Introduction
According to Yeoman & Beattie (2019), the experience economy entails the provision of not just products or services but unique and enduring life experiences. This shift is observed in the leisure and tourism industry, and companies endeavor to provide unforgettable events and activities as their main value-added product. Nevertheless, a fascinating aspect of this occurrence is that Dark tourism travels to places associated with death, tragedy, or other evil things connected to human history (Lewis et al., 2021). Some are linked with significant occurrences like war, natural catastrophes, terrorist activities, genocide, or similar essential happenings that have left indelible impressions on people’s minds (Lewis et al., 2021). Dark tourism may cover sites such as former concentration camps, battlefields, disaster zones, prisons, and catastrophic events memorials. This essay critically discusses the ethics and morals associated with marketing dark tourism experiences, defining and explaining the reasons for visiting, implications for marketing, and the morality of promoting suffering-linked experiences.
Various Motivations for Visiting Dark Tourism Sites.
Historical Curiosity
Dark tourism is primarily fueled by historical curiosity. Usually, visitors are attracted to historic places where they can investigate humankind’s evil side. This is a curiosity born of a desire to know about things that have made societies different and what caused some people to be different (Lewis et al., 2021). It is essential to recognize that historical curiosity is often a reason for visiting dark tourism sites. This fact makes evident the educational nature of such an experience. The dark tourism experience is accentuated by the motivational driver of historical curiosity, which underlines its educational character. Tourists visit to understand how people differentiate themselves through good and evil at the level of civilizations, what causes world conflicts, and so on (Lewis et al., 2021). Dark tourism is an avenue to experience and interact with history in a visceral and provoking way that goes beyond conventional forms of education. As dark tourism is viewed as more than voyeurism, this also means that historical curiosity is regarded as a critical motivation for such a phenomenon with the aim of explaining its occurrence (Lewis et al., 2021). People come to learn about the darkest moments in humanity’s history, which ultimately enrich their awareness of life’s complexity.
Quest for Authenticity
Another motivation pushing people to engage with dark tourism is a quest for authenticity. Today, people have to be in contact with actual, physical history because they live in a world where experience is digital, and there are many simulations. As an experience, dark tourism sites provide a thrilling glimpse at the past, allowing travelers to grapple with the challenging history that defined society (Magano et al., 2022). In this sense, authenticity becomes an expression of a genuine bond with history, exposing the deceptive, glossy history books and a more profound knowledge of history (Magano et al., 2022). In its essence, the search for authenticity in dark tourism mirrors the contemporary desire to embrace authentic and natural experiences, which are becoming scarce in the digital age.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Dark tourism takes the form of various motivations, including education-related ones. Often, people visit these sites to learn more about historical happenings and ensuing consequences. Dark tourism has a direct educational value because it may stimulate thinking and reflection. Pereira et al. (2022) state that well-designed dark tourism experiences can help in public history and memory. Individuals can understand complicated historical occurrences by experiencing the past directly. Furthermore, they appreciate what formal education may neglect to acknowledge or emphasize.
Morbid Fascination
Nevertheless, not all the motives of dark tourism have some intellectual background. Some people are fascinated with the morbid interest they have in death and tragedy. Jessica (2019) describes a voyeuristic dimension of dark tourism that might draw people’s attention toward the dramatic scenes of agony and death. Though this motivation could be deemed ethically dubious, it demonstrates the complexity of human psychology, with which different people are motivated to such events (Harikson, 2023). The controversy inherent in ethical assessments of dark tourism hinges on the contrast between stimulating the desire to know and the abuse of tragedy for amusement.
Catharsis
Dark tourism also has another motivation, catharsis, the emotional purification through art or tragedy. Visitors can find peace and closure through the harsh realities of the past. Martini & Buda (2018) assert that it can be used to offer an outlet for emotional catharsis. Emotional processing might also mean facing tragedy directly. That would be an opportunity to close the case surrounding historical events finally.
Commemoration and Respect
A more ethically sound motivation that characterizes dark tourism relates to commemoration and paying respects to the victims of historical catastrophes. Serious visitors who approach these sites with a solemn intention of remembering and honoring those who suffered help to safeguard collective memory (Vázquez, 2018). This motivation conforms to the values of memory and empathy, highlighting the necessity of recognizing human narratives in dark tourist places. Dark tourism is essential because it promotes a culture of memory, ensuring that past lessons are never forgotten, and we are all committed to avoiding new tragedies.
The marketing and managerial implications of marketing dark tourism experiences.
The complex interplay of challenges and opportunities for marketers with respect to promoting dark tourism experiences. Marketers should adopt a very sensitive approach in dark tourism, which entails visiting sites related to death, suffering, and disasters (Light, 2017). Sensitivity and consideration should be utilized strategically while creating messages that attract visitors without offending or stereotyping them. An important issue facing marketers of dark tourism is the ethics of commercializing tragedy. For instance, Wood (2020) points out that such sites should not be viewed as mere tourist attractions, given that one may treat sacred historical events like an entertainment show. Marketers have to consider this experience an educating and reflective one that one does not need for entertainment. This entails using the right words, images, and tone of the message to underscore the importance and seriousness of the site without forgetting its educational nature.
Given the possibility of rejection by the general public or affected groups, sensitivity becomes a key element in marketing these dark tourism experiences. According to Grebenar (2018), dark tourism requires some careful balancing of curiosity and respect, and hence, marketers should be aware of the cultural and societal nuances. Marketing mistakes may cause charges of “insensitive” or commodifying tragedy that damage the destination’s reputation and the tourism industry. Hence, it is necessary to understand the cultural and sociological backgrounds to plan appropriate marketing strategies that appeal to prospective visitors.
Another important feature in marketing dark tourism is authenticity. Duncan (2017) states that one of the leading causes for tourists’ motivation to visit dark tourism sites revolves around their desire to gain an authentic experience concerning the historical and other cultural aspects underpinning these sites. These marketing initiatives must reflect the authentic nature of the place and its heritage, avoiding any artificial exaggeration or sensationalism that would undermine the reality of the site. Authenticity enhances the educational value of a visit and contributes towards the overall satisfaction of visitors seeking a true link to the past.
The other element is “destination management,” which also helps neutralize the possible negative effects of dark tourism on the residents and the attractions. Baloch et al. (2022) stress the importance of a sustainable way that balances the benefits of the site and the conservation of the site’s history. The dark tourism destinations may fail long-term due to overcrowding, inadequate infrastructure, and lack of community involvement. Hence, managers need to practice responsible tourism by adopting measures like visitor quotas, educational programs, and partnerships with the communities to foster these places’ sustainable development.
Discuss how promoting and developing experiences around sites characterized by death and suffering can be morally right or wrong.
Educational and Commemorative Perspective
Developing experiences revolving around historically notable locations may serve an ethical role for educational reasons. These experiences can create awareness regarding incidents related to death and pain and, in return, cause understanding and sympathy (Hunt et al., 2018). An example is memorial museums and heritage sites allowing citizens to re-live the past to remind them of its lessons. This aspect may, however, turn out to be morally wrong in case of a possible commercialization of tragedy, which trivializes the suffering of those affected. However, if the main goal is profit rather than education and commemoration, this project will likely be perceived as explorative, thus eroding the intended objectives of memory conservation.
Preservation and Restoration
From the point of view of preservation and restoration, using historical sites for experiences may be correct if they make these sites more preserved (Nelson & Thormell, 2019). Tourism can help generate revenue, which can be used to conserve these sites for future generations. Likewise, the funds raised by the admission fees can be used to improve the infrastructure and protection measures. On the other hand, a morally wrong dimension develops when over-commercialization eradicates the historical authenticity of the site. In trying to accommodate mass tourism, a site could be degraded due to an imbalance between accessible nature and preservation (Nelson & Thormell, 2019). It is important to balance conservation needs and commercial interests; otherwise, historical sites will only be short-lived.
Community and Cultural Perspective
The moral correctness of including local communities in developing experiences can be justified from a community and cultural viewpoint. In addition, this approach offers economic benefits and allows communities to narrate their history truthfully (Abdul et al., 2023). Cultural preservation and empowerment can be made in cases with significant local community activity for creating and managing the experiences. Nevertheless, it becomes morally wrong when experiences are used to destroy local communities or exploit their stories. Ignoring cultural issues and presenting imposed versions of narratives from external perspectives can be seen as ethically problematic, and it further contributes to existing power relationships while undermining the integrity of the community’s historical narrative.
Tourist Experience and Perception Perspective
It will enhance tourists’ comprehension of history from the point of view of the tourist experience and perception through designing respectful and educational experiences. This morally appropriate way includes building empathy and responsible tourism so that the visitors appreciate history and consider the gravity of these events (Manola, 2019). However, a morally wrong side manifests when experiences are mostly done for shock and amusement without sufficient educational intent. Such an approach would undermine the severity of the past events and turn them into entertaining scenes for tourists. Ethical tourist experiences require striking a balance that promotes meaningful engagement but excludes sensationalism.
Sustainability Perceptive
Sustainable tourism practices become a moral obligation towards the planet and marginalized societies. For example, scholars such as Obradović & Tešin (2023) argue that tourism development should prioritize the environment and the community. To respect nature and culture, we restrict the number of visitors, thus minimizing environmental impact. If sustainability is not practiced, the industry can continue inflicting harm. The concept of justice and responsibility requires that a person engaging in tourism development should not ignore sustainability issues. Similarly, Alamineh et al. (2023) argue that tourism should benefit hosts and the environment. This eventually creates the duty to promote sustainable practices to limit any adverse effects on the environment, its culture, and the economy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, dark tourism raises ethical issues that go beyond the pursuit of profit. There are many reasons one may visit places characterized by death and suffering, including historical curiosity, the search for authenticity, seeking knowledge, Morbid fascination, catharsis, and commemoration, among others. Dark tourism requires careful consideration of the subject’s sensitive nature, authenticity, and destination management in ensuring that education is prioritized over-exploitation. Morally, developing and promoting experiences to such sites is justifiable if driven by education and commemoration purposes, restorations and preservations, community and culture involvements, perceptions and experiences of tourists, and sustainability commitments. On the other hand, ethical issues crop up when commercial reasons take precedence over educational objectives, archaeological sites and local communities are exploited, adventures are not educational, and sustainability considerations are undermined. In the long run, the ethical development of dark tourism experiences should maintain a balance on the appropriate weight of historical events in supporting sustainable travel.
References
Abdul Aziz, N. A., Mohd Ariffin, N. F., Ismail, N. A., & Alias, A. (2023, January 19). Community participation in the importance of living heritage conservation and its relationships with the community-based education model towards creating a sustainable community in Melaka UNESCO World Heritage Site. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031935
Alamineh, G. A., Hussein, J. W., Endaweke, Y., & Taddesse, B. (2023, June 11). The local communities’ perceptions on the social impact of tourism and its implication for sustainable development in the Amhara regional state. Heliyon. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361231/
Baloch, Q. B., Shah, S. N., Iqbal, N., Sheeraz, M., Asadullah, M., Mahar, S., & Khan, A. U. (2022). Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: A suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 5917–5930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w
Duncan, D. (2017). Progress in dark tourism and Thanatourism Research: An uneasy relationship with heritage tourism. Tourism Management, pp. 61, 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.01.011
Grebenar, A. (2018). The commodification of dark tourism – core. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159754327.pdf
Harikson, S. (2023, June 22). Dark tourism: Exploring the morbid fascination. Medium. https://medium.com/@steaveharikson/dark-tourism-exploring-the-morbid-fascination-1f56286bfd55
Hunt, M., Chénier, A., Bezanson, K., Nouvet, E., Bernard, C., de Laat, S., Krishnaraj, G., & Schwartz, L. (2018). Moral experiences of humanitarian health professionals caring for patients who are dying or likely to die in a humanitarian crisis. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0040-9
Jessica, A. (2019, July 2). From Chornobyl to concentration camps: Why the morbid fascination with places of death and disaster? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/jul/03/from-chernobyl-to-concentration-camps-why-the-morbid-fascination-with-places-of-death-and-disaster
Lewis, H., Schrier, T., & Xu, S. (2021). Dark tourism: Motivations and visit intentions of tourists. International Hospitality Review, 36(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/ihr-01-2021-0004
Light, D. (2017). Progress in dark tourism and Thanatourism Research: An uneasy relationship with heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 61, 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.01.011
Magano, J., Fraiz-Brea, J. A., & Leite, Â. (2022, September 24). Dark tourists: Profile, practices, motivations, and wellbeing. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph191912100
Manola, M. (2019). (PDF) Empathy in the tourism industry: A human-centered hospitality approach in the business world. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343979829_Empathy_in_Tourism_Industry_A_human-centered_approach_of_hospitality_in_business_world_Manola_Maria_Assistant_Professor_of_Tourism_Management_mmanolauniwagr_Papagrigoriou_Aristeidis_Assistant_Professo
Martini, A., & Buda, D. M. (2018). Dark tourism and affect: Framing places of death and disaster. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(6), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1518972
Nelson, T., & Thormell, K. (2019). Cultural Heritage Preservation: The Past, the Present, and the Future. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1224014/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Obradović, S., & Tešin, A. (2023, May 31). Local communities’ perceptions of tourism planning in Natural Areas. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp4020021
Pereira, T., Pereira, M. de, & Limberger, P. F. (2022). Dark tourism. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa Em Turismo, 16, 2493. https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v16.2493
Vázquez, D. (2018). Dark tourism and memorial tourism: Nexus and divergences between Theoretical Models. European Journal of Tourism Research, pp. 20, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v20i.339
Wood, B. (2020). A review of the concept of authenticity in heritage, with particular reference to historic houses. Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals, 16(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550190620904798
Yeoman, I., & Beattie, U. (2019). The experience economy: Microtrends. Journal of Tourism Futures. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JTF-05-2019-0042/full/html
write