Within the ambit of government agencies, there is a need for innovative approaches within the context of the intersectionality of social issues in the human services landscape. Housing insecurity among older adults should be addressed through proper interventions to safeguard them. This essay aims to develop a full plan for a governmental program that addresses housing insecurity among older adults. It incorporates aspects borrowed from the community needs assessment, outlining specific goals and activities, discusses suitable program evaluation strategies addressing ethical considerations, and emphasizes the importance of diversity and inclusion (Batsis et al.,2021).
Community Needs and Assessment.
The foundation of an effective government program targeting housing insecurity among older adults starts with a thoughtful and comprehensive Community Needs Assessment. The evaluative process constitutes the foundation for strategically building the program’s design. Employing qualitative and quantitative methodologies such as interviews, surveys, and focus groups has been useful for a deep understanding of the senior housing security problem (Hollin et al .,2020).
Key features associated with housing among older adults have been revealed due to the conducted needs assessment. The first major challenge pertains to the alarming deficit of affordable housing options, which is one of the leading causes of the vulnerabilities of this group. The evaluation has also pointed out the need for more support services available to older adults in dealing with the complexity of housing stability. Furthermore, there is also an absence of community participation opportunities, symbolically showing isolation and limited social connections experienced by older adults (Kotwal et al.,2021).
The proposed government program is meticulously tailored to address these identified needs directly. The program recognizes that housing insecurity among elderly individuals is complex and, thus, does not just offer physical solutions but builds a community around it to assist in finding secure and affordable housing among older people.
Program Evaluation Strategy
An effective program evaluation strategy is crucial for determining the proposed government housing program’s effectiveness and sustainability for older adults. However, recognizing the complex and multi-faceted nature of the action plan requires a form of evaluation that will be conducted simultaneously as the implementation progresses.
The formative evaluation approach embodies a commitment to continuous improvement by facilitating ongoing feedback and assessment throughout the program’s lifespan. This real-time responsiveness allows swift adjustments based on emerging needs and challenges. The iterative process makes the program flexible and relevant to the current situation regarding housing insecurity among older adults.
Key performance indicators have been selected to measure the program’s impact. These indicators include critical factors such as enhanced housing stability, improved financial literacy among older adults, and stronger community engagement. Their systematic measurement of hands will provide understanding and enable them to make informed decisions based on objective data about how the regular program contributes to addressing its target goals.
To complement the formative evaluation, summative evaluations undertaken periodically will provide a detailed picture of the overall effects of the program in the long run. A retrospective analysis will gauge the program’s sustained impact, providing useful insights into the lasting effects of housing insecurity among older people. By combining the two approaches, formative and summative evaluations, the proposed program addresses immediate needs and lays the foundations for long-lasting positive changes in older adults facing housing challenges (Svensäter et al.,2023).
Ethical Considerations
In human services and government programs, ethics are more than a procedural necessity-they provide substance to the entire development and implementation process. The proposed government initiative to address housing insecurity among older adults places ethical considerations at the forefront, recognizing their importance in protecting the health and dignity of the individuals it seeks to assist.
The program is based on three major principles: transparency, informed consent, and confidentiality. The program promotes transparency to build trust among older adults and program staff to provide information concerning the project’s goals and methodologies. Informed consent, a cornerstone of ethical engagement, underscores the autonomy and agency of older adults in deciding their participation in the program. In addition, confidentiality guarantees the secrecy of private data regarding people looking for support and their safety.
However, the ethical framework extends beyond procedural guidelines. The principle of fairness is built into the program, ensuring that all older adults have equal access to housing resources and support services without regard to their socioeconomic status or any other factor that can be categorized as a demographic. This program will strengthen these ethics guidelines through a well-designed system with frequent ethics training for the program staff. This ongoing training educates staff members on ethical standards and fosters a culture of ethical mindfulness.
The ethical framework will include continuous monitoring through real-time assessments of compliance with the ethics and possible challenges. Systematic reviews through periodic ethical audits are implemented to promote integrity and ensure the program meets professional ethics benchmarks over time. This proposed government program addresses the immediate needs of older adults facing housing insecurity while incorporating a firm adherence and commitment to the ethics that provide the backbone of human services.
Diversity and Inclusion
In tackling housing insecurity among older adults, diversity and inclusivity principles are fundamental and necessary for the viability and effectiveness of the proposed government program. The program is firm about a design that recognizes the variety among older adults, acknowledging it as a tapestry (Lewis et al.,2020).
The main philosophy of the program involves cultural sensitivity, and it is included in all aspects of implementation. The program aims to achieve a culture-specific approach that resonates with the unique characteristics of various communities, recognizing that the needs and preferences of older adults are linked to their cultural backgrounds. This cultural responsiveness goes beyond recognition and into tangible actions that prevent this program’s implementation approach from being mono-cultural (Pani-Harreman et al.,2021).
Language access will be important for the program to bridge communication gaps. The program provides effective communication channels in various languages so that information and resources are easily available for all older adults, regardless of their primary language. Additionally, all program staff members will be compulsorily subjected to cultural competence training. The staff will be equipped with skills to understand the culture of these diverse older adults so that they can relate well with them and promote an atmosphere of mutual trust and understanding (Rodriguez et al.,2021).
Finally, the program’s attitude toward diversity is more than just a tick-box exercise. It is a way of life that aims to make every older adult feel included regardless of culture, ethnic, or linguistic background. The program works towards creating a hospitable atmosphere based on the premise that everyone is valued equally, thus ensuring they do not discriminate against anyone with a different background or life experience.
Finally, the proposed government program to address housing insecurity among older adults is a comprehensive and reasonable initiative. Using community needs assessment results, the program will strive for its objectives by engaging in well-strategized, ethical activities and promoting diversity and inclusion. The proposed formative and summative program evaluations will offer a comprehensive framework for ongoing improvements and responsibility. This program aligns with human services principles because it caters to the difficulties older adults encounter trying to improve their everyday lives.
References
Batsis, J. A., Daniel, K., Eckstrom, E., Goldlist, K., Kusz, H., Lane, D., … & Friedman, S. M. (2021). Promoting healthy aging during COVID‐19. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(3), 572-580. https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgs.17035
Byrne, T., Montgomery, A. E., & Fargo, J. D. (2019). Predictive modeling of housing instability and homelessness in the Veterans Health Administration. Health services research, 54(1), 75-85. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1475-6773.13050
Hollin, I. L., Craig, B. M., Coast, J., Beusterien, K., Vass, C., DiSantostefano, R., & Peay, H. (2020). Reporting formative qualitative research to support the development of quantitative preference study protocols and corresponding survey instruments: guidelines for authors and reviewers. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 13, 121-136. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40271-019-00401-x
Kotwal, A. A., Holt‐Lunstad, J., Newmark, R. L., Cenzer, I., Smith, A. K., Covinsky, K. E., … & Perissinotto, C. M. (2021). Social isolation and loneliness among San Francisco Bay Area older adults during the COVID‐19 shelter‐in‐place orders. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(1), 20-29. https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgs.16865
Lewis, B., Purser, K., & Mackie, K. (2020). The Human Rights of Older Persons. A Human Rights-Base Approach to Elder Law. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-15-6735-3.pdf
Martin, P., Liaw, W., Bazemore, A., Jetty, A., Petterson, S., & Kushel, M. (2019). Adults with housing insecurity have worse access to primary and preventive care. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 32(4), 521-530. https://www.jabfm.org/content/32/4/521.abstract
Pani-Harreman, K. E., Bours, G. J., Zander, I., Kempen, G. I., & van Duren, J. M. (2021). Definitions, key themes and aspects of ‘ageing in place’: a scoping review. Ageing & Society, 41(9), 2026-2059. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ageing-and-society/article/definitions-key-themes-and-aspects-of-ageing-in-place-a-scoping-review/91206401288CAB4E9AB97EDB5D479AB8
Power, E. R. (2020). Older women in the private rental sector: unaffordable, substandard, and insecure housing. https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:56836?mc_cid=da4d74e28a&mc_eid=59dd88fe93)
Rodriguez, J. A., Saadi, A., Schwamm, L. H., Bates, D. W., & Samal, L. (2021). Disparities In Telehealth Use Among California Patients With Limited English Proficiency: Study examines disparities in telehealth use among California patients with limited English proficiency. Health Affairs, 40(3), 487-495. https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00823
Svensäter, G., & Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 149-157. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/eje.12787
write