Introduction
In Canada, there is an emerging new federal policy that tries to cut down the increasing trend of grocery prices. The Federal Government initiated this move as a measure aimed at addressing the affordability issue that is increasingly getting out of hand for most households in the face of an inflationary challenge. The policy will entail measures aimed at improving price stability among retailers of groceries in the competitive field, with the purpose of alleviating the financial burden on consumers. This paper critically investigates the complex ramifications involved in the federal policy concerning grocery prices. It tries to analyze the theoretical foundations of modeling such policy interventions in the frameworks of a static model of pricing. Secondly, the paper seeks to shed light on the perceptible changes of firms within the equilibrium outcomes of such models with regard to the resulting adjustments in pricing tactics as compared to rival companies. The analysis will go beyond the surface contours and explore the complex models studied in academic discussions regarding the effects that will result from the price-matching policy towards inter-firm relationships. Besides, it looks at the implications of this practice on consumers’ wellness in the grocery markets, which might alleviate or aggravate consumers. This will provide an evaluated perspective on the effectiveness of the federal policy regarding Canadian citizens’ grocery prices.
Description of the Proposed Policy
The government has taken the initiative to ensure that the rising graph of grocery prices is checked within the Canadian Market through various mechanisms. An elemental attribute that underpins this multi-faceted strategy is the adoption of a price-matching plan to institute price stability and increase cost affordability among consumers (AL MALLEES, 2023). This policy requires grocery retailers to give an assurance that they will charge the same prices for their commodities as others. This measure creates a competitive environment whereby consumers can be sure that they will find the lowest possible price for their purchasing needs, in theory, protecting families against the inflationary impact on their consumption budgets.
Price matching works under the assumption that the grocers should be encouraged to compete in prices and, therefore, adjust accordingly to a competitor’s pricing scheme. As such, this policy directive provides a condition in which the consumers can go elsewhere to buy at low prices, and this discourages the retailers from changing the rates too much (AL MALLEES, 2023). As a result, as a proactive measure, this government intervention cushions consumers against high prices arising as a consequence of rising inflation levels.
Participation of the various stakeholders in this policy has been profound, with key players such as government officials, grocery shop owners, and industry experts, among others. This policy has come out as one of the ways through which the government is committed to addressing the challenge of affordability and the rising public discontent towards it. Grocery retailers reluctantly agreed to this policy requirement (Al Mallees, 2023). Some retailers have committed to a pricing freeze or sales and price-match guarantees without revealing too much for fear of losing any ground to competing firms.
However, there has been disagreement among academic and industry experts on the effectiveness and quick influence of this policy. Some argue that this policy is wise as it would ultimately enhance consumer welfare and help to build a competitive market but critics claim that the impact of such policy on prices may not be realized right now. In the midst of opposing views, this becomes a crucial topic on which opinions are diverse and hopes about implementation and outcomes are expressed by all parties involved.
Effects on Consumer Welfare
Evaluation of the Impact of the Price-Matching Policy on Consumers
In the market, multidimensional effects are created by introducing a price-matching policy on consumer welfare. In the first instance, this policy brings about equality in prices among retailers and empowers the consumer. The fact that price convergence is taking place means that there will be higher price transparency and lower price differences between different retailers, thus making it easier for consumers to pick stores depending on the prices (Zhao et al., 2019). This leads to higher access to competitive prices, which in turn benefits the consumers as they gain a better position in the quest for cost-efficient purchases.
From a mathematical point of view, the CS in a competitive market is equal to the gap between what the consumers are ready to pay maximally and what they actually pay (Nalca et al., 2020). Under a price-matching policy, assuming prices align with marginal costs due to competitive pressures (P=MC), the potential increase in consumer surplus can be illustrated as CS=1/2× (P−MC) ×Q where P stands for the equilibrium price after cross-price matching at the point of production with MC as the marginal product and Q amount of consumption.
However, several conditional factors determine how much users get from the price-matching policy. The policy would result in significant advantages to the consumer if high variations in retail prices or differences in approaches to pricing marked a particular market. However, when retailers have varied cost structures or adopt differentiated pricing on account of product features, the policy might be effective in protecting only consumer welfare to a limited extent. Consumer benefits will depend, however, on how effective retailers implement and comply since non-compliance and deviation from the price matching guarantee will undermine these advantages.
As prices of similar products converge in an industry under conditions of perfect competition, consumers will earn higher payoffs from this policy. Nevertheless, the effect on consumer welfare could be moderate if competition was significant among several brands with considerable differences or if it occurred under conditions of monopoly markets, which would limit choice and reduce the range of products.
Customer Surplus, Price Elasticity, and Efficiency of the Market.
Consumer surplus varies depending on the price sensitivity of consumers when a price-matching policy is introduced. This policy could increase consumer surplus because it helps achieve some degree of price homogeneity, in turn benefiting particularly sensitive customers who search for the best price. Nevertheless, consumers who are not highly conscious of prices or who value factors other than price may show a lesser impact on the consumer surplus (Okere & Chen, 2020). Price matching leads to a change in market efficiency, which is represented by the allocation of resources to their most valuable employment. Such a policy promotes price convergence and openness that could improve allocative efficiency depending on how firms respond. Firms could then focus on cost efficiency as well as innovations leading to the overall efficiency of markets.
Conclusion and Opinion on Policy
An in-depth evaluation of the suggested price-matching policy shows a complex terrain of consequences for the Canadian grocery market. This is a policy that seeks to create equal pricing between retailers to enhance user benefits and promote competitive change. The findings show that if such policy is undertaken with diligence, it ensures uniform prices, which enable customers to enjoy competitive costs and a transparent business environment.
References
AL MALLEES, N. (2023a, October 5). Grocery chains will freeze some prices under a federal plan to fight rising food costs, the minister says. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-grocery-chains-will-freeze-some- prices-under-federal-plan-to-fight/#:~:text=The%20minister%20told%20reporters%20in
AL MALLEES, N. (2023b, October 17). Champagne says he wishes grocers were more
“forthcoming” on plans to stabilize prices. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-champagne-says-he-wishes-grocers-were-more-forthcoming-on-plans-to/
Al Mallees, N. (2023, October 17). Champagne says he wishes grocers were more “forthcoming” on plans to stabilize prices. CTVNews. https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/champagne-says-he-wishes-grocers-were-more-forthcoming-on-plans-to-stabilize-prices-1.6604417
Choi, M., Dai, A. Y., & Kim, K. (2018). Consumer search and price competition. Econometrica, 86(4), 1257-1281. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3982/ECTA14837
Den Boer, A. V. (2015). Dynamic pricing and learning: historical origins, current research, and new directions. Surveys in operations research and management science, 20(1), 1-18. https://www.scencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876735415000021
Haraguchi, J., & Matsumura, T. (2016). Cournot–Bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 117, 117-136. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00712-015-0452-6
Huang, T., Yin, Z., & Chen, Y. J. (2017). Managing posterior price matching: The role of customer boundedly rational expectations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(3), 385–402. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/msom.2016.0612
Jiang, J., Kumar, N., & Ratchford, B. T. (2017). Price-matching guarantees with endogenous consumer search. Management Science, 63(10), 3489–3513. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2513
Nalca, A., Ray, S., & Boyaci, T. (2020). Price-matching strategy: Implications of consumer behavior and channel structure (pp. 193–226). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-31733-1_8
Okere, V., & Chen, W. (2020). Optimal Price Strategy under Price-Matching Policy. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 8(12), 2981. https://www.scirp.org/html/22-1722110_106019.htm
Simpson, W. (2023). The Canadian government should make the grocery rebate permanent to combat the affordability crisis. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-canadian-government-should-make-the-grocery-rebate-permanent-to-combat-the-affordability-crisis-203219
Tan, G., & Zhou, J. (2019). Price competition in multi-sided markets. Available at SSRN 3029134. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3029134
Zhao, N., Wang, Q., Cao, P., & Wu, J. (2019). Dynamic pricing with reference price effect and price-matching policy in the presence of strategic consumers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(12), 2069-2083. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01605682.2018.1510809
write