Introduction
American history plays a pivotal role in shaping the intricate tapestry of contemporary American politics. The American political system lost and won various battles, from the founding to the modern setting. These are historical events, ideas, and socio-economic orientations that affect the political development of the society. This essay explores the intricacy of how American history and politics influence each other. It will present this through patterns transcending political leadership, the election process, policy-making, and societal norms over generations. By analyzing these links, we benefit from the great lessons that demarcate a line between the forces that have paved the path of American democracy, which also presents us with challenges and opportunities for the future.
Founding Ideals and Constitutional Framework
The roots of American politics run deep, stemming from the founding ideals and constitutional framework laid down by the nation’s ancestors. In 1776, Thomas Jefferson composed a monumental document known as the Declaration of Independence. Apart from declaring America’s separation from British rule, it also revealed fundamental concepts such as liberty, equality, and unalienable rights.. These rules alleged the foundation of American democracy and even made the country for the people. In the same year, the Constitution of the United States was drafted in 1787, strengthening the ideas of the new nation and laying the foundation for the federal system and separation of powers among the three branches of federal government. The Council Framework of Human Rights of the United Nations and the creation of the International Criminal Court is an aspect that significantly shaped the 20th century. Here, we will discuss how these two entities contributed to the enhancement of human rights in the 20th century. The Revolutionary War became a known event not only to control British liberty but also to build the channel for the birth of the United States of America.. So the idea of popular sovereignty, which is now the basis of the principle that says the power of the government is derived from the residents, now popularly termed as ‘the governed’, was considered a fundamental principle which is still the foundational basis of American politics to this day. Consoles moment in America historically adopted ethos centered on the idea of freedom, democracy, and self-governance to be American identity and keep her political progress moving empirically.
Manifest Destiny and Expansionism
In the 19th century, Manifest Destiny’s doctrine profoundly influenced American politics, driving the nation’s fervent expansionist agenda. This ideology, based on the notion of America’s intrinsic superiority and the divine mission that guided them, aided in westward moving and territorial expansion. Thus, it was justified. Among the means were the Louisiana Purchase, the annexation of Texas, the Oregon Territory, and the Mexican Cession, which were after pictures of perpetual American expansion of territory. With the commencement of new territory acquisitions, primary debates were sparked on primitive issues such as slavery, states’ rights, and the balance of power between free and enslaved person states. The southern states opposed any restriction on slavery, and the northern states seeking to develop the economy as much as possible were central sticking points. Constructions to maintain the equilibrium were most conspicuous in the passing of the Missouri Compromise in 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, as these laws tried to revive the issue of slavery in the newly acquired territories and address it.. Notwithstanding these provisional decisions about the matters of slavery and states’ autonomy, the deep-lived divisions were still fuming, after all, setting the stage for the Great War to break out. Manifest Destiny, as well as the expansion westward, formed enduring intrinsic features of American politics. The country’s identity was shaped, and the tensions were aggravated, becoming the most devastating episode in American history.
Civil War and Reconstruction
From 1861 to 1865, the Civil War stands as the bloodiest conflict in American history, with profound implications for the nation’s political landscape. In essence, the Civil War was a formidable conflict waged over the question of whether the Union was defendable or not and whether slavery was to continue or not. The widening gulf between North and South dates back many decades. The fabric of the society and economy, which proved to be the main ingredients for this difference, rested intensely on varying social and ideologies, especially slavery.. It is arguable that President Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, issued in 1863, was one of the most critical events during the Civil War. At first glance, the Emancipation Proclamation started as a purely military strategy rather than a direct action to undermine the Confederacy; however, it was also a significant move in which the Union shifted its own goal to be aligned with the moral necessity, not just for a victory but for the end of slavery. In essence, Lincoln asserted that all the slaves in the Confederate territories were now free. This, in turn, made the American war not just a war striving for a reunification of the country, but it was a war about abolishing slavery and human injustices as well.
The Reconstruction period that ensued from the Civil War was an attempt to repair the war-torn South and integrate the newly freed slaves into American society as equals. The Title: Investigating the Societal Aspects of Climate Change 1865 was the year when the Thirteenth Amendment was passed, which made slavery unconstitutional and may have been the single tremendous triumph of the Union cause and the ultimately unfulfilled objective of the Civil War.. Although the shift from slavery to freedom came with some drawbacks and white supremacists resisting the process, it was not easy; it was encouraged, and the people desired to keep their supremacy. It was the time of Reconstruction when Congress started to make laws unshackling black folks and granting them voting rights and political participation. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, bestowed citizenship to everyone born or naturalized on American soil and annunciated that everyone should be treated equally under the law. The Fifteenth Amendment, ratified in 1870, sanctioned politicians who wanted to dismiss voting based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Despite these legislative achievements, Reconstruction efforts were marred by persistent resistance from white supremacists determined to preserve the racial hierarchy of the antebellum South. The ascent of Jim Crow laws that not only required racial segregation but also stripped blacks of such fundamental rights was an indication of the loss made in the Reconstruction period. National Organization of Ku Klux Klan (K.K.K.), a terrorist group, emerged immediately after the end of the Civil War, and its members terrorized the black community as well as their White allies, trying to bring old slavery days back by subjecting people to abusive and intimidating treatments.. The failure of Reconstruction meant the beginning of an extremely dark period for African Americans in which they were deprived of several rights and could not fully enjoy the fruits of their labor until even up to the 20th century. The Jim Crow law that was in place affected every part of Southern society, beginning with schools and public facilities and ending with where people lived and whether or not they had suitable employment
Opportunities. Blacks saw themselves facing the most drastic conditions as these were continually upholding political exclusion, limited economic growth, and little social mobility, hindering their way up from poverty and inequality. The legacy of slavery and racial injustices still cast shadows over the political landscape of the U.S., spilling over to discourses about contentious issues of civil rights, affirmative action, and systemic racism. The Civil Rights Movement, which started in the 1950s and lasted through to the 1960s — with its leading figures Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and Malcolm X — fought against the wall of segregation to break it and secure equal rights and opportunities for everyone in the U.S.
Industrialization and Progressive Era Reforms
The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked a profound transformation in the United States, characterized by rapid industrialization, urbanization, and economic upheaval. The industrial revolution of capitalistic sorting impelled the nation into an epoch marked by the lack of inhibitions and technological progress, which were all abnormal compared to the previous times. Nevertheless, the Gilded Age recorded a passage of judges titanic economic frauds characterized by social inequalities, labor exploitation, and monopolistic practices that threatened societal structure in the U.S. Industrialization, in exchange for wealth as well as power, was favorably positioned in the hands of few industrialists who made a fortune from the exploitation of the labor as well as the concentration of industries.The Industrial Revolution caused a mass migration of people into factories, mainly immigrants and migrant workers from rural areas. Their jobs included working long hours under extreme conditions with no safeguards or protections. A surge in the industrial economy in the same period also created large corporations that formed monopolies and trusts with so much power that they could control markets, hampering competition and manipulating prices.
When various social problems emerged, a diverse coalition of progressive reformers that supported government intervention, social democracy, and the extending of democracy to the masses emerged in their place. The progressive leaders in the era of Roosevelt, Wilson, and Addams, for example, proposed reforms in all aspects of the industry to curb the excesses of the Industrial Revolution and strive to establish a more just and equitable societyThe crucial aim of propelling the Lockdown reforms was controlling trusts’ and monopolies’ powers and enhancing competition in market areas. Antitrust legislation like the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 tried to break up monopoly centers and prevent unfair business activities that stifled competition and affected consumers’ rights. These regulations set precedence for the current regulatory states where governmental participation impedes corporations from exploiting regular people.
Progressive reformers also sought to address the plight of workers and improve labor conditions through legislation such as the Fair Labor Standards Act, which established minimum wage and maximum hour requirements, and the establishment of the National Labor Relations. The board should hold businesses accountable for workers’ collective bargaining and unionization struggles. Other progressives, such as Jane Addams, pushed for social reforms by supporting interventions for the homeless, public health initiatives, and housing reforms to improve the livelihoods of the poor and those affected by inequalities. Moreover, the progressive era was also characterized by remarkable reforms in the areas of social justice and worker’s rights. The suffrage movement was born when women’s rights that were peculiar to them acquired prominence. It was followed by the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, paving the way for female access to voting. Moreover, the reform campaigners, among others, included voting reforms such as direct nominations, initiative, referendum, and recall, ensuring that citizens were active and making the political system accountable.
World Wars and Cold War Politics
The 20th century was a tumultuous period in global history, defined by two devastating world wars and the ideological struggle of the Cold War, which profoundly shaped American foreign policy and domestic politics. After World War I, the United States of America developed as the dominant power globally, propagating for collective security, international cooperation, and the establishment of the League of Nations—nevertheless, the U.S.A. Congress disapproved of America partaking in the League, which typified a global force of deterrence and disillusionment with international cooperation.. The free market system, which was in place in the early 1900s, was seriously eroded during the time of the Great Depression of the 1930s, and the trust in the American economy was shaken too. Although the economy was experiencing devastating consequences following the stock market crash of 1929, President Franklin D. Roosevelt made his mark with a string of courageous measures he called the New Deal. Through the efforts of the New Deal, the government shared its responsibilities to the public to give relief, recover from the Great Depression, and reform the economic system by making it more robust.They broadened the federal government’s role in economic stimulation by adopting the concepts of workers’ rights and the social safety net for citizens. The two principles consequently transformed the link between state and society.
World War II would develop the United States into the leading global hegemon simply because it withdrew from the war as an unquestionable chief of the free world. The Nazi governments in Europe and the Pacific were vanquished in record time, thus reinforcing that democracy and human rights could not be compromised by any country, an unmistakable reminder that the United States stood for the side of the world that represented freedom and democracy. Along with its allies, the United States made an instrumental contribution to the creation of a new Europe through the Marshall Plan, which was meant to revamp economic reorganization and the extended areas of communism. On the other side, the closing down of WW2 also started the beginning of the Cold War, which was, for about half of the 20th century, an ideological struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union that has shaped global politics..
In order to ensure the further spread of communism, the U.S. and its Western allies implemented a strategy known as “containment.” This strategy entailed a series of actions that combined diplomatic, economic, and military measures that were intended to deny the Soviet region of influence. The Cold War era encompassed brinkmanship, nuclear doctrine, proxy wars, an ideological struggle, and a spiral-like growth of conflicting ideologies. The Korean War and Vietnam War symbolized the central motive of this competition of massive influence as the United States heavily resisted the spread of communism in Asia with the use of the military. The Cold War was manifested in the domestic environment in our country through the development of an atmosphere of fear and paranoia. As a result, McCarthyism came up, and there was the suppression of all political dissent in the name of national security.
Civil Rights Movement and Social Change
The post-war era in the United States witnessed the emergence of the Civil Rights Movement, a grassroots struggle to achieve racial equality and social justice. The movement was championed by such iconic figures as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and Malcolm X, who mobilized millions of people to unite against race-based segregation, discrimination, and disenfranchisement, which was perhaps the main problem with American society.. What centered the Civil Rights Movement were the nonviolent protests, the sit-ins, and the marches which were created to reveal and confront the social diseases of segregation and racial discrimination. This type of civil disobedience, unsurprisingly, often resulted in violence from the authorities and the “whites-only groups.” It would then draw national attention to the cause and thus gain more support. The crucial win of the Civil Rights Movement was that class action suit, known as the Brown vs. the Board of Education, with a leading decision of the Supreme Court (1954). In this decision, segregation in public schools was declared unconstitutional. It resulted in lifting the less satisfactory doctrine of “separate but equal” established by the prior decision of Plessey v. Ferguson. Brown v. Board of Education is acknowledged as the starting point in the process of ending segregation not only in schools but in any other area of public life and it thus has become a potent symbol of the struggle for racial equal rights.
The legislative success also contributed badly to the success of the Civil Rights Movement. The United States Civil Rights Law of 1964, seen into law by Lydon B. Johnson, overlapped discrimination on the background of color, race, religion, sex, and national origin in employment, education, and public accommodations. It aimed at eliminating the racism canons and creating a condition free of racial and ethnic discrimination. The passage or the enactment of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 is another monumental victory of the equal rights campaign. Introduced as a revolutionary law, again eradicating these discriminatory practices that inhibited blacks from enjoying their unalienable right to vote through literacy tests and poll taxes. The Voting Rights Act also brought forth federal oversight of elections in states with a history of discriminating against voters. Through this regulation, the voting practice aimed at protecting all citizens from discriminatory practices to ensure that none of them were excluded from the process. However, this legislation will be far from achieving racial equality. The movement met a constant opposition of the groups of white supremacists, those who dug in segregation and deep-rooted racism within institutions. The audacity of racial violence, which included the murder of civil rights leaders like Medgar Evers and the bombing of churches and homes, also served to illustrate the deep-seated racial oppression inherent in the social system and the challenges ahead.
Vietnam War and Countercultural Movements
The Vietnam War stands as one of America’s most protracted and divisive conflicts of the 20th century, igniting a firestorm of opposition that reverberated throughout society. As the war was raging, it isolated a group of young Americans who became so doubtful about or even did not believe in the war’s morality and justification by the U.S. government.. Fighting against the war gained a tremendous weapon – citizens were able to express and demonstrate their disagreement on the one hand but were against the war, imperialism, and government secrecy on the other hand. It is believed that the core of the anti-war movement is a great deal of disenchantment with the policies and practices of the U.S. government, which seem to be the main perpetrators of injustice and violence around the world. At the same time, the needs of its citizens are neglected, which has mostly led to all these. The immense tragedy in human terms that the war triggered in American loss of life, together with the damage it caused to Vietnamese civilians, were the factors that stirred increasing disapproval and anger among the American people.The peace movement coincided with a general countercultural movement directed against traditional norms and institutions. This movement fueled a time of changes and social upheaval in society.
Due to the birth of a feminist movement that exploited the campaign for the issue of gender equality and reproductive rights to be at the top of their agenda, the women thought they should have the opportunity of more independence and be appropriately recognized. The environmental movement concerned about contamination, resource depletion, and ecological degradation could hold together activists in an advocacy group for conservation and sustainability.. The same applies to the LGBTQ+ movement, whose emergence as a vital force for social transformation led to the dissolution of differentiated treatment and persecution of one by the orientation of one’s sexuality and gender identity. Activists came together to organize demonstrations, persuade senators, and fight court cases to defend equal rights and protections by law. It was another point of view of people like the Watergate scandal that occurred between 1972 and 73 that contributed to the distrust of the institutions of the government. By telling the world about the existence of wide-scale corruption and misuse of power by the members of the Nixon administration, the Watergate scandal showed the shadow side of politics in the U.S.A. It once again enforced the importance of transparency and rightness as the main factors for good governance. After the Watergate scandal, President Richard Nixon became the first president to resign from office in 1974. It also created a countrywide conversation on the need to protect democratic institutions and norms when the leaders abuse executive authority.
Reagan Revolution and Conservative Resurgence
The 1980s marked a significant conservative resurgence in American politics, highlighted by the election of President Ronald Reagan and the rise of the New Right movement. Reagan’s presidency is an iconic representation of the time when the country steered clear from the liberal policies of the preceding decades and veered toward the Reaganian vision of the government as minimal, free enterprise capitalism promoting and the most potent defense. Reagan’s strength was in his ability to define and talk about what was good for America, which could be addressed by a political message appealing to the lowest instincts of many voters frustrated by the perceived excesses of government intervention and social liberalism.. When he communicated these values, such as individual freedom, economic opportunity, and traditional values, a part of the American public responded, and the landscape of the political domain was completely changed, and a new conservative spirit appeared. Within the core of the Reagan movement was a pledge to unroll the regulatory state and cut the government’s size and power. Reagan thought that heavy government intervention was tantamount to the suffocation of economic prosperity and destroying the individual initiative to prosper. He, therefore, devised a strategy that put on the course the power of the free market in full swing through the reduction of taxes, the cutting short of regulations, and the promotion of entrepreneurship.
These policies were further classically referred to as “Reaganomics,” which primarily favored supply-side economics, an approach arguing the case that lowering taxes and deregulating the markets would induce growth and increase employment levels and wealth. Besides his domestic plan, Reagan also had the foreign policy he was dealing with, a view that he saw as a threat to the American interests and values set abroad. He exhibited an unwavering anti-communist stance with increased military spending and bolstering the anti-communist movements abroad, especially in Afghanistan, Central America, and Eastern Europe. It can be concluded as an anti-communist policy.. Reagan’s foreign policy was forceful, and his view of America as the top country assisted in the attraction of conservatives and formed the view that he was a leader who was very strong and decisive. Reagan’s primary legacy is his impact on American politics and policy, which continued to be influenced by the subsequent conservative administrations since his office and the national debate is no longer the same as before his appearance. The controversy and criticism of his policies by liberals and progressives who thought that they inadequately addressed the issue of wealth and income inequality did not diminish the robust power of Reagan during that period. His legacy continues to represent the unmatched power of right-wing principles and a decisive and effective leader.
Globalization and Neoliberalism
The late 20th century saw the world undergo profound transformations with the end of the Cold War and the rise of globalization, which reshaped economic, political, and social dynamics across the globe. At the core of this transition was the rise of neoliberal ideology, which proposed principles of free trade, private ownership, deregulation, and fiscal sustainability. Although neoliberalism took center stage as the dominant economic paradigm, domestically and externally, it affected governments’ decision-making to the extent that it governed global policies.. The free market advocates argued that this nature of the economy would bring economic growth, innovative competition, and efficiency improvement by using market forces with any given limited government interference. It had been a system that enabled those ideas to be implemented through policies such as lowering government regulation, privatizing state-owned enterprises, and enforcing austerity measures to manage government spending and debt. In the broad fields of neoliberal globalization, this event may be the most outstanding and high-profile one, as it was the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994. NAFTA was carried out by Bill Clinton, the President back then, and was a historic agreement that was carried out to apply free trade and economic integration among these three regions of the world: North America, the United States, and Mexico.
The advocates claimed that fiscal growth, lower prices, and larger markets would be the outcome of NAFTA; on the contrary, the opponents disagreed regarding the impact of NAFTA on the industries within the nation, the labor market, and income inequality. Instead, implementing the NAFTA Act following the outflow of manufacturing jobs overseas, mainly to the Mexican side, is responsible for eroding some industries and the hollowing of the middle class in some parts.. Moreover, the growth of transnational companies and so-called financialization was the primary method of changing the world economic order during neoliberalism. With all the multinational companies that have significant resources and a global reach too, they imposed a powerful influence on the government’s economic policies as well as the decision-making making, and in this process, often the social problems and environmental sustainability got sidelined because of corporate profits. Financialization, whose dominant features are financial markets and institutions in the economy, became one factor that results in financial speculation, volatility, inequality, and a situation where few rich people hold absolute power/wealth.
9/11 and War on Terror
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, commonly referred to as 9/11, marked a seismic shift in American politics and foreign policy, profoundly altering the trajectory of the nation and the world. The terrorist group al-Qaeda’s devastating attacks, which were planned with the utmost precision, caused the death or injury of almost three thousand people and left an irreparable scar on the American people’s psyches. The counterterror campaign launched by the Bush administration after 9/11 went beyond borders, and the world heard the news of its coming global war on terror.. This campaign was differentiated by a diverse strategy, which included a mixture of military phases, intelligence projects, diplomatic missions, and actions to discover and thwart terrorist financing. Eliminating the previously encountered threat was the primary task and destroying any terrorist outbreaks. The core of the counterterrorism led by Bush was the invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, aimed at removing the Taliban regime and destroying al-Qaeda, which used Afghanistan as its base. The initial invasion by NATO allies under the umbrella of a coalition has received support from the public and countries around the world as a response to the 9/11 attacks and to uphold international morality..
Nevertheless, the later invasion of Iraq in the year 2003, presented based on removing W.M.D.s as well as toppling the regime of Saddam, showed that American foreign policy in the Middle East was a matter of debate and many disagreements. The wrong choice to invade Iraq, using inaccurate information and debatable excuses, was the beginning of a long and costly war that worsened the existing sectarian tensions. It led to the overall destabilization of the region, and the country also paid a high price in terms of lives and resources. The War on Terror also became a period in which there was an increase in the power of the executive authority that made it possible for some of the fundamental freedoms of the country to be lost for national interests. The Bush administration attempted to carry out controversial surveillance programs; in particular, the N.S.A. that carried out the wiretapping program had generated worries about the government overreaching its scope and going against civil rights. Then, besides this, the detention of suspected terrorists in Guantanamo Bay and the use of enhanced techniques for interrogation generated disputes concerning prisoners’ treatment and their adherence to international law.
Obama Presidency and Identity Politics
The election of Barack Obama as the first African American President in 2008 marked a significant milestone in American history, symbolizing the nation’s progress towards racial equality and inclusive democracy. Obama’s presidency fell into a progressive camp since he outlined ambitious plans to deal with the country’s profound social and economic issues. By promoting the Affordable Care Act, also known as the A.C.A., Congress accomplished a significant legislative achievement that led to a massive increase in the number of Americans with access to healthcare.. The second preeminent act of that time was the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which aimed to combat another financial crisis and protect consumers from abusive activities. For example, he has also enacted landmark social policy reforms like same-sex marriage nationwide, which had a symbolic significance in shifting the attitude towards LGBTQ+ rights and equality. These successes have proven his dedication to a systematic civil and human rights advancement towards a just and inclusive society under the flag of equality, mutual respect, and opportunity for all.
In addition, though Obama’s administration did lead to the reemergence of the identity politics and segregation issue, it also helped to draw attention to traits that were rarely discussed. Still triumphing in his historic electoral win, President Obama was to face ongoing challenges alongside race issues, which made certain people question his birthplace, religion, and patriotism. The emergence of the Tea Party Movement, expressing itself through its anti-governmental behavior, fiscal conservatism, and opposition to the policies of Obama, meant that the public split in American society was still observable and that unification through presidential rhetoric was limited.. In the same way, an association of Obama’s presidency with the surfacing of racial tension and activist movements was the main cause of the incidents of police brutality all across the country. That is the same movement that emerged in the aftermath of both the George Zimmerman trial acquittal in the killing of Trayvon Martin and the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo and made race-related issues and police violence visible topics of nationwide discussion.
Trump Era and Populist Revolt
The ascension of Donald Trump to the presidency in 2016 represented a seismic shift in American politics, reflecting a wave of populist discontent and nationalist fervor that upended conventional political wisdom and laid bare the deep-seated divisions within the nation. Trump’s nonconformist campaign and presidency weaved nationalism rhetoric, protectionism trade policy, and an assault on democratic institutions to upend and chip the very nature of liberal democracy, fueling further social division.. The proven truth of Trump’s Populism held a chord with those outcast sectors of the electorate who identified with those who were cut off and left behind in the wake of globalization, cultural shift, and political elites. He succeeded, purportedly due to his sole focus on the voter’s central issue, foreign trade, whose effect he articulated as an alien assault on core American values of political stability and economic growth. Trump’s populism style, by clinging on gradually developing fears related to the movement of migrants, economic insecurity, and a culture-based changing world, gave easy solutions to those without scapegoating the minorities for the evils of society..
While the Trump years saw a triumphant return of the white nationalism ideology and xenophobia and substituted democratic principles with authoritarian ones, these positions enjoyed the support and were promoted by far-right activists. Hence, the far-right finally came out of the shadows and found a voice and a platform in the executive power, in the face of the President himself. Trump’s anti-colonial rhetoric and informal immigration policies, such as the notorious travel ban to predominantly Muslim countries, have enlarged the racial and ethnic stains and supplied anti-immigrant emotions. Meanwhile, Trump’s presidency was the most destructive of his time off, with attacks on democratic principles and norms. His harsh words against media as “fake news” and “enemy of the people,” united with his efforts to interfere with the justice system’s independence and politicized law enforcement agencies, caused a downfall in the trustworthiness of the pillars of democracy and inspired doubt about the impartiality of election processing..
The mob invasion associated with the Capitol on January 6, 2021, signified a chaotic upshot of simmering disagreements about and blind faith in the Trump administration. The armed assault on the U.S. Capitol in January 2021 by a pack of Trump loyalists in their failed bid to subvert the election results showed the depth below the surface of American democracy and the tragic consequences of extreme politics and attempted misinformation.. After the uprising, the endeavor to safeguard the democratic culture and institutions has been highlighted, which involves the role of the battle against their decaying and mistrust. The events of January 6 essentially proved to be a rude awakening call for many American people, making them think and give or take any accountability for those intending to sabotage the democratic process.
Conclusion
In conclusion, American history serves as a rich tapestry through which we can unravel the intricate complexities of contemporary American politics. From the initial values of liberty and equality, written in the nation’s founding documents, to the contemporary struggles of marginalized groups for equal treatment, an inspiring pattern of changes has been formed throughout history. Multiple historical events, movements, and ideologies have deeply affected those changes. The endurance of America’s past can be seen continuously present or ongoing in the deep-rooted debates and disputes that permeate the nation’s political arena. Whether through the examination of federalism versus state powers, suffrage, and equality debates, or even liberal-conservative tension on the effective role of a government in society, there is no doubt that history is not just an inertia but a living force of the present-day and the future as well.
Given the diverse and complex challenges that America faces in the 21st century, ranging from globalization and rapid technological evolution to perpetual issues of inequality and injustice, the importance of having a deep insight into historical factors is strongly emphasized now more than ever. Through the consideration of all the intricacies of America’s past, one will have a vast knowledge that will help understand the root causes of modern-day political issues and will surely pave a road that leads to a brighter, fairer, and peaceful future At the very end; it is the viewpoint of history that allows us to see the patterns, trends, and lessons that are necessary to history widely our understanding of the present moment. By engaging in a part of America’s political history, we will be able to understand and handle the complicatedness of America’s present time, ultimately leading to a better future where all citizens will be prosperous and enjoy their lives in the U.S.
Reference
Barreto, Amilcar Antonio, and Nicholas G. Napolio. “Bifurcating American identity: partisanship, sexual orientation, and the 2016 presidential election.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8, no. 1 (2020): 143-159.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21565503.2018.1442727
Connolly, James J. An elusive unity: Urban democracy and machine politics in industrializing America. Cornell University Press, 2019.https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7591/9780801461552/html
Cronin, Ciaran. “On the possibility of a democratic constitutional founding: Habermas and Michelman in dialogue.” In Habermas and Law, pp. 197–223. Routledge, 2020.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003074977-13/possibility-democratic-constitutional-founding-habermas-michelman-dialogue-ciaran-cronin
Gillibrand, Isabelle. “A Different Master of War: The Influence of the Folk Music Revival on the Antiwar Movement during the Vietnam Era.” (2019).https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses/128/
Ife, Jim, Karen Soldatić, and Linda Briskman. Human rights and social work. Cambridge University Press, 2022.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IPxvEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Civil+Rights+Movement+and+Social+Change&ots=iox3lrLFuO&sig=9_Vnyd8rtYI804ku-aB_7W9WB0g
Kordick, Carmen. “Empire by Invitation: William Walker and Manifest Destiny in Central America by Michel Gobat.” The Americas 76, no. 2 (2019): 368–369.https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/122/article/721547/summary
Lowndes, Joseph. “Trump and the populist presidency.” In Populism in global perspective, pp. 118–135. Routledge, 2020.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003110149-8/trump-populist-presidency-joseph-lowndes
Navarro, Vicente. “Neoliberalism,” globalization,” unemployment, inequalities, and the welfare state.” The Political Economy of Social Inequalities (2020): 33–107.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315231051-5/neoliberalism-globalization-unemployment-inequalities-welfare-state-vicente-navarro
Podestà, Federico. “Did the conservative resurgence matter? A counterfactual replication of Pierson’s analysis on Reagan and Thatcher’s welfare state retrenchments.” Comparative European Politics 18, no. 5 (2020): 819–839.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41295-020-00211-8
Powell, Lawrence N. New Masters: Northern Planters During the Civil War and Reconstruction. Fordham University Press, 2020.https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780823296293/html
Reisch, George A. The Politics of Paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, and the Cold War “Struggle for Men’s Minds”. State University of New York Press, 2019.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=g3OUDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=World+Wars+and+Cold+War+Politics&ots=anV_BGNpzH&sig=ReiNK8ZjQeX272j3GY0L9OKBcYk
Sirin, Selcuk R., Elysia Choi, and Canan Tugberk. “The impact of 9/11 and the war on terror on Arab and Muslim children and families.” Current Psychiatry Reports 23, no. 8 (2021): 47.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11920-021-01264-6
Stewart, Megan A., and Karin E. Kitchens. “Social transformation and violence: Evidence from U.S. Reconstruction.” Comparative Political Studies 54, no. 11 2021: 1939-1983.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414021997164
Vallet, Guillaume, ed. Inequalities and the Progressive Era: breakthroughs and legacies. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2yXsDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Industrialization+and+Progressive+Era+Reforms&ots=JOfj6dbMo_&sig=kqcF3_ee-6DpU0vgZebnTpUTipo
Veneziano, Alina. “Applying the U.S. Constitution Abroad, from the Era of the U.S. Founding to the Modern Age.” Fordham Urb. L.J. 46 (2019): 602.https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/frdurb46§ion=21
Wolnisty, Claire M. A Different Manifest Destiny: US Southern Identity and Citizenship in Nineteenth-Century South America. U of Nebraska Press, 2020.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Y_zDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Manifest+Destiny+and+Expansionism&ots=6RvWCwlrcX&sig=G1n1_689SgGAllXJwXYcMaPXxB
write