The Self-Determination Theory and Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory are two well-known psychological theories used to examine how people behave in various situations. These two theories have diverse viewpoints and concentrate on various facets of the human experience, but they also have some things in common. Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and the Self-Determination Theory are closely compared and contrasted in this article.
A social psychological theory called Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory explains how people who belong to minority groups, such as sexual minorities, endure stress due to external and internal pressures. Internal stresses include hiding one’s identity and feeling ashamed, while external stressors include encounters with stigma and prejudice. According to the hypothesis, this stress may result in negative mental health consequences like sadness and anxiety, and the social context may worsen these negative results. The theory contends that people may create coping methods to lessen the negative impacts of minority stress, including seeking social support and forging a sense of community.
On the other hand, Self-Determination Theory is a motivation theory focusing on the inherent elements influencing human action. According to the principle, people have three fundamental psychological needs: relatedness, competence, and autonomy. While competence and relatedness pertain to the demand for mastery and accomplishment, autonomy and relatedness refer to the need for control and self-direction. According to the hypothesis, when these requirements are satisfied, people feel good within and are more motivated to take action, which produces good results.
The importance of social ties and relationships is one area where Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and Self-Determination Theory appear similar. According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, social support and a sense of belonging can lessen the negative impacts of minority stress. At the same time, the Self-Determination Theory contends that human conduct is motivated by a basic psychological urge for relatedness. Both theories recognize the value of personal autonomy and control. However, Self-Determination Theory emphasizes this idea more.
One of their main differences is the emphasis on external vs. internal elements in these two theories. According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, stigma, and discrimination are the main causes of stress and poor mental health outcomes. On the other hand, Self-Determination Theory emphasizes internal elements, such as psychological needs, as the influences on behavior and well-being. Another distinction is that whereas Self-Determination Theory applies to all people regardless of their social identity, Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory concentrates on marginalized groups.
The Self-Determination Theory and Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory are independent psychological theories with various focuses and viewpoints on human behavior. Despite some commonalities, they differ in their emphasis on external versus internal causes and their application to certain groups. Both ideas can be used in different settings and are useful for understanding human behavior.
Essay Argument
Several theoretical frameworks can be used to tackle the study question, “Does social media use, affective engagement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement predict gay men’s self-esteem?” However, one of the best hypotheses that fit this study’s question is Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory. First off, Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory focuses primarily on the pressures that members of disadvantaged groups, such as those who identify as gay or homosexual, suffer. This approach emphasizes the distinct stresses and societal elements, such as prejudice, discrimination, and social exclusion, that impact the mental health of people from minority groups. Given that it focuses exclusively on the experiences of gay men and their self-esteem, the theory is most suited to assess the study topic in this situation.
Second, Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory stresses how social and environmental factors influence how people from minority groups experience their mental health. This concept contends that people’s social environments significantly impact how they experience their mental health. Use of social media, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement are a few examples of social and environmental aspects that can affect someone’s sense of self. Therefore, this theory offers a comprehensive framework for comprehending how these elements affect homosexual men’s self-esteem.
Finally, Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory highlights the significance of context in comprehending the consequences of minority group members’ mental health. This theory acknowledges that social and cultural factors impact how people from minority groups see the world. Given that the social and cultural background of homosexual men’s experiences influences those experiences, this is especially pertinent to the research issue. Thus, Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory offers a complex and contextualized view of the elements affecting gay men’s self-esteem.
Social Media Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
For many people, especially homosexual men, using social media has become essential to daily life. Social media use may have both beneficial and detrimental consequences on self-esteem, according to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and research on homosexual men’s self-esteem. Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory states that homosexual men may feel stress due to prejudice, stigma, and other outside stresses associated with their sexual orientation. Self-esteem may suffer as a result of these pressures. The hypothesis does, however, also imply that those who can manage these stressors and retain positive mental health outcomes, including self-esteem, may be better able to tolerate the adverse impacts of these stressors.
There are conflicting findings from studies on homosexual men’s use of social media and self-esteem. Social media has been linked to better levels of self-esteem in some studies (Bazarova et al., 2015; Chou & Edge, 2012). However, other studies have indicated the opposite (Kircaburun & Griffiths, 2018). These variances in usage patterns, social media platforms, and individual traits could cause these discrepancies. According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, gay men’s use of social media may predict self-esteem through internal and external pressures. Social media can reinforce or combat external pressures associated with sexual orientation, such as stigma and prejudice. For instance, social networking sites can offer a venue for homosexual males to interact with and get support from other LGBTQ+ people, which can lessen loneliness and boost self-esteem. In addition, using social media can expose users to favorable portrayals of homosexuality, which can counteract cultural prejudices against it and boost self-esteem.
However, internal pressures like self-objectification and social comparison can also be made worse by social media. It thus lowers one’s self-esteem. People constantly compare themselves to others on social media. It causes poor self-esteem and feelings of inadequacy. Self-objectification occurs when someone places a greater value on their outward appearance. It happens when individuals exhibit themselves in a way that is more focused on their outward characteristics and ideas than on trying to obtain other people’s acceptance. It could also lower one’s self-esteem.
Based on Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and the available research, it is likely that social media use can predict homosexual men’s self-esteem. However, the direction and intensity of the link may depend on several factors, such as the particular social media platform and use. A platform for support, community development, and positive representation of homosexuality may be found on social media, which can lead to increased self-esteem. However, it can also contribute to harmful internal pressures that might lower self-esteem, like self-objectification and social comparison.
In light of Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, it can be concluded that homosexual men’s social media use can predict their self-worth. Social media use and self-esteem can have a complicated relationship depending on the type of use, particularly social media platforms. Future research should explore the relationship between homosexual men’s use of social media and their feeling of self-worth to develop effective treatments that can enhance mental health results.
Affective Engagement Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
The degree to which a person is emotionally committed in a given activity, circumstance, or relationship is called affective involvement. Affective engagement may be defined as the degree to which gay men feel emotionally connected and invested in their relationships and communities, despite experiencing internal and external stressors related to their sexual orientation in Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and self-esteem among gay men.
Minority group members are said to endure stress as a result of a mix of internal and external pressures, according to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory. Some of them include hiding their identity and experiencing shame. Stress can result in negative mental health effects like low self-esteem. However, the idea also implies that those who establish supportive networks and relationships can handle these pressures. They can also preserve favorable mental health outcomes like self-esteem.
Effective participation has been linked in studies to good mental health outcomes like self-esteem. Wang et al. (2020) say people who are emotionally committed to their relationships and communities tend to have greater self-esteem. Little research, however, has specifically looked at how homosexual men’s self-esteem is predicted by emotional involvement using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory. Huebner et al. (2002) did one study examining the connection between affective engagement and self-esteem among gay men. They discovered that gay men’s self-esteem was higher in those who expressed greater affective engagement with their love relationships. The authors hypothesize that these findings may result from romantic partnerships’ supporting and validating qualities, which may act as a protective barrier against the damaging effects of minority stress on self-esteem.
According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and the research that has been done, it is likely that affective engagement among gay men predicts self-esteem. Particularly, gay men who are emotionally committed in their relationships and communities may be better able to handle the pressures connected to their sexual orientation on the inside and the outside, which will result in higher levels of self-esteem. A big buffer against the damaging effects of minority stress on self-esteem may also come from romantic relationships.
In general, Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory suggests that affective engagement among gay men may predict self-esteem. Gay men feeling deeply connected to their relationships and communities may be equipped to face the stresses of being gay. It aids in increasing their levels of self-esteem. It is important to explore better the relationship between affective involvement and self-esteem among gay males and other marginalized groups. It will develop effective therapies that can enhance mental health outcomes.
Behavioral Engagement Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
The level of an individual’s behavioral engagement describes how actively they engage in the relationships and activities that are significant to them. Behavioral engagement may be used to describe how actively gay men behave and engage in activities that are consistent with their values and identities, despite experiencing both internal and external stressors related to their sexual orientation; in Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and self-esteem among gay men.
According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, individuals of minority groups experience stress due to internal and external challenges, including hiding their identities and dealing with humiliation. Stress can have detrimental psychological effects, including low self-esteem. The idea contends that those who can act in ways consistent with their identities and beliefs may better handle these stressors. According to the theory, creating a supportive network of people and communities can favor mental health, like self-esteem. As per research, engaging in activities is linked to benefits for mental health, including self-esteem. According to studies, people with greater self-esteem actively engage in activities and actions compatible with their beliefs and identities (Hadden et al., 2018; Sheldon & Hoon, 2007). Little research has, however, specifically looked at how the behavioral implications of Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory affect homosexual men’s self-esteem.
The relationship between behavioral participation and homosexual men’s self-esteem was studied by Williamson et al. (2017) in one study. They discovered that gay men with greater levels of self-worth engaged in activities that were important to them. They include community service or membership in LGBTQ groups. These findings can be linked to the support and validation one receives from engaging in activities congruent with their beliefs and identities. This sense of support and validation can function as a barrier to prevent the negative impacts of minority stress on self-esteem.
Gay men’s behavioral involvement is likely to predict self-esteem, according to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and the data that are accessible. Suppose they actively participate in behaviors and activities compatible with their beliefs and identities. In that case, gay men may be better equipped to handle the internal and external pressures associated with their sexual orientation. A higher sense of self-worth may result from this. To prevent the damaging impacts of minority stress on self-esteem, involvement in LGBTQ groups and community events may be crucial.
According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, behavioral involvement among gay men may predict self-esteem. Gay men with greater levels of self-esteem may be better able to handle the pressures associated with their sexual orientation if they actively engage in behaviors and activities consistent with their beliefs and identities. Future research should continue investigating the connection between behavioral engagement and self-esteem among homosexual men and other stigmatized groups. It will create efficient interventions supporting favorable mental health outcomes,
Cognitive Engagement Prediction of Gay’s men Self-esteem Using Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory
Cognitive engagement is the level of a person’s mental commitment to the relationships and activities important to them. Cognitive engagement may refer to the degree to which homosexual men actively process, challenge, and reject negative thoughts and beliefs linked to their sexual orientation in favor of adopting positive and affirming self-concepts, as it relates to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and self-esteem among gay men.
According to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory, people who belong to minority groups endure stress. It is because of internal and external pressures. They include masking their identity and experiencing shame. Stress can occasionally result in poor mental health effects, such as low self-esteem. The theory also contends that those who challenge negative beliefs can better manage stress and form positive self-concepts. They can also retain beneficial mental health outcomes, including self-esteem.
Cognitive engagement has been linked in studies to good mental health outcomes, including self-esteem. According to studies (Kashdan & Steger, 2007, Wood & Saltzberg, 1990), those who talk to themselves positively and question their negative beliefs have greater self-esteem. However, little research has particularly examined how Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory predicts cognitive engagement for self-esteem among gay men.
In one study, Pachankis et al. (2015) investigated the connection between cognitive involvement and self-esteem among gay men. They discovered that lower internalized homophobia mediated this association, with greater self-esteem levels reported by gay men with a positive and affirming self-concept. Internalized homophobia refers to unfavorable attitudes and feelings that gay men may develop due to prejudice and discrimination towards homosexuality. The authors contend that adopting positive self-concepts, particularly cognitive engagement, may act as a protective barrier against the damaging effects of internalized homophobia on self-esteem.
Cognitive engagement among gay men is probably a predictor of self-esteem, according to Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory and the existing studies. Gay men may be better able to manage internal and external stressors related to their sexual orientation. They can become more confident by actively processing and challenging negative thoughts and beliefs about their sexual orientation. Positive and affirming self-concepts can also help them manage stressors and build confidence.
Cognitive engagement may generally predict homosexual men’s self-esteem within the framework of Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory. Gay men who actively confront their sexual orientation-related negative attitudes and beliefs and replace them with positive and affirming self-concepts may be better able to handle the stressors connected to their sexual orientation, likely leading to greater self-esteem. Future studies should examine how cognitive engagement and self-esteem relate to homosexual males and other stigmatized groups. They will help to create efficient interventions supporting favorable mental health outcomes.
Conclusion
The Self-Determination Theory and Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory are independent psychological theories with various focuses and viewpoints on human behavior. While they have certain commonalities, they diverge in their application to particular groups and emphasize external vs. internal causes. Both theories are valuable resources for comprehending human behavior and can be used in various situations. Self-Determination Theory is an appropriate theoretical framework for comprehending the elements that motivate individuals, including those who belong to marginalized groups like gay men, and for understanding the research question of whether social media use, affective engagement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement predict gay men’s self-esteem.
However, social media use, affective engagement, behavioral engagement, and cognitive engagement may all be indicators of homosexual men’s self-esteem in the context of Meyer’s Minority Stress Theory. Gay men’s levels of self-esteem can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the type of social media use, the degree of emotional investment in relationships and communities, active participation in behaviors consistent with values and identities, and active processing and challenging of negative thoughts and beliefs about sexual orientation. To provide efficient therapies that support homosexual men’s and other oppressed groups’ improved mental health, future research must continue examining these associations.
References
Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99-112.
Manuoğlu, E. (2020). Differences between trolling and cyberbullying and examination of trolling from self-determination theory perspective.
Jaspal, R. (2022). Social psychological aspects of gay identity development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 101469.
Ashraf, S., Jamil, F., & Mairaj, S. (2022). Journal of ISOSS 2022 Vol. 8 (3), 125-138 RELIGIOSITY PREDICTS COLLECTIVE SELF ESTEEM, MINORITY STRESS & RESILIENCE AMONG TRANSGENDER OF LAHORE, PAKISTAN. Journal of ISOSS, 8(3), 125-138.
write