Project background
The project centers on improving services for students with learning disabilities in mainstream classes after persistent academic struggles have been identified as a vital issue. Learners with learning disabilities are included in mainstream classrooms for teaching and learning. Still, some deep-rooted challenges negatively impact teachers’ efforts to give maximum attention to all learners, including those with learning disabilities (Hove & Phasha, 2023). However, the particular laws designated for this group of students are not enough to improve performance in academics compared to the other non-disabled students. It has also been shown that the dropout rate of these students is higher, and they tend to encounter social and emotional issues (Plasman & Gottfried, 2018). This imbalance results from insufficient training and materials to enable general education instructors to support learners with learning disabilities (LD). Presently, many teachers feel like they need the proper knowledge to apply the strategies of inclusion and offer accommodations and adjustments (Hove & Phasha, 2023). Such a disparity in teacher preparation and resource allocation brings up grounds for denying learning disabilities (LD) students the support they need to excel in academics and social activities. This draws attention to the necessity of undertaking focused measures to tackle these inequalities.
Detailed step-by-step description of the plan
To address the educational disparities faced by students with learning disabilities (LD) in general education classrooms, a comprehensive plan has been developed with the steps and components below.
Plan
Conduct a Needs Assessment
The needs assessment will include reaching out to teachers, students, and parents to determine the specific problems and areas to focus on. This will be the basis for the design of professional development plans and redistribution of resources.
Professional Development (PD) Programs
Implement PD for general education teachers, including inclusive teaching strategies, understanding learning disabilities (LD), differentiation methods, and using assistive technology (Onyishi & Sefotho, 2020).
Curriculum and Resource Audit
Analyze the current curriculum materials and teaching resources for accessibility and inclusiveness, then make the required changes to help pupils with learning disabilities (LD).
Implement Collaborative Teaching Models
Provide opportunities for the collaboration of general and special education teachers to ensure consistent planning, teaching, and assessment that is supportive and embracing.
Monitor and Adjust
Develop a framework for constant student performance evaluation and the assessment of the implementation effectiveness, which will be used to make timely improvements when necessary.
Goals (Expected Outcomes)
The plan is focused on marking teachers’ effectiveness in helping students with learning disabilities (LD), raising academic and social-emotional results, and building a more inclusive classroom environment.
Timeline of Plan
The implementation duration covers one academic year, beginning with assessing needs and planning within the first quarter, then providing PD programs and curriculum modifications in the second and third quarters, and ending with monitoring and necessary adjustments in the fourth quarter.
Method of Implementation
The attendance records and teacher feedback forms will document the PD workshops. The curriculum modifications can be easily verified by reviewing the new set of learning plans and teaching materials. Teachers must work together in a collaborative learning model, which classroom observations and teacher interviews will evaluate.
Persons Involved
- General Education Teachers: Adapt the inclusive practices and implement the necessary adjustments.
- Special Education Teachers: Be an expert and advise the general teachers.
- School Administrators: Oversee the implementation and supply of the needed resources.
- Students and Parents: Give an opinion on the efficiency of the mentioned strategies.
Professional Development and Training
It includes workshops, seminars, and access to online resources targeted at practical strategies for inclusive education and this differentiation.
Method of Evaluation
We will measure the plan’s success by conducting teacher feedback surveys, analyzing student performance data before and after implementation, and classroom observations. This holistic approach will be the best means of covering the plan’s qualitative and quantitative implications.
Evidence of the outcome
Professional Development Schedule
A comprehensive account of professional development (PD) sessions held throughout an academic year is critical evidence always mentioned as the basis. We will set up a schedule that includes dates, topics to be addressed (for example, inclusive teaching strategies, differentiation, and assistive technology), and attendance records. The teachers’ feedback from the session after the PD program shows that the confidence and competence of teachers in accommodating students with learning disabilities (LD) have increased. Thus, the program is effective.
Curriculum and Resource Audit
The audit of curriculum and resources was followed by preparing a comprehensive report that addressed the strengths and weaknesses of the current materials and policies. We record the changes made to the curriculum that better accommodate diverse learners, as well as examples of modified lesson plans and tests. The audit and its follow-up adapting actions show care for making the learning environment more inclusive.
New Student Schedule
A modification in the student schedule, making an inclusive classroom placement, and provision of support services, among many others, are indicators of a shift toward a more integrated educational experience for students with learning disabilities (LD) (Krämer et al., 2021). These documentations of schedule modifications and students’ and parents’ qualitative feedback show that these positively affect student engagement and learning.
Requisition for New Material
Inclusion budgeting records of requests for new teaching materials and assistive technologies give solid proof of resource allocation targeted at supporting the put-in-place of such assistive technologies. Such inclusions include various types of adaptive software, books that present characters with diverse backgrounds, and materials used in sensory integration, demonstrating that the school has invested in tools that enable all students to learn.
Meeting Summary with Outcome
Reports from meetings between general and special education teachers, administrators, and parents indicate the group’s efforts to provide for students with learning disabilities (LD). Such summaries report on what was decided, what strategies were employed, and what was observed in terms of outcomes, a kind of journal that records the plan’s implementation and effectiveness.
Extracurricular Activities or Events
The documentation of inclusive extracurricular activities and events that consider student’s learning disabilities (LD) needs will prove that our school is moving forward to create a more inclusive culture. The participation records and the anecdotal evidence from these activities indicate that social integration is heightened and the student’s well-being is improved.
References
Hove, N., & Phasha, N. T. (2023). Inclusion of learners with learning disabilities in the Vaal Triangle mainstream classrooms. African Journal of Disability, pp. 12, 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331023/
Krämer, S., Möller, J., & Zimmermann, F. (2021). Inclusive education of students with general learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 432-478.
Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of Differentiated Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms: Implication for Teacher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136-150.
Plasman, J. S., & Gottfried, M. A. (2018). Applied STEM coursework, high school dropout rates, and students with learning disabilities. Educational Policy, 32(5), 664-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048166737
write