In the last hundred years, the world has changed significantly and continues to transform every day. From airplanes to high-speed internet, technology is always evolving. The use of electronic devices in the medical area is increasing. Significant advances in the use of robotics in surgery have happened in recent years, improving medical and technology therapy. Small instruments are connected to robotic arms that are controlled by a computer by the surgeon in novel surgical methods such as robotics. This allows for more accuracy, flexibility, and control throughout the operation. Patients are subjected to the same preoperative, general anesthesia, and postoperative protocols as they would for any other surgical surgery. The only difference between the two procedures is the number of people in the operating room and how the surgeon makes the incision.
When I initially began working as a nurse, I had the opportunity to see robotic surgery, and I believed it was a convenient and effective approach to have a faster operation. I was interested to learn more about the procedure after seeing it since I would be seeing the following patients, and witnessing the procedure gives me a better understanding of what is going on and what to look out for.
Identifying Academic Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
I searched the peer-reviewed literature on robotic surgery, surgery, operating room technology, patient safety, healthcare, and quality care using the Capella University Library’s resources. Using the advanced site search feature, I limited my search to scientific journals with papers published during the preceding five years.
Assessing The Credibility and Relevance of Information Sources
To increase accuracy and relevance, I selected authors who have published in a range of publications and peer-reviewed articles on my chosen topic. In order to continue the topic of robotic surgery, I made certain that the information was pertinent to the problem I wanted to investigate.
Annotated Bibliography
Martins, R. C., Trevilato, D. D., Jost, M. T., & Caregnato, R. C. A. (2019). Nursing performance in robotic surgeries: integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72, 795-800.
When your phone or computer stops working, and you have to reset everything, it can be quite frustrating, but in this instance, restarting might be a matter of life and death. The medical team that performs robotic surgery has its own set of benefits and limitations. The rising utilization of robotic surgery has resulted in a staffing boost. A group of experienced nurses were given the opportunity to learn how to manage a computer system and what to do if a robot malfunction occurred during surgery (Martins et al. 2019). The nursing team was responsible for promoting patient safety while the technology was being tested. They double-checked all the wires and nuts, and if anything, broke, they had to either fix it or replace it entirely. One of the cables failed during the process, but the crew was prepared to deal with the situation and recovered quickly. It is his responsibility to commit to patient safety and stay in the operating room during the process, inspecting and documenting all surgical events; you will also be in charge of giving surgical instruments to the robotic arm and sanitizing the equipment before and after surgery. Patients recover just as quickly from robotic surgery as they do from human surgery.
Desai, J. P., Sheng, J., Cheng, S. S., Wang, X., Deaton, N. J., & Rahman, N. (2019). Toward patient-specific 3d-printed robotic systems for surgical interventions. IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 1(2), 77-87.
Every human person is unique, from anatomy and physiology to microbiology and all in between. Before any surgery can take place, the medical team must create a strategy to ensure a favorable outcome. A series of procedures, including blood tests, scans, and a physical examination of the patient, are performed to identify the problem. The team must then decide if surgery is in the patient’s best interests. If they decide to continue, they must dedicate the time and effort necessary to obtain good results. The utilization of three-dimensional imprints of patients’ organs and blood vessels has transformed medical care. Using scanned photographs taken by the sufferer, it is possible to replicate his scenario. Experts may then practice prepping specific patients as required. The model goes a step further by visualizing different thicknesses of arterial blood walls. This may reveal abnormalities and hazards, which the surgical team may use to decide on the surgical procedure and equipment to use during the operation. Robotic surgery will be more beneficial since the surgeon can train the robotic arm to do the therapy in less time.
Ahmad, A., Ahmad, Z. F., Carleton, J. D., & Agarwala, A. (2017). Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surgical endoscopy, 31(1), 255-263.
Robotics is a cutting-edge technology to which we now have access. The world is always innovating new methods to improve health and save more lives. The use of robots has the potential to alleviate the doctor shortage. The benefits of using this technology include improved vision, increased instrument movement accuracy for smaller locations, and the elimination of human hand tremors (Ahmad et al. 2017). These changes may enable surgeons to do operations that would otherwise be impossible due to the significant risks they are hesitant to take. Because of their small size, certain cancers or tiny blood veins, for example, are difficult to reach, but shorter devices may treat more patients and save more lives.
Catchpole, K., Bisantz, A., Hallbeck, M. S., Weigl, M., Randell, R., Kossack, M., & Anger, J. T. (2019). Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies ‘in the Wild’. Applied ergonomics, 78, 270-276.
Surgery may be a life-changing event, so working with a team that has years of expertise is essential. Because robotic surgery is still in its early phases, practitioners must go through many levels of training to get used to using robotic arms and 3D computers. To be considered for this position, they must be proficient in laparoscopic surgery. According to this report, there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes like complications and recovery when people were compared to robots. This research looks at two papers that claim robotic surgery takes longer and costs more than traditional surgery (Catchpole et al., 2019). Doctors need more time since they operate with machines rather than their hands. The price is greater due to the expensive components of this robot, as well as maintenance and training costs. As the procedure grows more frequent and technology advances, the cost will drop, as will the surgeon’s time during surgery as he gains more competence. Costs might be reduced by increasing the number of surgeons who have the opportunity to learn and improve these skills.
Conclusion
The world, and especially the medical industry, is always changing. It would be best if one kept going in this pathway, or you would be left behind. Robotic surgery is transforming medicine, and it is benefitting many patients in the medical surgery department where I work. Based on scientific articles published in the last five years, I’m interested in learning more about its applicability for future employment in this field. This approach has the benefits of advanced eyesight, precision, and the use of robotic technology. Consequently, infection, discomfort, blood loss, and surgical scars are all decreased. Employees must be taught to work with such equipment and understand how to operate the system and its many components. Prior to surgery, they should also practice creating 3D models of the patient’s bodily parts to verify that they are comfortable with the process.
References
Ahmad, A., Ahmad, Z. F., Carleton, J. D., & Agarwala, A. (2017). Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surgical endoscopy, 31(1), 255-263.
Catchpole, K., Bisantz, A., Hallbeck, M. S., Weigl, M., Randell, R., Kossack, M., & Anger, J. T. (2019). Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies ‘in the Wild’. Applied ergonomics, 78, 270-276.
Desai, J. P., Sheng, J., Cheng, S. S., Wang, X., Deaton, N. J., & Rahman, N. (2019). Toward patient-specific 3d-printed robotic systems for surgical interventions. IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 1(2), 77-87.
Martins, R. C., Trevilato, D. D., Jost, M. T., & Caregnato, R. C. A. (2019). Nursing performance in robotic surgeries: integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72, 795-800.
write