In revitalizing its tourism sector, China emphasizes protecting and conserving its historical and archaeological sites. Again, while also indulging in sustainable development measures to ascertain the security of its historic site, the nation enhances its management system to encourage heritage tourism. Much research has been done on China’s archaeology and its role in tourism. The analysis delves into providing a review of the chosen articles capturing China’s archaeology as a national heritage and its involvement in boosting tourism.
Luo, Haifeng, and Bor-Shuenn Chiou. “Framing the Hierarchy of Cultural Tourism Attractiveness of Chinese Historic Districts under the Premise of Landscape Conservation.”
The article effectively captures Chinese cultural tourism in the precept of its Historic Districts or even archaeological background. The paper utilizes expert interviews and structural observations to explore redefining Chinese e archaeological Districts and cultural tourism attractiveness. The article points out that with the vast modern economic growth. Commercialization and globalization continue to wade off the previously existing archaeological sites (Luo and Bor-Shuenn, 2). The sites were once the emblem of the nation. Based on these, the nation continues reviving its glory from archaeological activities. The article thus hinges on revitalizing various historical sites while supporting sustainable development.
The article employs expert interviews to carry out the observations as research methods. It intends to investigate the issue of Chinese Historic Districts and the desirability of cultural tourism. In the research, Dadaocheng as a historic District is taken as a sample size in portraying how tourism and archaeology intertwine in producing sustainable development (Luo and Bor-Shuenn, 5). In-depth Interviews and The Modified Delphi Method are utilized in the interview. In the first part, a questionnaire was used. Also, a statistical approach and criteria screening Approach was used.
On methodology, the redefinition of Chinese Historic Districts and Cultural attractiveness was done using prototypes and final definitions. The Prototype framework implicitly assumed that cultural hierarchies majorly comprise the physical environment, human environment, and tourism marketing (Luo and Bor-Shuenn, 9). On the other hand, the physical environment considered aspects such as the Morphology of the landscape, the tourism infrastructure, and the image elements of the district. The cultural and natural environment comprised the historic district’s cultural and non-cultural relics. The cultural heritage entailed monuments, sites, traditional artifacts, and social aspects. Dadaocheng Historic District, a popular Chinese tourist attraction site, was used for the case study. It was chosen because it is an ideal city for tourist attractions.
It was found out that the historic sites were major tourist attractions sites. The photos taken expressed various landscapes, which correspond to a content framework. Chinese cultural heritage comprising archaeological and historic sites attracts massive tourist numbers (Luo and Bor-Shuenn,21). The research highly aligns with the predisposition of earlier researched works as evidence points out archaeology as a great part of Chinese cultural heritage, which links up with tourism. The Chinese historic districts and cultural tourist attractiveness are thus inseparable. This highly reflects the predisposition that archaeology in China plays a critical role in a tourist attraction.
Sendra, I. Made, and Yohanes Kristianto. “China’s Traces of Heritage as Tourism Discourse in Bali.” (2020).
The article captures Chinese heritage as a form of tourism discourse. Essentially, it delves into the analysis of the Chinese coin, a form of traditional archaeology, and how it has also contributed towards establishing a firm tourism foundation in the nation. It hinges on researching the essence of the Chinese coin in Bali. This is attained through utilizing genealogical study in theorizing and establishing empirical support for the cultural tourism discourse. Bali is utilized as the case study owing to its massive capability of attracting tourists. The analysis seeks to establish the power of the discourse. Through this, a well-established correlation of Chinese heritage as a propellor for tourism is established. The findings effectively correspond to existing research and previously reviewed articles as well.
The research also points out Bali as an international destination for many tourists due to its endowment of archaeological artifacts. The tourism discourse is established from archaeological discourses as they form the basis of the tourist attraction of Chinese heritage. Approximately 4.6 million tourists visit the town annually (Sendra and Yohanes,1). The uniqueness and abundance of heritage and culture transform Bali into a living museum. In carrying out the research, various aspects are considered. It analyses the various archaeological products and how they are utilized in establishing unending observance of the tourism discourse, evaluating the essence of the Chinese Coins in Bali as tourism discourse, and an in-depth analysis of how the product-initiated tourism discourse is tabulated. For instance, Chinese coins have been used in religious ceremonies in Bali. Similarly, Museum Rudan exhibits various artifacts made utilizing Chinese coins.
The research establishes a correlation between archaeology and tourism based on archaeological data. It is through the coins that China’s trade relations with Bali were streamlined from the 7th to the 8th century. Such trade relations opened China to unending tourism visitations. Similarly, the Chinese coin was found to have its cradle in the Tang Dynasty. With the conquests in China and Bali, the creation of the Singasari Kingdom boosted the spread of Tantrayana philosophy with archaeological relics dubbed as the Kebo Edan Statue, which was normally placed at the Kebo Edan Temple (Sendra and Yohanes,4). Thus, the China Coin was a transaction tool that attracted a massive inflow of tourists to the nation.
The Chinese currency was found to perform various functions which aided in boosting the tourism discourse. Illustrative, the coin has been utilized for currency exchange and religious functions. It was also utilized in traditional customary marriages to fulfill Chinese cultural heritage (Sendra and Yohanes,4). It thus reflects the embodiment of the noblest values of the coin, the cultural heritage discourse, which enhances tourism. The Chinese coin is an essential offering element in Balinese culture and traditions. Such include the Kawangen, a means of rituals in the Kindu-Bai religion. Thus, while maintaining its value, the Chinese coin continues to revitalize its tourism role. Such coins form the basis of cultural heritage, which attracts national tourism discourse.
The research found a definitive correlation between the Chinese Coin and tourism discourse. Historically the coin was found to bridge the local community and tourists from other regions. The coin is utilized in ritual and traditional artifacts and the tourism domain in the ancient temples connected to the Chinese cultural heritage sites (Sendra and Yohanes,15). As a cultural heritage utilized in ceremonies such as marriages, it attracted its value in the tourism discourse. Similarly, its utilization in making some traditional artifacts climaxes its critical role in the Chinese tourism sector. The research was detailed and objective and corresponded with other available literature that terms archaeology as a great tool for tourism. The research thus also corresponds to the research carried out in previously discussed articles that the Chinese coin as an archaeology artifact is a major domain of tourism in the nation.
Storozum, Michael J., and Yuqi Li. “Chinese archaeology goes abroad.”
The article delves into analyzing the increased Chinese involvement in the archaeological heritage fieldworks globally, which aids in attracting massive tourism activities in the nation. The study includes Chinese archaeological operations that help the country achieve its geostrategic goals. To support the research question of Chinese involvement in archaeological initiatives in foreign lands, Two case studies of the Swahili Coast in Kenya and the ancient Silk Road in Uzbekistan are used. This initiative is found to amass massive strong economic and cultural bonds between the countries, aiding China to expand its markets. Through such developments, archaeological works draw the attention of massive foreigners into the nation, thus strengthening their tourism discourse.
The research points to China as massively investing in archaeological field projects with foreign countries, aiding in advancing the nation’s cultural heritage. A foreign policy agenda was founded in the nation via the Belt and Road Initiative, which was a strategy aiding Chinese-led infrastructure development. China’s Sino-archaeological practices enhance a continuous international science projecting China’s interest worldwide (Storozum and Yuqi 3). It has aided in the revival of the Old Silk roads. Thus, the Sino-foreign archaeological projects are found to gradually revitalize the ancient archaeological artifact products such as Silk Road, which would aid in building continuous correlation with actions and also boost historical prosperity, peace, and political correlations. With China excelling in archaeology, it has diversified its reach from top-notch to global meanings that aid in shaping its historical narratives at home.
The article points out that China has well-established heritage management that continues to enhance foreign relations with nations. It utilizes ongoing projects in Kenya to aid in portraying how archaeology enhances co-existing foreign relations. As a form of national civilization, the nation has a massive endowment of archaeology which has aided the nation in maintaining its cultural identity across nations (Storozum and Yuqi, 208). As such, Yuqi heritage has been utilized to create friendly and profitable relationships with other nations. The archaeological excavations outside China provide an unending stream of discoveries and exploration in the nation, thus boosting tourism. The research provided tabulated data indicating Chinese archaeological research projects with the BRI boosting the sector since 2013. The research draws most of its arguments based on academic literature.
China currently has ongoing archaeological site development at Mingpeta in Uzbekistan and another along the Kenyan Coast. Such projects have been found to aid China in selling out its archaeological endowment expertise, attracting more investors, and subsequent tourism. The Chinese archaeological movement along Maritime Silk Roads revalorizes the nation’s heritage through such projects. Illustratively, the research also roots archaeology in China as a great and instrumental tool in enhancing the tourism aspect of the nation. By selling out its archaeological excavation skills outside the nation, China attracts an overflow of interest based on its rich heritage (Storozum and Yuqi, 14). China exhibits its archaeology as a tool in internationalizing its heritage, promoting its historical contours and prestige and thus amassing global attraction. The findings also correspond with other research articles.
Conclusively, China’s archaeology provides a firm foundation for enhancing its tourism discourse. Various research has proven that cultural heritage provides an adequate and meaningful mechanism for selling out China’s powerful archaeology artifacts through religious, cultural, or even economic aspects. Its archaeological works and heritage are a basis for founding a firm national identity that attracts foreign interests, building up the country’s tourism discourse.
Works Cited
Luo, Haifeng, and Bor-Shuenn Chiou. “Framing the Hierarchy of Cultural Tourism Attractiveness of Chinese Historic Districts under the Premise of Landscape Conservation.” Land 10.2 (2021): 216.
Sendra, I. Made, and Yohanes Kristianto. “China’s Traces of Heritage as Tourism Discourse in Bali.” (2020).
Storozum, Michael J., and Yuqi Li. “Chinese archaeology goes abroad.” Archaeologies 16.2 (2020): 282-309.
write