The term “Trades sector” in Ontario refers to professional careers that entail physical labor and specialized skills. The skilled trades include a wide selection of occupations including construction workers, plumbers, Chefs, motive power repairers, and electricians,. Women’s employment in the sector has ranged between 5 and 15% of the overall worldwide workforce during the previous decades, and women’s participation in craft and trade jobs is considerably lower. Women make up 4% of workers in male-dominated trades in Canada. While several nations claim that women constitute a significant share of the trades sector, relatively few are working in skilled crafts and technical professions. Although there have been repeated appeals to raise the number of women working in the construction industry, female involvement in trades and technical roles has remained at historically low levels. Gender-based discrimination, an inaccessibility to education and training, underemployment, rigid work schedules, an unsupportive work environment, and work-family conflict are just a few of the dangers women face in the sector which discourages their active participation as compared to other active work sectors. To alleviate this low record of women representation in the trades sector, this essay probes into the distinct factors leading to the low representation at the workplace.
To begin, the trades sector is regarded as a high-demand profession in which women are subjected to physical and psychological risks, as well as the poor health problems that come with them. While both men and women who work onsite are exposed to occupational threats, women have worse health outcomes. Women in the trades are more likely to report high levels of perceived stress and work-related injuries. Poor ergonomics, a shortage of protective equipment, lack of cleanliness and sanitation facilities, lack of sufficient training, overcompensation, and mental stresses are all risks that women in trades and semi-skilled positions face. Women in trades and semi-skilled positions face unique safety and health risks, which are referred to as “gender-based hazards.” The current masculine workplace culture, which fails to provide proper support for women and affords them restricted career options, allows the common safety and health risks in Trades. Women’s professional competence are inspected, questioned, or undervalued in the construction industry, while men’s is assumed to be competent. When a woman makes a fault, it is referred to be a “female capacity” problem rather than a personal error. In addition, there is a mentality of harassing and victimizing women who report abuse, gender discrimination, and assault. Given the variety of occupational risks they face, it is suggested that women in trades and semi-skilled jobs face hostile work environments creating a fear to those who try to venture in the sector.
Moreover, the trades career is often seen as a man’s job, which has historically fueled the industry’s male dominance. Gender expectations play a big role in the industry, influencing people’s judgments as to whether manual labor is suited for women and what kind of job they can do. There is a widespread belief that women lack the ability to work in physically demanding working environments and that women have a restricted ability to withstand the harsh working conditions on the site. In the construction sector for exmple, there is a prevalent assumption that women were much less efficient, both as trade employees and as managers. Men are accepted right away, but female recruits often must prove a point before selection by expressing additional effort and being too equipped for their task. Female professionals note that male competitors are approved right away, whereas female contestants must continually establish their competence. Furthermore, companies prefer to assign males to technical jobs while assigning women to office-based secondary roles. It is widely acknowledged that site-based technical occupations are linked with higher responsibility and purpose, and hence offer better job prospects for advancement. This indicates that men are offered more opportunity to advance in their careers than women.
Third, the demands of work combined with the objective of sustaining a family life have a negative effect on the health wellness of women working in the trades industry. Female construction employees have been shown to have greater levels of psychological distress than male construction personnel. The sector has not adopted flexible working practices in order to promote employee health and wellness. Working part-time, according to some female construction managers, is tough and hard to sustain if one wishes to pursue a management career path. Flexible work arrangements are not acknowledged as genuine professional opportunities for women in the construction industry because managing the demands of paid and unpaid labor undermines male dorminated image’ of the construction industry. Young women are discouraged from pursuing employment in the construction sector because of the physically demanding work environment. When faced with such a situation, women aspiring to construction occupations must struggle with employment that are developed and organized around the life cycle of males, who have traditionally embraced less duties in the household and with children. .
Informal recruiting practices, unstructured interviews, and biased selection criteria may discourage women from seeking for construction positions. Recruitment and selection are generally delegated to operational line managers and separated from central human resource planning in project-based construction firms. Individual divisions or projects have different and fragmented recruiting methods with subjective selection criteria. Some supervisors favor males over women based on the assumption that women would have more career interruptions and consequently less time to work. Informal networks, word-of-mouth, and headhunting are widely used in informal recruiting, resulting in gender implications. For employment and decent pay, males depend on informal male networks, whereas women are typically disadvantaged in the recruiting process because they are denied access to these networks. Informal recruitment based on personal relationships is seen as a strategy to exclude women from the sector since women frequently have no connections with mostly male bosses.
Many women give up on the profession during the early stages of work. When young professional women enter the workforce, they encounter both favorable and unfavorable situations. In this case, the poor experience is caused by a lack of organizational advice and support. Young women witness and encounter many gender biased behaviors when they join the male-dominated construction business, and they are excluded and stereotyped. Women’s experiences in the early stages of their careers have a significant impact on their eventual career goals. Young women’s initial exposure to industrial labor, for example, defines and reinforces their later professional path, which may include abandoning the sector. Women between the ages of 18 and 24 are more likely than women of other ages to indicate a wish to exit the construction industry. Their perspective is impacted by socializers (e.g., teachers and parents); industry knowledge (e.g., from career – related guidance and support from friends and family in the industry); subject potential (e.g.,ability in maths and science); competence in practical activities; related career rewards (e.g., salary, future prospects, and employment prospects); and social identification. Nonetheless, regulations and related efforts have not had the desired effect on reducing gendered challenges and barriers that women face in the construction industry. Instead of genuinely addressing gender practices and outcomes, gender equality policies are largely geared at increasing the number of professional women in the sector. Numerical fairness is never a long-term answer for increasing women’s involvement in the workforce, since women will still quit if the quality of their professional experience is not supported.
Pay disparities between men and women are clear, and they impact women throughout the industry, reducing their salaries and making it more difficult to balance work and family life. Despite the fact that more women have joined the labor field and made great academic advancement, women earn 79 cents for every dollar earned by men. Generally, it is assumed that salary discrepancies between men and women are not the result of discrimination, but rather are the result of a statistical illusion caused by a failure to account for factors that could contribute to pay inequalities. Gender stereotyping, on the other hand, often has an effect on these characteristics, most significantly employment disparities between men and women. By the time a woman makes her first income, she has had years of schooling, mentoring, norms established by those who raised her, firm employment procedures, and persistent traditions concerning work–family balance maintained by employers, coworkers, and society. In other words, even while women are preferentially inclined to lower-paying, female-dominated occupations, bias, cultural norms, and other external factors impact women’s choice to leave their positions.
In conclusion, Gender biases and stereotypes persist in the male-dominated trades sector for women, who are often marginalized and excluded. The obstacles that female professionals encounter in the workplace are largely constant, indicating that little progress has been achieved in improving the working environment. For women to be able to maintain numbers in trades, the sector must undergo more radical transformations. Long work hours and a lack of work-life balance have a substantial influence on the transition experience. To enhance the industry’s image, the hard hours and male culture that support it must be altered. Workers can better balance their job and personal lives if trades organizations improve the way they organize their work and make available the resources they require in order to make their working environments safe.
References
Bee, L. O., & Benson Teck, H. L. (2021). Changes in Job Situations for Women Workforce in Construction during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Construction Economics and Building, 21(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v21i2.752
Brandie, W. (2019, July 19). Women are making inroads in the trades but still have a ways to go. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/women-in-trades-1.5215384
Gismondi,, A. (2020). COVID-19 causing a ‘she-cession,’ impacting women in skilled trades. Daily Commercial News, 93(117), 1-2. http://ra.ocls.ca/ra/login.aspx?inst=centennial&url=https://www-proquest-com.centennial.idm.oclc.org/trade-journals/covid-19-causing-she-cession-impacting-women/docview/2416855400/se-2?accountid=39331
Levasseur, K., & Paterson, S. (2015). Jack (and Jill?) of all trades – A Canadian case study of equity in apprenticeship supports. Social Policy & Administration, 50(5), 520-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12125
Renzetti,, E. (2021). If you want women in trades, build better workplaces; OPINION. Globe & Mail [Toronto, Canada], O2. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A671053434/CPIu=ko_acd_cec&sid=summon&xid=7a90c424
Rollmann,, H. (2012). Women take on the trades: Newfoundland is leading the way in transforming workplaces that have long been exclusively male. Briarpatch, 41(6), 18+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A321180349/CPI?u=ko_acd_cec&sid=summon&xid=ec95204f
Sewalk, S., & Nietfeld, K. (2013). Barriers preventing women from enrolling in construction management programs. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(4), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2013.764362
Zhang, R. P., Holdsworth, S., Turner, M., & Andamon, M. M. (2021). Does gender really matter? A closer look at early career women in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 39(8), 669-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1948087
write