Migration and Integration Policies:
Toygür & Benvenuti (2016) note that Chancellor Angela Merkel decided to welcome over a million refugees in 2015. The decision had profound effects on German society through shaping debates regarding multiculturalism, national identity, and xenophobia in Germany. The leader’s decision, popularly called “Merkel’s migrant crisis,” attracted support and opposition from different political groups and German societies. Some groups praised the leader’s open-door policy as a humanitarian response to the rising refugee crisis. The decision reflected the country’s commitment to international cooperation and boosting humanitarianism. Some of the country’s citizens were motivated to help the newcomers through language classes, integration support, and job training. The rising number of refugees also leads to concerns about the strain on public service, security issues, and cultural assimilation.
The influx of refugees leads to the rise of anti-immigrant sentiment. The groups were motivated by far-right parties like Alternative for Germany (AfD), which led to the ruse of incidents of xenophobic violence and hate crimes (Decker, 2016). There were rising concerns over the compatibility of Islam with German values and the efficacy of multiculturalism. The issues exposed deep-seated tensions within German society. The debates and issues in German society shaped the political discourse. Many parties adopted varying stances on immigration and integration. The AfD’s anti-immigrant mission strongly aligned with the values of some voters, leading to its electoral success. The mainstream parties, such as the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD), struggled to balance humanitarian concerns and domestic pressures.
Economic Policies
Germany’s economic policies, such as tax policies, labor regulations, and welfare programs, lead to significant differences in socioeconomic contexts and greatly influence social mobility. The country’s economic policies greatly influence cultural perceptions of fairness, work ethic, and social responsibility. Bruttel (2019) notes that the German government introduced a national minimum wage in 2015, initially set at €8.50 per hour, which sparked debates about the minimum wage laws in German politics. The policy led to the rise of discussion about the impact on businesses, employment rates, and income inequality in Germany. The advocates of the policy argued that the policy suitably addressed the issue of fair compensation and reduction of poverty. The policy’s opponents raised concerns about the potential effects on job creation and economic growth. The discussion on the social welfare reforms dominated politics regarding the balance between providing a safety net for vulnerable populations and maintaining fiscal sustainability. Freier (2008) notes that the reforms implemented in the early 2000s under Chancellor Gerhard Schröder’s Agenda 2010 aimed to modernize the welfare state and promote labor market flexibility. Some of the reforms are changes to unemployment benefits and labor market policies. The reforms met both praise for promoting economic competitiveness and criticism for worsening income inequality and employment rates.
Environmental Policies
Germany is firmly committed to environmental sustainability through its Energiewende (energy transition) and ambitious climate targets. The policies significantly influence cultural attitudes toward ecological responsibility and innovation. Jacobs (2012) notes that the Energiewende was initiated in the early 2000s to transition Germany towards a low-carbon, renewable energy-based economy and reduce dependence on fossil fuels and nuclear energy. Over the years, the policy has led to investments in renewable energy sources like wind and solar. It has also encouraged a culture of innovation and technological advancement in clean energy technologies. The policy emphasizes renewable energy as a pillar of the national economy, thus shaping cultural perceptions of sustainability. The government took initiatives such as regulating emissions and implementing incentives for renewable energy production to impact public awareness of environmental issues.
Rietmann & Lieven (2019) writes that Germany’s policies promoting energy efficiency in buildings and incentivizing electric vehicle adoption lead to a cultural shift towards more sustainable consumption patterns. Today, German citizens are more conscious of their ecological footprint, contributing to changes in consumer behavior and lifestyle choices. Recycling, energy conservation, and sustainable transportation options are increasingly valued aspects of German culture (Lai et al., 2011).
Education Policies:
Education policies implemented by the German Government strongly shape cultural values, social progress, and knowledge sharing. Faas (2013) writes that the ongoing debate over curriculum content and educational standards showcases ideological divides about the country’s purpose and direction of education. The discussion majorly lies on whether education must foster critical thinking, cultural awareness, and global citizenship or prioritize transmitting traditional values and national identity. The discussions mainly cover integrating diversity, gender equality, and environmental sustainability into the curriculum. The delegate supporting the issue argues that an inclusive and diverse curriculum prepares students to thrive in a multicultural society and globalized world. However, the opposers say that the curricula should be focused on preserving national identity and cultural heritage within the education system. Debates over teaching history, literature, and language often reflect tensions between promoting a sense of belonging and cultural pride. The discussions demonstrate acknowledgment of Germany’s complex history and multicultural reality.
Freedom of Expression and Civil Liberties
Germany’s strong commitment to upholding civil liberties such as freedom of expression and media pluralism shapes societal norms around tolerance, diversity, and democratic participation. Conversely, the political debates regarding censorship, hate speech laws, and surveillance measures demonstrate the competing values of individual rights and collective security. The debates strongly shape cultural attitudes toward democracy and civic engagement. According to Haupt (2005), Germany’s legal framework contains restrictions on hate speech and Holocaust denial. The regulations emanate from the historical context and commitment to dealing with extremism and promoting social cohesion. The laws seek to prevent the spread of discriminatory rhetoric and protect vulnerable groups. However, they are sparking debates regarding the limits of free speech and the balance between individual freedoms and societal interests.
Wagner et al. (2020, January) note that there are rising discussions surrounding online censorship and regulation of social media platforms. The discussions highlight the tensions between combating harmful content and preserving freedom of expression. Wagner et al. (2020, January) also write that Germany’s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) was implemented in 2018 to regulate social media companies. Social media firms must remove illegal content within strict timeframes, which sparks concerns regarding the potential censorship and the role of private corporations in regulating the public discourse.
European Union Integration
Germany’s position within the European Union (EU) significantly impacted its political landscape and cultural identity. The membership has led to debates regarding a wide range of policies. The integration and questions reflect concerns about the country’s national sovereignty, European solidarity, and the future of European integration. According to Janning & Möller (2016), Germany actively engages in the EU after taking the new economic governance role. Today, Germany’s policies and decisions on fiscal discipline, monetary policy, and trade have profound implications for the entire bloc because it is one of the largest economies in the EU. The issues are sparking debates over the balance between national and collective interests, given the country’s decision on austerity measures or stimulus packages. There are tensions on the issue of advocating between fiscal responsibility and budgetary discipline with greater solidarity and support for economically weaker member states. According to Toygür & Benvenuti (2016), Chancellor Angela Merkel strongly decided to welcome refugees in 2015, emphasizing Germany’s stance on humanitarian and immigration issues within the EU. However, it raised concerns and sparked debates about Germany’s ability to integrate newcomers, European solidarity, and burden-sharing. THE EU members have strong disagreements concerning asylum policies and border controls, which worsen the challenges of achieving a unified approach to migration management within the EU.
References
Bruttel, O. (2019). The effects of the new statutory minimum wage in Germany: a first assessment of the evidence. Journal for Labour Market Research, 53(1), 1–13.
Decker, F. (2016). The “Alternative for Germany”: Factors behind its emergence and profile of a new right-wing populist party. German Politics and Society, 34(2), 1–16.
Faas, D. (2013). Germany after the ‘PISA Shock’: Re-visiting national, European and multicultural values in curriculum and policy discourses. Managing diversity in education: Languages, policies, pedagogies, pp. 33, 43–44.
Freier, M. (2008). Political Economy of the Agenda 2010 Reforms: How Gerhard Schröder Overcame the ‘Blocked Republic.’ American Consortium on European Union Studies (ACES) Cases, (2008.3).
Haupt, C. E. (2005). Regulating hate speech-damned if you do and damned if you do not: Lessons learned from comparing the German and US approaches. BU Int’l LJ, pp. 23, 299.
Jacobs, D. (2012). The German Energiewende–history, targets, policies and challenges. Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, pp. 223–233.
Janning, J., & Möller, A. (2016). Leading from the center: Germany’s new role in Europe. European Council on Foreign Relations.
Lai, K. H., Lun, V. Y., Wong, C. W., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2011). Green shipping practices in the shipping industry: Conceptualization, adoption, and implications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 631-638.
Rietmann, N., & Lieven, T. (2019). How policy measures succeeded in promoting electric mobility–Worldwide review and outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 66-75.
Toygür, İ., & Benvenuti, B. (2016). The European response to the refugee crisis: Angela Merkel on the move. IPC Mercator Policy Brief.
Wagner, B., Rozgonyi, K., Sekwenz, M. T., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. (2020, January). Are we regulating transparency? Facebook, twitter and the German network enforcement act. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 261-271).
write