Abstract
The article analyzes Glasgow and Manchester’s learning and teaching strategies. It discusses changing knowledge views, the shift from teacher-centered to learner-centered education, and research-education trends. The paper analyzes these strategy documents and relevant research literature to determine how each embodies these themes and their ramifications for students, staff, universities, and society. The examination considers internal consistencies, educational concepts, feasibility, and stakeholder benefits. The analysis concludes the evidence, considering any limits or circumstances that may affect them. The study compares the University of Glasgow’s and Manchester’s learning and teaching methods. It illuminates how these strategies address educational trends and impact stakeholders’ educational experiences and outcomes.
Introduction
The research critically compares Glasgow and Manchester universities’ learning and teaching strategy documents. These UK universities were chosen for their prominence and diverse higher education views. Our analysis focuses on three main themes: changing knowledge views, the shift from teacher-centered to learner-centered education, and research-education interactions. We want to show how both colleges address these three currents by comparing their learning and teaching strategy documents. Shifting conceptions of knowledge examine how higher education and both institutions respond to changing knowledge. The second theme examines the change from teacher-centered to student-centered pedagogy and how each university improves learning. Finally, the final theme examines how colleges integrate research into teaching. Therefore, this critical examination aims to illuminate Glasgow and Manchester’s learning and teaching practices. We may better comprehend the varied techniques adopted by prominent UK institutions and contribute to the ongoing dialogue on higher education practices by evaluating their distinct perspectives on knowledge, educational methodologies, and the research-education nexus.
Knowledge evolution has changed how we see and learn. Abstract knowledge has given way to practical knowledge. However, this transition acknowledges practical application and bridges theoretical notions and their practical ramifications. Interdisciplinary and challenge-driven approaches have replaced restricted disciplinary approaches. Complex real-world problems require multidisciplinary collaboration and inventive solutions. Learner-centered education is another major change. These methods empower students as engaged learners. Learner-centered approaches encourage students to take control of their learning journey and customize educational experiences to their needs and interests. Teaching is also using cutting-edge research. The trend acknowledges research and education’s mutuality. It recognizes that incorporating the newest research findings into teaching can improve learning and expose students to current information and methods. Strategy documents can show how these currents are prioritized and assist stakeholders. Students, employees, universities, and society are stakeholders. We can support our claims and provide a complete assessment by analyzing relevant research literature and plan documents.
We shall define and describe each current in our analysis. We will then compare the portrayal in the two strategy documents. Therefore, this comparative research will show how much these currents are considered in the strategic strategies of individual institutions. We can assess the documents’ plans’ efficacy and inclusivity by evaluating students, staff, universities, and society. The examination examines how well strategy papers match the changing educational world. It will reveal whether these schools value student empowerment, multidisciplinary approaches, and research-based education. We will use a wide range of research literature and strategy papers to give a well-rounded analysis contributing to the continuing discourse on educational strategies and their effects on stakeholders and society.
Broad Current 1: Shifting Conceptions of Knowledge
Recent years have seen a movement from abstract to real-world knowledge and from disciplinary to multidisciplinary and challenge-driven approaches. The literature emphasizes these sub-currents’ impact on educational institutions. We will identify and characterize each sub-current based on study findings and examine how they are represented in the strategy documents of Glasgow and Manchester. Comparing their strategies will reveal any inconsistencies, strengths, or flaws. We will also examine how these techniques affect students, staff, universities, and society and if they are in their best interests. The shift from abstract to practical knowledge indicates a rising awareness of the value of practical education. Traditional educational programs generally concentrated on abstract concepts and theoretical frameworks that seemed distant from life. Modern research demonstrates that real-world learning experiences improve student engagement, motivation, and learning results.
Glasgow and Manchester’s plan documents recognize this sub-current’s importance. Glasgow University stresses active and interactive learning to give students real-world experience. Practical experiences, internships, and industry partnerships develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Manchester University emphasizes real-world relevance to prepare students to solve global problems and improve society. These universities handle real-world relevance differently. Glasgow encourages students to apply their expertise to help local and global communities. However, Manchester University aligns its strategy with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals to solve global issues. Both methods have merit, but the University of Glasgow’s focus on community engagement may help students connect with real-world challenges.
The second sub-current understands that difficult problems typically require multidisciplinary teamwork. Discipline limits problem-solving and inventiveness. Interdisciplinary techniques integrate information from other domains to solve problems. Glasgow and Manchester universities value interdisciplinary strategies. The University of Glasgow promotes transdisciplinary research and partnerships to address global issues. Manchester University promotes interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge sharing across academic fields and with external stakeholders. These universities handle interdisciplinary collaboration differently. Glasgow’s strategy emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration among teachers and students from diverse backgrounds. However, the University of Manchester encourages industry, government, and community engagement. Moreover, this larger approach may improve multidisciplinary solutions and help academia and society share knowledge.
These sub currents help students, as shown by their ramifications. Real-world relevance and multidisciplinary approaches can help institutions prepare students for job issues. Practical experiences and interdisciplinary collaborations teach students critical thinking, problem-solving, adaptability, and communication, which employers value. These strategies also affect university workers. Interdisciplinary teaching may require additional training and support for faculty. Collaboration across disciplines can lead to discoveries and inventions, creating a vibrant academic atmosphere. These techniques can boost universities’ reputations as schools that graduate problem-solvers. Universities can also get funds and resources for multidisciplinary research by building partnerships. These sub currents can also help institutions stay relevant in a fast-changing world by showing their dedication to generating graduates who can solve difficult social concerns.
University sub currents benefit society. Real-world knowledge and multidisciplinary skills help graduates address social issues, innovate, and contribute to their communities. Universities can help solve global concerns like climate change and social injustice through collaborative research and stakeholder involvement. In conclusion, knowledge is changing from abstract to real-world relevant and from disciplinary to multidisciplinary and challenge-driven. Although their approaches differ, Glasgow and Manchester universities recognize these sub currents. These sub-currents in university strategies benefit students, employees, universities, and society. Universities may help create a more informed, competent, and innovative society by preparing students for the world, encouraging multidisciplinary collaboration, and addressing global issues.
Broad Current 2: Teacher-Centered to Learner-Centered Education
The move from teacher-centered to learner-centered education has transformed education. The paradigm emphasizes student interaction, personalized learning, and autonomy. Therefore, according to extensive research, this current may benefit pupils and meet the needs of a fast-changing world. The investigation will explore how two famous universities, Glasgow and Manchester, have incorporated learner-centered approaches into their strategy documents. We compare their tactics to assess how well they serve students, staff, universities, and society. These strategy documents must thoroughly understand learner-centered approaches and provide clear implementation measures.
Learner-centered education is a recognition that traditional teacher-centered approaches may not suit the different demands of 21st-century students. According to research, learner-centered approaches improve student engagement and motivation, critical thinking and problem-solving skills, and learning outcomes. These methods attempt to create lifelong learners who can traverse an ever-changing information landscape by empowering students to participate in their education. Glasgow University’s strategic plan emphasizes learner-centeredness. It values diversity and student interaction in a friendly and inclusive learning environment. According to the text, students must develop transferable skills like critical thinking, creativity, and communication to succeed in the modern workforce. The institution also offers flexible and multidisciplinary programs for personalized learning. The University of Glasgow empowers students to shape their education through technology-enhanced learning and innovative teaching. The University of Manchester’s strategy paper emphasizes learner-centered initiatives for future-ready students. It highlights students’ need for subject-specific knowledge and transferrable abilities to succeed in a changing global world. The paper emphasizes the university’s commitment to an inclusive, supportive learning environment where diverse students can thrive. Manchester also promotes student-staff partnership and knowledge co-creation. Both universities emphasize learner-centered education, but their approaches differ. The University of Glasgow’s paper stresses personalized learning and multidisciplinary approaches. However, Manchester’s plan emphasizes student-staff co-creation and collaborative learning.
Both institutions prioritize students’ demands over other stakeholders. They seek to establish friendly and inclusive learning environments that empower students to participate in their education. The strategies emphasize staff participation and professional development to help educators apply learner-centered approaches. The documents also show that learner-centered education helps universities achieve reputation, research excellence, and societal impact. To assess the strategy papers ‘ comprehension of learner-centered approaches, active participation, personalized learning, and student autonomy must be addressed. Glasgow and Manchester realize the relevance of these factors and incorporate them into their strategies. The implementation procedures may vary in detail and clarity. These institutions must help instructors embrace learner-centered methods with real guidance and tools. In conclusion, teacher-centered to learner-centered educational approaches have gained traction to prepare students for a complex and fast-changing world. Glasgow and Manchester’s plan documents emphasize student-centered learning. While their policies differ, both institutions value students, staff, universities, and society. However, the comprehension and implementation processes should be improved. These institutions can apply learner-centered approaches and create a transformative learning environment that prepares students for success by refining their techniques and supporting educators.
Broad Current 3: Trends in the Relationship Between Research and Education
Research-based teaching approaches are changing the link between research and education. Research informs education, and education promotes research. Research and university strategy documents are needed to comprehend these developments. We will compare and contrast Glasgow and Manchester’s approaches to assess how much research is valued and integrated into teaching. By doing so, we may analyze the ramifications of these techniques for students, staff, universities, and society and determine whether this trend truly serves their interests. Higher education is increasingly emphasizing research integration. Research fuels innovation, discovery, and knowledge. Universities can provide a more complete and current education by incorporating research into teaching. This technique teaches Students critical thinking, cutting-edge ideas, and real-world applications. It also helps educators stay current and improve their teaching. The literature discusses universities’ research-education strategies. These tactics promote research-led teaching, research-intensive learning environments, and multidisciplinary cooperation. Research-led teaching incorporates research findings and methods into the curriculum to provide students with the newest in their disciplines. This method helps kids learn more and think critically.
Examine university initiatives to determine how much research is valued and integrated into teaching. Glasgow’s curriculum emphasizes research-led learning. In the university’s strategy paper, research-led teaching improves education and prepares students for careers. Research-inspired teaching fellowships pay and encourage educators to develop novel teaching approaches based on their research expertise. These activities show the university’s dedication to a dynamic learning environment that encourages research-based teaching. Manchester University emphasizes research-intensive learning. The university’s approach emphasizes research-education integration to improve the student experience. It encourages all students to participate in research and work with academics. The document promotes multidisciplinary research and collaborations. The University of Manchester aspires to prepare students for the future by promoting research and collaboration. Research-education integration affects many stakeholders. This strategy allows students to learn about the newest research, improve critical thinking abilities, and gain field-specific expertise. Instilling a research mindset and giving them research experience prepares them for future employment. Interdisciplinary interactions provide students with a broader perspective and marketable skills.
Research-education integration offers faculty and staff professional development opportunities. However, research helps them advance their fields. Using research findings, educators may create a dynamic and engaging learning environment that stimulates intellectual curiosity and critical thinking. Collaboration between faculty from diverse disciplines fosters idea-sharing and innovative research and teaching. Research-education integration can boost universities’ reputations and attract top personnel. Research-intensive universities attract students and faculty seeking intellectual growth and innovation. Universities may lead their disciplines and progress knowledge and society by prioritizing research-led teaching and fostering research-intensive learning environments.
Research-education integration affects society. It keeps universities at the forefront of knowledge development and dissemination, advancing several fields. Integrating research into schooling can solve societal problems and improve quality of life. Universities foster economic growth and social change by teaching students research-based skills and knowledge. Research-education integration is a major academic trend. Universities can enhance student learning by incorporating research into teaching. Glasgow and Manchester demonstrate how universities value and incorporate research into teaching. These methods benefit students, staff, universities, and society by fostering knowledge, creativity, and future readiness.
Discussion and Conclusions
The article examines altering knowledge conceptions, the move from teacher-centered to learner-centered education, and research-education trends. We have critically analyzed and evaluated Glasgow and Manchester’s learning and teaching strategy documents, referencing pertinent research. These initiatives should match identified currents and benefit students, staff, universities, and society. The first current is changing knowledge concepts. Glasgow’s learning and teaching strategy stresses multidisciplinary approaches and research-teaching synergy. It understands that complicated real-world problems require cross-disciplinary solutions. Manchester’s policy also values multidisciplinary research and research-education synergy. Both colleges encourage students to consider many viewpoints and use knowledge across disciplines to promote critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. These tactics support the current view of knowledge as dynamic and socially created, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach. If interdisciplinary viewpoints are properly integrated, learning may be cohesive. Teacher-centered to learner-centered education is the second current. Both colleges stress active and immersive learning and student empowerment. The University of Glasgow’s strategy encourages student participation, self-directed learning, and personalized learning using technology.
Problem-based and collaborative learning is also emphasized at Manchester University. These tactics reflect the belief that children learn best when actively involved and their needs and interests are considered. These universities use learner-centered methods to boost student motivation, critical thinking, and lifelong learning. If kids get enough help, self-directed learning may be expanded. Third, research-education trends. Integrating research and teaching improves education at both universities. According to Glasgow’s policy, research-led education engages students in cutting-edge research and knowledge development. The University of Manchester’s approach promotes research-based education, research skills development, and undergraduate research experiences. These methods help students acquire critical research abilities and become active knowledge producers. These universities integrate research with education to foster intellectual inquiry and teach transferable skills. However, research may devalue underlying knowledge and disciplinary expertise. In conclusion, the learning and teaching strategies in the University of Glasgow and the University of Manchester documents align with the identified currents of shifting conceptions of knowledge, the shift from teacher-centered to learner-centered approaches, and trends in research and education. Both universities value multidisciplinary approaches, learner-centered pedagogies, and research-teaching integration. These tactics promote critical thinking, creativity, and student empowerment. However, interdisciplinary approaches may fracture, self-directed learning may need more support, and research may overshadow core knowledge. A sophisticated awareness of these consequences will feed the information synthesis, ensuring a full assessment of the tactics and their possible effects on students, staff, universities, and society.
References
Ahmed, J. U. (2003). The Strategic Development of Higher Education Institutions in the UK with Specific Reference to 1992–2002. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).
Barth, M., Adomßent, M., Fischer, D., Richter, S., & Rieckmann, M. (2014). Learning to change universities from a service-learning perspective on promoting sustainable consumption in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.006
Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking skills and creativity, 33, 100584.
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5-22.
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1367-1385.
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717
Dunn, L. (2016). The future affordances of digital learning and teaching within the school of education.
Evertson, C. M., Hawley, W. D., & Zlotnik, M. (1985). Making a Difference in Educational Quality Through Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718503600302
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81- 112.
Howells, J., Nedeva, M., Georghiou, L., & Science & Technology Policy Research in Engineering. (1998). Industry-academic links in the UK. Manchester PREST: University of Manchester.
Innocenti, P. and Vullo, G., 2009. DRAMBORA: case studies from the University of Glasgow. Associazione Italiana Biblioteche. Bollettino, 49(2), pp.139-158.
JOHNSON, N. (1997). Lester M. Salamon and Helmut K. Anheier (eds.), Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-national Analysis, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1997, xiii+ 536 pp.,£ 50.00 hard,£ 16.99 paper. Journal of Social Policy, 26(4), 543-570.
Staeheli, L. A., Attoh, K., & Mitchell, D. (2013). Contested engagements: Youth and the politics of citizenship. Space and Polity, 17(1), 88-105.
Tanveer, M., 2007. Investigation of the factors that cause language anxiety for ESL/EFL learners in learning speaking skills and the influence it casts on communication in the target language. University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Whitton, J., Grundy, C., & Hughes, C. (2010). Participant Perceptions on the Nature of Stakeholder Dialogue Carried Out by the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester).
Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212.
write