Managing the Multinational Organisation-Toyota Motor Co., Ltd

Introduction

International human resource management (IHRM) is essential for multinational corporations (MNCs) like Toyota because they can use the best available skills and create a robust global workforce. Nevertheless, MNCs are confronted with distinctive problems in formulating and carrying out the best IHRM recruitment and selection practices globally. These challenges involve operating under different labor laws, locating and assessing a culturally varied talent pool, and guaranteeing a fair and bias-free selection process (Armstrong, 2014). If these issues are not addressed, it might lead to suboptimal hiring decisions, low workplace diversity, and legal implications.

For the Australian division of the Japanese automotive giant Toyota, the recruitment and selection of a diverse workforce has become a critical IHRM concern. The Australian labor market is highly multicultural, with workers from different ethnic, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. Recruiting and retaining the pool of employees who are capable of working in a novel corporation is a challenge.

As per industry reports, Toyota Australia has not been successful in building a workforce that represents the diversity of the Australian community, especially in leadership and technical positions. This lack of workforce diversity can hinder innovation, weaken cultural competitiveness, and alienate certain customer segments (Iles and Zhang, 2013).

Recruitment sources, selection criteria, and hiring processes that work well in Japan may translate poorly in Australia due to differences in cultural values, discrimination laws, and societal expectations around diversity and inclusion (Jackson, 2002). For example, Toyota’s strong preference for long-tenure employees in Japan could disadvantage job applicants from underrepresented groups in Australia.

This report will examine the recruitment and selection challenges faced by Toyota Australia in building a diverse, culturally competent workforce. It will analyze the key internal factors, such as organizational culture, and external factors, such as the multicultural labor market, that are shaping this IHRM issue. Finally, evidence-based recommendations will be provided on developing robust, culturally-intelligent recruitment and selection strategies to address this challenge effectively.

Internal and External Factors

Toyota Australia’s HRM challenges in managing its diverse workforce and fostering positive employee relations were influenced by a multitude of internal and external factors.

Internal Factors

Organizational Culture Disconnect: Toyota Australia’s organizational culture, deeply rooted in Japanese traditions and values, posed significant challenges in creating a harmonious work environment for its multicultural workforce. The hierarchical and centralized decision-making processes characteristic of Japanese corporations may have hindered effective communication and collaboration between expatriates, PCNs, and HCNs, which could have contributed to misunderstandings and conflicts (Iles and Zhang, 2013).

Inadequate Policies and Procedures: Due to the absence of an effective anti-harassment policy and employee relations practices, the company’s culture became a place where unacceptable behavior could not be controlled. It is important to take measures to rectify these shortcomings to avoid future cases of workplace bullying and harassment as well as to foster a good employee relationship (Sablok et al., 2017).

Leadership and Management Shortcomings: Toyota Australia’s leadership and management styles played a crucial role in shaping the company’s relationships with its employees. If leaders lacked the necessary training and skills to navigate cultural differences, resolve conflicts effectively, and foster open communication, it could have contributed to a breakdown in workplace harmony and employee morale (Thomas and Lazarova, 2013).

Insufficient Training and Development: Inadequate training and development programs for expatriates, PCNs, and HCNs may have perpetuated cultural misunderstandings and hindered the development of cross-cultural competencies essential for effective collaboration and positive employee relations (Briscoe, Schuler and Tarique, 2012).

External Factors

Legal and Regulatory Environment: Australia has stringent laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, requiring employers to take proactive steps to prevent and address workplace bullying and harassment (Iles and Zhang, 2013). Failure to comply with these legal requirements can result in severe financial penalties and reputational damage for companies like Toyota Australia.

Economic Pressures: The cut-throat competition and economic conditions in the global automotive industry, as well as the economic conditions, may apply overwhelming pressure on companies such as Toyota Australia, making the work environment more stressful (Harzing, Ashley, and Pinnington 2014). This can potentially result in strains in employee relations, which in turn could lead to conflicts and tensions within the workforce.

Societal and Cultural Expectations: Societal expectations for workplace behavior have changed a lot, and now they pay more attention to diversity, inclusion, and respecting cultural differences (Brewster et al., 2016). Organizations must review and adjust their HRM guidelines and procedures to align with the changing societal expectations and provide a supportive and inclusive workplace for their employees.

Technological Advancements: The fast-paced technological innovations and the increasingly widespread automation systems can cause uncertainties and fear among employees. Toyota Australia’s capability to deal with these disruptive technologies and answer the various concerns of the heterogeneous workforce is vital to maintaining a good relationship with the employees (Iles and Zhang, 2013).

Proposed Solutions and Recommendations

To address the HRM challenges faced by Toyota Australia in managing its diverse workforce, fostering positive employee relations, and preventing incidents of workplace bullying and harassment, the following solutions and recommendations are proposed:

Develop and Implement Robust Anti-Harassment and Anti-Discrimination Policies: Toyota Australia should prioritize the development and implementation of comprehensive policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination that align with Australian legal requirements and societal expectations. These policies should:

• Clearly define and communicate the company’s zero-tolerance stance on workplace bullying, harassment, and discrimination, including the consequences of engaging in such behavior (Jackson, 2002).
• Establish a formal and transparent complaint and investigation process that protects the rights of all parties involved and ensures impartial handling of complaints by trained HR personnel or external mediators (Harzing, Ashley and Pinnington 2014).
• Mandate regular training programs on preventing workplace harassment and discrimination for all employees, including expatriates, PCNs, and HCNs. These training programs should be tailored to the unique cultural contexts and legal requirements of each Toyota Australia location.
• Implement regular monitoring and review mechanisms to assess the effectiveness of the anti-harassment and anti-discrimination policies, including periodic employee surveys, assessments, and feedback from external stakeholders, such as labor unions and regulatory bodies.

Cultivate a Culture of Inclusion and Cross-Cultural Understanding: Toyota Australia should prioritize initiatives to foster a culture of inclusion and cross-cultural understanding to bridge the gaps between expatriates, PCNs, and HCNs. These initiatives may include:

• Implementing comprehensive cultural sensitivity and cross-cultural communication training programs to enhance cultural awareness, understanding, and effective intercultural communication skills (Brewster et al., 2016).
• Promoting team-building initiatives and events highlighting cultural diversity and encouraging collaboration among employees from varied backgrounds, such as multicultural events, sports competitions, or team-building exercises.
• Implementing mentorship programs that pair expatriates or PCNs with HCNs fosters the exchange of knowledge, professional growth, and the development of robust cross-cultural connections.
• Consistent evaluation and modification of communication channels and practices to ensure they are inclusive and effective for a culturally diverse workforce, potentially utilizing technology-based solutions such as video conferencing or translation software (Armstrong, 2014).

Invest in Leadership Development and Accountability: Toyota Australia should prioritize leadership development and hold managers accountable for creating and maintaining an inclusive and respectful work environment. This can be achieved through:

• Providing comprehensive leadership training programs that focus on developing emotional intelligence, conflict resolution skills, and cultural competence. These programs should equip managers with the tools to navigate cultural differences, foster open communication, and effectively address employee concerns (Iles and Zhang, 2013).
• Implementing performance evaluation mechanisms that assess managers’ ability to lead diverse teams, promote inclusivity, and address incidents of workplace bullying, harassment, or discrimination promptly and appropriately (Harzing, Ashley and Pinnington 2014).
• Encouraging a participative and collaborative leadership style that values the input and perspectives of all employees fosters a sense of belonging and engagement in the workforce (Iles and Zhang, 2013).
• Enforcing accountability of managers for creating and maintaining a good and diverse work environment through regular performance evaluations, feedback mechanisms, and, if required, disciplinary actions for the failure to uphold the company’s standards (Brewster et al., 2016).

Continuous Monitoring, Evaluation, and Improvement: Toyota Australia must set up a comprehensive evaluation program, monitoring and continual improvement of its HRM strategies to keep in line with organizational targets and good human resource management practices. This includes:

• Establishing the key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics that measure the effectiveness of the HRM projects, such as employee engagement, retention, and the level of satisfaction, as well as the diversity of leadership within the organization (Armstrong and Taylor, 2020).
• Regular evaluation of the progress of HRM initiatives should be done through tools such as employee surveys, exit interviews, and performance evaluations. This will help Toyota Australia find out where the process is deficient and adjust the HRM strategies to meet needs (Iles and Zhang, 2013).
• Organizing periodic audits to keep track of the company’s HRM policies and practices to conform to legal standards and match the industry. This could involve employing external consultants or entering into partnerships with organizations specializing in diversity and inclusion to provide an impartial judgment of TA’s HRM practices (Jackson, 2002).

• Continually revising and improving the company’s HRM policies and practices with feedback from employees, industry trends, and research on best practices. This approach will be proactive for Toyota Australia, and it will help in dealing with the emerging HRM challenges and ensure that the company policies and practices are relevant and effective for managing a diverse workforce (Jackson, 2002).

Conclusion

The workplace bullying and harassment at Toyota Australia’s Melbourne dealership has exposed the company to the problems of managing a diverse workforce and maintaining good employee relations. This example is a valuable lesson for Toyota Australia and many other multinational corporations operating in the country.

At the heart of the problem is the management accountability and training. The fact that the manager of an Australian branch of Toyota is involved in the racial discrimination case emphasizes the necessity for this organization to ensure that the top managers are held accountable for their actions and are provided with relevant training. This can be accomplished by developing managerial strategies and setting a clear precedent that such behavior will not be condoned at the company. The managers will be trained and supported regularly, facilitating their management by example and creating a working environment that appreciates diversity and inclusion.

On the other hand, this event demonstrates Toyota Australia’s need to diversify IHRM structures and practices. Ensuring an accessible and nurturing workplace for expatriates, the parents’ country nationals, and the host country nationals is paramount. It is important to tackle workplace bullying and harassment to ensure that employees’ morale and productivity are not affected and the company’s reputation is protected. The Australian arm of Toyota Motor Company should use a comprehensive strategy to tackle the issue, which will include developing and implementing anti-harassment policies and procedures and consistently investing in employee training and development programs.

Another critical barrier to IHRM is the cultural gap between Toyota Australia’s Japanese origins and the Australian culture, which is more equal and decentralized. This misalignment might lead to communication barriers and incomprehensions between expatriates, PCNs, and HCNs. In order to cope with this problem, the company should foster cultural integration and facilitate better communication across all levels of the organization. Initiatives, for example, cult, cultural awareness training, employee exchange programs, and job mentorship, could form the basis for cross-cultural understanding and collaborations, which, over time, will build a cohesive work environment.

Furthermore, compliance with the law and fulfilling social norms are among Toyota Australia’s priorities. The Australian laws set out severe penalties for any discrimination or harassment and compel companies to develop and implement policies that will allow them to prevent such cases and address them in case they occur. Failure to conform can burden a company with huge legal and reputation costs. Also, societal norms on workplace conduct have changed, and there is a greater focus on diversity and inclusion promotion. Progressive IHRM policies of Toyota Australia can help produce an environment that is supportive and inclusive, thus enhancing its reputation and competitiveness in the global market.

Effective HRM is the basis of the company’s continuous success in the competitive global marketplace and a key factor for building a reputation and maintaining a motivated and productive workforce. Toyota Australia has to focus on mitigating these HRM obstacles to prevent future events and to become a preferred employer of choice for the best performers from diverse backgrounds. Through the adoption of the proposed measures, Toyota Australia will be able to bridge the cultural divides, cultivate an inclusive working environment, and thus improve employee relations, which will strengthen the position of the company as a leading multinational corporation in Australia.

Bibliography

Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S., 2020. Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.

Armstrong, M., 2014. Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice–13th Edition.

Brewster, C., Houldsworth, E., Sparrow, P. and Vernon, G., 2016. International human resource management. Kogan Page Publishers.

Briscoe, D., Schuler, R. and Tarique, I., 2012. International human resource management: Policies and practices for multinational enterprises. Routledge.

Harzing A. and Ashley H. Pinnington eds. 2014. International. Human Resource Management (4th ed), London, Sage.

Iles, P. and Zhang, C.L., 2013. International human resource management: A cross-cultural and comparative approach. Kogan Page Publishers.

Jackson, T., 2002. International HRM: A cross-cultural approach. International HRM, pp.1–252.

Müller-Camen, M., Croucher, R. and Leigh, S.R. eds., 2008. Human resource management: a case study approach. Kogan Page Publishers.

Sablok, G., Stanton, P., Bartram, T., Burgess, J. and Boyle, B., 2017. Human resource development practices, managers and multinational enterprises in Australia: Thinking globally, acting locally. Education+ Training, 59(5), pp.483–501.

Thomas, D.C. and Lazarova, M.B., 2013. Essentials of international human resource management: Managing people globally. Sage Publications.