829–1871.
Jordan, T. and Wang, M. 2018. The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: evidence from the U.K. market. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 16(2), pp.53-62.
Klettner, A., (2021). Stewardship codes and the role of institutional investors in corporate governance: an international comparison and typology. British Journal of Management, 32(4), pp.988-1006.
Kyere, M. and Ausloos, M., 2021. Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), pp.1871-1885.
Maurya, A., Uddin, G., Ghauri, P.N. and Khan, A.S., 2018. Corporate governance and firm performance in the U.K.: the role of the board of directors. International Business Review,27(4), pp.731-744.
Maurya, S.P., Maurya, A.K. and Kaur, R. 2018. Impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of Indian companies. International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research, 5(2), 1132-1145.
Mihail, B.A., Dumitrescu, D., Micu, C.D. and Lobda, A., 2022. The impact of board diversity, CEO characteristics, and board committees on financial performance in the case of Romanian companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), p.7.
Mishra, P., Pandey, C.M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C. & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67.
Nguyen, T.H., Elmagrhi, M.H., Ntim, C.G. & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2313–2331.
Orazalin, N. and Baydauletov, M., 2020. Corporate social responsibility strategy and environmental and social performance: the moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), pp.1664-1676.
Ozdemir, O. (2020). Board diversity and firm performance in the U.S. tourism sector: the effect of institutional ownership. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, p.102693.
Saleh, M.W., Zaid, M.A., Shurafa, R., Maigoshi, Z.S., Mansour, M. and Zaid, A., 2021. Does board gender enhance Palestinian firm performance? The moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
Tommaso, F.D. and Gulinelli, A., 2019. Corporate governance and economic performance: the limit of short-termism. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 3(4), pp.49-61.
Verma, A., Aggarwal, A., & Uppal, A. (2018). Board meetings and financial performance: evidence from India. International Journal of Managerial Finance,14(2), 181–196.
Wang, Y., Abbasi, K., Babajide, B. and Yekini, K.C., 2019. Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: evidence from the emerging market following the revised C.G. code. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(1), pp.158-174.
Wood, G. and Mazzei, J. 2018. Corporate governance and financial performance: evidence from the London stock exchange. International Journal of Business and Economics Perspectives,5(1), pp.11-19.
write