Task 1: Factors that Characterize Operations
Variety: Diversity constitutes the number of various products and services provided by a company. They can be different by size, colour, features, or customization options (Dou et al., 2020). Another example is a fashion retailer, which may provide a wide range of products, including blouses, trousers, dresses and accessories that can be found in different styles, colours and sizes to fit the tastes of different customers. Likewise, a restaurant with so many different dishes which are made with different kinds of ingredients and using different cooking techniques implies that the restaurant has high variety in its work.
Visibility: Visibility stands for the extent of interaction of the customer during production. The operations with high visibility are operations where customers are directly engaged and can watch the production process as it is happening and even participate in it (Karizat et al., 2021). Examples are restaurants where customers can see the food being prepared or hair salons where clients can watch stylists style their hair. On the contrary, operations that are viewed as invisible by customers can take place with either some or no customer involvement during production, for example, manufacturing plants or automated online order fulfilment centres.
Volume: Volume measures the amount of goods or services realized or supplied over a specified time. Operations of high volume are carried out to produce large amounts of identical products or services efficiently to cater to any mass demand (Budiman & Rau, 2021). For example, an automotive assembly plant manufactures hundreds of thousands of vehicles per month that respond to market demands. In contrast, operations with low volume supply smaller pieces of products that are specific to each customer or a customized product. A small-scale bakery that makes question small quantities of traditional desserts every day illustrates operators running at low volume.
Variation: Variation means a degree of unpredictable or changeable demand, input, or output. In operations with significant variation, the dynamics of customer preferences and order sizes change frequently, or product specification changes, making the production processes required to be flexible and adaptable (Erasmus et al., 2020). As an example, fashion retailers may observe the seasonal demand difference in clothing styles. Conversely, for low variation operations, demand patterns are stable and predictable, thereby standardizing and streamlining production. A utility company providing water or electricity with a consistent quality of service faces low variation in operations.
Task 2: Stages in the Operations Strategy Processes.
Assessment and Analysis: The first stage is about evaluating the current situation, and external and internal factors are reviewed, considering their impact on the organization’s strategic objectives (Fuertes et al., 2020). Deloitte conducts an all-encompassing overview of its activities by focusing on critical performance metrics, carrying out SWOT analysis, and looking into market trends and competitor strategies. For instance, Deloitte may assess its capabilities in consulting, audit, tax, and advisory services, examine client speeches, and assess the developments in tech, regulatory compliance, and globalization.
Strategy Formulation: Upon assessment completion, Deloitte plots its operations strategy through the setting of long-term plans, priorities, and action points to achieve organizational objectives (Cannone et al., 2023). This includes making decisions that fit with the overall strategy of the business (like market expansion, service differentiation, or cost leadership). To illustrate, Deloitte may develop tricks to upgrade its digital capabilities, move into growing markets or cut down, resulting in profitability improvement and customer satisfaction.
Resource Allocation: In this phase, Deloitte brings in the resources needed to ensure that the operations strategy is implemented well. The required resources include finances, human beings and technology. This encompasses the budgeting, staffing and investing process, which supports strategic objectives. For details, Deloitte invests in hiring and training professionals with AI and data analytics expertise in order to enhance their service offerings, that is, digital transformation and innovation.
Implementation and Execution: Once the strategy is formulated and the resources have been arranged, Deloitte is tasked with implementing and executing the strategy successfully. This is creating operational plans out of strategic plans, defining key performance indicators and tracking the progress towards the achievement of strategic goals. Let us say programming teams controlled by Deloitte will do this, that, and the other thing. They will implement new technologies and processes, establish new metrics, and track milestones.
Performance Measurement and Continuous Improvement: This phase entails the assessment of performance by tracking against the set metrics and also adjusting operations to comply with new market conditions and stakeholders’ expectations (Kerzner, 2022). The performance measures (KPIs) that Deloitte employs to assess the achievability of its operational strategy include client satisfaction, revenue growth, profitability, and employee productivity. Deloitte improves its operation strategy by using the performance feedback and lessons learned in order to achieve market innovation, efficiency and competitiveness.
Task 3: Methods of Production
Consulting Services: Deloitte offers consulting services to clients spanning multiple industries, allowing them to address intricate business issues and achieve organizational upgrades (Birkinshaw and Lancefield, 2023.). In the current situation, the production allows consultants’ knowledge to be used in assessing the client’s needs, developing personalized strategies, and implementing solutions. For instance, the strategy consulting arm at Deloitte can engage in SWOT analysis, market trend analysis, and benchmarking to evaluate client businesses and propose solutions for growth and efficiency improvement.
Audit and Assurance Services: Deloitte offers audit and assurance services for reviewing the accuracy and credibility of financial information that is reported by client organizations (Bartoszewicz & Rutkowska-Ziarko, 2021). In this case, the production method implies carrying out extensive examinations of financial statements, internal controls, and accounting procedures that provide a level of assurance to all parties that have an interest in the entity. The standard audit procedures, sampling techniques, and analytical tools that Deloitte’s auditors utilize are used to confirm that the company’s financial reporting is high quality. Examples of what they do could be undertaking substantive testing, walkthroughs, and risk assessments that identify and deal with financial misstatement or fraud risks.
Tax Advisory Services: Deloitte assists clients in overcoming the complexity of tax laws, reducing tax payments, and maximizing tax efficiency to accomplish their financial goals. The tax advisory services entail planning for taxes comprehensively, providing compliance, and offering advisory services that are in line with client needs. Deloitte’s tax professionals use specialized software, tax research databases, and regulatory updates to analyze tax implications, find ways to maximize the benefits, and make sure that everything is in line with the policies and regulations. For example, they can help multinational corporations organize transactions across borders in order to reduce the tax burden and ensure tax efficiency.
Technology Implementation Services: Deloitte assists its clients in carrying out and blending technology solutions in order to improve their business processes, increase productivity, and foster innovation (Khalisa, 2024). In this domain, the production approach implies the use, to a considerable extent, of industry expertise, technology platforms, and project management methodologies to provide the customer with tailor-made solutions. Deloitte’s technology consultants work in conjunction with clients to devise the correct requirements, design solution architectures, and monitor the implementation processes. For example, Deloitte may help a client implement and integrate ERP, CRM and cybersecurity solutions in order to provide business process efficiencies and risk mitigation.
Task 4: Compare and Contrast Different Process Layouts
In operations management, the process layout refers to the spatial layout or the physical arrangement of workstations, equipment, and resources to allow for the smooth flow of materials and information in the process of production or service delivery (Kovács, 2022). There are several varieties of process arrangements each being suitable for different types of operations and work cultures. The two main types of process layout are the product layout and the process layout, which differ in that the first type is used in the processing of a single product or groups of similar products. In contrast, the second one is used to optimize the production of similar parts on a line in large batches.
A product layout also called a line layout or assembly line layout, consists of workstations and equipment that are placed in a single line according to the process steps involved in the manufacturing of a given product (Leiber et al., 2020). The ease of the manufacturing process makes it suitable for mass production of regular goods, which are characterized by a high volume and low variety. A typical instance of product layout in the industry is the automotive production line; at the latter, the production is organized in a way that the vehicles move along a fixed track, and every workstation is intended to perform a specific function. The linear organization of workstations will reduce material handling and transportation costs, small production lead times, and improve productivity.
In another way, a process layout, which is also called a functional layout or a job shop layout, groups similar equipment and functions together. They do that because of their similarity or compatibility. Service and products flow in a line is product layout. On the other hand, the process layout allows for flexibility and versatility in handling a wide variety of products or services with different processing requirements. One example is a hospital where they use the process layout to organize departments like emergency, surgery, radiology and laboratory, where every department has the required equipment for diagnosis, tests, and treatments. A process layout allows a manufacturing or service facility to produce various products or services, but it can lead to longer lead times, increased material handling, and lower equipment utilization.
On the other hand, process layouts follow the highest level of efficiency and agility of a factory (Bouchard et al., 2022). However, they need to be more flexible to cope with changes in product design or demand. On the other hand, the process layouts have greater flexibility and customization opportunities. However, the disadvantage is that they may reduce the efficiency of operations and productivity due to the increase in materials handling and setup times. Further, production layouts work well for continuous and repetitive manufacturing processes, whereas process layouts perform well in intermittent and customized settings.
The determination of whether to have a product or process layout mainly depends upon factors like the production volume, the type of product variety, demand fluctuation, and the need for flexibility. While product layouts are responsible for maximizing efficiency and output rate for standardized products, process layouts ensure flexibility and customization in the case of diverse product offerings. Properly implemented operations management consists of the choice of a suitable layout strategy in accordance with the particular objectives and needs of the company.
Reference List
Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M. and Andalibi, N., 2021. Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co-produce Knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), pp.1-44.
Bouchard, S., Abdulnour, G. and Gamache, S., 2022. Agility and Industry 4.0 implementation strategy in a Quebec manufacturing SME. Sustainability, 14(13), p.7884.
Leiber, D., Eickholt, D., Vuong, A.T. and Reinhart, G., 2022. Simulation-based layout optimization for multi-station assembly lines. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, pp.1-18.
Kovács, G., (2020). Combination of Lean value-oriented conception and facility layout design for even more significant efficiency improvement and cost reduction. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2916–2936.
Khalisa, A., (2024). The Digitalization in Insurance Broker Industry: How Artificial Intelligence Affects This Industry. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 5(1), 261–279.
Bartoszewicz, A. and Rutkowska-Ziarko, A., 2021. Practice of non-financial reports assurance services in the Polish audit market—the range, limits and prospects for the future. Risks, 9(10), p.176.
Birkinshaw, J. and Lancefield, D., (2023). How Professional Services Firms Dodged Disruption. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64(4).
Fuertes, G., Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R. and Sabattin, J., 2020. A conceptual framework for the strategic management: a literature review—descriptive. Journal of Engineering, 2020, pp.1-21.
Kerzner, H., (2022). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Erasmus, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Traganos, K., Keulen, R. and Grefen, P., 2020. The HORSE project: the application of business process management for flexibility in intelligent manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 10(12), p.4145.
Budiman, S.D. and Rau, H., 2021. A stochastic model for developing speculation-postponement strategies and modularization concepts in the global supply chain with demand uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, p.107392.
Dou, R., Huang, R., Nan, G. and Liu, J., 2020. Less diversity but higher satisfaction: An intelligent product configuration method for type-decreased mass customization. Computers & industrial engineering, 142, p.106336.
Cannone, C., Hoseinpoori, P., Martindale, L., Tennyson, E.M., Gardumi, F., Somavilla Croxatto, L., Pye, S., Mulugetta, Y., Vrochidis, I., Krishnamurthy, S. and Niet, T., (2023). Addressing Challenges in Long-Term Strategic Energy Planning in LMICs: Learning Pathways in an Energy Planning Ecosystem. Energies, 16(21), p.7267.
write